Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  Coast Guard Auxiliary    Alabama Flotilla Gets Good Press...Not so Fast...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of flyandscuba
Posted
quote:

Flotilla played key role after Katrina struck
Crew set up radio after storm to help Coast Guard direct rescue operations

Wednesday, October 17, 2007By GEORGE WERNETHStaff Reporter

Mobile-based Coast Guard Auxiliary Flotilla 3-9 played a key role in the immediate response to Hurricane Katrina after it wracked the central Gulf Coast a little over two years ago, and the unit continues today to help in the recovery effort.

The flotilla -- which has some 55 volunteer members from an array of walks of life -- quickly responded after Katrina slammed into the central Gulf Coast on Aug. 29, 2005, members noted in a recent interview.

Immediately after Katrina passed, Flotilla 3-9 members aided the Coast Guard by using the 43-foot trawler Argo to survey the Mobile Ship Channel and other local channels to determine the extent of damage done to buoys and other navigation markers, said Jim Patterson, 60, a member from Mobile. Patterson, an information technology specialist with the FBI's Mobile Office, said the flotilla undertook the mission because local Coast Guard vessels had been removed from the area for safety reasons as Katrina approached.

"Communications at Coast Guard Sector Mobile and the Coast Guard Aviation Training Center were all down," after Katrina struck, Patterson noted. "An auxiliary member went to the ATC and installed a portable Marine VHF radio." Also, he noted, another member of the auxiliary unit, Rene Stiegler, owns WLO -- a Marine radio station. Patterson said Stiegler altered his equipment to the same frequency as the Coast Guard to provide the Coast Guard's only radio communications in the Katrina-devastated area."

The Mobile ATC was the staging site for scores of Coast Guard helicopters who rescued thousands of stranded Katrina victims from the rooftops of New Orleans and along the Mississippi coast. Wayne Kindred, a civilian employee of Sector Mobile who acts as a liaison between the Coast Guard and the auxiliary, noted that the rescues could not have been made without the communications.

"In other words," said another Flotilla 3-9 member, Fairn Whatley, 40, of Mobile, with a laugh, "without our assistance, I don't know what the Coast Guard would have done."

Flotilla 3-9 remains active in the Katrina recovery effort, noted Whatley. Since September 2006, the flotilla has been providing a half-dozen boats to be used to transport Coast Guard officials to and from debris cleanup sites in navigable waters along the Mississippi coast, she said. She said the officials are overseeing the debris removal being done by contractors.

The U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary has about 27,000 members, according to the organization's Web site, nws.cgaux.org, and was established by Congress in 1939. Their services include making requested vessel safety checks; conducting boating safety classes; and helping in search and rescue missions and marine environmental protection.

Flotilla 3-9 meets at 7 p.m. on the third Thursday of each month in the auditorium of the Mobile Gas Service Corp., 2828 Dauphin St.

The flotilla's members include teachers, doctors, pilots and others and the members include retirees and persons who are still working for a living. It is open to people 17 and older, noted Kindred, who added: "If they can walk, we'll take them."

Whatley, an artist, said she joined because, "I love volunteerism and I love the water." Of the reasons others join, she said, "I think volunteerism is important to all of us."

This message has been edited. Last edited by: flyandscuba,
 
Posts: 538 | Registered: Fri 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Picture of flyandscuba
Posted Hide Post
Update -

I rec'd a phone call this afternoon from a silver-side district leader. Evidently, this article I happened upon in a neighboring city's newspaper was not well received...

Sadly, there may very well be some "casualties" of Auxiliarists as a result.

This should be an example to be very careful what you do when it comes to PA -- be very careful...
 
Posts: 538 | Registered: Fri 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Basic Training
Picture of AuxDoc
Posted Hide Post
What's the specific issue with the article?

That certain AD functions went down and the Aux helped?
 
Posts: 168 | Registered: Thu 13 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Picture of flyandscuba
Posted Hide Post
That was my first impression upon reading the article too -- that it was positive -- and that the Auxies helped out with critical services when they were needed the most. (One of the reasons we exist...)

