Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
Hey Flyandscuba... Nice Throttle! Big Grin

 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Picture of MikeAux
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Now.. how big is your tiller?



Well, It's big enough to get the job done but not too big to be in the way. It's always steered me clear of rough waters. Now, turn about is fair play: How wide is your beam and how buoyant are your ballasts?
 
Posts: 81 | Registered: Fri 25 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Gimpycoxn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Forewatch:
Yep, I sure am giving back the sexist comments. You don't like it Tam, do you? Makes you a little uncomfortable?

That was my point.

Now.. do tell me what your tiller is like!


You are THE ONLY ONE making sexist comments!

Sheesh!

And, I'm happy to critique your next video. Actually, I was going to discuss your Boys and their Toys video.. but I thought the subject matter (the boys profiled) was more ridiculous than the production content... so I weighed in on that instead.
 
Posts: 729 | Registered: Thu 06 June 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
Don't like it, do you Gimpy? I think I've made my point.

Oh, btw... yet another tight plunging v-neck on Miss Stacy today.
 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Picture of MikeAux
Posted Hide Post
quote:
h, btw... yet another tight plunging v-neck on Miss Stacy today.


So that would mean that you purposely went to the web site and watched the show. If it offends you so much, why did you go back? That just doesn't make sense.
 
Posts: 81 | Registered: Fri 25 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Skyray
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Oh, btw... yet another tight plunging v-neck on Miss (sic) Stacy today.


If you got it, flaunt it.
 
Posts: 786 | Registered: Sun 14 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Gimpycoxn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Forewatch:
Don't like it, do you Gimpy? I think I've made my point.

Oh, btw... yet another tight plunging v-neck on Miss Stacy today.


If your point is that you are childish, immature and want to bother someon with your opinions when they cannot do anything about your "problem"... You have made your point. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 729 | Registered: Thu 06 June 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gimpycoxn:


If your point is that you are childish, immature and want to bother someon with your opinions when they cannot do anything about your "problem"... You have made your point. Roll Eyes


Oh, my... I do believe I hit a nerve! Smile
 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
It's funny that she's accusing everyone here of being testosterone-driven morons and bashing boaters.tv for using sex to draw viewers and depicting women as sex objects and then she posts:

Originally posted by Forwatch:
quote:
Oh, btw... yet another tight plunging v-neck on Miss Stacy today


She should go to work in their marketing department. Big Grin
 
Posts: 202 | Registered: Wed 13 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Skyray
Posted Hide Post
Oh, to be testosterone driven again. Move over, Bob Dole.
 
Posts: 786 | Registered: Sun 14 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended
Mainedawg
Moderator
Hot TopicS
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 222 | Registered: Wed 20 February 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Forewatch:


Yeah.. my opinion isn't shared-- because this forum is made up of 99-percent testosterone poisoned men. Smile



That and the fact that they don't want to come off as hypocritical as you. Remeber when we were talking about uniform rank insignia and someone referred to the CAP cadet (and some J/ROTC) "diamond and circle jerk" system of rank insignia? Who got all prude and offended at that time? The same person making accusations now?
 
Posts: 583 | Registered: Thu 18 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eirikr1:
quote:
Originally posted by Forewatch:


Yeah.. my opinion isn't shared-- because this forum is made up of 99-percent testosterone poisoned men. Smile



That and the fact that they don't want to come off as hypocritical as you. Remeber when we were talking about uniform rank insignia and someone referred to the CAP cadet (and some J/ROTC) "diamond and circle jerk" system of rank insignia? Who got all prude and offended at that time? The same person making accusations now?


Yes, thanks for bringing that up and making my point! I don't like sexual vulgarity nor do I like sexual inappropriateness... which is why I think Stacy's plunging neckline and tight leotard attire is inappropriate and clearly pandering to the male hormones.

The bikini story was another blantant example of this. As was the former hostess who reads her copy with her hands on her hips to jut out her breasts.

This is not the Playboy Channel.. but a web show about a hobby shared by men and (SURPRISE!) women too!

I voiced my opinion, and some of the men on this forum got defensive... and even seeing fit to attack me.

