Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    JCS Chairman Wants Gitmo Shut Down
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of shotgun1371
Posted Hide Post
But no base is 'american soil' unless in the 50 states, DC, or a US territory or US embassy by treaty.[/QUOTE]

Interesting. So then, using your logic, my son must not be an American citizen. Though the soil is not American, it is treated as such for as long as the base resides there. Quit splitting hairs.
 
Posts: 327 | Registered: Fri 23 February 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by schmiddc:
Its the great paradox, if everything done there is so legal, ethical, and above board, why does it have to be done in a legal never-never land like Guantanamo bay?

Don't give the "security" line of BS.. There are plenty of places, Johnston Island, Midway, the Aleutians, hell even Alcatraz, that are just as secure, and indisputably US territory ...

If they've done something wrong, try them, convict them, and sentence them, to death if it warrants it. We gain nothing by indefinately imprisoning low-level towel head islamists, but even more low-level towel head islamists...


The Goonies own Midway now there is nothing left but an old crumbling runway, how about Bikini Atoll, they will glow in the dark and be easier to spot at night.
 
Posts: 324 | Registered: Sun 29 January 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of shotgun1371
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MarkAntney:
quote:
Originally posted by shotgun1371:
QUOTE BY PETEY THE DOG: Gitmo needs to go, and the unconstitutional, un-American methods used to hold those prisoners without proper judicial process need to be scrapped.

QUOTE BY CHAPLAINMMOORE: Terrorism without any rights... if they were American citizens or military personnel... have we sunk to the same level as the enemy?

QUOTE BY MARK ANTNEY: So you believe that's a legitimate basis for keeping someone at Gitmo?
A belief that they MIGHT do something?


You people, and others like you, are unbelievable?!! If you had your way, these killers of Americans would get the full protection of our constitution and full access to our courts! Maybe they should be able to sue Colt Firearms, Raytheon, and Bell Helicopter for their part in this war! These guys are terrorists!! That means they are our enemies and deserve to be held in A POW CAMP UNTIL SUCH A TIME AS THE WAR IS OVER OR SENTENCE IS PASSED ON THEIR ACTIONS BY A MILITARY TRIBUNAL!!! Notice I said military tribunal...not our civilian court system. They are not US citizens (some are barely human). Most of these guys get better treatment than I did in bootcamp! We are at war people, let's try to remember that!


You called them KILLERs, right?

Then why are we keeping them there and NOT prosecuting or even executing them then?

And why are you trying to legitimize it by saying they're getting GOOD treatment?

If you were picked up by a foreign govt, taken to foreign soil, no formal charges, no contact with family, no FREEDOM, no viable means of defending yourself against the charges... yet you're provided a ROOMY cell, 3meals a day and a basketball court...

You say that's a good deal?

Perhaps you should apply for the Gitmo Resort when you're planning your next vacation.

BTW, a lot of prominent NON "You People" types have chimed in on Gitmo, unless you consider Colin Powell and others (like him) "you people"?

If what we've PICKED up and sent to GITMO are killers and then subsequently RELEASED them, that alone tells you how seemingly convoluted it's been structured?

You detain a "Killer" for years only to release them?

Hold them for years, without CONVICTING them?


You go ahead and justify your irrational thinking any way you like. You say these aren't "legal" enemy combatants so they can't be treated as POW's. It's all rationalization. We are at war, these guys are enemy combatants, and they are sitting in a POW camp. Spin it any way you want, that's the bottom line. You (and your liberal friends) would really hate my alternative solution to the "detainee problem". And for the record, I fought in Iraq, I do not hate Muslims or Middle Easterners, and I would like to see the war end just as much as you would. I suspect my ending and yours would be completely different though. Radical and extreme America hating Muslims should all be hunted down and killed. OK, it's your turn, label me a neanderthal and then call me names.
 
Posts: 327 | Registered: Fri 23 February 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shotgun1371:
quote:
Originally posted by MarkAntney:
quote:
Originally posted by shotgun1371:
QUOTE BY PETEY THE DOG: Gitmo needs to go, and the unconstitutional, un-American methods used to hold those prisoners without proper judicial process need to be scrapped.

