Oh yes, NSNN. Ample evidence.

What evidence? Some Hamas members telling them what has "happened"?

HS do not work at Hamas. They blow their kids with explosive belts, do you think that they will hesitate to shoot at them? BS.

I find it very interesting that there are NO pictures from 2009. If we would have done so, Hamas would have filmed it.

In short all this "evidence" is based on horror stories told by Hamas in order to gain some sympathy.

Yet AI buys it and immediately accuses Israel.

WHY, OH WHY, i am NOT surprised?

quote:

Originally posted by L0A1:

quote:

Originally posted by NSNN:

quote:

Originally posted by FlankerFlyer:
I bet they didnt throw any more rocks

Fo’sure......I say add the “human shields” as legit tactics under ROE & Geneva Convention.

So they put this kid in front of their vehicles to stop the others from throwing rocks? This is a very big exgageration of "Human Shield"



I thought they were being shot at.
GG Isreal, I think it's a great idea.

You have to go easy on them. It's geting harder finding material since Bush retired. The kid looks horrified!

quote:

Originally posted by rayevinsonsr:

quote:

Originally posted by L0A1:

quote:

Originally posted by NSNN:

quote:

Originally posted by FlankerFlyer:
I bet they didnt throw any more rocks

Fo’sure......I say add the “human shields” as legit tactics under ROE & Geneva Convention.

So they put this kid in front of their vehicles to stop the others from throwing rocks? This is a very big exgageration of "Human Shield"



I thought they were being shot at.
GG Isreal, I think it's a great idea.

You have to go easy on them. It's geting harder finding material since Bush retired. The kid looks horrified!

Actually, he looks bored to hell, probably cause they stopped throwing rocks.

Whatever! All you care about is your liberal, lost cause!

quote:

Originally posted by NSNN:

quote:

Originally posted by Airborneinfantry:
Where was this stupid group, Amnesty International, when the freaking terrorist turds were firing rockets at innocent civilians of Israel?
I didn't hear $hit from them, then?
Turds!

That’s cuz you weren’t listening. Contrary to ***** beliefs AI is an equal opportunity “accuser”.

quote:

Originally posted by Airborneinfantry:
Whatever! All you care about is your liberal, lost cause!

quote:

Originally posted by NSNN:

quote:

Originally posted by Airborneinfantry:
Where was this stupid group, Amnesty International, when the freaking terrorist turds were firing rockets at innocent civilians of Israel?
I didn't hear $hit from them, then?
Turds!

That’s cuz you weren’t listening. Contrary to ***** beliefs AI is an equal opportunity “accuser”.

Brilliant response! In the words of John Nash “I am Terrified, petrified, mortified, stupified...by you"

quote:

Originally posted by LineDoggie:
Whatever pop, I do know AI isnt very credible when they equivocate Gitmo to a Soviet Gulag

Where are your lips?

No more incredible than the 'fog of war' horse**** used on a regular basis to justify Israeli actions, like this one, yesterday.

'We didn't kill anybody, they did' and 'if they don't know how old she was how can anybody believe it when they say we killed her?'. Turns into 'OK, we did it - but they made us do it'. Dissemblance and horse****.

Which doesn't get at the basic BS part of the story about getting shot at by militants laying bombs in Gaza to 'lure' Israelis into the strip? They're still shooting into Gaza for no reason.

They've been lying so long, it's turned into truth.



>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3738745,00.html

>http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443709541&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

PopsiqAlibubba, it seems that according to the article, the girl had been killed in fire exchange between IDF and terrorists.

What is your point? Maybe IDF should not shoot back? Or maybe IDF should use more accurate mortar rounds?

To sum the story-IDF had incidentally killed a girl, than IDF had admitted it.

I fail to see any reason for IDF bashing.

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
PopsiqAlibubba, it seems that according to the article, the girl had been killed in fire exchange between IDF and terrorists.

What is your point? Maybe IDF should not shoot back? Or maybe IDF should use more accurate mortar rounds?

To sum the story-IDF had incidentally killed a girl, than IDF had admitted it.

I fail to see any reason for IDF bashing.

PM, are you serious Ali is Pop?

why wouldnt I be surprised.

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
Oh yes, NSNN. Ample evidence.

What evidence? Some Hamas members telling them what has "happened"?

HS do not work at Hamas. They blow their kids with explosive belts, do you think that they will hesitate to shoot at them? BS.

I find it very interesting that there are NO pictures from 2009. If we would have done so, Hamas would have filmed it.

In short all this "evidence" is based on horror stories told by Hamas in order to gain some sympathy.

Yet AI buys it and immediately accuses Israel.

WHY, OH WHY, i am NOT surprised?

Think you are right on the money on this one...
Israel is not perfect, heaven knows but, I will take Israel and her actions over the actions of the terrorists that have attacked Israel...
IMHO...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81

Hamas' anti semetic propaganda finds believability among anti-semites. SHOCKING!

WAKE UP, HAMAS LIES CONTINUALLY!!!

