Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Reserve Seeks to Partner with Business
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,162828,00.html

I think this program could be great! It sounds like what this country needs. My husband went through three employers in just over three years largely due to the additional training required by his unit. They each said they only had to provide him "one weekend a month" for training. If more companies were looking at the value a soldier brings to their business, we wouldn't have to deal with all this other stuff.

Did I mention my soldier is currently deployed?

Military Wife in Las Vegas, NV
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Mon 03 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
maybe the guard should pick up the soldiers tab when it comes to insurance, instead of saving businesses money they should be a little more concerned with saving soldiers money. but having insurance that would stay current even when your deployed would be nice. when i was on r&r from Iraq a lump showed up on the side of my neck, it was sore to the touch, and made my whole neck and throat hurt, i called tricare and was told if it wasn't an emergency i would have to make an hour and a half drive to get it checked out. or get it checked out here and pay out of my own pocket. i was pretty upset because i had insurance before i deployed that wouldn't make me waste a day to see a Dr. so i just said screw it, I'll get it checked out on the army's time on my way back into country.
 
Posts: 29 | Registered: Mon 25 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Sure, this program may look great on paper. However, in reality, many companies still view returning soldiers as a risk rather than an asset.
Plenty of individuals have thanked me for my service to our beloved country. But, I will still continue to highlight my education and civilian experience on my resume.
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: Sat 06 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of SFC_MST
Posted Hide Post
Working in the private sector, I saw how many employers were ill informed about the benefits of hiring troops/vets, which includes Reserve/National Guard and IRR Soldiers. Working in HR, I often saw Soldiers under- utilize their experience on their resume... I found that networking is the best source. Agencies like RECRUITMILITARY.COM have fairs throughout the country...
 
Posts: 48 | Registered: Wed 16 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Okay, how about some realism. Not withstanding the fact that the author is spinning the PAO Hyperbole, the Civilian Business Leader can expect pretty much the same class of person from the Reserve Ranks, as he/she can from the want ads. Reservists are NOT drug-tested every month (this is cost and time prohibitive), the majority of Reservists are folks who were on Active Duty but left for a variety of reasons, many because they were not up to par for the Army. I am not implying that ALL Reservists are second-class Soldiers, but they are certainly treated that way by the Active folks and being a Reservist myself, I know first-hand that there are far more losers than winners at the monthly get-togethers and all of these folks have Civilian Jobs which places their Employers over the proverbial barrel when they need to be canned. The problem is that the Reserves value each and every BODY, not person, B-O-D-Y, in the formation. Recruitment and Retention is difficult and getting rid of a dirtbag or loser or even leadership who physically abuse their soldiers is impossible. Even soldiers who abuse drugs are kept on the rolls and if they play their hands right, they get to stay in the Reserves and their Civilian Employer never hears about it. No, a Civilian Employer can only be certain that if they hire a Reservists, they are subjecting themselves to an employee for which the employer MUST have an additional person on staff, for when Uncle Sam calls, that Citizen-Soldier must report and leave the Civilian Employer to endure the manpower shortage, continue to promote the deployed person AND provide employment upon return 15 months later. This is a tall order for a business that must be profitable. But, it also impacts larger organizations, such as hospitals. The Army does not have traditional doctors and nurses on Active Duty because they can make so much more money in the civilian sector. To satisfy this shortcoming, the Army rotates Reserve Hospital Units into their daily and wartime missions. The nurse who makes $75k in the civilian sector only makes a couple hundred dollars for her weekend of Drill and maybe $35k if deployed. The doctor makes $150k as a civilian, but only $75k deployed. So why do they do it? Well, they are in such need, the Reserves ignores their weight issues and gives them hefty bonuses. And, how does this relationship with the Reserves affect the large business? A hospital can be decimated by the deployment of the local Army Reserve Hospital unit, causing them to have many more people on staff, driving up costs and reducing effectiveness during deployment.
To say that it cannot be done is not my point. To infer that Civilian Employers can be assured of a better employee is ludicrous. To think that the current Reservists represent a drug-free, physically-fit, dress-right-dress pool of potential is ignorance.
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Wed 05 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 4386828:
Okay, how about some realism. Not withstanding the fact that the author is spinning the PAO Hyperbole, the Civilian Business Leader can expect pretty much the same class of person from the Reserve Ranks, as he/she can from the want ads. Reservists are NOT drug-tested every month (this is cost and time prohibitive), the majority of Reservists are folks who were on Active Duty but left for a variety of reasons, many because they were not up to par for the Army. I am not implying that ALL Reservists are second-class Soldiers, but they are certainly treated that way by the Active folks and being a Reservist myself, I know first-hand that there are far more losers than winners at the monthly get-togethers and all of these folks have Civilian Jobs which places their Employers over the proverbial barrel when they need to be canned. The problem is that the Reserves value each and every BODY, not person, B-O-D-Y, in the formation. Recruitment and Retention is difficult and getting rid of a dirtbag or loser or even leadership who physically abuse their soldiers is impossible. Even soldiers who abuse drugs are kept on the rolls and if they play their hands right, they get to stay in the Reserves and their Civilian Employer never hears about it. No, a Civilian Employer can only be certain that if they hire a Reservists, they are subjecting themselves to an employee for which the employer MUST have an additional person on staff, for when Uncle Sam calls, that Citizen-Soldier must report and leave the Civilian Employer to endure the manpower shortage, continue to promote the deployed person AND provide employment upon return 15 months later. This is a tall order for a business that must be profitable. But, it also impacts larger organizations, such as hospitals. The Army does not have traditional doctors and nurses on Active Duty because they can make so much more money in the civilian sector. To satisfy this shortcoming, the Army rotates Reserve Hospital Units into their daily and wartime missions. The nurse who makes $75k in the civilian sector only makes a couple hundred dollars for her weekend of Drill and maybe $35k if deployed. The doctor makes $150k as a civilian, but only $75k deployed. So why do they do it? Well, they are in such need, the Reserves ignores their weight issues and gives them hefty bonuses. And, how does this relationship with the Reserves affect the large business? A hospital can be decimated by the deployment of the local Army Reserve Hospital unit, causing them to have many more people on staff, driving up costs and reducing effectiveness during deployment.
To say that it cannot be done is not my point. To infer that Civilian Employers can be assured of a better employee is ludicrous. To think that the current Reservists represent a drug-free, physically-fit, dress-right-dress pool of potential is ignorance.

Damn man...where do you drill? You must drill with a hell of a unit! Granted not all reservists look and act like something out of a Marine Corps recruiting ad, but if you compare the majority with an equal number of "little Timmy from down the street" (non-veteran counterpart), the disparity is significant. I work with employers that have given up recruiting through normal channels and are recruiting exclusively with the military. It's not that they are buying a myth that veterans are the best thing since sliced bread...it's because of their orientation, work ethic and soft-skills. You can believe me or not, it doesn't matter. I work with priviate and public employers, and they are loosing "Babyboomers". They are getting desperate and see the Guard and Reserves as an answer.
 
Posts: 4173 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Reserve Seeks to Partner with Business

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.