Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    New Army Combat Shirt Debuts
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
 
Posts: 410 | Registered: Mon 09 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of R102
Posted Hide Post
Please just take us back to the BDU/DCU combo with the pockets of the ACU.
 
Posts: 3913 | Registered: Fri 16 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of anoldnotboldrecondo
Posted Hide Post
Va va voooooom! Hubba hubba!
 
Posts: 1851 | Registered: Fri 24 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
what is this? looks like another flop of an idea to me. the ACUs are premiere in their performance and practicality already, altho' I'd prefer that the ACU blouse/shirt be about 4 inches longer!
 
Posts: 165 | Registered: Wed 25 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of AKinNC
Posted Hide Post
I don't like it, but I don't like any turtleneck style shirts.
 
Posts: 1118 | Registered: Mon 21 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTBOWLING:
what is this? looks like another flop of an idea to me. the ACUs are premiere in their performance and practicality already, altho' I'd prefer that the ACU blouse/shirt be about 4 inches longer!
The ACU blouse is long enough. Soldiers are just getting them too small. I see it all the time. You are not supposed to be wearing an ACU tight or even like the BDU was worn. It is supposed to be baggier; just too many soldiers are wearing them too tight and it then barely comes down to the belt. Properly worn, it should go between the side pocket and cargo pocket.
 
Posts: 1256 | Registered: Tue 07 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by anoldnotboldrecondo:
Va va voooooom! Hubba hubba!


HELL YEAH!!!! Applause
 
Posts: 70 | Registered: Wed 27 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Pistol762
Posted Hide Post
ApplauseAlways glad to see the Army taking steps to make the combat uniforms more duarable, wearable and comfortable. Combined with camoflage patterns and body armour it is great improvement from rip-stop jungle uniforms of a lifetime ago.
Now when do the grunts get a decent rifle that can reach-out and touch someone with a round where they know they been touched!
 
Posts: 686 | Registered: Tue 05 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
However, to retain modesty, the original fabric was maintained in the mid-chest area. Both fabrics have a four-way stretch.

They picked the wrong model to show modesty in a shirt.
 
Posts: 131 | Registered: Sat 22 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The Air Force would greatly benefit from this too
 
Posts: 1607 | Registered: Sat 29 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of anoldnotboldrecondo
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RT841:
However, to retain modesty, the original fabric was maintained in the mid-chest area. Both fabrics have a four-way stretch.

They picked the wrong model to show modesty in a shirt.


You have every right to your opinion but Va va vooooooom!
 
Posts: 1851 | Registered: Fri 24 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of anoldnotboldrecondo
Posted Hide Post
Mmmmmm. Getting a mental pic of that model in that shirt all wet. Dvlish
 
Posts: 1851 | Registered: Fri 24 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
If you take your life at once aside

Then remove yourself from the cast

You will find the ship of fools steams on- regardless......

Leaving you free to sail on past.

-"Shaneo" 1998 West Australia
Posted Hide Post
I heard the French had some imput in the design, hence the turtle neck. Their camo pattern is white, so the shirt has a duel purpose role- clothing and a flag.
 
Posts: 5896 | Registered: Mon 12 May 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Ok, here’s my question.

Is this worn under the existing ACU top, or in place of it? The article seems to suggest, to me anyway, that it’s worn in place of the ACU top. If this is the case, then gone are the days when you could take your top off for those hot and heavy work details, since this will literally be “all there is.” Also, where are the oh so important rank, name and U.S. Army? I can’t see any uniform conscious chain of command allowing soldiers to wear this shirt without some sort of identifying “stuff” on it (after all, what if the folk back home saw our fine warriors walking around “nameless” in these shirts?) I do see, though, a nifty marketing logo (which will no doubt render the shirt NMC if it ever fades or peels (thereby compromising the shirt’s combat effectiveness.)

Of course, this may be a “combat” only piece of clothing, and you only wear it when you’re wearing your body armor. Unfortunately, at the FOB I was at, that would be 24/7 (well you could take your armor off at the mess hall and while in the blue unit) so soldiers will probably have to carry an ACU top with them for when they go to areas that let you take your armor off but don’t let you run around in your “shirt.”

Of course, this could end up being an “undergarment” to the ACU top, which means instead of wearing a t-shirt I’m now wearing a long sleeved PT top with a unit patch on it. Great…

Finally, that big moisture wicking chestpiece, the one that goes right under the non-moisture wicking ISAPI plate? It’s made of a synthetic fabric, which means it’s a fire hazard (which is why the Corps banned under armor.)
 
Posts: 103 | Registered: Thu 19 June 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I like it.

Need a bit of input from those that wear it.

Semper Fidelis
 
Posts: 2049 | Registered: Tue 23 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of TheTinker
Posted Hide Post
didn't I see this design in one of those futuristic military movies...
 
Posts: 1036 | Registered: Mon 18 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Not a bad idea for troops that go out the wire. Right before I came home from Iraq in April they required all troops working outside the FOB to have flame resistant uniforms because of the increased in burns caused mostly by IEDs. So we had to wear those nice tan overalls which made no use for the ACU.
 
Posts: 14 | Registered: Fri 12 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of Joel97
Posted Hide Post
We've got umpteen different pieces of headgear with the ACU's and now two different shirts.

Great.

We have four or five different battle-dress uniforms running around theater. Thank God we're fighting an insurgency... I only shoot the ones wearing civilian clothes (tonge in cheek on that one).

This is getting really stupid already.

Oh, and pockets. It's hard enough to keep **** on me when all I have are two shoulder pockets (which, in some cases, are rendered useless if your unit makes you wear that stupid upper-arm thingie add-on) and one thigh pocket (the other covered up with a pistol holster).

Give me back my SOF-mod BDU/DCU's and quit smothering me in damn kevlar!!!!

I'm starting to feel like that little kid in "Christmas Story".

Smile
 
Posts: 201 | Registered: Sun 24 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by anoldnotboldrecondo:
Va va voooooom! Hubba hubba!


Indeed!
We need a bigger pic to see her, errr, I mean the uniform. Yeah, that's it the uniform. Wink

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 67NOV,
 
Posts: 8771 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AkH8r:
quote:
Originally posted by anoldnotboldrecondo:
Va va voooooom! Hubba hubba!


HELL YEAH!!!! Applause



I'd like to check her for ticks! Beer
 
Posts: 12 | Registered: Wed 22 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    New Army Combat Shirt Debuts

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.