Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Sound Off!  Hop To Forums  Sound Off - Dave Barker    News regarding the Second Amendment
Page 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 25
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
5-star Rating (1 Vote) Rate It!  Login/Join 
"Has Been 5"

Lead Moderator
Sound Off Forums
Picture of DaveBarker
Posted Hide Post
--> NRA letter received today.www.NRAILA.org/mayors

HAS YOUR LOCAL MAYOR JOINED A NATIONAL ANTI-GUN GROUP?

IF SO, URGE YOUR MAYOR TO RESIGN
FROM THE BLOOMBERG COALITION TODAY

September 14, 2009


Dear David Barker:


Close to fifty mayors in Ohio have joined "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" (MAIG) which was founded and is funded by activist anti-gun billionaire and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Is your mayor one of them? Check to see by clicking here. Earlier this week, NRA members in these localities received postcards from us informing them that their mayor was a MAIG member. As a result of NRA members contacting these mayors, several mayors in Ohio have already resigned from MAIG.

Despite its very misleading name, this national group of anti-gun mayors has lobbied Congress against national reciprocity of state Right-to-Carry permits, against much-needed reform of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), for regulating gun shows out of existence, and for repealing the Tiahrt Amendment that protects the privacy rights of law-abiding gun owners and limits disclosure of sensitive firearm trace data to protect law enforcement personnel and protect lawful gun manufacturers from bogus lawsuits.

Bloomberg created "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" as a front group to lobby Congress to oppose important pro-gun reforms and support new federal gun control restrictions. And too many mayors in Ohio have joined this anti-gun Bloomberg crusade. If your mayor has joined MAIG, it is critical that he or she resign from this national anti-gun group. You can do your part by contacting your mayor's today and urging your mayor to withdraw his or her MAIG membership. Several mayors in Ohio have already quit this anti-gun Bloomberg coalition and your mayor should be the next one to do so.

Using the contact information provided on this map, please call, e-mail and write your mayor today and ask them to support law-abiding gun owners by publicly disassociating themselves with Michael Bloomberg and "Mayors Against Illegal Guns." You may also visit www.NRAILA.org/mayors for more information. Help your mayor make the right choice between protecting our Second Amendment rights or continuing to be associated with those who actively oppose and undermine your firearms freedom.




