|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
In the News
Obama: Honduras' Coup "Not Legal" ...|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
Did you also read the associated docs adopted later, sort of like the Amendments to the US constitition? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Not a fan. Saw a clip on MSNBC. |
|||
|
|
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate |
Link to that which you refer and I'll be happy to tell you whether I've read it or not ... I've read the current, updated OAS charter. I'm still waiting a quote that substantiates previous assertions ... |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
Short of force, that's exactly what the Charter calls for "b) To promote and consolidate representative democracy, with due respect for the principle of nonintervention;" Short of force, just how would one go about "Promoting Democracy? Indeed, part of the earlier quotes from the charter I gave you states that overthrowing a Democratic Government REQUIRES stripping such a country of their membership rights. How can such a thing occur without actions? Dave |
|||
|
|
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate |
So let the OAS strip the HOnduras of its membership rights ... and Obama follow our law and terminate foreign aid ... though as I have argued and you have refrained from answering ... stripping a president of his authority and revesting it in another democratically elected official ... without changing the form of government ... is hardly overthrowing a democracy. I ask again ... what defines what occurred in the Honduras as "not legal"? ... and your quotation from the OAS charter, with all due respect, doesn't require jack diddley from Obama. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
So Dave (and others), this was not a coup.
If it was, then what we did to Nixon in the 70s was also a coup. The supreme court and the congress chose to oust a bad president according to their constitution. It doesnt get any clearer than that. There is nothing to intervene in as the government wasnt deposed, democracy is in fact functioning as required under their constitution. There will be an interim president until the presidential elections are held, according to the constitution. Why must some of you read more into it than what really happened. Please someone tell me (quoting specific paragraphs in the Honduran constitution) exactly what was done illegally. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
The leftist government of Honduras is still intact Dave. This fact doesn't seem to matter to some folks. The very leftist President Zelaya, rancher, Oligarthy, Christian, Dictator however you want to describe him ran afoul of the establishment but continued to go against the rightful government. He, was not the government. To force a referendum his own party turned against him. In one manner of speaking I like mavericks but he played his hand and lost.
Honduras was attack by El Salvador in what they caled the Soccer wars. It took the OAS two days to respond giving nothing to support their defensive effort. By the OAS inaction once Honduras ridded themselves of the intruders several tens of thousands Salvadorean were displaced back to their own country setting up a human disaster far more than the war itself. Central America has seen the Ortega, Military Generals, Sandinista, Castro, your bud Hugo and many others. Legalese OAS establishes a democratic process, free elections, absent from intimidation. How can you pick on Honduras with Chavez the dictator arresting the oppostition, Castro imprisoning them. Foremost in any charter it will say any State has the right of self protection from enemies home or abroad. I think Honduras just solved both problems by the early retirement of Zelaya.. |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
I find it odd, that the Supreme Court decision was made in secret and announced after the fact. A hallmark of Democracy? You (and others) ask what occured that wasn't legal? I have a hard time with this response because it covers the actions of almost every dictatorship that ever existed. If this is the defintion of "legality," we're in deep trouble. I will repeat, I am absolutely against the use of force to restore him. But it was more than one man who was overthrown. It was Democracy itself that was overthrown. Their following the "law," in and of itself means nothing. Was there a public debate? Nope Was there an invesitgation? Nope Hearings? Nope Did he continue to push for a binding referendum, which at LEAST would provide his opponents with a fig leaf for their acts? Nope - He obeyed the Court. Dave |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
So then, you would have opposed those who got rid of Communism in Russia because they "broke the law?" You support the Chinese in their quashing of the Tibetan People, because they were upholding the law? And all of this, because he wanted to hold a non-binding referendum? Oh the horror of finding out what the Honduran People actually think. Dave |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
Cuba, may or may not be readmitted to the OAS. Chavez has arrested NO ONE JUST because they oppose him. Those in jail belong in jail because THEY not him commited acts of violence against the People of Venezualla. All of those who monitor Venezuallan elections unanimously report they are Free and Fair. You just don't like Democracy Ray, because your side (horror of horrors) can actually lose. Dave |
|||
|
|
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate |
LOL ... he wouldn't ... but Obama apparently would have. Obama's the "not legal" guy, remember? |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
Zalaya is being called a "Leftist." In our country he would be called a moderate Republican. A RINO... The only "leftist" move he's made is cuddling up to Chavez in order to get a break on the price of oil. Let those who routinely call him a leftist, give us a list of his leftist moves? They CAN'T. They can't because even Republicans would consider his proposals simple and elementary. Plain and simple, like any dictatorial ruling group, the Oligarchs of Honduras wrote a "fail safe" Constitution. Such is part of the stock and trade of all dictatorships. When this maverick moved to promote basic human rights, they've gone ballistic. Dave |
|||
|
|
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate |
LMAO ... you win Dave ... I can't top that. It's a dictatorship because its Constitution precludes establishing the conditions needed for a dictator to take control. Got it. Clear. |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
No the difference is that the opposition in Honduras did not follow the legal requirements to get rid of the president. While Zelaya probably broke the law by pushing the referendum the opposition rather than following the rule of law decided to oust him from power and in doing so violated their country's constitution themselves. What Honduras needs to do is follow their own law and impeach Zelaya not have the oligarchs use their control of the military to kick him out of the country. Nations should be run by laws and not human whim so IMO Zelaya should be returned to the presidency in Honduras and then face impeachment for any constitutional violations he's committed. |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
The Honduran Constitution provides for Impeachment of the President. So tell me, what exactly was the emergency that prompted a military coup? Can the US Supreme Court order the arrest, detention and removal from office of ANY Amercian politician? As I said, this Constitution was written as a fail safe Constitution, in which there is NO WAY for reforms to take place. The Constitution in fact gives emergency powers to the President to suspend Congress and ignore the Courts. Because normally "threats" come from an outraged public. Honduras, the poorest country in Latin America, didn't get to this position by accident; but rather by policy. You can defend them, as Flanker defacto defends the Russian Communists, or the Chinese perpetuators of genocide - But I see no reason to back the oligarchs because of their "law." The purpose of law is no more and no less, then the perpetuation of common sense and reason. Read our Constitution for an example. Dave |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
Home of the people think:
""http://lagringasblogicito.blogspot.com/ We should, of course "meddle" here in Honduras, but not with murdering islamofascists in the ME and JP Facist./Communist governments in the Western Hemisphere, right? |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
From your link:
No wonder they are so terrified of a referendum. They're afraid they would win? Dave |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Instead of writing a long response trying to explain what happened in Honduras, but this blog summed it up rather nicely.
<<http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2009/06/honduras-defending-democracy-and.html>> |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
PECULIAR response, Dave. Got anything better?
Got a link to the 1982 Honduran Constituion in ENGLISH? Mr. Obama won't "meddle" in Iran, Syria, Cuba, etc. politics, but seems gleeful to "meddle" in Israel and Honduras' affairs. Why is that Dave, as you seem to have access to info. we don't. |
|||
|
|
suspended pending review,Nemesis |
As we have been informed by people like yourself, only leftists anxious to impose Socialism would even dream of calling this a Coup, or an attack on Democracy... Here are some selected comments from various crazed leftist groups...
Clearly the menace of Socialism is growing... Dave |
|||
|
| Powered by Eve Community | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
In the News
Obama: Honduras' Coup "Not Legal" ...