However -- I suppose -- some could view it as putting the two local Gold-side commands in a poor light?

Above my pay grade for sure...
 
Posts: 538 | Registered: Fri 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo
Picture of FL51D7
Posted Hide Post
Sadly, there may very well be some "casualties" of Auxiliarists as a result.

This should be an example to be very careful what you do when it comes to PA -- be very careful...

The article is by-lined to a reporter - not an Aux PA officer.

Have the Auxies memorize this line:

quote:
I was misquoted!!!


OTOH - the report may just be an update of this Press Release of September 12, 2005. Now that Press Release has the Nihl Obstat and Imprimatur of Nat Aux PA - so it still appears the local Auxies may have cover.
 
Posts: 9508 | Registered: Fri 12 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
-Using a non-Aux radio for CG communications?
-Giving out information about CG operations and capabilities
-Perhaps claiming a bit more credit for the Aux than they were due
 
Posts: 4069 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
suspended
Mainedawg
Moderator
Hot TopicS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
"If they can walk, we'll take them."

That statement is going to get them in more trouble than they realize.
www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm
 
Posts: 222 | Registered: Wed 20 February 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Hi All:

Most of you know my passion is PS and the health and welfare of our members. But my wife is the consummate PA officer and has worked for years at local, district and national (as a division chief) in PA.

In the past we have worked closely together on many Auxiliary promotional and incident events that required good and careful PA. She became a pretty good teacher of acceptable press and promotional releases and I learned a ton.

In the Auxiliary, because of the USCG relationship, we are under extreme scrutiny as to what we say, especially if it involves any jointness with the USCG. The civilian head of the USCG PA is a dragon and would have our PA completely muzzled if possible. There has been some very extreme fallout from Auxiliary releases that seemed innocuous on the surface, but really tweaked the sensibilities of the USCG.

We are amateurs at this process and we often make mistakes that are re-broadcast regionally or nationally. When we do, we're quick to hear about ir down the chain. Our leaders are very quick to assess member blame.

So when I think of that member who write this and probably put lot of time and thought into it, my heart goes out to her.

It has some errors that could have been avoided. It implies that the USCG was fumbling around and we saved the day. We could have left that part out and still had a good story. The USCG will not stand for a hint of that, even if it was not the intention at all.

PA releases is a "the paste is out of the tube" deal. You can't take it back. And if it reaches the USCG PA via any USCG channel with a hint of offense taken, there's hell to pay.

The problem is, our leadership won't stand up to the USCG and say "Hey, sorry about that, we'll do better next time but please take some deep breaths and let it go". So we attack our members who are trying to do the best they can with censure and recrimination.

It's like walking in a mine-field. It would probably be best if we never mentioned or even alluded to the USCG. The primary job of PA is promoting the Auxiliary anyway (not the USCG as we often see).
 
Posts: 500 | Registered: Thu 24 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Picture of flyandscuba
Posted Hide Post
As FL indicated, this piece was the work of a local news reporter. However, one of the Auxies quoted is the FSO-PA for the Flotilla featured.

Unfortunately, she'll probably take the heat for the article. Too bad, as she is a friend, a good AUXAIR observer and an exceptional photographer -- as well as an all-around very nice person.

Too funny on the ADA comment -- as we have our share of mobility challenged members who serve in various important roles in the Auxiliary. Maybe the statement should have been -- "If they're not 6 feet under, we'll take them"...
 
Posts: 538 | Registered: Fri 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
A bad day on the water beats a good day at the office.
Picture of ward2up
Posted Hide Post
Or the statement could have been the line that Hal used to use frequently: "If they can fog a mirror". . .
 
Posts: 620 | Registered: Mon 28 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
It actually surprised me when I learned exactly how controlled the Aux was when it came to actual public affairs (as opposed to being public event organizers, which seems to be the main role of our PA folks at the flotilla level.
 
