Afghan Hijacker Found Working as Cleaner at Heathrow Airport

quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Afghan Hijacker Found Working as Cleaner at Heathrow Airport
May 18, 2008

An Afghan hijacker who won the right to live in England is working at Heathrow Airport in London as a cleaner in the British Airways training center, the Daily Mail reported.

Nazamuddin Mohammidy, 34, was among nine hijackers who in 2000 diverted an Ariana Airlines flight with 160 passengers on board to Stansted Airport in Essex, England.

The group, armed with guns and hand grenades, claimed it was fleeing the Taliban and threatened to kill all the passengers unless they were granted asylum. It took four days for the hijackers to surrender.

Mohammidy appeared in court this week after police pulled him over while he was driving a car around the new Terminal 5 at Heathrow, the Daily Mail reported.

At first authorities thought he was an unlicensed cab driver but were shocked to discover he was one of the hijackers and had a British Airways pass on him.

He initially was arrested on charges of being in breach of bail over assault charges for allegedly attacking his landlord, and then it emerged that he was one of the Stansted hijackers.

He has spent months working for a firm that has a contract to clean at Heathrow. Sources told the Daily Mail that Mohammidy’s British Airways pass did not give him airside access, but it did allow him to go into secure areas.

LINK

So much for "airport security"...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81

Posts: 22592 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006

Ignored post by SUNLINER81 posted

popsiq

suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09

Posted

Love to know how he 'won the right' to stay in England.

Either it was that gentleman's word thing. 'Surrender the guns and grenades, let everybody go and we'll grant you amnesty.'

Or it was that 'anti-cruelty to animals' thing: they didn't want to send him back for the Sunday spectacular at the football stadium in Kabul.

Now he's a 'good-guy'.

Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005

Ignored post by popsiq posted

Experienced Member
Picture of AngelHeart

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:

So much for "airport security"...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81

Yep...right under their noses. There are probably more than a few here in the US right under our noses. Thats what happens when people ignore the terrorist threat because they are too busy with their soft secure little lives.

Posts: 3256 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004

Ignored post by AngelHeart posted

outlaws93

Banned by admin

Posted

craziness..

Posts: 39661 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005

Ignored post by outlaws93 posted

JmacOSI

New Member

Posted

Well, let's see---if you want to count the number of muslems in England and the rest of Europe, France should declare themselves a muslem state by the end of next year, assuming that those currently living in France declare war on them and France surrenders. Europe better wake up--it's commmmmingggggggggggg (soon to a theater near you)!!

Posts: 200 | Registered: Fri 21 March 2008

Ignored post by JmacOSI posted

rm444

Where are the Carriers?

Posted

I am speechless.

"Thank you, for your support." - Bartles & Jaymes

Posts: 9756 | Registered: Sat 31 March 2007

Ignored post by rm444 posted

godawgz

Experienced Member

Posted

Wasn't Atta's visa extension granted 2 months after 9/11? Or was that urban legend?

Posts: 5625 | Registered: Thu 24 January 2008

Ignored post by godawgz posted

suspended pending review,Nemesis

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by godawgz:
Wasn't Atta's visa extension granted 2 months after 9/11? Or was that urban legend?

Since the guys not in jail, the British clearly believed the story that this guy hijacked a plane to get away from the Taliban, not to join them.

If such is the case, what is the big deal? Sure, I agree, I wouldn't want someone like him minding the store - But he's proved his anti Al Qaeda orientation.

Dave

Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006

Ignored post by Grachus posted

proudcavmom

The Argument from Intimidation is a confession of intellectual impotence.
Picture of proudcavmom

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:

Since the guys not in jail, the British clearly believed the story that this guy hijacked a plane to get away from the Taliban, not to join them.

If such is the case, what is the big deal? Sure, I agree, I wouldn't want someone like him minding the store - But he's proved his anti Al Qaeda orientation.

Dave

You are overlooking the fact that he helped hijack an airplane. I don't think he should have access any where near an airport.

Posts: 5526 | Registered: Thu 07 April 2005

Ignored post by proudcavmom posted

Experienced Member
Picture of AngelHeart

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:

Since the guys not in jail, the British clearly believed the story that this guy hijacked a plane to get away from the Taliban, not to join them.

If such is the case, what is the big deal? Sure, I agree, I wouldn't want someone like him minding the store - But he's proved his anti Al Qaeda orientation.

