Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Continued Aggression By Iran Sparks New Look At Options By U.S. Military
Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 21
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aco275RGR:
quote:
How many cyclotrons do they have? Nuclear power or nuclear weapon?


Last time I checked, the only people talking about Nuclear Weapons are NON-Military and NON-Intelligence officials with-in the US...So who exactly should I, a tax paying American trust?

quote:
Space program? Using the Tae PO Dong II?


First I've heard of this..

quote:
Holocaust denial conference?


Alot of people deny the Holocaust, from South American, to Africa to Japan...The motives behind such stupid rhetoretic are important. Despotic regimes say outrageous things to try and appease their populations.

quote:
Actively seeking the return of the 12th Imam, by instituting the final war on earth?


Yeah and we have people here in the US like John Hagee who pretty much wish they could do the same thing, so what??

quote:
Mister, your azz is on fire! NO, it's not...


Iran is not any kind of serious threat today or in the near future to Israel, zero ammount of threat to an American on American soil. When we have an undisputed World Coalition against them then i'll buy it, till then: "Door slams shut"


Oh, now you trust the government, the rest of the time it's a bunch of republican war mongers in charge huh?
Your argument is spurious and you know it.
You got nailed and it hurts...
First time you heard of this? You ain't been paying attention in class, the whole world knows of their missile testing program and the launch of their first rocket in their space program, just recently...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 15695 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aco275RGR:
Whatever, they want to hit Iran so be it...Israel will not have one inch of its land left unscorched by sucide bombers, rockets, missiles and pools of blood...

While here in Los Angeles i'll be at the beach...


I have heard it all before. "We shall this, and we shall that", "Israel had opened the gates of Hell" bla-bla. That, in 2-3 lines what Hamas told us after we have killed Yassin and Rantisi.
Never amounted much to anything, and what they have managed fell much shorter of your "expectations".

They try it on daily basis, regardless of what we shall do.
 
Posts: 1439 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
snip



We intervened un Yugoslavia to protect the people of Kossovo from the Serbs. Of coure it was the Kosovars commiting genocide against Serbs that was the problem. No need to mention that - We had to stop Milosivic before he could conquer the world. "He's another Hitler" was what I heard. He was committing genocide, ergo, he was Hitler

And aren't you just a little bit ashamed of attacking the Serbs? While the Nazis recruited Muslims from Kossavar to kill the Jews, almost a million Serbs died to kill the Nazis off, and protected the Jews. You are again presuming too much. How did you deduce, that i support genocide?? So they were Muslims, AND??? I fail to see the relevance. Genocide is WRONG, regardless against whom it is used. Frankly this argument is one of sheer desperation.

My, my, short memory?

Now you want the US to attack Iran because, maybe ten years from now they might have nukes. I am touched... That is called prevention.

And I loved your, pull your troops out if Iraq, while we take out Iran statement. Then what, put em back in, sort of like jack in the box? They can catch better positions in Iraq, There is no need to evacuate them from the country. And yes, since that Iranian invasion is probable, this action is one of necessity.

Meanwhile this little business about treaties. No need to follow treaties, treaties are for little people? Israel is being threatened? But haven't we been threatening Iran? How are you threatening Iran? Do you post posters "Iran must be wiped from the earth"?

Doesn't count, we're the good guys. Or YOUR the good guys, while you have millions of third class citizens under the gun, whatever excuse you want to use, that's a fact, and it's also a fact that you want to keep it that way forever.

Well Israel has a track record of turning whole populations into favoring terrorism. And you've succeeded beyond your wildest dreams, turning a fringe group like Hamas into the most popular group in Palestine. Not happy with this success, you want us to emulate you on that happy road to victory.

Sorry, no, I don't buy it. If you think that the fact that some Muslims will hate you a bit more, overshadows the Bomb, i feel rather sorry for you. Long term Analysis is not one of your strong sides. Just a thing to consider-as snoon as Iran will have nukes, you will not be able to do ANYTHING to it, regardless of what it does. Death toll in Iraq will jump sky high, and you will be unable to do anything at all.

