It is simple , CHina is a very important power block which ensures balance of power in the world , yes the growing of china does pose as a challenge and concern for american hegamony , but if china is down , then nobody has what it takes to stop americans does , and gradually and gradually US will subjugate everybody and punish those insuboridnates as he wishs , i mean not in a military term , But in a fashion by which US can insitute laws to protect american interest which disregard the intergrity and fairness for other nations .

So what I am saying is the world does not need big azzholes nation just want to other turn the other cheek , neither CHinese nor american shall become just a single dominant power in the world who subjugate those who dare to show disobidence , I mean what I am saying is US shall not be betaen by chinese , nor China shall be knock down either , instead , what we need is rise more nation into the power block to secuire the balance of power of this planet .

If china is down , Russia is down, germany and Japan is pathetic minion for the americans , i mean , in the distant future this planet will have a family name and its called USA .

China certanly has the right to rise and pose as a balance of power for the global hegamony , as much as Russia germany < japan does .

The treaty of deprive Japan and Germany rise into world power militarily and politicly is unfair , To ensure the peace and fariness and intergrity for mankind , what we need is multiple rise of many world power that include Germany / EU . Russia Japan China or that .

Especailly Germnay and Japan thse two great nation should rise into world power militayly and policily , that way balance of power and world without hegamonism can be acheived .

I strongly object those who insist to beat down China , since china is important power block ensures balance of power for this world , I advocate china shall not be beaten down , the rise of china shall also associate with the rise of russia again and cast off the shcakle which enforced upon german and Japanese .

that way we will have bright future . Surely this world neednt big az*hole who just want monopoly everthing and subjugate others by force .

this is best all around

We have hardly treated Germany and Japan like puppets. The Japanese destroyed our electronics industry with an aggressive strategy and Germany is trying to wreck our economy by putting tariffs on American goods, even though they still want the food that we grow. If they were our puppets we would have stopped that long ago. In fact we are becoming slaves to the hypercapitalists/internationlists who oppose any move to secure national self sufficiency through the government or pressure groups.
We could be economically independent if we had our own energy, but the cult of environmentalism stops us. These same people had DDT banned by using an acontextual comparison to regular use to that of the overuse in some areas during the 50s. As a result of their stupidity or evil intent (I'm guessing it is the latter), 50 million Africans have died of malaria. They oppose the drilling for oil in our own country and keep us subject to the whims of Oil Sheiks in Saudi Arabia. They oppose Nuclear Power based on nothing at all but sheer ignorance and lies. They advocate Solar Power, which is environmentally destructive, as anyone who has studied it can tell you. They oppose Wind Energy because it kills endangered birds. They oppose Hydroelectric power and they certainly oppose coal. If they just were to shut up, smoke their weed, and take their handout checks, we could be fine. Nuclear power can provide for all with no environmental damage whatsoever, but until we acheive that we are going nowhere.
These people oppose anything that makes America self sufficient and strong, so blame them for "free trade" all around, not the American people. We work 12 months a year and still everybody acts like we are stealing from them.....it's complete nonsense.

quote:

gradually and gradually US will subjugate everybody and punish those insuboridnates as he wishs , i mean not in a military term , But in a fashion by which US can insitute laws to protect american interest which disregard the intergrity and fairness for other nations .

So what I am saying is the world does not need big azzholes nation

nuclear power is clean efficient, but also dangerous and still not nuclear waste to concern and deal with. Eventhough, an accident that caused by nuclear plant failure is very very low. But, just one out of a million chance would be more than enough.

Beside if you starting to build them you are actually increasing it chances of failure and some city/town will be completely wiped out.

France then has more than a few out of a million chances, since 80 percent of their energy is from nuclear power. It is not fair to compare our nuclear power to a Soviet disaster: They couldn't run farms correctly, and we are surprised that they had a meltdown in the country they didn't even like?

As for waste, it isn't impossible to store by any means, but even still, we can launch it into space. There are tens of thousands of satellites for all purposes in orbit right now, so don't tell me that we can't use rockets to throw nuclear waste away. There is a risk with anything but the rare chance of leaking waste (which we would immediately clean up anyway). The risk is far less than having to rely on a jealous and malicious world of ingrates and psychopaths. We must be self sufficient and strong if we are to have a future.

I was referring to the incident happened in PA. It pretty much single handedly destroyed any prospersity of nuclear energy in US.

Sending waste to the sun or outsider space maybe a pipe-dream down the road. As who is going to justify the cost associate with it?

How much space we we even have to store on a unman aircraft?

The fuels that the aircraft uses?

The science and technology of stablizating the nuclear waste while going up the atmosphere, or into the weightless space?

Not to mention the single most important and dangerous of all.........