So.. it was time for an object lesson. To make you understand how objectifying a woman feels, I turned the table on you. (Plural-you).

All of a sudden, these same men started squirming. They didn't like that their male anatomy was being focused on. Like the bikini ice fishing story, they were suddenly being objectified.

Do feel free to print this thread out and discuss it at your next sexual harrassment workshop.
 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
So.. it was time for an object lesson. To make you understand how objectifying a woman feels, I turned the table on you. (Plural-you).


Lame excuse, Chris.


(Just like a woman!) Big Grin

...gjd
 
Posts: 10011 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by geejaydee:

Lame excuse, Chris.

(Just like a woman!) Big Grin

...gjd


Hits you squarely in the tiller.. doesn't it, Georgie?
 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post


.gjd
 
Posts: 10011 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Originally posted by Forewatch:


FW>:Yes, thanks for bringing that up and making my point! I don't like sexual vulgarity nor do I like sexual inappropriateness... which is why I think Stacy's plunging neckline and tight leotard attire is inappropriate and clearly pandering to the male hormones.

You don't like vulgarity, and demonstrate it by making tiller jokes and posting pics of phallic tillers. Doesn't bother me, but brings a pretty good focus on your hypocripsy.

FW:>The bikini story was another blantant example of this. As was the former hostess who reads her copy with her hands on her hips to jut out her breasts.

Just wondering..where does a young woman get a book with all these rules of postures she can never assume, clothes she can never wear, and attitudes/opinions she dare never express, without being a ****? And who makes these rules? Do you bother giving a warning first, or go straight to condemntion?


FW>I voiced my opinion, and some of the men on this forum got defensive... and even seeing fit to attack me.

The only attacks I saw were over your hypocripsy. The first person I saw being defensive, of course, was you.

So.. it was time for an object lesson. To make you understand how objectifying a woman feels, I turned the table on you. (Plural-you).

FW>:All of a sudden, these same men started squirming. They didn't like that their male anatomy was being focused on. Like the bikini ice fishing story, they were suddenly being objectified.

Actually, you can objectify and focus on my male anatomy like the rest of the tramps all you want, and it won't bother me a bit. Might even find yourself twenty dollars richer, just lock the door on your way out.
 
Posts: 583 | Registered: Thu 18 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eirikr1:


Actually, you can objectify and focus on my male anatomy like the rest of the tramps all you want, and it won't bother me a bit. Might even find yourself twenty dollars richer, just lock the door on your way out.


Awwww! You big bad meanie. You hurt my wittle fee fees!
 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of flyandscuba
Posted Hide Post
What an interesting twist it would be if someone would have told Forewatch on this forum that she "had" to wear high-necked blouses and figure-covering blazers as a woman on television -- lest any plunging necklines or tight-fitting blouses draw inappropriate attention to the female form...that anything less was a crude and vulgar display of a sexual nature...

What an outcry and response do you think we would see?? We all know the answer. Roll Eyes

If conservative dress codes must be the norm for women, there is an organization actively recruiting for new members -- and they don't require a PSI process.... It is called the Taliban...
 
Posts: 558 | Registered: Fri 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Forewatch
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flyandscuba:
What an interesting twist it would be if someone would have told Forewatch on this forum that she "had" to wear high-necked blouses and figure-covering blazers as a woman on television -- lest any plunging necklines or tight-fitting blouses draw inappropriate attention to the female form...that anything less was a crude and vulgar display of a sexual nature...

What an outcry and response do you think we would see?? We all know the answer. Roll Eyes

If conservative dress codes must be the norm for women, there is an organization actively recruiting for new members -- and they don't require a PSI process.... It is called the Taliban...


I would bet that Stacy was pressured to wear those tight little things.

It seems to be part of the Boat U.S. webcast "uniform" pandering to horny men. Check out the outfits on the other two former hosts.

This is intentionally sexually provocative clothing in a webcast aimed at boaters--( note: both genders own boats).

And once again, her outfits aren't the only issue.. the bikini ice fishing is the other. So where is my tiller story???!!!!
 
Posts: 3815 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 


© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.