quote:

Originally posted by AliBubba:
>http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL312024420090703

After only a week on the job the new head of the IAEA has announced he cannot find any evidence that Iran is working on nuclear capability. What a loss of credibility.

That's not much good. He doesn't even have 'gut feeling' like the last head that the Iranians might want to develop a nuclear defense against threats.

Geez, he needs to get some solid opinion on this, like from Jerusalem or Washington the capitals most endangered by the Mad Mullahs not-yet-existent nukuler arsenal.

Maybe there are other equally strong opinions. Anybody else threaten to bomb Iran?

quote:

Originally posted by AliBubba:
>http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL312024420090703

After only a week on the job the new head of the IAEA has announced he cannot find any evidence that Iran is working on nuclear capability. What a loss of credibility.

That's not much good. He doesn't even have 'gut feeling' like the last head that the Iranians might want to develop a nuclear defense against threats.

Geez, he needs to get some solid opinion on this, like from Jerusalem or Washington the capitals most endangered by the Mad Mullahs not-yet-existent nukuler arsenal.

Maybe there are other equally strong opinions. Anybody else threaten to bomb Iran?

quote:

Originally posted by rayevinsonsr:

quote:

Originally posted by AliBubba:
>http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL312024420090703

After only a week on the job the new head of the IAEA has announced he cannot find any evidence that Iran is working on nuclear capability. What a loss of credibility.

That's not much good. He doesn't even have 'gut feeling' like the last head that the Iranians might want to develop a nuclear defense against threats.

Geez, he needs to get some solid opinion on this, like from Jerusalem or Washington the capitals most endangered by the Mad Mullahs not-yet-existent nukuler arsenal.

Maybe there are other equally strong opinions. Anybody else threaten to bomb Iran?

"I don't see any evidence in IAEA official documents about this," Yukiya Amano told Reuters in his first direct comment on Iran's atomic program since his election, when asked whether he believed Tehran was seeking nuclear weapons capability.


What the heck, he's reading El Baradei files in Vienna, I'm not sure a conclusion can be reached by someone that was not permitted to inspect the plant, reactor or the SEVEN THOUSAND aluminum tubes. Duh

quote:

Originally posted by rayevinsonsr:
Show me the letters CIA in my proposition.

Our intelligence apparatus was nuetered in the 90's, Iraq and Iran could have had any number of devices without our knowledge. Something else the commissioners logged in their report.

El Baradie found small amounts of Plutonium in machinery Iran had acquired from Pakistan. Asking permission to inspect other plants but was denied, since having repeatily said that Iran has no intention of nuclear weapons capacity. My point is that 7,000 plus aluminum tubes would be worthless except for processing uranium to weapons grade. No other explanation.

quote:

Originally posted by Popsiq:
>http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL312024420090703

After only a week on the job the new head of the IAEA has announced he cannot find any evidence that Iran is working on nuclear capability. What a loss of credibility.

That's not much good. He doesn't even have 'gut feeling' like the last head that the Iranians might want to develop a nuclear defense against threats.

Geez, he needs to get some solid opinion on this, like from Jerusalem or Washington the capitals most endangered by the Mad Mullahs not-yet-existent nukuler arsenal.

Maybe there are other equally strong opinions. Anybody else threaten to bomb Iran?

quote:

And your point is silly. If they want a power plant, then they HAVE to enrich uranium. What do you mean, "No other explanation?"

It's ALSO the explanation of the 2007 NIE issued by our joint intelligence agencies. You think that they barrow a still from Kentucky to make non-weapons grade uraninium?

quote:

Originally posted by rayevinsonsr:

quote:

And your point is silly. If they want a power plant, then they HAVE to enrich uranium. What do you mean, "No other explanation?"

It's ALSO the explanation of the 2007 NIE issued by our joint intelligence agencies. You think that they barrow a still from Kentucky to make non-weapons grade uraninium?

I might be silly Dave, my limited knowledge knows you don't need to enriched uranium to U-235
to run a power plant all that much, and you can damn near use a crude separation as you described.

If this is your arguement its pretty dense. Read up on properties of natural uranium which the whole earth is made up. To enriched weapons grade takes several steps and processing. Nuclear ships are powered by enriched uranium. A power plant that you seem to think Iran is satisfied is enriched to 4% U-235, weapons to blow you to hell to 85%. Anybody and everybody would give Iran the ample fuel for energy since wasted materials can be processed. And Iran would'nt have to bury their plant in the damn ground sseveral hundred feet. Now, who in the hell is silly.

quote:

Originally posted by Grachus:

quote:

Originally posted by rayevinsonsr:

quote:

And your point is silly. If they want a power plant, then they HAVE to enrich uranium. What do you mean, "No other explanation?"

It's ALSO the explanation of the 2007 NIE issued by our joint intelligence agencies. You think that they barrow a still from Kentucky to make non-weapons grade uraninium?

I might be silly Dave, my limited knowledge knows you don't need to enriched uranium to U-235
to run a power plant all that much, and you can damn near use a crude separation as you described.

If this is your arguement its pretty dense. Read up on properties of natural uranium which the whole earth is made up. To enriched weapons grade takes several steps and processing. Nuclear ships are powered by enriched uranium. A power plant that you seem to think Iran is satisfied is enriched to 4% U-235, weapons to blow you to hell to 85%. Anybody and everybody would give Iran the ample fuel for energy since wasted materials can be processed. And Iran would'nt have to bury their plant in the damn ground sseveral hundred feet. Now, who in the hell is silly.

Why you insist on firmly placing your foot in your mouth, and then trying to talk through it is beyond me.

Right, yeah, sure Ray, all you do is collect some Uranium, run it though a meat grinder, and you're all done.

http://www.america.gov/st/wash...d.state.gov0.8355219.
"http://www.usec.com/americancentrifuge.htm"

Would you believe that to make fuel for a Nuclear Plant you NEED centifuges, and NOT panning for enriched fuel?

Now if ONLY you could convince the US government of your new miracle technique of making fuel, all would be well.



That's exactly what I told you dumbarse. You should have used your browser before showing your ignorance.
Dave