Mayor Dan Pillow
Addyston, OH



Mayor Donald Plusquellic
Akron, OH



Mayor Merle Gorden
Beachwood, OH



Mayor Daniel Pocek
Bedford, OH



Mayor Fletcher Berger
Bedford Heights, OH



Mayor John Licastro
Bratenahl, OH



Mayor Samuel Alai
Broadview Heights, OH



Mayor Mark Mallory
Cincinnati, OH



Mayor Frank Jackson
Cleveland, OH



Mayor Edward Kelley
Cleveland Heights, OH



Mayor Michael Coleman
Columbus, OH



Mayor Jack Bacci
Cuyahoga Heights, OH



Mayor Rhine McLin
Dayton, OH



Mayor Marilee Chinnici-Zuercher
Dublin, OH



Mayor Bill Cervenik
Euclid, OH



Mayor Theodore Shannon
Fairfax, OH



Mayor Thomas J. Longo
Garfield Heights, OH



Mayor Joseph C. Hubbard
Glendale, OH



Mayor Alan Zaffiro
Golf Manor, OH



Mayor Deborah Neale
Lakeline, OH



Mayor Michael Kolomichuk
Lakemore, OH



Mayor Jo Ann Toczek
Linndale, OH



Mayor Jim Brown
Lockland, OH



Mayor Donald Kuchta
Macedonia, OH



Mayor Gregory Costabile
Mayfield Heights, OH



Mayor Bruce Rinker
Mayfield Village, OH



Mayor Robert Shiner
Mentor, OH



Mayor Gary Starr
Middleburg Heights, OH



Mayor Susan Renda
Moreland Hills, OH



Mayor Thomas E. O'Grady
North Olmsted, OH



Mayor Kathy Mulcahy
Orange Village, OH



Mayor Martin Zanotti
Parma Heights, OH



Mayor Bruce Akers
Pepper Pike, OH



Mayor Daniel Ursu
Richmond Heights, OH



Mayor William Robertson
Rittman, OH



Mayor Earl M. Leiken
Shaker Heights, OH



Mayor John Smith
Silverton, OH



Mayor Kevin Patton
Solon, OH



Mayor Georgine Welo
South Euclid, OH



Mayor Matthew Brett
South Russell, OH



Mayor Carleton S. Finkbeiner
Toledo, OH



Mayor Darreyl D. Davis
Trotwood, OH



Mayor Katherine Procop
Twinsburg, OH



Mayor Beryl Rothschild
University Heights, OH



Mayor Jean Anderson
Vermilion, OH



Mayor Michael J. O'Brien
Warren, OH



Mayor Barry Porter
Wyoming, OH



Mayor Jay Williams
Youngstown, OH

Go here to get e-mail addresses:www.NRAILA.org/mayors

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION



I will cast no stones.
Another proud member, Derelict Veterans Group.
“OF MUNERIS UT TOTUS”

 
Posts: 15961 | Registered: Tue 12 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Has Been 5"

Lead Moderator
Sound Off Forums
Picture of DaveBarker
Posted Hide Post
The NRA letter received today was for we Ohio dudes. Please check www.NRAILA.org/mayors for your state!

Worth repeating:
NYC Mayor Bloomberg created "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" as a front group to lobby Congress to oppose important pro-gun reforms and support new federal gun control restrictions. And too many mayors in Ohio have joined this anti-gun Bloomberg crusade. If your mayor has joined MAIG, it is critical that he or she resign from this national anti-gun group. You can do your part by contacting your mayor's today and urging your mayor to withdraw his or her MAIG membership.



I will cast no stones.
Another proud member, Derelict Veterans Group.
“OF MUNERIS UT TOTUS”

 
Posts: 15961 | Registered: Tue 12 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Elesso
Posted Hide Post
just out of curiosity... what exactly constitutes as an "illegal gun"?

i know that the sullivan Law in NYC was passed banning guns in city limits, but as far as illegal weapons go, is it not up to the municipallity or the state?

the second ammendment grants us the freedom to keep and bear arms, but it does not limit the government from limiting it.

i know it is a loophole that many have tried to exploit, but state law trumps federal law if it is constitutional.

we have the right to keep and bear arms, but do we have the right to own a Patriot battery?
or RPG's?
or Vulcan guns?
or Stinger missiles, SAM's, Howitzers and MLRS's?
.

where is the line drawn between arms and armiong a military force?
where do we seperate the constitutionalists from the terrorists?
 
Posts: 3240 | Registered: Fri 07 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of billbright
Posted Hide Post
What is the NRA's recommendation for curtailing gun running to Mexico and south?
 
Posts: 5704 | Registered: Tue 13 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by billbright:
What is the NRA's recommendation for curtailing gun running to Mexico and south?


Enforce the frickin' laws on the books. Bolster the border patrols. Nab the scumbags violating the law, and throw the book at them.
 
Posts: 3828 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Elesso
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RRR52:
quote:
Originally posted by billbright:
What is the NRA's recommendation for curtailing gun running to Mexico and south?


Enforce the frickin' laws on the books. Bolster the border patrols. Nab the scumbags violating the law, and throw the book at them.


but the borders are for guarding from OUTSIDE sources, not inside...
if we guard the border against outgoing weapons, we are curtailing freet rade.
 
Posts: 3240 | Registered: Fri 07 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Elesso:
just out of curiosity... what exactly constitutes as an "illegal gun"? [Any clear, unambiguous, fully Constitutional (therefore, modest) restriction of common firearms creates those that might be categorized as "illegal."]

i know that the sullivan Law in NYC was passed banning guns in city limits, but as far as illegal weapons go, is it not up to the municipallity or the state? [The Sullivan Law was passed for polytickle control purposes, to assure one polytickle faction that the others would not be armed, or, if so, that the others could be jailed for possessing the guns. The Sullivan Law was written not to make the people of New York safer, but to ensure elitists that their power would be further consolidated into the hands of that self-selected few and their lemmings. That's the typical purpose for gun-grabbing laws--control for elitist, political purposes.]

the second ammendment grants us the freedom to keep and bear arms, but it does not limit the government from limiting it. [What an obtuse statement! So the guvmint is really not limited from extending the time till an accused gets a trial; from limiting all sorts of speech; from quartering troops in your house; from all sorts of uncontrolled searches and seizures? I am amused by the lame attempts of the collectivists to rationalize curtailment of the explicit and obvious intent of the 2nd Amendment while seeing "emanations and penumbras" of all sorts of imagined "rights" that are NOT written into the Constitution. God grants us the right to efficiently defend ourselves and our families and our property from criminals who would do us harm or take them. The Constitution merely reaffirms that innate right. Only the greatest restrictions apply to ANY guvmint intrusions upon the God given and Constitutionally affirmed rights of individuals. The power belongs to individuals, not to the government.]

