|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
In the News
Haditha Marine prepares to sue Murtha over smear|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
Congressman had accused soldiers of killing 'in cold blood'
--------------------------------------------------------- Posted: June 18, 2008 6:14 pm Eastern © 2008 WorldNetDaily With most of the eight Marines charged in the Haditha, Iraq, incident now exonerated, the highest-ranking officer among the accused is considering a lawsuit against Democratic Rep. John Murtha, who fueled the case by declaring the men cold-blooded killers. In an interview with nationally syndicated radio talk host Michael Savage, the lead attorney for Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani said he and his client will look into suing Murtha and the Time magazine reporter, Tim McGuirk, who first published the accusations by Iraqi insurgents. But the attorney, Brian Rooney, said nothing will happen immediately because he wants Chessani, described as a devout Christian and the father of six homeschooled children, completely "out of the woods" legally before any action is taken. The government, through Lt. Col. S.M. Sullivan, today filed a notice that it would appeal the case to the next judicial level. As WND reported, a military judge at Camp Pendleton in California yesterday dismissed charges that Chessani failed to properly investigate the Nov. 19, 2005 incident in which 24 Iraqi men, women and children were killed. Rooney, an attorney for the Thomas More Law Center who served a tour of duty in Iraq himself, is urging citizens to tell their representatives in Congress and military officials that they want the case to come to an end. "At some point you have to have somebody in the chain of command, whether it's civilian or military, saying enough is enough," said Rooney, who served with Chessani in the second battle of Fallujah. Rooney told Savage the Haditha case is the largest investigation in the history of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, with 65 agents assigned by the government. The filing of charges against Chessani was approved by Gen. James Mattis, then commander of the Marine Corps Forces Central Command and commander of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton. Mattis has been promoted to commander of NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation and commander of U.S. Joint Forces. "This is the most important case since Vietnam, if not before," Rooney said. "There's no doubt about it." He noted the New York Times featured the case on the front page when it was being compared by war critics to the infamous My Lai massacre in Vietnam. But now, with evidence the Haditha accusations were a smear, the story has been relegated to the back pages. The military judge, Col. Steve Folsom, dismissed Chessani's charges without prejudice, giving permission for the prosecutors to continue trying to build a case that began in December 2006. Four Marines were charged with murder and another four with not properly investigating the incident. Defense lawyers contend insurgents deliberately attacked the Marines from hiding places where they surrounded themselves with civilians to use as shields. The defense insisted Chessani promptly reported the events to his superiors and that nobody in the chain of command believed there was any wrongdoing on the part of the Marines. Libel and defamation Rooney acknowledged to Savage it's difficult to sue a sitting congressman, but he believes it can be done. "If he leaves his realm of speaking from the congressman's point of view … then he can be sued for libel and defamation," Rooney said. The Time magazine story, according to Rooney, was planted by an insurgent propaganda agent. Publishing of the story was soon followed by a May 17, 2006, news conference by Murtha. The congressman announced he had been told by the highest levels of the Marine Corps there was no firefight and Marines "killed innocent civilians in cold blood." "All the information I get, it comes from the commanders, it comes from people who know what they're talking about," Murtha told reporters at the time. Murtha's assertions, however, conflicted with results from the military's own investigations. An initial probe by Army Col. G.A. Watt found no indications coalition forces "intentionally targeted, engaged and killed noncombatants." Later, Army Maj. Gen. Aldon Bargewell found no cover-up. Nevertheless, the Marine Corps eventually brought charges against Chessani and seven other Marines. But now the cases against Lance Cpls. Stephen Tatum and Justin Sharratt, Capts. Randy Stone and Lucas McConnell and Sgt. Sanick P. Dela Cruz have been dropped. First Lt. Andrew Grayson has been acquitted, leaving only the case of Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich untested in court and Chessani prosecutors facing the hurdles of the appeal process. WND previously reported a military jury of seven officers acquitted Grayson of all charges. The ruling by Col. Folsom yesterday followed a previous decision in which he confirmed evidence of unlawful command influence. The evidence indicated two generals who controlled Chessani's case were influenced by Marine lawyer Col. John Ewers, who was allowed to attend at least 25 closed-session meetings in which the case was discussed. Throwing Marines under the bus Rooney acknowledged the Haditha case taken a toll on the Marine Corps. "There's no doubt it's affected recruiting," he told Savage. "How could you have your sons or daughters join the Marine Corps when you're not sure the government will protect them?" Rooney was asked by Savage why he thought Murtha, a former Marine himself, accused the officers and enlisted men. "In my opinion, it's clear it was done during the election cycle, it was done to bolster himself in the party," the attorney said. "He was vying for a leadership position, and if he had to throw some Marines under the bus to do so, that was the cost of power for him." He hopes soon politicians will weigh in on the case in support of Chessani and the others. "I would think all politicians, especially politicians that have military records, should say something about this case," he said. "In a horrible and very complex environment, when you have an enemy that's using women and children as shields, you should always give the benefit of the doubt to the Marine or soldier," said Rooney. "You should never bring him back and put him in front of a court martial." http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=67434 That Murtha is a real winner. He should have served 3 years in jail like the rest of his friends who were willing to accept bribes to bring Saudis into the states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abscam http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwjkQTNPDAg Who knows? Politicians like him just might have let the 9/11 attackers into the states. All for a couple thousand dollars. |
||
|
|
"God Save The American States" |
i hope they get every penny that pos has.... good luck Marines on your lawsuit...
|
|||
|
|
"Resistance to reason is futile" |
I'll second that!
|
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
I hope they take EVERYTHING that slimeball has, right down to the toilet paper.
