Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    CIA Cites Big Gains Against Al-Qaeda
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
GREAT NEWS!

Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaeda, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Story
 
Posts: 1895 | Registered: Wed 12 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
Ah, your point is?...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22582 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Banned by admin
Posted Hide Post
well it takes time and its paying off....
 
Posts: 39661 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
Ah, your point is?...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
No point other than this is great news for those of us invested in success in Iraq.
 
Posts: 1895 | Registered: Wed 12 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of oldmole
Posted Hide Post
Frankly it was news that we were fighting AQ in Saudi Arabia, so the victory seems less praiseworthy.

Can we go home now? I have heard numbers like 90% contained ... and find them, shall we say, optimistic. Granted, they have been having great trouble operating without antagonizing the locals ... a fundamental flaw that has little to do with what we are doing to them.

But I am curious as to what effect this should have on our operations. Can we safely reduce troop levels? If not, why not? Cool
 
Posts: 10931 | Registered: Mon 05 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by oldmole:
Frankly it was news that we were fighting AQ in Saudi Arabia, so the victory seems less praiseworthy.

Can we go home now? I have heard numbers like 90% contained ... and find them, shall we say, optimistic. Granted, they have been having great trouble operating without antagonizing the locals ... a fundamental flaw that has little to do with what we are doing to them.

But I am curious as to what effect this should have on our operations. Can we safely reduce troop levels? If not, why not? Cool


What would be a criteria for success for you?
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22582 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Banned by admin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Frankly it was news that we were fighting AQ in Saudi Arabia,

the saudi gov is doing it...alqueda has been trying to destabilize saudi arabia for years now....
 
Posts: 39661 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of oldmole
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
quote:
Originally posted by oldmole:
Frankly it was news that we were fighting AQ in Saudi Arabia, so the victory seems less praiseworthy.

Can we go home now? I have heard numbers like 90% contained ... and find them, shall we say, optimistic. Granted, they have been having great trouble operating without antagonizing the locals ... a fundamental flaw that has little to do with what we are doing to them.

But I am curious as to what effect this should have on our operations. Can we safely reduce troop levels? If not, why not? Cool


What would be a criteria for success for you?
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


I am not sure we see success in the same way. I would see success as accomplishing our mission enough to start withdrawing ... General Hayden seems to see "success" as a reason why we can't. Cool
 
Posts: 10931 | Registered: Mon 05 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by oldmole:
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
quote:
Originally posted by oldmole:
Frankly it was news that we were fighting AQ in Saudi Arabia, so the victory seems less praiseworthy.

Can we go home now? I have heard numbers like 90% contained ... and find them, shall we say, optimistic. Granted, they have been having great trouble operating without antagonizing the locals ... a fundamental flaw that has little to do with what we are doing to them.

But I am curious as to what effect this should have on our operations. Can we safely reduce troop levels? If not, why not? Cool


What would be a criteria for success for you?
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


I am not sure we see success in the same way. I would see success as accomplishing our mission enough to start withdrawing ... General Hayden seems to see "success" as a reason why we can't. Cool



Seems that you and I may see success in the same light...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22582 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
"In a strikingly upbeat assessment, the CIA chief cited major gains against al-Qaeda's allies in the Middle East and an increasingly successful campaign to destabilize the group's core leadership."

It's amazing how all friggin assessments (Good or Bad), from the Administration seem to achieve about 60 to 70 percent negative comments after posting here. But, of course there's no pre-conceived biases allowed here -- only, fair and balanced.

God Bless President Bush and all our leaders. They deserve much more credit than we give them.

From A Proud Vietnam Veteran
 
Posts: 3381 | Registered: Sun 19 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Serafinosdream
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by outlaws93:
quote:
Frankly it was news that we were fighting AQ in Saudi Arabia,

the saudi gov is doing it...alqueda has been trying to destabilize saudi arabia for years now....


Now we know, Sir, it would be extremely difficult to obtain "other" news around the world... when fixed on slicing & dicing every vowel spoken or every "spec" of this administration to find fault & spin webs of lies about them & President Bush ... don't we? Truth would crack the varnished views & twisted spewing from MoveOn... taken as fact, without research. lol Wink

NEWS would be categorized as propaganda from the far right-wing conspiracy. lol

Missed ya oldmole! (elbow-taps her friend with different views) Big Grin
Proud Vietnam Vets WIFE
Deauna
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: Tue 27 July 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky_Lieutenant:
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
Ah, your point is?...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
No point other than this is great news for those of us invested in success in Iraq.


If you go with the President’s pattern of lowered expectations and are happy with the goal of “Success is not no violence” then there is reason to celebrate the assessment that "On balance, we are doing pretty well" in Iraq.

Success is not victory though.

There is no victory available in Iraq.

After all the blood, sweat, tears and treasure spent in Iraq, the enemies of American are as strong or stronger than the day Operation Iraqi Freedom began.

Iran is far more influential in the Middle East than is was before President Bush decided to invade Iraq. Despite the best efforts of the Administration, the Iranians are still working on nuclear capability.