Dave
 
Posts: 1439 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Grachus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:

Since you asked,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2005/

That should give you a bunch of reading, also, who's really advocating "bombing" as a first response, there are other means, most of which have been tried and haven't worked.
So we keep keep doing what you suggest and just wait till we get that warm nuclear feeling in the seats of our collective pants huh?
Please, don't be stupid with our lives and above all, don't read crap into my posts that aren't there...
Also, when you ask, should we or die our troops die for Israel, again, that's a non sequitur.
You should have asked, how many of us will die, if we don't do something about a group of religious despots who have proclaimed to the world, that it is their goal to bring about the final battle of the world, so that the 12th Imam can return and bring about the return of Allah on the planet. Yeah, do nothing about that sorta cr-p, you gotta be on drugs! They are developing a "space program", experimenting with the North Koran Tae Po Dong II missile, you know, the one that Kim mentally ill Jong shot over Japan and into the Pacific, not even to it's full range, just letting us know, that Hawaii and the west coast is in his sights. Is it worth dying for Israel? I would ask you, is it worth dieing for New York, Boston, New London, Bangor, Charleston or Jacksonville and brother, that ain't rhetoric, that's denial on your part!...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


I couldn't open the link with my Netscape 7.01, on the other hand, I assume you wish to point out to me that Iran is armed. Perhaps they have good reason to be armed?

You wrote: "...don't read crap into my posts that aren't there..." and "Also, when you ask, should we or die our troops die for Israel, again, that's a non sequitur."

You've said this to me before, and I have to admit this is a stupid tendency on my part. But not this time. I was complaining about an Israeli playing make believe that our interests are identical with theirs. They are not.

You have said that Iran is planning to conquer the world so that the hidden Iman (#13 I believe) can come out of the cave he's been hiding in for the last 1200 years.

I challenge that statement! You can't back it up. Just because Pat Robertson says that Armegeddon is around the corner, doesn't mean he speaks for my government.

And with the arrest recently of some Russians trying to peddle radioactive material in Eastern Europe, you want me to worry about Iran? Ok, I DO worry about Iran, but not enough to go to war with them, or go to war with China or Russia or any other country that gives me the heebie jeebies. The plain fact of the matter is that the Iranian government has been trying for YEARS to come to an accomodation with us. We, not they, have been turning that down.

That's because the Bush definition of "accomodation" is surrender.

Finally, if our country in ACTUALLY in danger, then we have to do whatever it takes - That's a non-starter of a question. North Korea wouldn't even have the bomb, except for the fact that Mr. Bush announced that we're not going to negotiate with our enemies.

He's sort of changed his tune recently, although I believe he still believes this interesting theory of only making peace with your allies. We could have bought the North Koreans off. Cheaper than what we now have.

Dave
 
Posts: 6070 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of godawgz
Posted Hide Post
I would like to think we'd do whatever it takes,frankly, Dave, I'm not so sure....
 
Posts: 4845 | Registered: Thu 24 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Grachus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:


Oh, now you trust the government, the rest of the time it's a bunch of republican war mongers in charge huh?
Your argument is spurious and you know it.
You got nailed and it hurts...
First time you heard of this? You ain't been paying attention in class, the whole world knows of their missile testing program and the launch of their first rocket in their space program, just recently...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


Our intelligence agencies have unequivocly stated that Iran abandoned it's nuclear weapons program in 2003. Period.

You want a link?

Who pray tell are we to tell them to stay out of space? This some sort of monopoly awarded the US by the Pope? If so, please inform the Russians, the Chinese, the French, and now the Brazilians that they better abandon their space programs, or else.

Dave
 
Posts: 6070 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Grachus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:

We intervened un Yugoslavia to protect the people of Kossovo from the Serbs. Of coure it was the Kosovars commiting genocide against Serbs that was the problem. No need to mention that - We had to stop Milosivic before he could conquer the world. "He's another Hitler" was what I heard. He was committing genocide, ergo, he was Hitler



Now that's the kind of damn lies that you seem to think will be accepted just because they are voiced. I've heard them before.

Did you know that Poland attacked Germany and started World War Two?

Well, I didn't know it either, but that's what the Germans claimed. And the German people believed that lie - Why not, would the Great Leader lie? Big Grin

In 1992 there were almost 600,000 Serbs in Kossovo, at the time of our intervention there was only 90,000 left. So who was commiting genocide? Ahh, yes, it was Milosovic that "Hitler."