And then I hope they sue the magazine and reporter who reported all the lies to begin with. |
|||
|
Member![]() |
A Picture is worth a few thousand words.... |
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
LABEL is a tort consisting of a false and malocious PUBLICATION PRINTED... A spoken defamation is called SLANDER. THERE IS NO LEGAL CAUSE OF ACTIONCALLED DEFAMATION. Libel and slander may be founded on defamation but the right of action itself is libel or slander. In my opinion the case shall not hawe a MERITS as slanderous utterances may not be actionable WITHOUT PROOF OF ACTUAL TEMPORAL DAMAGES. Translated to this case the seargent has to prowe that Murtha's words impute crime,loathsome disease or unchastity a.s.o. There is a difference of saying that a person is "killing in cold blood" and THAT THIS PERSON IS A COLD BLOODED KILLER. Someone could kill an animal in "a cold blood" ...THIS DOES NOT MAKE HIM/HER A KILLER in the meaning of the Penal Code. Someone could "kill a person in cold blood" defending her/himselfagainst an attacker...HE WILL NOT BE A KILLER as the Criminallaws giwe him the exuse of a selfdefense! A motorist could kill a child,playing on the street and suddenly running into his car... he might be charged with "criminally-negligent homicide" if gross negligence is prowed. Do you see now the difference...KILLING IN A COLD BLOOD is not being a cold blooded killer! The special damages require a HARM TO THE PLAINTIFF's business or profession. Was the officer discharged for his actions inHaditha? NO!As much as i know they were aquited...SO WERE ARE THE DAMAGES? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani's reputation was damaged, and any good attorney will have no problem prooving this!
|
|||
|
|
Member |
When found guilty always resort to the meaning of words for your defense. As in, the meaning of "is" is.
Common sense tells us that men/women in high places must keep their opinions to themselves even more than Jane or John Doe. There is no dispute that Murtha continued in gutter politic's against men in the frontlines. There's a very small list of worse accusations that could be made of anyone and no matter how his supporters try to sidestep this complete falsehood for self promotion by Murtha needs to be addressed and stand trial, judged by 12 Marines that have served in Iraq. Then and only then can this disrespectful legislature along with his lies and false accusations can be put to rest. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
You mean that you really can't figure it out? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
NO!As much as i know they were aquited...SO WERE ARE THE DAMAGES?[/QUOTE]
Other then an elected official using his position to accuse these Marines of "cold blooded murder"? Murtha is a piece of shitte, phuc 'em. Should've checked your bio prior to responding: "This Member", no bio. Just another phuking troll. |
|||
|
|
Member |
EXCERPT:]
REP. JOHN MURTHA: … on November 19th, we had an incident in Haditha in Anbar province, where a Marine was killed with an IED. Time magazine reported it, and it's kind of a puzzling report, because they're investigating it right now. Let me tell you what the consequences of this have been. It's much worse than reported in Time magazine. There was no fire fight. There was no IED that killed these innocent people. Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood. And that's what the report is going to tell… Murtha on HARDBALL with Chris Matthews Transcript / May 17, 2006 MATTHEWS: Mr. Murtha, let me ask you about this accusation that you have come out with today, that U.S. service people fighting in Iraq killed civilians in cold blood. What evidence do you have on that now? MURTHA: Well, "Time Magazine" ... MATTHEWS: Was this melee? I mean, was this a case of -- when you say cold blood, Congressman, a lot of people think you're basically saying you have got some civilians sitting in a room or out in a field and they're executed just on purpose... MURTHA: That's exactly what happened. THE SITUATION ROOM with Wolf Blitzer Aired May 19, 2006 - 19:00 ET BLITZER: There's an investigation of what happened at Haditha. ...you've suggested this week that there in effect was a massacre. … MURTHA: Well there was. There's no question about it... BLITZER: The Marines say they're still investigating. They don't know what happened yet. The pentagon says the same thing. How do you know what happened? MURTHA: Wolf, you read the "Time" magazine articles. There are pictures, there are photos. You don't have to talk to the military about the proof. John Murtha is a maggot of indescribable proportions. From the excerpts that I have included here, there is no doubt that this 'wanna be' used this incident to propel himself into the limelight. There is no excuse for this... especially from a hack politician who's only reason for doing this was to make himself look good. The Democrats should apologize for this puke... but they won't, and Murtha himself will never apologize. And they talk about GWB... |
|||
|
|
Warning 30 Days 13 SEPT 08 Fin Suspended 5 days 02 Oct for same. FMI |
|
|||
|
|
Suspended. |
First of all "World Net Daily???" hahahahahaha ... What a piece of shiite rag. But, thank GOD for good men like Rep. (US Marine Col) Jack Murtha. I'd be pissed too if I were him over scum who bring dishonor to his beloved Corps. Keep up the excellent work Rep. Murtha, both your constituancy and REAL Americans stand with you 100%.
|
|||
|
|
"God Save The American States" |
|
|||
|
|
"God Save The American States" |
well if wnd you dont like then what about cnn and washingtonpost http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...AR2006080101345.html http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/02/haditha.suit/index.html there happy??? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Lee, You have completely disgraced yourself with this post, crossing a line that I cannot abide nor forgive. Out of respect and honor for each Marine slandered by this dishonorable puke, I am adding you to my Ignore List. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Be shure to put your ignore list in a leek proof bottle, slime has a way of leeking out!
|
|||
|
|
Member |
Bottom line, the man has the right to sue whom ever he wishes to sue. It will all come out in court.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
REAL Americans don't call thier fellow soldiers " scum". I can't believe you actually posted this. Aren't you a Vietnam Vet ? |
|||
|
Highly Experienced Member![]() |
|