|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Coast Guard Discussions
Coast Guard Auxiliary
Alabama Flotilla Gets Good Press...Not so Fast...|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
Member![]() |
This message has been edited. Last edited by: flyandscuba, |
||
|
Member![]() |
Update -
I rec'd a phone call this afternoon from a silver-side district leader. Evidently, this article I happened upon in a neighboring city's newspaper was not well received... Sadly, there may very well be some "casualties" of Auxiliarists as a result. This should be an example to be very careful what you do when it comes to PA -- be very careful... |
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
What's the specific issue with the article?
That certain AD functions went down and the Aux helped? |
|||
|
Member![]() |
That was my first impression upon reading the article too -- that it was positive -- and that the Auxies helped out with critical services when they were needed the most. (One of the reasons we exist...)
However -- I suppose -- some could view it as putting the two local Gold-side commands in a poor light? Above my pay grade for sure... |
|||
|
|
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo |
Sadly, there may very well be some "casualties" of Auxiliarists as a result.
This should be an example to be very careful what you do when it comes to PA -- be very careful... The article is by-lined to a reporter - not an Aux PA officer. Have the Auxies memorize this line:
OTOH - the report may just be an update of this Press Release of September 12, 2005. Now that Press Release has the Nihl Obstat and Imprimatur of Nat Aux PA - so it still appears the local Auxies may have cover. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
-Using a non-Aux radio for CG communications?
-Giving out information about CG operations and capabilities -Perhaps claiming a bit more credit for the Aux than they were due |
|||
|
|
suspended Mainedawg Moderator Hot TopicS |
That statement is going to get them in more trouble than they realize. www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm |
|||
|
|
Member |
Hi All:
Most of you know my passion is PS and the health and welfare of our members. But my wife is the consummate PA officer and has worked for years at local, district and national (as a division chief) in PA. In the past we have worked closely together on many Auxiliary promotional and incident events that required good and careful PA. She became a pretty good teacher of acceptable press and promotional releases and I learned a ton. In the Auxiliary, because of the USCG relationship, we are under extreme scrutiny as to what we say, especially if it involves any jointness with the USCG. The civilian head of the USCG PA is a dragon and would have our PA completely muzzled if possible. There has been some very extreme fallout from Auxiliary releases that seemed innocuous on the surface, but really tweaked the sensibilities of the USCG. We are amateurs at this process and we often make mistakes that are re-broadcast regionally or nationally. When we do, we're quick to hear about ir down the chain. Our leaders are very quick to assess member blame. So when I think of that member who write this and probably put lot of time and thought into it, my heart goes out to her. It has some errors that could have been avoided. It implies that the USCG was fumbling around and we saved the day. We could have left that part out and still had a good story. The USCG will not stand for a hint of that, even if it was not the intention at all. PA releases is a "the paste is out of the tube" deal. You can't take it back. And if it reaches the USCG PA via any USCG channel with a hint of offense taken, there's hell to pay. The problem is, our leadership won't stand up to the USCG and say "Hey, sorry about that, we'll do better next time but please take some deep breaths and let it go". So we attack our members who are trying to do the best they can with censure and recrimination. It's like walking in a mine-field. It would probably be best if we never mentioned or even alluded to the USCG. The primary job of PA is promoting the Auxiliary anyway (not the USCG as we often see). |
|||
|
Member![]() |
As FL indicated, this piece was the work of a local news reporter. However, one of the Auxies quoted is the FSO-PA for the Flotilla featured.
Unfortunately, she'll probably take the heat for the article. Too bad, as she is a friend, a good AUXAIR observer and an exceptional photographer -- as well as an all-around very nice person. Too funny on the ADA comment -- as we have our share of mobility challenged members who serve in various important roles in the Auxiliary. Maybe the statement should have been -- "If they're not 6 feet under, we'll take them"... |
|||
|
|
A bad day on the water beats a good day at the office. |
Or the statement could have been the line that Hal used to use frequently: "If they can fog a mirror". . .
|
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
It actually surprised me when I learned exactly how controlled the Aux was when it came to actual public affairs (as opposed to being public event organizers, which seems to be the main role of our PA folks at the flotilla level.
|
|||
|
|
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo |
You might find this excerpt from Division 5 of D7 Newsletter (pdf page 8) to be of interest:
After that remark, the SO-PA then makes an announcement of a new D7 Policy ("Your mileage and district may vary.")
How timely do you think the press releases are going to be now - given the notorious Aux Rusty Chain? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Am I reading it right that you have to have your internal newsletters reviewed by higher authority before publication?
|
|||
|
|
Member |
I always learned the main tenet of public affairs was "Maximum disclosure, Minimum delay"... What should be gleaned from this is that it is a good idea to swing interviews up the chain before doing them. The internal newsletter bit is probably a byproduct of a some racy stuff that I've seen in some flotilla newsletters. |
|||
|
|
10 day suspension for disruptive postings. TOS Section 6(i). 10/8/08 |
Paper publications are only a small part of it. How about all flotilla web sites, where the information posted is available not only locally, but throughout the world? I guess if they wanted to get the story out, they could have included it in the minutes which would then be posted on the flotilla's web site.
...gjd |
|||
|
|
We have met the enemy and he is us. Pogo |
Am I reading it right that you have to have your internal newsletters reviewed by higher authority before publication?
I'll save you the exact cite but flotilla newsletters have always been subject to review by the DirAux. He can and usually does delegate that to the Aux - usually the unit elected leader. Part of the review is a content review. The other part is to make sure the flotilla isn't breaking the rules regarding ads. Does anybody know how many Auxies were run thru the Nat PA course - the one that used to get you Boat Rides in CA? If the Aux is still having problems with PA - is that course doing any good or is it just another 'feel good' and a way to waste the CG's money? |
|||
|
|
Member |
This is the typical Auxiliary knee-jerk response to USCG criticism of an Auxiliary article. Instead of standing up, the leadership folds under the scowl of the USCG and becomes more dictatorial and restrictive. To be fair, the USCG criticism is often well founded because as I said before, we have a very schizophrenic message and regional focus and attention on Auxiliary affairs varies wildly. Until we decide who we are and what our direction is as an organization, these messages will continue to be very mixed. That's what causes "blue-light" and illegal covert patrol activity. The PA courses offered were/are pretty good. They try real hard to explain the nuances and elephant traps of working with the USCG. But folks who take those courses soon move on and their replacements don't get trained. In this area at least, PS and PA are those "you don't have to do anything much, just fill the billet for us" types of jobs. And we pay a heavy price for that. |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Military.com Forums
Coast Guard Discussions
Coast Guard Auxiliary
Alabama Flotilla Gets Good Press...Not so Fast...

