Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Fatal Coast Guard Dive: What Went Wrong
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
------------------

Proud Member
Derelict Veterans Group

------------------

Picture of Vanir97
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,158743,00.html


When all else fails, read the instructions! Don't dive if you don't know what you are doing.
 
Posts: 1103 | Registered: Fri 08 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of FriscoLady01
Posted Hide Post
You are right. However as a Coast Guardsman this saddens me.

Our line is thinner now. Two brave souls dedicated to saving others are gone.

Fair Winds and Following Seas,

Go Home to God with the Angels my Brother and Sister Coast Guardsmen.

We have the Watch,

Semper Paratus.

Patti

This message has been edited. Last edited by: FriscoLady01,
 
Posts: 3118 | Registered: Fri 22 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
At least they died having fun.
 
Posts: 171 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 6145060:
At least they died having fun.
Unlikely, it wasn't quick.

The complete accident report is available on-line. There was significantly more than failure to read the instructions involved and certainly a lot of not knowing how to supervise dive operations and lack of qualification of the divers to perform cold water dives.

FINAL ACTION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION INTO THE DIVING MISHAP AND THE RESULTING DEATHS OF USCGC HEALY'S CREWMEMBERS THAT OCCURRED ON 17 AUGUST 2006

Commandant’s All Hands – Final Action on CGC HEALY Mishap

Arctic Dive Incident Killed Two Coast Guard Divers—12 Jan 2007

Edited to provide link to the official Coast Guard accident report.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: johca,
 
Posts: 4705 | Registered: Sat 25 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Does begging and pleading count as foreplay?
Picture of PSimon572
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 6145060:
At least they died having fun.

I must say, that's the most f'd up statement I have ever read on any discussion board. I guess you rationalize your fellow Marines getting killed in the mid-East as "at least they died enjoying the pleasures of combat"?
 
Posts: 2517 | Registered: Fri 22 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of The_Bonesaw
Posted Hide Post
Diving is one of the most dangerous professions in the world. Most deaths occur from taking shortcuts. It's the one profession where it must be repeatedly hammered home that, "the procedures are there for a reason, violating any one of them - no matter how trivial - kills".

The Byford Dolphin Accident
 
Posts: 6109 | Registered: Fri 06 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of 14219531
Posted Hide Post
Strange currents develope under the ice that are very unpredictable. Like ascending and desending air currents near mountains. If a plane gets caught in a desending airflow that exceeds his clime rate, he slames into the mountain. I suspect the last feeling they had was that of desperation as they attempted to resolve the situation without the time to do so.
 
Posts: 1765 | Registered: Thu 29 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 14219531:
Strange currents develope under the ice that are very unpredictable.
Did you make the effort to read the accident report? Currents were not a significant direct or indirect cause or influence in the accident being discussed.

quote:
Originally posted by 14219531:
I suspect the last feeling they had was that of desperation as they attempted to resolve the situation without the time to do so.
No need to suspect, the situation and circumstances provided sufficient time for the divers to be in duress. Both diver’s air tanks were empty, the air was either breathed out of them or the air was used in attempt to attain buoyancy and ascent.

quote:

Each diver eventually departed the surface with over 60 pounds of weight (including lead shot and steel tank). As a diver descends, air compresses and at a depth of 33 feet, its volume decreases by 50%. Therefore, to maintain buoyancy, the diver must add air to the BCD or dry suit during any descent. Thus, an overweighted diver may be able to control his or her buoyancy on the surface, but enter an uncontrolled descent only a few feet from the surface.
….
Depth gauges revealed that LT Hill had descended to 187 feet, and BM2 Duque had exceeded the maximum gauge reading of 200 feet, and was pegged at a maximum point on the gauge that corresponded to a depth of approximately 220 feet.