Remember the photo's from Lebanon? The same dead child going into the same ambulance carried by the same "attendent" over and over? The photoshopped fire's smoke? The same teddy bear at site after site, always so very new-clean amongst the rubble...almost as if it was just placed there....All were posted on these web pages over and over again....now you want to buy anorther pig-in-the-poke from the same despicable manuer salesmen.

Anyone else see more "cognative dissonance" floating to the surface....again ?

quote:

Originally posted by GunnyRet03:

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
PopsiqAlibubba, it seems that according to the article, the girl had been killed in fire exchange between IDF and terrorists.

What is your point? Maybe IDF should not shoot back? Or maybe IDF should use more accurate mortar rounds?

To sum the story-IDF had incidentally killed a girl, than IDF had admitted it.

I fail to see any reason for IDF bashing.

PM, are you serious Ali is Pop?

why wouldnt I be surprised.

Yep, it is Popsiq. At least he uses the same "nu", cryptic messages, and the same vocabulary. Coincidence? Nah.

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:

quote:

Originally posted by GunnyRet03:

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
PopsiqAlibubba, it seems that according to the article, the girl had been killed in fire exchange between IDF and terrorists.

What is your point? Maybe IDF should not shoot back? Or maybe IDF should use more accurate mortar rounds?

To sum the story-IDF had incidentally killed a girl, than IDF had admitted it.

I fail to see any reason for IDF bashing.

PM, are you serious Ali is Pop?

why wouldnt I be surprised.

Yep, it is Popsiq. At least he uses the same "nu", cryptic messages, and the same vocabulary. Coincidence? Nah.

So did Pop get banned?

Maybe he is ashamed of his old name.

quote:

Originally posted by GunnyRet03:

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:

quote:

Originally posted by GunnyRet03:

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
PopsiqAlibubba, it seems that according to the article, the girl had been killed in fire exchange between IDF and terrorists.

What is your point? Maybe IDF should not shoot back? Or maybe IDF should use more accurate mortar rounds?

To sum the story-IDF had incidentally killed a girl, than IDF had admitted it.

I fail to see any reason for IDF bashing.

PM, are you serious Ali is Pop?

why wouldnt I be surprised.

Yep, it is Popsiq. At least he uses the same "nu", cryptic messages, and the same vocabulary. Coincidence? Nah.

So did Pop get banned?

Maybe he is ashamed of his old name.

Not illegal to have more than one "screen name", a lot of posters do it, so when they post their outlandish BRAVO SIERRA, they support themselves, to give others the false impression that more think like they do...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81

never did find out why outlaws98 got band, any one know?

As my old boss in the menswear department Sydney 'Halvah' Schwarz used to tell me "Silence ist gelt, nu?".

On the matter at hand, the IDF wouldn't use 'human shields' - not when there are so many eager 'civilian volunteers' willing to go first. Like killing, it's really just a matter of semantics.

quote:

Originally posted by SUNLINER81:

quote:

Originally posted by GunnyRet03:

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:

quote:

Originally posted by GunnyRet03:

quote:

Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
PopsiqAlibubba, it seems that according to the article, the girl had been killed in fire exchange between IDF and terrorists.

What is your point? Maybe IDF should not shoot back? Or maybe IDF should use more accurate mortar rounds?

To sum the story-IDF had incidentally killed a girl, than IDF had admitted it.

I fail to see any reason for IDF bashing.

PM, are you serious Ali is Pop?

why wouldnt I be surprised.

Yep, it is Popsiq. At least he uses the same "nu", cryptic messages, and the same vocabulary. Coincidence? Nah.

So did Pop get banned?

Maybe he is ashamed of his old name.

Not illegal to have more than one "screen name", a lot of posters do it, so when they post their outlandish BRAVO SIERRA, they support themselves, to give others the false impression that more think like they do...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81

Not so sure about that people have been banned for having 2 accounts.

If true its I guess Popsiq got tired of being reminded he doesn't rate when it comes to domestic policy and other matters American since he doesn't vote or pay taxes here. So I could see how he would create another account to run his Anti-American dribble.

quote:

Originally posted by EAG154:
never did find out why outlaws98 got band, any one know?

He posted some personal attacks against a vet that killed herself, it did him in at the end.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: L0A1,

The Mighty IDF - Gideon Levy - Haaretz

Let's try to stay on topic.

>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1098053.html

Popsiq, posting Gideon Levi, is like posting the words of that Obama's priest that everyone was talking about.

Gideon Levi is ignorant idiot. Since when "primitive" weapons do not kill? Since when state is NOT required to do everything in its power to protect its civilians? 8 years of rocket barrage are not good enough casus belli? States have fought for less.

And who has said that Palestinians use primitive weapons? RPG is NOT primitive, nor are M-16 and 0.5 machine guns.

Pops, do your self a favor, and pay attention to what sources you use. GL does not stand ANY scrutiny.

quote:

Originally posted by SUNLINER81:

Not illegal to have more than one "screen name", a lot of posters do it, so when they post their outlandish BRAVO SIERRA, they support themselves, to give others the false impression that more think like they do...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81

What a great idea! I never thought of that. Since I hardly ever get anyone who agrees with my POV, maybe I'll develop an alter ego and lavish praise on my posts. I just can't think of an appropriate screen name.