QUOTE BY CHAPLAINMMOORE: Terrorism without any rights... if they were American citizens or military personnel... have we sunk to the same level as the enemy?

QUOTE BY MARK ANTNEY: So you believe that's a legitimate basis for keeping someone at Gitmo?
A belief that they MIGHT do something?


You called them KILLERs, right?

Then why are we keeping them there and NOT prosecuting or even executing them then?
And why are you trying to legitimize it by saying they're getting GOOD treatment?
If you were picked up by a foreign govt, taken to foreign soil, no formal charges, no contact with family, no FREEDOM, no viable means of defending yourself against the charges... yet you're provided a ROOMY cell, 3meals a day and a basketball court...
You say that's a good deal?
Perhaps you should apply for the Gitmo Resort when you're planning your next vacation.
BTW, a lot of prominent NON "You People" types have chimed in on Gitmo, unless you consider Colin Powell and others (like him) "you people"?
If what we've PICKED up and sent to GITMO are killers and then subsequently RELEASED them, that alone tells you how seemingly convoluted it's been structured?
You detain a "Killer" for years only to release them?
Hold them for years, without CONVICTING them?


You go ahead and justify your irrational thinking any way you like. You say these aren't "legal" enemy combatants so they can't be treated as POW's. It's all rationalization. We are at war, these guys are enemy combatants, and they are sitting in a POW camp. Spin it any way you want, that's the bottom line. You (and your liberal friends) would really hate my alternative solution to the "detainee problem". And for the record, I fought in Iraq, I do not hate Muslims or Middle Easterners, and I would like to see the war end just as much as you would. I suspect my ending and yours would be completely different though. Radical and extreme America hating Muslims should all be hunted down and killed. OK, it's your turn, label me a neanderthal and then call me names.


1. You don't meet my definition of Neanderthal, for you FULLY articulate what you believe, I just don't agree with it; if you couldn't articulate it yet are passionate about those beliefs, that's drifting into Neander Waters to me.

2. My MAIN beef with a Gitmo, is the short sightedness of it's creation (seemingly), it's a sore that will produce more problems (terrorists) than it'll ever solve in the Long Term.

3. A few FORMER Chiefs and now this current one are speaking similar of this Eyesore and they're not Liberal, maybe they are now like Jim WEBB but who beliefs changed?

4. If someone is held there for years and then JUST released, what does that say of WHY they were detained?

5. How many that have been held there, been tried (and convicted) for ANY Terror or similar crimes? I saw on CSPAN, I think it was less than 3 (if any), I thought they said none but were still preparing cases.

6. What I BELIEVE is your solution is indeed one, concerning those that are there, I just don't agree with it but it's actually BETTER than what we're doing now, not much though but definitely better.

7. Thanks for your service.
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Palm pilot? Or do they let E3's fly? Suspended 23 Jan 08 dmuhler
New Member
Posted Hide Post
All political, moral, legal, and sentimental reasons aside, I think its a damn shame to close a facility that we arent even finished building yet. Yes, it had bad karma and all that, but the place is new. Surely they can find something to do with it. (besides just closing it)
 
Posts: 23 | Registered: Fri 11 January 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Buckellew:
Well, there have been some interesting posts so far. A lot of people are concerned about this issue.

We are a nation of laws. We have agreed to International Treaties. They carry the weight of U.S. Law. Our Armed Forces are bound by those laws and treaties regardless of their location on (or off) the planet. Under the Geneva Convention we have agreed to treat EPWs and Detainees humanely and in accordance with the rule of law. That others do not share our commitment to this does not justify our disregard of the rule of law. Our nation was founded on certain inalienable rights being given to people by God. When we deny basic rights to individuals, other States/Nations call us hypocritical. When we deny rights of others we start down a slippery slope with our own rights.
...
The term "illegal combatant" does not exist yet in any treaty that our country has signed. It may yet be defined by our courts. That's up to the courts to decide if the government makes good argument for it. Until then, they are detainees and still need to be treated appropriately. Under the rule of law.

The moment we stop treating people, regardless of where they've come from, or what they've done, outside of the rule of law that's the moment we put at risk our own rights.