WHAT IF THE AIRCRAFT EXPLOSED IN MID-AIR?
Now we got tons of nuclear wastes dropping down on earth into our air and raining like hell.

Not to mention US is like how many times larger than France? We will need x amount more nuclear plants and x amount of complicated problems to solve.

quote:

Not to mention US is like how many times larger than France? We will need x amount more nuclear plants and x amount of complicated problems to solve.

America handle it...just as long as we don't outsource it.

quote:

Sending waste to the sun or outsider space maybe a pipe-dream down the road. As who is going to justify the cost associate with it?

How much space we we even have to store on a unman aircraft?

The fuels that the aircraft uses?

The science and technology of stablizating the nuclear waste while going up the atmosphere, or into the weightless space?

Not to mention the single most important and dangerous of all.........

WHAT IF THE AIRCRAFT EXPLOSED IN MID-AIR?

The first three questions could be answered with the same answer as pertains to the current, constant launching of satellites by all sorts of private companies all over the world. Obviously it would be under better control if it actually came to the point we needed to dispose of the nuclear waste in a place other than the designated areas on earth, of which there are a lot and are easy to seal.

The only complication involved in increasing the number of nuclear power plants is in improving education and eliminating affirmative action, dumbing-down of tests, and the sacrifice of real study for Leftist agendas and illegal alien students. If we don't fix those problems, it won't matter if we have no power because we'll have no educated working class.

The fact is that nuclear power is the only perfectly clean and controllable source of energy, and it is by far the most productive for the small cost of uranium. Plus it makes us stronger and more able to resist an attack by anyone, and provides a need for real careers as engineers and could restore our failed educational system at every level. Of course it would also provide millions of jobs. It's a good thing for America, and that is why Leftists hate it.

quote:

Originally posted by Thrust_0311:

quote:

Sending waste to the sun or outsider space maybe a pipe-dream down the road. As who is going to justify the cost associate with it?

How much space we we even have to store on a unman aircraft?

The fuels that the aircraft uses?

The science and technology of stablizating the nuclear waste while going up the atmosphere, or into the weightless space?

Not to mention the single most important and dangerous of all.........

WHAT IF THE AIRCRAFT EXPLOSED IN MID-AIR?

The first three questions could be answered with the same answer as pertains to the current, constant launching of satellites by all sorts of private companies all over the world. Obviously it would be under better control if it actually came to the point we needed to dispose of the nuclear waste in a place other than the designated areas on earth, of which there are a lot and are easy to seal.

The only complication involved in increasing the number of nuclear power plants is in improving education and eliminating affirmative action, dumbing-down of tests, and the sacrifice of real study for Leftist agendas and illegal alien students. If we don't fix those problems, it won't matter if we have no power because we'll have no educated working class.

The fact is that nuclear power is the only perfectly clean and controllable source of energy, and it is by far the most productive for the small cost of uranium. Plus it makes us stronger and more able to resist an attack by anyone, and provides a need for real careers as engineers and could restore our failed educational system at every level. Of course it would also provide millions of jobs. It's a good thing for America, and that is why Leftists hate it.

to you Mr. trust3011, a little joke lights the air

the Han soilder Vs ROman legion

Remember that by the third century, Roman legionaires were mounted too.

quote:

The only complication involved in increasing the number of nuclear power plants is in improving education and eliminating affirmative action, dumbing-down of tests, and the sacrifice of real study for Leftist agendas and illegal alien students.

Agreed!!!

It's interesting you bring up the Roman Empire. Not the Republic, mind you, which is the real basis of Western Electoral, secular law. Either way, both had one very relevant practice that is censored in history books today but very enlightening on this whole energy problem.
Iberia (Spain) has always been known for the high quality of its iron ore. In the old days, this was a very important resource as it was used for the weapons that the Romans used. They actually were at a disadvantage against all their enemies in armaments until they conquered Iberia in a 100 year war (sometimes called 'Rome's Vietnam'). When they controlled the land, they strip mined the land and processed it on the spot, causing an environment uninhabitable but for imported food, and polluting the air quality to the point where birds would drop dead out of the sky. There were no hysterics then, so nothing was predicted based on this and, of course, the land healed within a few hundred years or less. Now, did they ask permission of anybody to do this? Did it matter to them when the lives of their citizens were on the line? Can anyone argue against it from a position of protecting the Republic/Empire? If someone had taken a problem with this, they would have been rightly seen as an enemy of the state, or as an eccentric to be ignored. Fast forward 2,000 years and the only people concerned about the good of the country are vilified and the hysterics lauded. Rome prospered once it put the Shamans in the back where no one had to pay attention to them - we put ours in charge of the government.

<-- Where is the "Applause" icon when you need it!!!