Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  Information System Technician (IT)    Commandant's SITREP 4 - Mission Support
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Basic Training
Picture of TwrMunkeeFB
Posted
I apologize firsthand if this has already been discussed, or is common knowledge in the IT community...I've been stuck on a cutter for three years and have only heard rumor of what is happening. After reading Admiral Allen's email this morning I thought I would throw it out there and ask.
So, here is my question: Are there any major changes occurring at the ESU/ESD level? (aside from us all being phased out to the civilian sector...) Big Grin
Admiral Allen states "We intend to unify our entire support structure and business practices into a single mission support model for the Service." Does this mean ESU's will take on additional roles? Or are ESD's becoming more independant? Any knowledge or thoughts on this is greatly appreciated.
 
Posts: 71 | Registered: Sun 13 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
From what I understand, as it stands currently, the ESU/ESD structure will feel the least change of anyone during the transition. Most of the changes will be made at the top levels, i.e. combining/dissolving of LANT and PAC into a single entity at the head (top of the pyramid). In addition, most of the change will be virtual vice physical for the first few years or so.

This is, of course, all subject to change.
 
Posts: 120 | Registered: Mon 12 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Picture of ScotchLocks
Posted Hide Post
Good topic. I heard that, like was said, there will be one MLC and a more stream-lined chain.

Also, like sectors, I bet that some standardization will be sought at least at the ESU level.

Someone may have to finally decide if it'll be eOn (LANT) or Nortel(PAC). And, should ESU's include the ESD function(PAC), or should their be a separate OPFAC and ESD co located(LANT)?

My opinion; eOn's and ESD's for field, fully staffed ESU's for Command, oversite, and management.
 
Posts: 12 | Registered: Fri 24 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Picture of NOLAIT
Posted Hide Post
I remember there being talk about having 2 Super ESU's, Portsmouth and Alameda, but don't know much more about it.
 
Posts: 39 | Registered: Thu 08 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Picture of TwrMunkeeFB
Posted Hide Post
Groovy, thanks for the input. That's about what I had heard, aside from the Super Esu's and one MLC. I guess we'll sit back and watch it unfold!

Oh yeah, OOMP those EoN's!
Nortel all the way baby!!!
 
Posts: 71 | Registered: Sun 13 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
You guys deal a lot with reservists at the ESU and ESD level?
 
Posts: 141 | Registered: Tue 17 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Picture of NOLAIT
Posted Hide Post
At the ESD's that I've been at, it seems to me that there are more ET reserves than on the IT or TT side.
 
Posts: 39 | Registered: Thu 08 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  Information System Technician (IT)    Commandant's SITREP 4 - Mission Support

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.