Do I like that these people have committed vile and depraved acts against our people? No...

That there isn't speaks volumes about the competence of our government in this issue, and serves our enemies well. Military commanders on the field of battle could have decided the fate of these people when they were captured on the battlefield. They operate under the constraints of civil authority. Our government as elected by "We the People."
War-on-the-Cheap is very costly...


Man you said it all and said it well.

This isn't a Liberal-Conservative issue.

This is an American Moral Authority issue. We shouldn't keep having to bend and twist our laws, rules, which in essence is about OUR Way of life, to combat some religious zealouts(NUTs) that got lucky on us 11Sep2001.

We should broadcast what we're doing, how will it be deemed a negative?

It'll show the MEast how we do it, those acts won't be tolerated and those responsible will be held accountable.

Now tell me how OUR CURRENT system(s) doesn't ALLOW that?

We're EVEN trying to CHANGE the meaning of torture to justify our incompetence on this.

MLK (and others of course) tried to show how you defeat true evil, you expose it, turn it against itself (convince OTHERs NOT to) but thinking you can "KILL THEN all", only produces MANY more of the very thing you're trying to exterminate.
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TheTinker
Posted Hide Post
Closing GITMO is a bad decision...bringing the inmates to CONUS is a worse idea...

Personally...I could care less about what "THE WORLD" thinks of the US...we have built and rebuilt "THE WORLD" many times over...if they don't like GITMO...then "THE WORLD" can house the prisoners...take them off our hands...
 
Posts: 1036 | Registered: Mon 18 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of shotgun1371
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MarkAntney:
QUOTE]

7. Thanks for your service.


Right back at ya'.
 
Posts: 327 | Registered: Fri 23 February 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
10934224 has it right. Put them to sleep, place very small undetectable GPS implants in them. Return them to the same " Battle theatre;" Iraq, Afghanistan etc---where they were captured! Encourage them to re-enter the fight, remind them of the 72-virgins who are impatiently waiting for them---hahahaheeheehee. Heck, just airdrop them into the Afghan/Pak area, more bang for the buck that way. Platoon Sergeant, USArmy (R)---Please the world, makum luv us. All Gods chillun needs luv. God bless the USA and our military men, who have borne the cost of this terrorist invented war.
 
Posts: 37 | Registered: Thu 20 December 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<oldbuckjumper>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Petey_the_dog:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,159911,00.html

For legal purposes, a permanent military encampment is considered US soil, and governed by US laws. (For example, the hospital where my son was born was in another country, owned by that country, leased by the US Army. It was considered US soil.) The idea that US law does not apply to Gitmo is ludicrous. Gitmo needs to go, and the unconstitutional, un-American methods used to hold those prisoners without proper judicial process need to be scrapped.


JCS Chairman Wants Gitmo Shut Down

The chief of the U.S. military said Jan. 13 he favors shutting down the prison at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base as soon as possible because negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects there has been "pretty damaging" to the image of the United States.

What’s the matter with him?

Is he getting paranoid?

Let the minority thinking negative and saying it’s damaging to the US get lost.
That’s a good way to find out who are making up lies and who is on the right side of things.
Open Alcatraz back up and put them to work there.
Lets shut the negative up with putting them on that hell forsaken island and put it off limits to civilian trouble makers.
Lock them all up with this one below to start with on Alcatraz.




Big Grin
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<dmuhler>
Posted
Warning to all: No more racist nor bigoted religious remarks. Discuss the topic and leave those comments out.
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Picture of jkbrent
Posted Hide Post
Funny, when I was in the Navy anyone from Admiral on down who qustioned authority the way this CNO is was written up for insubordination. As for the prioners at Gitmo.. HELLO!!!! they are the ENEMY!!!! Their not entitled to ANY rights of ANY kind. Not even the Geneva Convention since they are not soldiers. They nothing bloodthirsty THUGS! Until this country gets over being such bleeding hearted mamas-boys, we are on a road to defeat.
 
Posts: 27 | Registered: Fri 22 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dmuhler:
Warning to all: No more racist nor bigoted religious remarks. Discuss the topic and leave those comments out.


My momma said (concerning your request)...