So now Iran is is the New Hitler. Proof? He denies the holocaust. He's said that Iran will defend itself. He sponsors Hezbollah.

I am impressed? Why look at how many countries Iran has conquered. Zero is a huge number isn't it.

Dave
 
Posts: 6070 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NSNN
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cwubullrider:
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
On May 2 1964 the Viet Cong sunk an American Carrier (USS Card) in the Saigon River.

Starting a war with Iran might just get another one, or two, sunk in the Persian Gulf.


Pop what are you smoking. The Viet Cong never such an aircraft carrier. Also the Navy would never dock an aircraft carrier in the Mekong. Man you are desparate and ignorant to find anti-American stuff.


It would have taken you a 5 minute online search to either confirm of reject his claim…….yet you didn’t bother. Popcorn

In her role as an aviation transport the now-USNS Card carried helicopters and aircraft from one place to another. While docked in the shallow Saigon harbor, in the Republic of Vietnam she was attacked at 0500 May 2, 1964 by a naval mine which holed her. Five of her civilian crewmen were killed and the ship settled in the mud of the harbor.
http://modern-war.suite101.com/article.cfm/us_aircraft_carrier_sunk_1964



"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
Posts: 2435 | Registered: Thu 12 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NSNN
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:



We intervened un Yugoslavia to protect the people of Kossovo from the Serbs. Of coure it was the Kosovars commiting genocide against Serbs that was the problem. No need to mention that - We had to stop Milosivic before he could conquer the world. "He's another Hitler" was what I heard. He was committing genocide, ergo, he was Hitler



I suggest you look-up demographics maps from 1990 & 1995 (Break up of former YU); and from 1999 (Kosovo war), and then tell me who was “ethnically cleansed”. Popcorn Roll Eyes


"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
Posts: 2435 | Registered: Thu 12 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post
So the bit of Hague court for war crimes, and various charges brought against Miloshevich and Company are just empty words? Roll Eyes

Both sides were guilty of war crimes, and i have never said anything else. Since both of them practiced ethnic cleansing, both of the sides were Hitlers writ small.

There was a physical ethnic cleansing there, and it had to be stopped.
 
Posts: 1439 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Grachus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
So the bit of Hague court for war crimes, and various charges brought against Miloshevich and Company are just empty words? Roll Eyes

Both sides were guilty of war crimes, and i have never said anything else. Since both of them practiced ethnic cleansing, both of the sides were Hitlers writ small.

There was a physical ethnic cleansing there, and it had to be stopped.


Nobody said a word about the ethnic cleansing going on in Kossovo - Not a word. Only when the Serbs took over the State government to put a stop to the genocide, did our government suddenly get horrified.

What an evil man was Milosovic. He actually put a stop to the genocide of an entire people. Clearly a Hitler. How nice that his trial was cut short. Very, very convenient if you followed the trial.


Cut the BS - Just what happened to those 500,000 Serbs that got beaten, shot, killed and thrown out of their homes?

By YOUR logic if one German was killed by a Pole, then Hitler was right to invade. By your logic if One Jew killed a Nazi, then the holocaust was ok.

Dave
 
Posts: 6070 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NSNN
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
So the bit of Hague court for war crimes, and various charges brought against Miloshevich and Company are just empty words? Roll Eyes

Both sides were guilty of war crimes, and i have never said anything else. Since both of them practiced ethnic cleansing, both of the sides were Hitlers writ small.

There was a physical ethnic cleansing there, and it had to be stopped.


"Operation Storm"

the operation forced approximately 200,000 to 250,000 Serbs to flee to parts or Croatia and Bosnia.

Former European Union Special Envoy to the Former Yugoslavia Carl Bildt called it "the most efficient ethnic cleansing we've seen in the Balkans."Three Croatian generals, Ante Gotovina, Ivan Čermak and Mladen Markač, alleged to have been involved in the planning and execution of Operation Storm, have been indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and are now standing trial in the Hague on charges of operating a joint criminal enterprise for the purpose of permanently removing the Serb population from the Krajina by force and of crimes against humanity



If Serbs were committing genocide on such a grand scale, as everybody says they were.....well they F*** sucked at it. Confused Roll Eyes


These forces had been trained by a U.S.-based firm, Military Professional Resources Incorporated (MPRI), which provides both training and senior staff services.Its engagement was approved by the U.S. government.

