A cut and paste for your consideration

Global warming has stopped!

Recent scientific studies may make 2007 go down in history as the "tipping point" of man-made global warming fears. A progression of peer-reviewed studies have been published which serve to debunk the United Nations on climate change.

Paleoclimate scientist Bob Carter, who has testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works (LINK), noted in a June 18, 2007 essay that global warming has stopped.

“The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998. Oddly, this eight-year-long temperature stasis has occurred despite an increase over the same period of 15 parts per million (or 4 per cent) in atmospheric CO2. Second, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements, if corrected for non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, show little if any global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 %),” (LINK)

In August 2007, the UK Met Office was finally forced to concede the obvious: global warming has stopped. (LINK) The UK Met Office acknowledged the flat lining of global temperatures, but in an apparent attempt to keep stoking man-made climate alarm, the Met Office is now promoting more unproven dire computer model projections of the future. They now claim climate computer models predict “global warming will begin in earnest in 2009” because greenhouse emissions will then overtake natural climate variability.

Southern Hemisphere is COOLING

UN scientist Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar, a retired Environment Canada scientist and an expert IPCC reviewer in 2007, explained on August 6, 2007 that the Southern Hemisphere is cooling. “In the Southern Hemisphere, the land-area mean temperature has slowly but surely declined in the last few years. The city of Buenos Aires in Argentina received several centimeters of snowfall in early July, and the last time it snowed in Buenos Aires was in 1918! Most of Australia experienced one of its coldest months of June this year. Several other locations in the Southern Hemisphere have experienced lower temperatures in the last few years. Further, the sea surface temperatures over world oceans are slowly declining since mid-1998, according to a recent world-wide analysis of ocean surface temperatures," Dr. Khandekar explained. (LINK)

Meteorologist Joseph Conklin, who launched the skeptical website www.ClimatePolice.com in 2007, recently declared the “global warming movement [is] falling apart.”

“A few months ago, a study came out that demonstrated global temperatures have leveled off. But instead of possibly admitting that this whole global warming thing is a farce, a group of British scientists concluded that the real global warming won’t start until 2009,” Conklin wrote in an August 10, 2007 blog post on his website. (LINK)

Climate models made by unlicensed 'software engineers'

But the credibility of these computer model predictions took a significant hit in June 2007 when Dr. Jim Renwick, a top UN IPCC scientist, admitted that climate models do not account for half the variability in nature and thus are not reliable. "Half of the variability in the climate system is not predictable, so we don’t expect to do terrifically well," Renwick conceded. (LINK)

Another high-profile UN IPCC lead author, Dr. Kevin Trenberth, recently echoed Renwick’s sentiments about climate models by referring to them as “story lines.”

“In fact there are no predictions by IPCC at all. And there never have been. The IPCC instead proffers ‘what if’ projections of future climate that correspond to certain emissions scenarios,” Trenberth wrote in journal Nature’s blog on June 4, 2007. He also admitted that the climate models have major shortcomings because “they do not consider many things like the recovery of the ozone layer, for instance, or observed trends in forcing agents. There is no estimate, even probabilistically, as to the likelihood of any emissions scenario and no best guess." (LINK)

IPCC reviewer and climate researcher Dr Vincent Gray, of New Zealand, an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990 and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of "Climate Change 2001," declared “The claims of the IPCC are dangerous unscientific nonsense” in an April 10, 2007 article. (LINK)

“All [UN IPCC does] is make ‘projections’ and ‘estimates’. No climate model has ever been properly tested, which is what ‘validation’ means, and their ‘projections’ are nothing more than the opinions of ‘experts’ with a conflict of interest, because they are paid to produce the models. There is no actual scientific evidence for all these ‘projections’ and ‘estimates,'” Gray noted.

In addtion, meteorologist Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, a scientific pioneer in the development of numerical weather prediction and former director of research at The Netherlands' Royal National Meteorological Institute, recently compared scientists who promote computer models predicting future climate doom to unlicensed “software engineers."

"I am of the opinion that most scientists engaged in the design, development, and tuning of climate models are in fact software engineers. They are unlicensed, hence unqualified to sell their products to society," Tennekes wrote on February 28, 2007. (LINK)



Should we spend a trillion dollars on "Global warming" when, in fact, the earth is cooling?

10-30-2007 06:24 AM

The last ice age was precipitated by global warming and the melted glacier water from the Great Lakes spilling over into the Atlantic Ocean via the now St. Lawrence Seaway cooling the ocean. This turned off the Atlantic's warm ocean currents (Earth's weather engine) which caused the last ice age.

The next ice age is occurring now with Greenland's ice melting into the Atlantic at an alarming rate.

Ice ages has happened many times in earths history, this will be one of the fastest or fastest to occur.

And the government wants you to worry about Usama bin Forgotten in the mean time.

Get your overcoats out, myself I won't be here

I have heard that Aliens are not coming from outer space but in fact are coming from another time and space rift from a dimensional fold, passing in and out of our dimension into theirs. So if Aliens or future humans are coming from a fourth dimension, that means they may have figured a way to vent their CO2 and pollution into out time and space, leaving their time and space free of greenhouse gases and global cooling or warming vapors.

I say it's chaos effect, where a man in China farts, then a butterfly dies from bad air here in America.

quote:

Originally posted by 10th:
The last ice age was precipitated by global warming and the melted glacier water from the Great Lakes spilling over into the Atlantic Ocean via the now St. Lawrence Seaway cooling the ocean. This turned off the Atlantic's warm ocean currents (Earth's weather engine) which caused the last ice age.

The next ice age is occurring now with Greenland's ice melting into the Atlantic at an alarming rate.

Ice ages has happened many times in earths history, this will be one of the fastest or fastest to occur.

And the government wants you to worry about Usama bin Forgotten in the mean time.

Get your overcoats out, myself I won't be here

Yeah....I saw "the day after tomorrow" too.

quote:

Get your overcoats out, myself I won't be here

Yeh, ...well, ..I will be.

Sf,
--the 11th

A big problem with the believability of the 'climate models' is that they don't work backwards. No inputs into the model seem to stop or reverse global warming.

And I doubt we could change the planet's weather if we actually tried.

The Earth seems to have absorbed all the nukes we set off in the 40'- and into the 60's, not to mention all the green house gases and polution we put into the air and sea during WWII.

Another thing:
The Ozone hole was around,,,
and the same size, before we even invented Freon. And on & on.

I often wonder how the scientist's (who do the climate research on grant money) results would look if thier paychecks weren't directly linked to them coming up with the 'right' conclusions.

.

quote:

often wonder how the scientist's (who do the climate research on grant money) results would look if thier paychecks weren't directly linked to them coming up with the 'right' conclusions.

Bingo!!!!!!!!!!!!! See Matt Lauer go Green, then had NBC? Football show go dark for green cause....so much BS!
It replaces the What your sign?, Pyramid power and mood ring as getting a lay with trend following beotches.

A scientist in climatology in Alabama said we may be warming but it's cyclical and there is nothing we can do about it. He also went on to say we are being presumption to thing we are living in the ideal climate. Warmer climate in the north means a longer growing season, lesser need for heating fuel etc..