Followers of Al Sadr has on more than one occassion attacked the Grand Ayatollah and now seeks his support.


Sadr aide criticises Iraq's Sistani



An aide to Muqtada al-Sadr has lashed out at Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's most revered Shia cleric, for keeping silent over clashes that have killed hundreds in Baghdad.
Fifteen people were killed and dozens wounded in fighting in the Sadr City district of the capital on Friday, US and Iraqi officials said.
The area is home to some of the poorest Shia in Iraq, and forms the bedrock of support for al-Sadr and his al-Mahdi Army militia.
US forces have killed 25 fighters in two days of clashes in the area.
Hospitals in Sadr City said they had received four bodies and treated 51 wounded by Friday morning, but gave no further casualty figures after that. Children were among the wounded.
Fighting has raged in Baghdad since Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, ordered a crackdown on fighters in late March.
Several hundred people have been killed since then and while al-Maliki said the crackdown was to disarm groups of fighters, al-Sadr's followers see it as an attempt to sideline them ahead of local elections in October.
'Silence from Najaf'
Speaking at Friday prayers, Sheikh Sattar Battat, an aide to al-Sadr, said he was "surprised" that al-Sistani had failed to condemn the violence.
"We are surprised by the silence in Najaf where the highest Shiite religious authority is based," he said, referring to al-Sistani.
"For 50 days Sadr City is being bombed ... Children, women and old people are being killed by all kinds of US weapons, and Najaf remains silent."

Battat said the al-Sadr movement has not seen any "reaction or fatwa [religious decree] from Najaf" criticising the government assault on Shia fighters in Sadr City.
"For us this means that Najaf accepts the massacre in Sadr City," he said.
Shia clerics, including al-Sistani, have remained silent despite the high numbers of people killed since al-Maliki ordered the crackdown.
Also on Friday, fighters launched rockets towards the fortified Green Zone, taking advantage of a sandstorm that gave cover from attacks by US aircraft.
US forces did not confirm any strikes inside the Green Zone but one rocket damaged the bureau of the BBC.

Funny how it all works out in the end, eh Ray? The US is backing Maliki who has closer ties to Tehran than Sadr does.

Y'know, if America had backed Iran instead of Hussein during the Iran/Iraq war, the situation we are in now (that of Iraq becoming controlled politically by Iran) could have been achieved without any US blood-letting at all.

quote:

Originally posted by Squizzer:
Funny how it all works out in the end, eh Ray? The US is backing Maliki who has closer ties to Tehran than Sadr does.

Y'know, if America had backed Iran instead of Hussein during the Iran/Iraq war, the situation we are in now (that of Iraq becoming controlled politically by Iran) could have been achieved without any US blood-letting at all.

A good point. As well as the Kurds (Talabani) being good buds with Tehran.

We'll never know if we could have made progress with the ayatollahs by not following the Sunni Arab world and stay nuetral in the 80's. I'll just guess the 444 days hostage crisis, blowing up our embassy in Beirut, marine barracks, hanging Lt Colonel Higgins and the tanker wars (to name a few) had a little something to do with our choosing Riyadh, Cairo, Amman, and Damascus. Another 30 years we might find out if there's a winner.