Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Navy Discussions  Hop To Forums  The Chief's Mess    Chief in 10 years?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Basic Training
Posted
Is it probable for a Sailor to make Chief in 10 years? I'm not asking this because I want to get Chief in 10 years, but I met a sailor the other day that says he turned 18 and joined a few months after Vietnam (1975) and then make Chief in 1985. Could this happen?
 
Posts: 92 | Registered: Tue 30 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
I dont remember what the time in rate requirments are but if you put your head into it anything is possible.
 
Posts: 326 | Registered: Sat 10 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
Yes. many sailors who have done well in service schools have been picked for accelerated advancement.
In the mid 1960's I saw many sailors advance to CPO in just over 7 years. ET's were a prime example.
 
Posts: 23 | Registered: Fri 31 October 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
Thanks. The man I talked to was a PN, he went through military customs school, maybe that was what helped. He became a seabee and picked up Chief while there.
 
Posts: 92 | Registered: Tue 30 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
i know of a few people who have made CPO in less than 10 years. sailors who sail through the ranks have several common traits...they begin with strong technical knowledge and are shored up with strong leadership traits...it also helps to be in a rating that is undermaned...a substained record of superior performance will get you there above your peers.



quote:
Originally posted by Barret163:
Is it probable for a Sailor to make Chief in 10 years? I'm not asking this because I want to get Chief in 10 years, but I met a sailor the other day that says he turned 18 and joined a few months after Vietnam (1975) and then make Chief in 1985. Could this happen?
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Mon 26 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Picture of p3sailor
Posted Hide Post
In 1989 I made Chief with a "Red Stripe" Chief.. was an AW... At COP Leadership school, 1990, in Little Creek met a "Red Stripe" SCPO.. a nuke MM.. was a PO3 out of school..
 
Posts: 55 | Registered: Thu 02 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Picture of Boats22151
Posted Hide Post
If I remember right it is possible. The best way to answer the question is to get a copy of the advancement manual and review the time-in-rate tables.
 
Posts: 1788 | Registered: Wed 23 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
It's been lovely, but I have to scream now.
Picture of ATWife
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boats22151:
If I remember right it is possible. The best way to answer the question is to get a copy of the advancement manual and review the time-in-rate tables.


Boats--

If I remember correctly, there was a guy running around the forum after last year's selection board who was a 10 year chief. I only remeber because he was an AT like my hubby, and I thought he was a little bit of a jerk. all in MHO, mind you.

Here's hoping third time is a charm for my hubby this year. Wink
 
Posts: 486 | Registered: Tue 01 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Hey there,

It is possible. I was pinned at my 6 year, 3 month mark. Everyone said it was impossible, but I was lucky enough to have amazing mentors and awesome Chiefs to guide me through my brief career. It's been good times since!
 
Posts: 419 | Registered: Wed 15 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
It used to be pretty "normal" for ET's to make it in less than 10. 16 years ETCM's were not unheard of.

I made it in 8 myself. less than 8 if you count when I was sitting down taking the test.
 
Posts: 436 | Registered: Sat 30 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Experienced Member
Picture of william969
Posted Hide Post
It was more likely back in 1985 than today, especially as a PN. However, I made it in 9 as a PN in 1994 so yes it is possible.
 
Posts: 6223 | Registered: Fri 11 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm not sure how it was in the 80's, but I would think it would be more likely now. With early promotes and such, I would think you could make it much quicker now. My Grandfather Picked up Chief at 7, Master Chief at 13, this was in the 60's and 70's. I picked it up at 6 in 06. With the draw downs in the 80's, did things change?
 
Posts: 419 | Registered: Wed 15 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I'm not sure how it was in the 80's, but I would think it would be more likely now. With early promotes and such, I would think you could make it much quicker now. My Grandfather Picked up Chief at 7, Master Chief at 13, this was in the 60's and 70's. I picked it up at 6 in 06. With the draw downs in the 80's, did things change?


First and foremost, the board has to have "vacancies" for CPO. If no vacancies or quotas exist, then making CPO could be a long process? If your rating is promoting you could do it in 6 or 7 years? But, you'll need to have a vast amount of leadership under your belt to get picked up? 6 years is not a lot of experience...but it happens every year!
 
Posts: 137 | Registered: Fri 24 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Yes it is certainly vacancy driven. I and lot of ET's that came along when I did saw this up close and personal.

All through the 80's we would see them make around 130 ETCS's every year and around 330 ETC's a year I was one of those in 88.

This was before we had all the different flavors of ET's that they have today.

Then the downsizing of the 90's set in and for years those numbers were single digits, as I remember 6 the first year I was up for ETCS, so there we sat better than 1000 of us ETC's going up for less than 10 spots, a selection rate of less than 1% for years many of us like myself not eligible for any of the early out programs because of the NEC's we had. I retired in 01

It got a little better toward the end but I don't remember that number ever getting back anywhere close to 100, around 60 is as high as I remember,and of course that was after absorbing the DS's the sub RM's the sub QM's and the IM's, all rates who in the old days would have had there own quotas
 
Posts: 436 | Registered: Sat 30 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Come to RTC. You'll meet tons of them. Lots of folks have a problem with it. Ive been in for 14 years and have yet to make Chief. I for one, do not have a problem with guys picking up Chief with under 10. If they hard chargers, then they shouldnt be held back. Look at it this way, if a guy makes Chief in 8 years, imagine the wealth of knowledge this guy will have at 18. 10 years in the mess? What a resource for his fellow Chiefs and Sailors.
 
Posts: 251 | Registered: Sat 12 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Lots of folks have a problem with it. Ive been in for 14 years and have yet to make Chief. I for one, do not have a problem with guys picking up Chief with under 10. If they hard chargers, then they shouldnt be held back.


No problem or complaints from me. Actually ...my "RATING" doesn't select Chiefs at the 6,7,or8 year mark. Well, at least not in the last 10 years. So no problem on my end. If it happens, it happens. You really can't control how someone grades or scores your record?
 
Posts: 137 | Registered: Fri 24 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
quote:
First and foremost, the board has to have "vacancies" for CPO. If no vacancies or quotas exist, then making CPO could be a long process? If your rating is promoting you could do it in 6 or 7 years? But, you'll need to have a vast amount of leadership under your belt to get picked up? 6 years is not a lot of experience...but it happens every year!



Quote:
"First and foremost, the board has to have "vacancies" for CPO. If no vacancies or quotas exist, then making CPO could be a long process? If your rating is promoting you could do it in 6 or 7 years? But, you'll need to have a vast amount of leadership under your belt to get picked up? 6 years is not a lot of experience...but it happens every year!"

He hit it right on the head. Quatas are billet driven. I made Chief in 11 years as an AW, and a year before i was eligble for AWCS they merged all the aircrewman into AW's. The quotas went from an avg. of 24 AWCS's to 8. My point is advancment opportunity is cyclical, hopefully you catch a up side at the right time.
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: Mon 12 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
quote:
My point is advancment opportunity is cyclical, hopefully you catch a up side at the right time.



Yep, the DK/PN rating is definitely one of those affected by the merge. It will be hard to make Chief in that rating IMO.
 
Posts: 137 | Registered: Fri 24 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
I made e-7 at nine years and sc at 15 in the early 60's..it's all about quotas and knowing your specialty. Mine was EM
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Thu 20 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
All:

Take a look at this week's Navy Times. They give a little insight on the projected "advancement" numbers this year. FY-8 for all ratings.
 
Posts: 137 | Registered: Fri 24 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Navy Discussions  Hop To Forums  The Chief's Mess    Chief in 10 years?

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.