HARD to change a "MADE Up" mind sometimes?

One of the most difficult things in life is to UNLEARN something, rather it's true or false.

You at least hit on why we'll be going about this "Terror" Thwarting thing via the SCENIC route.

The LONG Way.
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I never cease to be amazed at all the bleeding hearts on this forum. It is hard to believe this is a military forum when so many of the posters here have such anti-military, leftist views. Perhaps this website should be renamed anti-military.com

The idea that our image in the world (more specifically Europe) has been damaged because of Gitmo is crap. Anyone who has spent any time in the military knows that most of the so-called "enlightened" countries have never been all that fond of us and generally view us as barbarians. During tours in Europe in the late 60's and early 70's we were told to not wear our military uniforms off-post because of the danger of attack by our NATO allies' citizens. I can remember many mornings when I would find my car trashed by the peace-loving citizens of Europe, merely because it had U.S. armed forces license plates. My experiences in Asia and the Americas has not been much better.

The United States has rarely been loved anywhere by anyone. (Anyone who doubts this hasn’t spent enough time overseas.) But we are not alone. The British in the 18th and 19th century, Spain in the 16th and 17th centuries, and the Romans during the time of the empire were equally reviled. This is not a new phenomenon for any nation with a monopoly of wealth and power. Our problem is that we, as a country, want to be loved. The reality is that instead we should want to be feared. Machiavelli had it right when he said that it was far safer to be feared than loved. Our problem is that we are neither loved or feared. It is unlikely that these terrorists (or the world for that matter) will ever love us. And by our weakness in dealing with these terrorists it is equally unlikely they will ever fear us either.

Our conduct in the war on terror and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq has been far more measured and humane than in any of our past wars, yet the left in this country rants about cruelty and torture. The left in this country doesn’t really care about Mohammed in Gitmo. Their real agenda is to disparage the United States, its military, and, by extension, George Bush.

There may be a few innocent detainees in Gitmo, but I doubt it. In any event there are far fewer innocents in Gitmo than there were in the World Trade Center. I don’t give a fig about anyone in Gitmo. And I assure you that were the situation reversed nobody in Gitmo would give a fig about any of us. In a just world the prisoners in Gitmo would have been treated like non-uniformed combatants (i.e. spys and saboteurs) have been treated for hundreds of years - they would have been interrogated and then put up against a wall and shot.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Thu 15 June 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I wish the U.S. Attorney General was as concerned about prisoner conditions and the immediate release of innocent U.S. citizens, or at least those who are not a threat to America, or have served enough time. Remember the "the punishment must fit the crime"? With over 100-men, finally released from death row--because they were FINALLY proven innocent, I think more citizens should get off their *** and ask the CJS and AG look into the rights of our own. Many of the 2,000,000+ U.S. citizens locked up, thanks to the Dept. Of Corrections industrial complex; are young and fit for military duty. They should be screened and properly cleared, released from prison and fitted for a military uniforn. These young men could be a great assist to our young men currently serving repeatedly in the zone, my son, on his 3rd turn like many could use a hand, I hope the chairman and ag will get their priorities straight. Read my prior in-put above. Platoon sergeant, USArmy, (R) God bless warriors
 
Posts: 37 | Registered: Thu 20 December 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of shotgun1371
Posted Hide Post
1000 AMENS for this post!!!!


quote:
Originally posted by 3158306:
I never cease to be amazed at all the bleeding hearts on this forum. It is hard to believe this is a military forum when so many of the posters here have such anti-military, leftist views. Perhaps this website should be renamed anti-military.com

The idea that our image in the world (more specifically Europe) has been damaged because of Gitmo is crap. Anyone who has spent any time in the military knows that most of the so-called "enlightened" countries have never been all that fond of us and generally view us as barbarians. During tours in Europe in the late 60's and early 70's we were told to not wear our military uniforms off-post because of the danger of attack by our NATO allies' citizens. I can remember many mornings when I would find my car trashed by the peace-loving citizens of Europe, merely because it had U.S. armed forces license plates. My experiences in Asia and the Americas has not been much better.

