http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/50955

Western hypocrisy isn't? The truth hurts.

quote:

the Americans are exploiting the struggle for their own purposes. Clearly, the CIA has planned and organized the riots, and the American media are leading the world-wide campaign.

Clearly the author has no proof, but isn't going to let that get in his way.

The "truth" hurts if you're a Tibetan monk...

I am sure there are many more photos of Iraqi people getting hurt, but who to say that they don't deserve it?

ill bet thats a photo got from nepal. cause i seen them on the news before. some nepal police was beating some protestor.

someone needs to send them the geographic map of the area. Nepal is like a rectangle shape underneath southwest of china.

LOL...you both have a serious case of denial.

yes, this monk was beaten by Nepal police.


http://www.time.com/time/picturesoftheweek/0,29409,1724154,00.html

March 14 - 20, 2008
Monday, March 17, 2008
Protest
Blood flows from the forehead of a Tibetan monk beaten by police during a peace rally in Kathmandu, Nepal.

That does not, however, disprove the fact Tibetan monks are being systematically beaten, arrested and probably tortured by the imperialist forces of China

...

on more than one occasion

...

as well as their close allies.

quote:

Originally posted by Sgt_Schlappy:
That does not, however, disprove the fact Tibetan monks are being systematically beaten, arrested and probably tortured by the imperialist forces of China

Again, you are taking 100% face value, there could be some beatings took place, but systematically? I don't think so. And probably tortured? Good assumption, but your proof?

Here is a new counter one you may want to read, I think it is more credible than the one you offered. The one you did does not even have a real name.

http://tigerloong.wordpress.com/2008/04/03/the-riots-in...-by-eirik-granqvist/

Imperialist forces? I think this word is more approeriate for CIA by setting China up together with some media.

quote:

Originally posted by Sgt_Schlappy:
That does not, however, disprove the fact Tibetan monks are being systematically beaten, arrested and probably tortured by the imperialist forces of China

...

on more than one occasion

...

as well as their close allies.

Many of what you've done with so-called proofs against Chinese tell me of the Hollywood stories about your childhood: When you was found sh?t on your parents' bed, you always explained to your parents that Hitler(your hero) did it or your doggy did in order to have the bed well decorated. Naturally you, by identified, are a straight up demented tw?t freak.

alpha7716
YOU NEED TO STOP AND READ THE TOS, NAME CALLING WILL NOT BE ALLOWED

tibet is part of china,no country will allow its minority group splitting the territory,that's common sense.and i don know why only tibet gets this much attetion,just because they have a super star dalai lama?tibetans are not even a big minority group in china.

tibetans are only the ninth minority group in china.

中国少数民族人口
china's minority groups
（按人口数多少排列）
ranking in population

民 族nationality

人 口population


1 壮族 zhuang 15489630


2 满族 manchurians 9821180


3 回族 hui 8602978


4 苗族 miao 7398035


5 维吾尔族 uighur 7214431

6 彝族 yi 6572173

7 土家族 tujia 5704223

8 蒙古族 mongolian 4806849


9 藏族 tibetan 4593330

quote:

Originally posted by onibattousai:
I am sure there are many more photos of Iraqi people getting hurt, but who to say that they don't deserve it?

Well I guess that's what happens when the enemy sets bombs in crowded markets. I mean I wouldn't want to fight Marines if I was a bony-armed, pot smoking terrorist either, but even still....

quote:

tibet is part of china,no country will allow its minority group splitting the territory,that's common sense.and i don know why only tibet gets this much attetion,just because they have a super star dalai lama?tibetans are not even a big minority group in china.

tibetans are only the ninth minority group in china.

I hate the Dalai Lama: If I have any reason to support Tibetan independence it's for the principle of self determination. Why is that so objectionable? All race and religion aside, I just want an answer to that question.