Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    President Obama in 2006: KSM will get a "full military trial"
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of stec74
Posted
Flashback to 2006. In a debate of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, then Senator Obama says that the critics of the act are wrong and KSM will get a "full military trial".

"http://www.breitbart.tv/bombshell-uncovered-obama-statement-ksm-will-get-full-military-trial/"
 
Posts: 2669 | Registered: Sat 10 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ACR26
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stec74:
Flashback to 2006. In a debate of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, then Senator Obama says that the critics of the act are wrong and KSM will get a "full military trial".

"http://www.breitbart.tv/bombshell-uncovered-obama-statement-ksm-will-get-full-military-trial/"


I havn't seen yet where anyone in the media is calling him on this.

I am confused. What is the media for again?
 
Posts: 2455 | Registered: Fri 12 September 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
Just words, they dont mean a damn thing, especially with this sack.
 
Posts: 19769 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Liberty and Justice!
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
Perhaps some of you are unaware of the separation of powers? This was not the President's decision to make, but the Justice Department's...


Ignoring the ignorant is almost as fun as ridiculing the ridiculous.
 
Posts: 14310 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
Perhaps some of you are unaware that Obama appointed that turd. Obama owns this.
 
Posts: 19769 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of stec74
Posted Hide Post
Separation of powers? Isn't that listed in that outdated document called the Constitution?

That document that President Obama called "a charter of negative liberties"?

That document that Congresses and Presidents have ignored for the last 70 years?

I guess we should ignore the Constitution when it suits the Liberal agenda, but follow it when they need a convenient excuse.
 
Posts: 2669 | Registered: Sat 10 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Liberty and Justice!
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
LOL...this from the people who blindly supported GW Bush for 8 years...the man who allegedly referred to the Constitution as a Godamn piece of paper. Thanks, but I'm going with the Constitutional Scholar on this one. The Justice Department makes their decisions independently from the White House for a reason. Regardless of whose decision it was, it IS a good one. These were crimes committed and are being tried in the district in which they were committed. That is law and order. I thought that is what the conservative party used to tout as one of their values?


Ignoring the ignorant is almost as fun as ridiculing the ridiculous.
 
Posts: 14310 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
LOL...this from the people who blindly supported GW Bush for 8 years...the man who allegedly referred to the Constitution as a Godamn piece of paper. Thanks, but I'm going with the Constitutional Scholar on this one. The Justice Department makes their decisions independently from the White House for a reason. Regardless of whose decision it was, it IS a good one. These were crimes committed and are being tried in the district in which they were committed. That is law and order. I thought that is what the conservative party used to tout as one of their values?




GB2-G-damn Paper 'http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_president_bush_call_the_constitution_a.html'
quote:
Extremely unlikely. The Web site that reported those words has a history of quoting phony sources and retracting bogus stories.



Obama constitutional scholar/ Dont think so. Lecturer.'http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_really_a_constitutional_law.html'

Try to keep up to date huh.


Take your tired old lies somewhere else where people have been away from the facts for the last 8+yrs.
 
Posts: 19769 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of stec74
Posted Hide Post
quote:
These were crimes committed and are being tried in the district in which they were committed. That is law and order.


Crimes or war crimes?

Are you saying that Al Qaeda is not at war with the USA?
 
Posts: 2669 | Registered: Sat 10 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Suspended 30 days for personal attacks.
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GunnyRet03:
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
LOL...this from the people who blindly supported GW Bush for 8 years...the man who allegedly referred to the Constitution as a Godamn piece of paper.......




GB2-G-damn Paper 'http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_president_bush_call_the_constitution_a.html'
quote:
Extremely unlikely. The Web site that reported those words has a history of quoting phony sources and retracting bogus stories.


Try to keep up to date huh.


Oh now, that just wasnt fair. you know they need their derangement fix on President Bush
 
Posts: 20234 | Registered: Thu 17 November 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
aka ssgduke53 and ssgduke56retired.
SUSPENDED
Member
Posted Hide Post
This is what we get when we FAILED to Declare War on Al Qaeda and all other Fascist Islamic Terrorists that wants to destory USA and Convert those here into the Terroist version of Islam.....

This is not a CRIME and these B A S T A R D S are not petty crooks! They are TERRORISTS OF THE WORST KIND and only a Miltary Tribunal is the place for these WAR CRIMINALS!!
 
Posts: 521 | Registered: Fri 26 June 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Liberty and Justice!
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stec74:
quote:
These were crimes committed and are being tried in the district in which they were committed. That is law and order.


Crimes or war crimes?

Are you saying that Al Qaeda is not at war with the USA?
I don't care what Al Qaeda thinks. We are not at war with Al Qaeda and therefore no "war crimes" have been committed. You need an actual declaration of war from Congress for that. Come on folks, I was like a "C" student here and even I know this stuff.