The United States has rarely been loved anywhere by anyone. (Anyone who doubts this hasn’t spent enough time overseas.) But we are not alone. The British in the 18th and 19th century, Spain in the 16th and 17th centuries, and the Romans during the time of the empire were equally reviled. This is not a new phenomenon for any nation with a monopoly of wealth and power. Our problem is that we, as a country, want to be loved. The reality is that instead we should want to be feared. Machiavelli had it right when he said that it was far safer to be feared than loved. Our problem is that we are neither loved or feared. It is unlikely that these terrorists (or the world for that matter) will ever love us. And by our weakness in dealing with these terrorists it is equally unlikely they will ever fear us either.

Our conduct in the war on terror and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq has been far more measured and humane than in any of our past wars, yet the left in this country rants about cruelty and torture. The left in this country doesn’t really care about Mohammed in Gitmo. Their real agenda is to disparage the United States, its military, and, by extension, George Bush.

There may be a few innocent detainees in Gitmo, but I doubt it. In any event there are far fewer innocents in Gitmo than there were in the World Trade Center. I don’t give a fig about anyone in Gitmo. And I assure you that were the situation reversed nobody in Gitmo would give a fig about any of us. In a just world the prisoners in Gitmo would have been treated like non-uniformed combatants (i.e. spys and saboteurs) have been treated for hundreds of years - they would have been interrogated and then put up against a wall and shot.
 
Posts: 327 | Registered: Fri 23 February 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
"Leader of Marines, Killer of Communists, Distributor of Death and Destruction, Etc,."

Member
Picture of TopBaxter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ol_Doc:
quote:
Originally posted by TopBaxter:
These prisoners were taken in combat against U.S Forces during war. Just like the Japanese, German, an Italian POW's of WWII, they neither rate or deserve any kind of Court,appeals,or judicial proceedings, other than Geneva Conventions being applied and followed.
This suedo-compassionatisum running wild in our limpwristed society, is going be the ultimate defeat of this nation. As for me, I'll go down fighting. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Maybe you should keep up on current events. A large percentage of the prisoners were "paid for". The US put a bounty on "possible AQ/Taliban" suspects. The war lords were happy to round up people and "sell" them to the US. Does this mean the people at Getmo are innocent? Some are some aren't. If these people are terrorists, they should be tried and punished if guilty or released if innocent.


All I know is, some of the ones who have been released, have been RE-Captured on the battlefields. How's that for keepin up with current events? You want to feel compassionate towards these "Victims", why don't you offer to take a couple into your house with maybe a tracking ankle-bracelet for security? Ambulance chasing lawyers and liberals are gonna be the death of this country.
 
Posts: 627 | Registered: Tue 03 December 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RollingThunder777:
All political, moral, legal, and sentimental reasons aside, I think its a damn shame to close a facility that we arent even finished building yet. Yes, it had bad karma and all that, but the place is new. Surely they can find something to do with it. (besides just closing it)


Im afraid you dont understand how the Pentagon does things. first we spend millions to either build a new base or to upgrade one then we close it down to save money and ship the personel somewhere else then do it again. Its similar to another AF program in which we buy parts we dont need then order them scrapped before they are delivered.
 
Posts: 6938 | Registered: Sun 30 April 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FlankerFlyer:
quote:
Originally posted by RollingThunder777:
All political, moral, legal, and sentimental reasons aside, I think its a damn shame to close a facility that we arent even finished building yet. Yes, it had bad karma and all that, but the place is new. Surely they can find something to do with it. (besides just closing it)


Im afraid you dont understand how the Pentagon does things. first we spend millions to either build a new base or to upgrade one then we close it down to save money and ship the personel somewhere else then do it again. Its similar to another AF program in which we buy parts we dont need then order them scrapped before they are delivered.


IMAGINE how much more hilarious that would be if it weren't so true? Smile

But that's really the fault of our Executive and Legislative Branches than military.
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Isn't there a financial reason for shutting down Gitmo. The military men station there can be bolstering the economy of a US city. Financially it has to be cheaper to have that base here in the US than in Cuba.
 
Posts: 135 | Registered: Sat 22 April 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    JCS Chairman Wants Gitmo Shut Down

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.