Hezbollah has more seats in the Lebanese Parliament than when W. became President and fought Israel to a standstill in 2006. With backing from Syria, they are now a more dominate factor in Lebanon.

Hamas was elected to lead the Palestinian people on W.’s watch and now controls the Gaza strip. They had never officially controlled anything before.

Syria withdrew security forces from Lebanon, but still has great influence in that country’s politics and continues to supply Hezbollah, including rockets that are fired into Israel and to assassinate Lebanese leaders.

North Korea continues to d!ck us around, promising to give up their nukes, but they have not, although we have started to give them food and fuel oil again.

Afghanistan is struggling to maintain its gains. President Karzai has control of the capitol Kabul, but not much else. Despite the best efforts of NATO forces, the Taliban is still a threat to the country. Afghanistan supplies more than 70% of the world’s heroin, which in turn supplies the Taliban and al Qaeda with money to further terrorism.

President Bush has lost ground on the war on drugs also, with Afghanistan leading the way in supplying the world with heroin and porous southern border where drugs still stream in from Mexico.

Shia Militias are as strong as ever and some continue to kill Americans and Iraqi officials.
Many Sunni have joined forces with American forces and fight against al Qaeda. Many do not and still kill Americans and ISF. Some play both sides of the fence, they kill al Qaeda and Americans.

Al Qaeda in Iraq – American forces have done an outstanding job in going after al Qaeda in Iraq. But they are still a force to be reckoned with, one that did not exist before the invasion of Iraq.

Al Qaeda was crippled after the U.S. drove them out of Afghanistan. However they are now reconstituting and now have safe bases in Pakistan from which to plan and train for the next large scale attack on America. Al Qaeda is as big a threat to American as they were before 9/11, only their target has been hardened.

President Bush can count one enduring victory as CinC – Saddam Hussein is out of power.
 
Posts: 2480 | Registered: Sat 27 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended pending review,Nemesis
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WesLemmon:
"In a strikingly upbeat assessment, the CIA chief cited major gains against al-Qaeda's allies in the Middle East and an increasingly successful campaign to destabilize the group's core leadership."

It's amazing how all friggin assessments (Good or Bad), from the Administration seem to achieve about 60 to 70 percent negative comments after posting here. But, of course there's no pre-conceived biases allowed here -- only, fair and balanced.

God Bless President Bush and all our leaders. They deserve much more credit than we give them.

From A Proud Vietnam Veteran


He has ONLY himself to blame. No one else.

Dave
 
Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by oldmole:
I am not sure we see success in the same way. I would see success as accomplishing our mission enough to start withdrawing ... General Hayden seems to see "success" as a reason why we can't. Cool
Well, by that standard CERTAINLY Bill's Balkans war was a failure right?
 
Posts: 1895 | Registered: Wed 12 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by xerello:
If you go with the President’s pattern of lowered expectations and are happy with the goal of “Success is not no violence” then there is reason to celebrate the assessment that "On balance, we are doing pretty well" in Iraq.

Success is not victory though.

There is no victory available in Iraq.

After all the blood, sweat, tears and treasure spent in Iraq, the enemies of American are as strong or stronger than the day Operation Iraqi Freedom began.

Iran is far more influential in the Middle East than is was before President Bush decided to invade Iraq. Despite the best efforts of the Administration, the Iranians are still working on nuclear capability.

Hezbollah has more seats in the Lebanese Parliament than when W. became President and fought Israel to a standstill in 2006. With backing from Syria, they are now a more dominate factor in Lebanon.

Hamas was elected to lead the Palestinian people on W.’s watch and now controls the Gaza strip. They had never officially controlled anything before.

Syria withdrew security forces from Lebanon, but still has great influence in that country’s politics and continues to supply Hezbollah, including rockets that are fired into Israel and to assassinate Lebanese leaders.

North Korea continues to d!ck us around, promising to give up their nukes, but they have not, although we have started to give them food and fuel oil again.

Afghanistan is struggling to maintain its gains. President Karzai has control of the capitol Kabul, but not much else. Despite the best efforts of NATO forces, the Taliban is still a threat to the country. Afghanistan supplies more than 70% of the world’s heroin, which in turn supplies the Taliban and al Qaeda with money to further terrorism.

President Bush has lost ground on the war on drugs also, with Afghanistan leading the way in supplying the world with heroin and porous southern border where drugs still stream in from Mexico.

Shia Militias are as strong as ever and some continue to kill Americans and Iraqi officials.
Many Sunni have joined forces with American forces and fight against al Qaeda. Many do not and still kill Americans and ISF. Some play both sides of the fence, they kill al Qaeda and Americans.

Al Qaeda in Iraq – American forces have done an outstanding job in going after al Qaeda in Iraq. But they are still a force to be reckoned with, one that did not exist before the invasion of Iraq.

Al Qaeda was crippled after the U.S. drove them out of Afghanistan. However they are now reconstituting and now have safe bases in Pakistan from which to plan and train for the next large scale attack on America. Al Qaeda is as big a threat to American as they were before 9/11, only their target has been hardened.