The Croatian government maintained the operation was justified on the grounds that a sovereign state has the right to be in control of its own territory.

But when Serbs tried to fight Terrorist and Separatist on their own territory (Kosovo 1999), they got bombed by NATO. Roll Eyes


Just one among hundreds of sources....


"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
Posts: 2435 | Registered: Thu 12 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Can you guess which Middle Eastern country I am talking about?

- head of state called 9/11 a good thing
- routinely ignores UN resolutions
- has a secret weapons program, inspectors not allowed (and these WMD actually exist...)
- frequent human rights abuser
- spies on the US
- sold US sensitive weapons technology to China which was re-sold to Iran

quote:
The plain fact of the matter is that the Iranian government has been trying for YEARS to come to an accomodation with us. We, not they, have been turning that down.


Exactly, the Iranian Government was willing to pretty much do what we wanted in 2003 so long as they stayed in power, but we turned it down....Atleast I hope it was the US that turned down that offer...

This is about power and influence and money......and possibly defense.
 
Posts: 2046 | Registered: Tue 12 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Nuke the crappers Cool
 
Posts: 4057 | Registered: Tue 01 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:

Since you asked,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2005/

That should give you a bunch of reading, also, who's really advocating "bombing" as a first response, there are other means, most of which have been tried and haven't worked.
So we keep keep doing what you suggest and just wait till we get that warm nuclear feeling in the seats of our collective pants huh?
Please, don't be stupid with our lives and above all, don't read crap into my posts that aren't there...
Also, when you ask, should we or die our troops die for Israel, again, that's a non sequitur.
You should have asked, how many of us will die, if we don't do something about a group of religious despots who have proclaimed to the world, that it is their goal to bring about the final battle of the world, so that the 12th Imam can return and bring about the return of Allah on the planet. Yeah, do nothing about that sorta cr-p, you gotta be on drugs! They are developing a "space program", experimenting with the North Koran Tae Po Dong II missile, you know, the one that Kim mentally ill Jong shot over Japan and into the Pacific, not even to it's full range, just letting us know, that Hawaii and the west coast is in his sights. Is it worth dying for Israel? I would ask you, is it worth dieing for New York, Boston, New London, Bangor, Charleston or Jacksonville and brother, that ain't rhetoric, that's denial on your part!...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


I couldn't open the link with my Netscape 7.01, on the other hand, I assume you wish to point out to me that Iran is armed. Perhaps they have good reason to be armed?

You wrote: "...don't read crap into my posts that aren't there..." and "Also, when you ask, should we or die our troops die for Israel, again, that's a non sequitur."

You've said this to me before, and I have to admit this is a stupid tendency on my part. But not this time. I was complaining about an Israeli playing make believe that our interests are identical with theirs. They are not.

You have said that Iran is planning to conquer the world so that the hidden Iman (#13 I believe) can come out of the cave he's been hiding in for the last 1200 years.

I challenge that statement! You can't back it up. Just because Pat Robertson says that Armegeddon is around the corner, doesn't mean he speaks for my government.

And with the arrest recently of some Russians trying to peddle radioactive material in Eastern Europe, you want me to worry about Iran? Ok, I DO worry about Iran, but not enough to go to war with them, or go to war with China or Russia or any other country that gives me the heebie jeebies. The plain fact of the matter is that the Iranian government has been trying for YEARS to come to an accomodation with us. We, not they, have been turning that down.

That's because the Bush definition of "accomodation" is surrender.

Finally, if our country in ACTUALLY in danger, then we have to do whatever it takes - That's a non-starter of a question. North Korea wouldn't even have the bomb, except for the fact that Mr. Bush announced that we're not going to negotiate with our enemies.

He's sort of changed his tune recently, although I believe he still believes this interesting theory of only making peace with your allies. We could have bought the North Koreans off. Cheaper than what we now have.