The air in BM2 Duque's air tank was depleted. LT Hill's air tank had a pressure of 90 psi, essentially rendering it empty.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: johca,
 
Posts: 4705 | Registered: Sat 25 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of 14219531
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by johca:
quote:
Originally posted by 14219531:
Strange currents develope under the ice that are very unpredictable.
Did you make the effort to read the accident report? Currents were not a significant direct or indirect cause or influence in the accident being discussed.

quote:
Originally posted by 14219531:
I suspect the last feeling they had was that of desperation as they attempted to resolve the situation without the time to do so.
No need to suspect, the situation and circumstances provided sufficient time for the divers to be in duress. Both diver’s air tanks were empty, the air was either breathed out of them or the air was used in attempt to attain buoyancy and ascent.

quote:

Each diver eventually departed the surface with over 60 pounds of weight (including lead shot and steel tank). As a diver descends, air compresses and at a depth of 33 feet, its volume decreases by 50%. Therefore, to maintain buoyancy, the diver must add air to the BCD or dry suit during any descent. Thus, an overweighted diver may be able to control his or her buoyancy on the surface, but enter an uncontrolled descent only a few feet from the surface.
….
Depth gauges revealed that LT Hill had descended to 187 feet, and BM2 Duque had exceeded the maximum gauge reading of 200 feet, and was pegged at a maximum point on the gauge that corresponded to a depth of approximately 220 feet.

The air in BM2 Duque's air tank was depleted. LT Hill's air tank had a pressure of 90 psi, essentially rendering it empty.
I got distracted during my read and missed the part about the empty tanks. The weights I know were zippered and no way in hell at that water temp is removing weights going to be easy. I once heard the statement made you should never assume because it it makes an as*-out of-U-and me. In this case assumption caused a fatality. It is the nature of some people to feel a false sense of security that causes them to egnore danger. The Military would not exist if people didn't have this trait. The only way to protect people from themselves is to do the check list and use proper preperation.
 
Posts: 1765 | Registered: Thu 29 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
At least they died having fun.

how could you say something like that? Im sickened by your ignorant comments. none of you were there so shut the hell up.

First of all, 99% of this is incorrect.
My mom works on that ship, she was there when it happend.

Heres something thats actually TRUE:
Equipment hasnt been checked for 5 years? Jessica had been trying to get better equipment and communication but they kept turning it down. I bet that guy feels reel great right now, someone is dead because he didnt want to approve the papers, but then again that would mean he has to admit that he screwed up.

The article said "Hill and Duque simply didn't have enough dives under their belt"?...THE ONLY WAY YOU GET MORE DIVES IS IF YOU DIVE!
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Fri 04 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 16391585:
First of all, 99% of this is incorrect.
My mom works on that ship, she was there when it happend.
Unfortunately regardless of what position your mom works on the ship, being a mom lacks any underwater diver qualifications.

The criteria for assigning responsibility and blame requires determining who was responsible for deed or act causing the outcome. The lack of equipment being serviceable and properly inspected and working order wasn’t the direct cause for this accident. The primary direct cause of this accident is negligence, incompetence and reckless judgment of the dive officer planning the dive and who presented it for final approval to the ship’s Captain (Commanding Officer).

The secondary direct cause of this accident is lack of proficiency and qualifications of the divers to perform this planned diving operation and their reckless judgment to dive with use of improper equipment configuration and unsafe diving practices.

The Diving Officer’s primary responsibility is the safe conduct of all diving operations. These duties bring with it responsibility of obtaining and sustaining through understanding of all safety regulations and diving manuals pertinent to conducting a dive or a series of dives.

Diving Officer duties does not necessarily require or indicate possession of qualification to supervise or be in charge of an actual diving operation for a particular dive or series of dives. Appointment as Dive Supervisor is typically based on seniority of available qualified diver personnel of demonstrated ability and experience. None of the divers possessed any reasonable measure of experience or qualifications to perform diving supervisor duties.

What killed the two divers wasn’t that the equipment wasn’t inspected and properly maintained in five years. The cause of the deaths was the nonperformance of duties and incompetence of the Dive Officer and the degree of deviation from standards of caution regarding equipment requirements and safety all three divers voluntarily decided on doing. There was no mission or operations requirement for this dive. A training need didn’t justify the dive being done when training records put in question the experience and qualification of the divers to safely accomplish cold water dives in such a remote and unfamiliar area.