i know it is a loophole that many have tried to exploit, but state law trumps federal law if it is constitutional.

we have the right to keep and bear arms, but do we have the right to own a Patriot battery?
or RPG's?
or Vulcan guns?
or Stinger missiles, SAM's, Howitzers and MLRS's? [What a ridiculous off-the-wall insinuation.]
.

where is the line drawn between arms and armiong a military force? [Do you understand that the Supreme Court in 1939 or so ruled against a guy named Miller, since he had a sawed-off shotgun, which the court ruled was not "military" enough? (Never mind the M97 trench sweepers of WW1.) Miller's right to keep and bear arms was denied because the firearms was insufficiently "military."]
where do we seperate the constitutionalists from the terrorists? [When your neighbor starts attacking innocents in the neighborhood with bombs and murdering everyone she or he sees for political gain, then you might have a terrorist. But I am sure the collectivist twits and twerps cannot tell the difference from Americans with a deep and abiding respect for the Constitution.]
 
Posts: 3828 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
forever Bubba’s
cyber-babe

Old Fart #5
-------------------

"Derelict Patriot"

-------------------

Picture of MissU2
Posted Hide Post
Wow RRR ~ I think Elesso brought up an interesting question/point-of-view especially with America’s current, “political turmoil”

Popcorn


choose joy each day
 
Posts: 10877 | Registered: Sun 17 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
forever Bubba’s
cyber-babe

Old Fart #5
-------------------

"Derelict Patriot"

-------------------

Picture of MissU2
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Elesso:
just out of curiosity... what exactly constitutes as an "illegal gun"?

i know that the sullivan Law in NYC was passed banning guns in city limits, but as far as illegal weapons go, is it not up to the municipallity or the state?

the second ammendment grants us the freedom to keep and bear arms, but it does not limit the government from limiting it.

i know it is a loophole that many have tried to exploit, but state law trumps federal law if it is constitutional.

we have the right to keep and bear arms, but do we have the right to own a Patriot battery?
or RPG's?
or Vulcan guns?
or Stinger missiles, SAM's, Howitzers and MLRS's?
.

where is the line drawn between arms and armiong a military force?
where do we seperate the constitutionalists from the terrorists?

Elesso ~ here’s another “point-of-view”
I forwarded your question to my RTKBA peeps. . .below is an immediate response from a family member and a good one IMO!!

“Based on my strict, personal, studied interpretation of the US Constitution, according to the original version established by our founding fathers, the Second Amendment, and the USSC's recent decision, there's no such thing as an "illegal" firearm.

On the other hand, our Congress makes up its own rules daily, so an "illegal firearm" is whatever they say it is, from day to day, as long as we allow it. Our Congress ignores the Constitution and makes up whatever unconstitutional laws it wants.

According to the USSC, any law in conflict with the US Constitution is, per se, immediately, naturally and automatically, null and void. It's as if there were never any such law.

BTW, remember.... One man's terrorist is another man's patriot.

Remember, too, that our founding fathers ~ George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, John Hancock, Ben Franklin and the others ~ were all labeled "traitors" and "terrorists." I find myself in very good company. I'm proud to be one of them.

You say, "state law trumps federal law if it is constitutional."
NO! Nothing trumps the US Constitution.
It's the law of the land.

Beer


choose joy each day
 
Posts: 10877 | Registered: Sun 17 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Has Been 5"

Lead Moderator
Sound Off Forums
Picture of DaveBarker
Posted Hide Post
MissU2 is my nominee!www.nrahq.org/women/index.asp

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
Women's Awards Program
In recognition of the significant contributions made by women in the areas of Second Amendment advocacy, education, volunteerism, hunting and shooting sports activities, the National Rifle Association bestows the:

⇒ Sybil Ludington Women's Freedom Award upon women whose contributions have been made at the national level
⇒ Marion P. Hammer Woman of Distinction Award upon women whose contributions have been made at the local, state and/or regional levels

Award nominations for the 2010 awards are being accepted until November 1, 2009. Many women have made significant contributions in the areas listed above; you probably know a few of them. Please take a moment to nominate them for an award appropriate to their contributions. This is the perfect way to recognize their hard work and dedication.