Dave


First, it ain't just Bush, it has been a multi generational and multi political party problem.
This all started out as speculation on several posters parts, no more AND nothing that is said on these boards is ever going to be put into national policy, we are nothing but a bunch of vets and now family members or civil servants or their family members blowing off steam and postulating our ideas...
I have read, many years ago, the English translation of Mein Kampf, in fact I was a freshman in high school and talk about the flak I took for reading it, my parents d-mn near disowned me and people who saw it, shunned me.
But hey, I was taking world history, it was on the reading list and it was in the high school library. Well my point is, that if you had and by you, I mean the world at the time of it's publication, you could see where that cat was heading, really, really, spooky! If you go and read today, what the Iranian leadership is saying and putting in writing, it's d-mn spooky!
Will they do as Hitler did and fulfill what he wrote? Well, frankly no one can answer that question, not without a time machine. My point is, that the parallels are, well spooky...
The one thing about our fathers and grandfathers generation, is that they learned the hard lesson of you can't give in to fascism, whether political or religious. Iran used to be called Persia and they changed the name to Iran and I hope someone here will help me out on this, but doesn't Iran mean Riech? I heard that and I never really bothered to research it, but I know the Arab nations suported Hitler or gave sympathetic support to Nazi Germany during WW-II and that's why I mentioned at least one book, a very old book, it was old when I read it twenty years ago, called, The Fuhrer and the Mufti, it will open your mind to what is taking place in the Arab nations and give you a sense of what it behind some of the tensions with the Arabs and why the Persian people, i.e. the Iranians are doing what they are doing..
The Iranians are developing missile technology, at first openly militarily and now, their long range missile program has been "disguised" as a "space" program? They bluff and bluster and lie, just like Hitler did, in his conquering of certain countries, talked the European peoples into accepting the annexation of territories, worked with the Russians to divide and conquer and then turned on the Russians. My point to all of this? That we need to watch carefully, Iran and when they are about to achieve a nuclear weapon, we must stop them, because, at least from what I've been able to observe, they are looking for an excuse to use it. The world today, is in a far more dangerous place than in the first cold war, I say first, because it would appear that Russia is trying to relive past glories, because far more unstable nations have achieved nuclear weaponry and will use it in the name of religion. Fascist governments can be kept in check, religious fascism seeks to die, for it brings the ultimate reward, hence they have no vested interest in staying alive.
We dealt with religious fascism in WW-II with the Imperial Japanese and the kamakazi. It took total annihilation of a banzai charge to break it, total destruction of a kamakazi to prevent it from crashing into a ship. It took two atomic bombs before the Emperor spoke to his people and then, it was only because the palace guard stayed loyal to prevent his assassination, that Imperial Japan surrendered. What will it take here, with Iran, I wonder?...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 15695 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:


Oh, now you trust the government, the rest of the time it's a bunch of republican war mongers in charge huh?
Your argument is spurious and you know it.
You got nailed and it hurts...
First time you heard of this? You ain't been paying attention in class, the whole world knows of their missile testing program and the launch of their first rocket in their space program, just recently...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81


Our intelligence agencies have unequivocly stated that Iran abandoned it's nuclear weapons program in 2003. Period.

You want a link?

Who pray tell are we to tell them to stay out of space? This some sort of monopoly awarded the US by the Pope? If so, please inform the Russians, the Chinese, the French, and now the Brazilians that they better abandon their space programs, or else.

Dave


Again, now you believe? Second, you and who, actually believe that this is really a space program? I mean the Tae Po DongII was never designed to be a space launch vehicle and well, some folks will take a beating by a mugger and still not understand why they were beaten.
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 15695 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:

We intervened un Yugoslavia to protect the people of Kossovo from the Serbs. Of coure it was the Kosovars commiting genocide against Serbs that was the problem. No need to mention that - We had to stop Milosivic before he could conquer the world. "He's another Hitler" was what I heard. He was committing genocide, ergo, he was Hitler



Now that's the kind of damn lies that you seem to think will be accepted just because they are voiced. I've heard them before.

Did you know that Poland attacked Germany and started World War Two?

Well, I didn't know it either, but that's what the Germans claimed. And the German people believed that lie - Why not, would the Great Leader lie? Big Grin

In 1992 there were almost 600,000 Serbs in Kossovo, at the time of our intervention there was only 90,000 left. So who was commiting genocide? Ahh, yes, it was Milosovic that "Hitler."

So now Iran is is the New Hitler. Proof? He denies the holocaust. He's said that Iran will defend itself. He sponsors Hezbollah.

I am impressed? Why look at how many countries Iran has conquered. Zero is a huge number isn't it.

Dave


Dave, did the holocaust happen?
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 15695 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post