This dive accident cannot be attributed to someone not wanting to approve purchase of better or newer equipment or pay for equipment maintenance. To do so would require the Dive Officer being completely unaware duty responsibilities include verifying qualifications and safe diving practices of all divers assigned to the Healy. The particulars of putting blame on such reason would also require Dive Officer being completely unaware duty responsibilities include ensuring all diving equipment used by divers on the Healy is properly configured, in good repair, well maintained, and correctly stowed.
 
Posts: 4705 | Registered: Sat 25 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of 14219531
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by johca:
quote:
Originally posted by 16391585:
First of all, 99% of this is incorrect.
My mom works on that ship, she was there when it happend.
Unfortunately regardless of what position your mom works on the ship, being a mom lacks any underwater diver qualifications.

The criteria for assigning responsibility and blame requires determining who was responsible for deed or act causing the outcome. The lack of equipment being serviceable and properly inspected and working order wasn’t the direct cause for this accident. The primary direct cause of this accident is negligence, incompetence and reckless judgment of the dive officer planning the dive and who presented it for final approval to the ship’s Captain (Commanding Officer).

The secondary direct cause of this accident is lack of proficiency and qualifications of the divers to perform this planned diving operation and their reckless judgment to dive with use of improper equipment configuration and unsafe diving practices.

The Diving Officer’s primary responsibility is the safe conduct of all diving operations. These duties bring with it responsibility of obtaining and sustaining through understanding of all safety regulations and diving manuals pertinent to conducting a dive or a series of dives.

Diving Officer duties does not necessarily require or indicate possession of qualification to supervise or be in charge of an actual diving operation for a particular dive or series of dives. Appointment as Dive Supervisor is typically based on seniority of available qualified diver personnel of demonstrated ability and experience. None of the divers possessed any reasonable measure of experience or qualifications to perform diving supervisor duties.

What killed the two divers wasn’t that the equipment wasn’t inspected and properly maintained in five years. The cause of the deaths was the nonperformance of duties and incompetence of the Dive Officer and the degree of deviation from standards of caution regarding equipment requirements and safety all three divers voluntarily decided on doing. There was no mission or operations requirement for this dive. A training need didn’t justify the dive being done when training records put in question the experience and qualification of the divers to safely accomplish cold water dives in such a remote and unfamiliar area.

This dive accident cannot be attributed to someone not wanting to approve purchase of better or newer equipment or pay for equipment maintenance. To do so would require the Dive Officer being completely unaware duty responsibilities include verifying qualifications and safe diving practices of all divers assigned to the Healy. The particulars of putting blame on such reason would also require Dive Officer being completely unaware duty responsibilities include ensuring all diving equipment used by divers on the Healy is properly configured, in good repair, well maintained, and correctly stowed.
Summary, pilot error.
 
Posts: 1765 | Registered: Thu 29 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
I offer my condolences to the families of those who died. This by the way is an old story, it was posted on Mil.com months ago. I'm not sure why we are discussing it again...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22576 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
I'm not sure why we are discussing it again...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
Because Popular Mechanics published an article on it on 28 December 2007 and then military.com posted it with link to comment on the accident.

The writer of the article unfortunately was unable or unwilling to present information accurately.

This is one of the significant inaccuracies:
quote:
Both were Navy trained, and considered seasoned divers.
The other problem with the article is nondisclosure or suppression of significant information that confuses what caused this accident to happen.

The Diving Officer completed Basic Diving Officer at NDSTC on 11 May 2004. Was not qualified to perform a dive for lack of proficiency dives. The Dive Officers dive experience after getting basic qualification to perform diving duties was less 24 dives.

The other divers completed basic diving qualification courses in 2005 and each had less than 5 dives since obtaining basic qualifications to perform dives.

It is why I took effort to post link to the complete final findings report of the causes for this accident.

You are correct it is an old story and a very tragic incident. The first Coast Guard Press release to the news media informing of this accident was released August 18, 2006.
 
Posts: 4705 | Registered: Sat 25 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
I am a troll. I am suspended. 30 days - fin
Posted Hide Post
Gweep! Gweep! The sound of the fish!

Was there an ice shark in the area of the dive?
 
Posts: 18 | Registered: Wed 09 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Fatal Coast Guard Dive: What Went Wrong

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.