Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Navy Discussions  Hop To Forums  Joining the Navy    Medical Marijuana vs. Background Check
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
I know someone who has successfully been processed by MEPs and has DEP'ped into the Navy and has been contracted to a job with secret clearance. He was a medical marijuana patient. He has cancelled his prescription. My question is: Would he be able to be accepted into a rating with a top secret clearance (IS, CTI, etc.) due to the thorough background check? Also, how should he go about this background check?
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: Fri 03 October 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Project Manager


Picture of Mrsjvb
Posted Hide Post
the Military does not( apparently I need to review/proofread more before hitting the post now button) recognize the validity of a marijuana 'prescription'.

long term use is a PDQ. more than a double digit use over a lifetime is a PDQ. Failure to mention that he took it, for any reason..'medical' or otherwise..is Fraudulent enlistment.

the Recruit has nothing to do with the background check. that's all on whatever civilian agency that is hired to perform it. the use WILL be discovered.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Mrsjvb,


There can be no freedom without sacrifice
 
Posts: 14564 | Registered: Mon 04 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Lead Mod Navy and Recconect America Forums
catherine0830@msn.com
Democracy will survive until the government figures out it can bribe the people with their own money.
Posted Hide Post
Hmmmm Medical marajuana is associated with cancer and glaucoma ususally........I guess his "medical" necessity for it is probably a DQ as well, and I'm guessing he never told the Navy about that, either?
 
Posts: 7243 | Registered: Wed 13 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Navy Forums Moderator

jccrabby@yahoo.com
Picture of DC2crabby
Posted Hide Post
I guess it really doesn't matter why it was prescribed, but seems he was up front and not currently using, so got the clearance. I suppose there could be other reasons besides cancer or gluacoma to prescribe it, it depends upon the doc.
 
Posts: 1471 | Registered: Tue 27 January 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Lead Mod Navy and Recconect America Forums
catherine0830@msn.com
Democracy will survive until the government figures out it can bribe the people with their own money.
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DC2crabby:
so got the clearance.
It doesn't say he got his clearance. Said he contracted into DEP. BIG difference. They contracted him under a pre-screen. They have yet to do the investigation.
 
Posts: 7243 | Registered: Wed 13 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Navy Forums Moderator

jccrabby@yahoo.com
Picture of DC2crabby
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by catherine0830:
quote:
Originally posted by DC2crabby:
so got the clearance.
It doesn't say he got his clearance. Said he contracted into DEP. BIG difference. They contracted him under a pre-screen. They have yet to do the investigation.


oops...no comprehension today. However, he still was able to DEP though.
 
Posts: 1471 | Registered: Tue 27 January 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Forum Project Manager


Picture of Mrsjvb
Posted Hide Post
Yeah but I'm with catherine..ten bucks sez the use, prescribed or otherwise, was never disclosed..nor was the reason for the prescription.

I am still thinking Fraudulent Enlistment here.


There can be no freedom without sacrifice
 
Posts: 14564 | Registered: Mon 04 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Navy Forums Moderator

jccrabby@yahoo.com
Picture of DC2crabby
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mrsjvb:
Yeah but I'm with catherine..ten bucks sez the use, prescribed or otherwise, was never disclosed..nor was the reason for the prescription.

I am still thinking Fraudulent Enlistment here.


OK, I see where you guys are coming from...had to go back and re-read...the old "a friend" I know. YEp, could be fraudulent, but it could also be that hhe was honest and said he did use marijuana in the past, medicinal or not, if so, there shouldn't be an issue with the enlistment. If not, then we may be on here in a few months to next year or so with someone asking how to get back in because of a discharge for not disclosing smoking pot.
 
Posts: 1471 | Registered: Tue 27 January 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of lamedog
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Hmmmm Medical marajuana is associated with cancer and glaucoma ususally


Heck, in Oregon you can get medical mary j for just about anything. There are doctors here who will prescribe it for pain management.
 
Posts: 226 | Registered: Tue 20 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Navy Forums Moderator

jccrabby@yahoo.com
Picture of DC2crabby
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lamedog:
quote:
Hmmmm Medical marajuana is associated with cancer and glaucoma ususally


Heck, in Oregon you can get medical mary j for just about anything. There are doctors here who will prescribe it for pain management.


I wonder if they include munchies in that perscription? Big Grin
 
Posts: 1471 | Registered: Tue 27 January 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Navy Discussions  Hop To Forums  Joining the Navy    Medical Marijuana vs. Background Check

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.