Ignoring the ignorant is almost as fun as ridiculing the ridiculous.
 
Posts: 14310 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Liberty and Justice!
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
Gunny, the irony of you using factcheck.org doesn't escape anyone I would imagine.

Didn't I say "allegedly"?..darn, meant to say "allegedly" called the Constitution a GD piece of paper. I noticed that factcheck said "unlikely" but did not rule it out completely. Big Grin


Ignoring the ignorant is almost as fun as ridiculing the ridiculous.
 
Posts: 14310 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
LOL...this from the people who blindly supported GW Bush for 8 years...the man who allegedly referred to the Constitution as a Godamn piece of paper. /QUOTE]

Key word here is "allegedly", which to me means another unsupported allegation by Seawitch, apparently still suffering from BDS.
 
Posts: 9602 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
quote:
Originally posted by stec74:
quote:
These were crimes committed and are being tried in the district in which they were committed. That is law and order.


Crimes or war crimes?

Are you saying that Al Qaeda is not at war with the USA?
I don't care what Al Qaeda thinks. We are not at war with Al Qaeda and therefore no "war crimes" have been committed. You need an actual declaration of war from Congress for that. Come on folks, I was like a "C" student here and even I know this stuff.


In your nit picking about war, whether it be declared or undeclared, matters not to AQ, who most definately ARE at war with the USA.
 
Posts: 9602 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of stec74
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
quote:
Originally posted by stec74:
quote:
These were crimes committed and are being tried in the district in which they were committed. That is law and order.


Crimes or war crimes?

Are you saying that Al Qaeda is not at war with the USA?
I don't care what Al Qaeda thinks. We are not at war with Al Qaeda and therefore no "war crimes" have been committed. You need an actual declaration of war from Congress for that. Come on folks, I was like a "C" student here and even I know this stuff.


Ok, got it. Because we haven't declared war, someone else can not be at war with us.

I guess Al Qaeda didn't get the memo.
 
Posts: 2669 | Registered: Sat 10 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
Gunny, the irony of you using factcheck.org doesn't escape anyone I would imagine.

Didn't I say "allegedly"?..darn, meant to say "allegedly" called the Constitution a GD piece of paper. I noticed that factcheck said "unlikely" but did not rule it out completely. Big Grin


Cant be proved so why whine? Oh, thats right got to keep hurling bs.

I noticed you left out the scholar BS too, why not use alleged on that too. Ahh cant use that since everyone knows he's not a frackin scholar.
 
Posts: 19769 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
aka ssgduke53 and ssgduke56retired.
SUSPENDED
Member
Posted Hide Post

quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
I don't care what Al Qaeda thinks. We are not at war with Al Qaeda and therefore no "war crimes" have been committed. You need an actual declaration of war from Congress for that. Come on folks, I was like a "C" student here and even I know this stuff.



Hey whats wrong with you? Are you that stupid?!! Al Qaeda declared war on us since the first attack on the Trade Building! So it is all right for the Islamic Fascist A-holes to declare war on us and YOU DON"T CARE!!! So crashing into building and KILLING almost 3000 good souls is not a war crime! Beheading and killing anyone who do not beleive in their version of the Koran is not a war crime! And you FOOL want to treat them like they are PETTY CROOKS! You are a fool like other fools who stood by and allowed petty dictators and tyrants run rampted while you want to live in your version of make beleive bubble world that you called America. How sad, how very very sad and I do feel sorry for you for what you are.....a FOOL!!!
 
Posts: 521 | Registered: Fri 26 June 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Liberty and Justice!
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
LOL...declaration of war isn't "nitpicking". We aren't at war so these people are not "war criminals". They are just plain criminals that will be tried in a court of law in the district in which their crimes were committed.


Ignoring the ignorant is almost as fun as ridiculing the ridiculous.
 
Posts: 14310 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Liberty and Justice!
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GunnyRet03:
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
Gunny, the irony of you using factcheck.org doesn't escape anyone I would imagine.

Didn't I say "allegedly"?..darn, meant to say "allegedly" called the Constitution a GD piece of paper. I noticed that factcheck said "unlikely" but did not rule it out completely. Big Grin


Cant be proved so why whine? Oh, thats right got to keep hurling bs.

I noticed you left out the scholar BS too, why not use alleged on that too. Ahh cant use that since everyone knows he's not a frackin scholar.
Wow...so now the President isn't a Constitutional scholar? Have you seen a doctor about this ODS of yours?


Ignoring the ignorant is almost as fun as ridiculing the ridiculous.
 
Posts: 14310 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    President Obama in 2006: KSM will get a "full military trial"

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.