President Bush can count one enduring victory as CinC – Saddam Hussein is out of power.
Yep... all that if you really want to replace facts with subjective rhetoric, however, the FACT REMAINS THAT CLINTON GOT THE 3000+ innocents killed on 911 through his FAILED DIPLOMATIC SABER RATTLING DIDN'T HE?
 
Posts: 1895 | Registered: Wed 12 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky_Lieutenant:
quote:
Originally posted by xerello:
If you go with the President’s pattern of lowered expectations and are happy with the goal of “Success is not no violence” then there is reason to celebrate the assessment that "On balance, we are doing pretty well" in Iraq.

Success is not victory though.

There is no victory available in Iraq.

After all the blood, sweat, tears and treasure spent in Iraq, the enemies of American are as strong or stronger than the day Operation Iraqi Freedom began.

Iran is far more influential in the Middle East than is was before President Bush decided to invade Iraq. Despite the best efforts of the Administration, the Iranians are still working on nuclear capability.

Hezbollah has more seats in the Lebanese Parliament than when W. became President and fought Israel to a standstill in 2006. With backing from Syria, they are now a more dominate factor in Lebanon.

Hamas was elected to lead the Palestinian people on W.’s watch and now controls the Gaza strip. They had never officially controlled anything before.

Syria withdrew security forces from Lebanon, but still has great influence in that country’s politics and continues to supply Hezbollah, including rockets that are fired into Israel and to assassinate Lebanese leaders.

North Korea continues to d!ck us around, promising to give up their nukes, but they have not, although we have started to give them food and fuel oil again.

Afghanistan is struggling to maintain its gains. President Karzai has control of the capitol Kabul, but not much else. Despite the best efforts of NATO forces, the Taliban is still a threat to the country. Afghanistan supplies more than 70% of the world’s heroin, which in turn supplies the Taliban and al Qaeda with money to further terrorism.

President Bush has lost ground on the war on drugs also, with Afghanistan leading the way in supplying the world with heroin and porous southern border where drugs still stream in from Mexico.

Shia Militias are as strong as ever and some continue to kill Americans and Iraqi officials.
Many Sunni have joined forces with American forces and fight against al Qaeda. Many do not and still kill Americans and ISF. Some play both sides of the fence, they kill al Qaeda and Americans.

Al Qaeda in Iraq – American forces have done an outstanding job in going after al Qaeda in Iraq. But they are still a force to be reckoned with, one that did not exist before the invasion of Iraq.

Al Qaeda was crippled after the U.S. drove them out of Afghanistan. However they are now reconstituting and now have safe bases in Pakistan from which to plan and train for the next large scale attack on America. Al Qaeda is as big a threat to American as they were before 9/11, only their target has been hardened.

President Bush can count one enduring victory as CinC – Saddam Hussein is out of power.
Yep... all that if you really want to replace facts with subjective rhetoric, however, the FACT REMAINS THAT CLINTON GOT THE 3000+ innocents killed on 911 through his FAILED DIPLOMATIC SABER RATTLING DIDN'T HE?


Do the failures of President Clinton justify the failures of President Bush or does comparing one bad President to another make things not seem so bad?

What facts concerning America's enemies strength today do you dispute?
 
Posts: 2480 | Registered: Sat 27 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Suspended.
S_S
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky_Lieutenant:
GREAT NEWS!

Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaeda, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Story


Great news indeed! Big gains against 2% of the insurgency. Keep this up and they can all come home by the spring of 4637.
 
Posts: 4023 | Registered: Thu 08 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended pending review,Nemesis
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Squizzer:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky_Lieutenant:
GREAT NEWS!

Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaeda, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Story


Great news indeed! Big gains against 2% of the insurgency. Keep this up and they can all come home by the spring of 4637.


Meanwhile of course, we have this new thread on the board about the latest treaty that Pakistan has signed with the Taliban:
http://forums.military.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/672198221/m/7150081581001

How appropriate that the two discussions are so close together.

Dave
 
Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by Squizzer:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky_Lieutenant:
GREAT NEWS!

Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaeda, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Story


Great news indeed! Big gains against 2% of the insurgency. Keep this up and they can all come home by the spring of 4637.


Meanwhile of course, we have this new thread on the board about the latest treaty that Pakistan has signed with the Taliban:
http://forums.military.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/672198221/m/7150081581001

How appropriate that the two discussions are so close together.

Dave


O.K., what do you see is the connection?
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22582 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended pending review,Nemesis
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by Squizzer:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky_Lieutenant:
GREAT NEWS!

Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaeda, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Story


Great news indeed! Big gains against 2% of the insurgency. Keep this up and they can all come home by the spring of 4637.


Meanwhile of course, we have this new thread on the board about the latest treaty that Pakistan has signed with the Taliban:
http://forums.military.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/672198221/m/7150081581001

How appropriate that the two discussions are so close together.

Dave


O.K., what do you see is the connection?
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


How can Hayden claim that Al Qaeda and the Taliban are losing ground in Pakistan, when the Pakistani Government is busily engaged in signing treaties with them, giving them safty and safe havens?

Dave
 
Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    CIA Cites Big Gains Against Al-Qaeda

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.