|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
In the News
Broken bones and possible boys molested at FLDS compound|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Experienced Member |
The people who support these people and uphold their "religious rights" when nothing they have done so far, with its history is something that God would approve of at all....How they can jump over all the molested children boys and girls and forced marriages right to their religious right...Is exactly why these activities have gone on for so long..... That is the real tragedy. |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
The LDS haven't practiced polygamy or plural marriage since 1890! Get it right, you are slandering an entirely innocent group of people! Course, everyone on here wants to hang these people, FLDS, with out a trial anyway, so what the heck, let's take out all the "Mormons" while we're at it too... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
I AM NOT SUPPORTING THEIR RELIGIOUS RIGHTS! I AM SUPPORTING THE FACT THAT THIS GREW OUT OF A CRANK PHONE CALL FROM A KNOWN CRANK CALLER! THAT THE WARRANT WAS NOT FOR HOMES AND RESIDENCES, BUT BUILDINGS! THAT HOMES AND RESIDENCES WERE "RAIDED" AND CHILDREN CONFISCATED, TO TRY AND FIND THE MYTHICAL "SARAH" WHICH DIDN'T EXIST!!! IF YOU ARE GOING TO HATE ME, THEN HATE ME FOR WHAT I'M PROTESTING ABOUT, NOT ABOUT SOMETHING THAT I'M NOT PROTESTING ABOUT!!!!!!... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 |
|||
|
|
Member |
These religious child molester slavers are the scum of the earth, but they must be given their day in court.
If and when they are found guilty they must be treated harshly. And because the victims are children the rights of the children must given the highest priority! |
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
Sunliner with due respect, your comments don't make sense. The founder of the LDS Church
was Joseph Smith. He claims that he had a relevation to practice polygamy. His successor was Brigham Young, he had 40 wifes. Maybe more. Part of the LDS Church doctrine was the practice of polygamy. For Utah to become a state they stopped the practice, probably another devine revelation. The FLDS believed the Church sold out to the government and branched off. It is a tired argument that the LDS Church hasn't practiced polygamy in years, and it is frowned upon by the current LDS Church. If the Church finds polygamy abhorrent now, then they must feel this way about their founders, who practiced it. They believed that this kind of life style was necessary to get to the celestrial kingdom. They believe in polygamy in the afterlife. A man can be married and sealed to one woman for time and all eternity, if she dies, he can marry again and be sealed for time and all eternity to her. So in the next life he will have 2 wives. I am just stating facts. I am still amazed that you are defending these child molesters. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
No one is defending child molesters. To date, no one has been convicted of such, further, no one has even been charged with the offense at this point. So there are no legally defined child molesters to defend as one would have to be convicted of that chargeable offense for them to be classified as one. So far no one has even challenged the fact that I have already on numerous occasions, pointed out that there are only 4 people that can be considered suspects of sexual misconduct with a minor and one of the suspects is the police informant himself who has been given immunity from prosecution. There MAY be as many as 20 victims of these 4 men. The remaining teens have become pregnant by their similarly aged "husbands" in which the age difference is less than 5 years, hardly child molesting although illegal in Texas. You try to characterize the members of YFZ ranch as a rving bunch of child abusers when there is simply no facts to support your allegation. At this point, CFS is despertely trying to convince these children that something DID happen as so far their hopes are being repeatedly dashed so they are trying to create offenses by brainwashing the children using techniques that when used against Gitmo prisoners you then claim is torture. Why the double standard in that regard? If it is torture when employed against terror suspects then it should also be considered torture when used by Texastan. |
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
What I think some people fail to realize is that the rights of the children trump the rights of the parents. I am not a lawyer (although I have watched more "Law and Order" than would be considered normal) and don't claim to be an expert - not even close, but I do believe the authorities have the right and the responsibility to remove children from any situation they deem dangerous. They do not need the same level of probable cause as required for other "seizures." In my personal opinion, I would rather a child in danger be taken away from the parents as soon as possible - even at the risk of destroying the criminal case against the perpetrator - rather than have a child continue to be harmed. Maybe someone who is an expert in this area (someone with a legal degree/background not an avid "Law and Order" follower) can comment on this aspect.
I don't have the specifics of this particular case, and I really am not sure how many of you do either. If you have not seen the warrant, or been given the details of the conditions found at the scene, I am not really sure you can make a determination about whether the authorities were just in their actions. I would like to wait until all the information is out before I make a judgment. I will say that I am normally a strict believer in an individual's rights. I just believe the rights of the child have to take priority. SCOUTS OUT! |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Do you have a link to a new source about this "police informant"? |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
First and foremost, I AM NOT DEFENDING CHILD MOLESTATION!!! I AM DEFENDING THE RIGHT GUARANTEED US, THAT'S YOU AND ME, AGAINST UNDUE SEARCH AND SEIZURE AND THE RIGHT TO BE FREE IN ONES HOME AND POSSESSIONS, PERIOD! JUST BECAUSE SOME IN THE FLDS RELIGION MOLESTED CHILDREN, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THEY ALL DID OR EVEN SANCTIONED IT! JUST BECAUSE THEY DRESS FUNNY AND WEAR THEIR HAIR FUNNY, IN THE CASE OF THE MOTHERS, DOESN'T MEAN THEY SHOULD HAVE THEIR CHILDREN CONFISCATED, FOR CRIMES THEY DIDN'T COMMIT OR SANCTIONED A-N-D TILL IT IS PROVEN THAT THEY DID, IN A COURT OF LAW THAT SOME OF THEM DID, T-H-E-N YOU PROSECUTE THOSE THAT COMMITTED THE CRIME AND NOT THE INNOCENT! Now, as far as the LDS church is concerned, it is clear that others on here, want to associate them with the FLDS, as is evident that you do, by your post! I am not an apologist for any religion, let alone the FLDS or the LDS. I don't care what they now believe, I know what they state and what history bears out. That is, they stopped the practice of polygamy or plural marrieage in 1890 and tore down the "endowment house" that those marriages took place in. So if you have a complaint about their religion, take it up with them... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 This message has been edited. Last edited by: SUNLINER81, |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
It's not about religious rights and never has been, it's about Constitutional guarantees about "undue search and seizure", what part of that can't you grasp? So, from now on since people can't grasp what it is REALLY all about, I'm going to continuously ask, "WHERE IS SARAH?"... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
It is four Sarah at that compound? Undue searches and seizures do not apply to child/sex abuse cases.... http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/11/yfz.search.ap/ Perhaps the real Sarah, will stand up and speak, now that they have been remove...Perhaps the real Sarah was afraid of all that cyanide. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
BTW, the constitutional rights and search and seizure spiel you are own...Has been trumped by the Patriot Act years ago...Should have spoken up then...
|
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
WHERE IS SARAH?... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
WHERE IS SARAH?... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Exactly, when children are involved they do not need a probably cause...They are bound by law to investigate and many reports are label and "no cause found". However, once they do arrive they can search the premises with immunity for criminal or civil suits.... Which is a good thing....Since the coverup and supporters of these people is on and off compound grounds...And their history of sex with minors and forced marriages is a FACT..... But these people I believe, they have outside help and protection as well...Or they would have been debunked by now...That is real tragedy part...Even though they may or may not be indicted...I am sure some will...They amount of outside support is pathetic...They move into places that they really are not hiding...They definitely own and operate many business, so they are supported by outside dollars... |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
WHERE IS SARAH?... Respectfully, SUNLINER81 |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
----------------------------------------------- Exactly! And if it was for child abusers and molesters and those that protect them...Our government would not have these rules, that might seem unfair...Although molesting children compares in comparison. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
The FLDS argument |