Posts: 4069 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo
Picture of FL51D7
Posted Hide Post
quote:
It actually surprised me when I learned exactly how controlled the Aux was when it came to actual public affairs


You might find this excerpt from Division 5 of D7 Newsletter (pdf page 8) to be of interest:

quote:
Remember that anything you say or do can be a positive or negative reflection on the organization. When dealing with the media and the public, the first thing you want to remember is –“DO NO HARM.” It is important to make sure that nothing you say, write or do harms our national security, the mission of the Coast Guard, the reputation of the Coast Guard in general, the Auxiliary in particular, and to the people we seek to serve.


After that remark, the SO-PA then makes an announcement of a new D7 Policy ("Your mileage and district may vary.")

quote:
To make sure we do no harm, District Seven has a review policy that must be followed without exception.

For the routine announcement of local meetings and classes, review by the Flotilla Commander, Vice Commander, Division or Vice Captain is appropriate. For any other material, review by an ADSO or DSO-PA or ADSO or DSO-PB for internal publication is mandatory. In matters where Operational or Security issues may be present, review should also be by the appropriate level Elected Officer. Materials written by those in leadership are not exempt from review and a second set of eyes should review all material going out.


How timely do you think the press releases are going to be now - given the notorious Aux Rusty Chain?
 
Posts: 9508 | Registered: Fri 12 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Am I reading it right that you have to have your internal newsletters reviewed by higher authority before publication?
 
Posts: 4069 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
When dealing with the media and the public, the first thing you want to remember is –“DO NO HARM.”


I always learned the main tenet of public affairs was "Maximum disclosure, Minimum delay"...Smile

What should be gleaned from this is that it is a good idea to swing interviews up the chain before doing them.

The internal newsletter bit is probably a byproduct of a some racy stuff that I've seen in some flotilla newsletters.
 
Posts: 607 | Registered: Mon 11 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
10 day suspension for disruptive postings. TOS Section 6(i). 10/8/08
Posted Hide Post
Paper publications are only a small part of it. How about all flotilla web sites, where the information posted is available not only locally, but throughout the world? I guess if they wanted to get the story out, they could have included it in the minutes which would then be posted on the flotilla's web site. Eek

...gjd
 
Posts: 9446 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo
Picture of FL51D7
Posted Hide Post
Am I reading it right that you have to have your internal newsletters reviewed by higher authority before publication?

I'll save you the exact cite but flotilla newsletters have always been subject to review by the DirAux. He can and usually does delegate that to the Aux - usually the unit elected leader.

Part of the review is a content review. The other part is to make sure the flotilla isn't breaking the rules regarding ads.

Does anybody know how many Auxies were run thru the Nat PA course - the one that used to get you Boat Rides in CA?

If the Aux is still having problems with PA - is that course doing any good or is it just another 'feel good' and a way to waste the CG's money?
 
Posts: 9508 | Registered: Fri 12 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
To make sure we do no harm, District Seven has a review policy that must be followed without exception.

For the routine announcement of local meetings and classes, review by the Flotilla Commander, Vice Commander, Division or Vice Captain is appropriate. For any other material, review by an ADSO or DSO-PA or ADSO or DSO-PB for internal publication is mandatory. In matters where Operational or Security issues may be present, review should also be by the appropriate level Elected Officer. Materials written by those in leadership are not exempt from review and a second set of eyes should review all material going out.



This is the typical Auxiliary knee-jerk response to USCG criticism of an Auxiliary article. Instead of standing up, the leadership folds under the scowl of the USCG and becomes more dictatorial and restrictive.

To be fair, the USCG criticism is often well founded because as I said before, we have a very schizophrenic message and regional focus and attention on Auxiliary affairs varies wildly.

Until we decide who we are and what our direction is as an organization, these messages will continue to be very mixed. That's what causes "blue-light" and illegal covert patrol activity.

The PA courses offered were/are pretty good. They try real hard to explain the nuances and elephant traps of working with the USCG. But folks who take those courses soon move on and their replacements don't get trained.

In this area at least, PS and PA are those "you don't have to do anything much, just fill the billet for us" types of jobs. And we pay a heavy price for that.
 
Posts: 500 | Registered: Thu 24 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  Coast Guard Auxiliary    Alabama Flotilla Gets Good Press...Not so Fast...

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.