For more information about NRA's Women's Awards Program, please call Patty Zollman at 800-861-1166 or visit www.nrahq.org/women/index.asp to download to download nomination forms.

Please note: Women may not be nominated for both the Sybil Ludington Women's Freedom Award and the Marion P. Hammer Woman of Distinction Award in the same year.


DEADLINE FOR NOMINATIONS:
NOVEMBER 1, 2009

-----------------------------------------------------
National Rifle Association * 11250 Waples Mill Road * Fairfax, VA 22030



I will cast no stones.
Another proud member, Derelict Veterans Group.
“OF MUNERIS UT TOTUS”

 
Posts: 15961 | Registered: Tue 12 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Elesso
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MissU2:
Wow RRR ~ I think Elesso brought up an interesting question/point-of-view especially with America’s current, “political turmoil”

Popcorn

not to worry MissU... when he lashes out it makes him feel Accomplished.

to him there is "them" and "us" and there are no people in between.. free thought is discouraged in his world
 
Posts: 3240 | Registered: Fri 07 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH...

Super Member

On Warning~Disrespectful of TOS

"HB/OF 7"
Picture of RONCO
Posted Hide Post
DOESN'T YOUR STMT RE RR"S POINT OF VIEW SPEAK VOLUMES AGAINST YOUR OWN ARGUMENT Eek

JES WUNDERIN Roll Eyes


"FORGET WHAT THEY SAY, WATCH WHAT THEY DO"
 
Posts: 29518 | Registered: Wed 20 December 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Has Been 5"

Lead Moderator
Sound Off Forums
Picture of DaveBarker
Posted Hide Post
Illegal gun? Hmmmm, if it fits within the following it is not illegal. However it must fit in the Second Amendment as written.

June 26, 2009 marked the one-year anniversary of the landmark D.C. v. Heller case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual right. The Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects "the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. This meaning is strongly confirmed by the historical background of the Second Amendment."

There are those who would still deny our Second Amendment freedoms are always looking for ways to thwart our success and reverse that decision. And while the case affirmed that the Second Amendment prohibits the federal government, and federal entities such as Washington, D.C., from banning handguns for self-defense, the decision did not resolve the separate question of whether the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments.

Piracy And The Right To Self Defense: Previous we reported on the arming of merchant mariners to allow them to defend their crews and ships from pirate attacks. We noted that, with the increase in pirate attacks on the high seas, many are now realizing that firearms and armed citizens can be as effective a criminal deterrent at sea, as they are on land."



I will cast no stones.
Another proud member, Derelict Veterans Group.
“OF MUNERIS UT TOTUS”

 
Posts: 15961 | Registered: Tue 12 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New member
-------------------

Founding Member Derelict Veterans Group

-------------------

Picture of Doc247
Posted Hide Post
Seems pretty clear to me:

"...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

That makes any law (fed., State, or local) that infringes on the individual right illegal. Some may quibble over the meaning of "infringe" or "arms" but the basic right now seems clear. What would give State or local gov. any more right to limit a Constitutional right than they have to limit other amendments (Bill of Rights)?
 
Posts: 183 | Registered: Fri 12 September 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Elesso
Posted Hide Post
the point i am making is that we are not automatons to be programed with a constitution and not operate outside the confines imposed by such.

in the Declaration of Independence Pres. Jefferson wrote that men were all created equal (unless they were not white Christians), imbued with inalienable rights... etc. Fat chance that Gays be humans created equal, blah, blah... or that African Americans, or Hispanics, or any other group have "equal rights.

we sit there and defend the rights we see fit, and ignore the rest... torture (water boarding) has been declared to be legal so that we may "enhance" our interrogation techniques.

this is a case very akin to the extremist views. one poster said we have the "god given" right to keep arms.I'm all for the bill of rights, but when defending the second, you CANNOT infringe upon our FIRST amendment right.

and the fact is, as we defend our right to bear arms, the 4th ammendmet has been shattered by illegal wire taps, No knock warrants, secret warrants, no Habeas corpus ...
our 5th right has been basically suspended because of the previous statement.
and the 8th (cruel and unjust punishment) has been stomped on so hard, i doubt we'll ever bounce back...

folks.. we bicker away our rights, and what do we have left?
a bunch of guns to make our last stand with...
 
Posts: 3240 | Registered: Fri 07 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 25 
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Sound Off!  Hop To Forums  Sound Off - Dave Barker    News regarding the Second Amendment

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.