Dave
You are overlooking the fact that he helped hijack an airplane. I don't think he should have access any where near an airport.

He isn't over looking it, he is excusing it. These are his words..

quote:
hijacked a plane to get away from the Taliban, not to join them.

Posts: 3256 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004

Ignored post by AngelHeart posted

proudcavmom

The Argument from Intimidation is a confession of intellectual impotence.
Picture of proudcavmom

Posted

Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

Posts: 5526 | Registered: Thu 07 April 2005

Ignored post by proudcavmom posted

Experienced Member
Picture of AngelHeart

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Posts: 3256 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004

Ignored post by AngelHeart posted

SUNLINER81

Super Member

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by rm444:
I am speechless.

YOU, speechless, h3ll just froze over...
LOL Respectfully, SUNLINER81

Posts: 22592 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006

Ignored post by SUNLINER81 posted

suspended pending review,Nemesis

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Absolutely Right! Anyone who is an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban is an enemy of America!!!!

Thank you for correcting me! Of course as usual, I just don't feel the NEED to apologise for my strange attitude. I actually believe you should give a medal to people who fought the Taliban. How anti-American of me.

Of course that doesn't mean I think he should be in an airport. But I must admit, that if British Intellgence decided to give him an OK, I would be fine with that.

Dave

Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006

Ignored post by Grachus posted

SUNLINER81

Super Member

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Absolutely Right! Anyone who is an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban is an enemy of America!!!!

Thank you for correcting me! Of course as usual, I just don't feel the NEED to apologise for my strange attitude. I actually believe you should give a medal to people who fought the Taliban. How anti-American of me.

Of course that doesn't mean I think he should be in an airport. But I must admit, that if British Intellgence decided to give him an OK, I would be fine with that.

Dave

YOU have a strange attitude?! Oh, say it ain't so Dave!...
LOL Respectfully, SUNLINER81

Posts: 22592 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006

Ignored post by SUNLINER81 posted

suspended pending review,Nemesis

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by SUNLINER81:
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Absolutely Right! Anyone who is an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban is an enemy of America!!!!

Thank you for correcting me! Of course as usual, I just don't feel the NEED to apologise for my strange attitude. I actually believe you should give a medal to people who fought the Taliban. How anti-American of me.

Of course that doesn't mean I think he should be in an airport. But I must admit, that if British Intellgence decided to give him an OK, I would be fine with that.

Dave

YOU have a strange attitude?! Oh, say it ain't so Dave!...
LOL Respectfully, SUNLINER81

If you read the article, and better, check his name on the web, you will find that he's an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

The British never charged him with a crime. Not only were they granted asylum, but provided with a pension for a few years.

So, what's going on here? Should we simply say, "He's a ******* terrorist and extradict him back to Mullah Omar (assuming we can find Mullah Omar) and let "justice" take it's course?

Sure, I don't think it's a good idea to have him working at the airport - But as I said, if British intellgence gave him the ok, I would be alright with that decision.

What is wrong with the picture of demanding that this friend of the West simply being called a "terrorist." We suddenly in the business of defending the "rights" of the Taliban?

Dave

Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006

Ignored post by Grachus posted

Experienced Member
Picture of AngelHeart

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Absolutely Right! Anyone who is an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban is an enemy of America!!!!

Thank you for correcting me! Of course as usual, I just don't feel the NEED to apologise for my strange attitude. I actually believe you should give a medal to people who fought the Taliban. How anti-American of me.

Of course that doesn't mean I think he should be in an airport. But I must admit, that if British Intellgence decided to give him an OK, I would be fine with that.

Dave

Posts: 3256 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004

Ignored post by AngelHeart posted

suspended pending review,Nemesis

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Absolutely Right! Anyone who is an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban is an enemy of America!!!!

Thank you for correcting me! Of course as usual, I just don't feel the NEED to apologise for my strange attitude. I actually believe you should give a medal to people who fought the Taliban. How anti-American of me.

Of course that doesn't mean I think he should be in an airport. But I must admit, that if British Intellgence decided to give him an OK, I would be fine with that.

Dave

Yeah, I'm really sorry he killed a bunch of Taliban, and hijacked one of their planes.

And the British, if you can believe this, actually gave him asylum.

Mark This

Your hatred of reality has reached the point where you actually condemn this guy because he hates the Taliban and Al Qaeda - All we have to do is say, "He's a terrorist," and your ready to extradict him back to Afghanistan and the tender mercies of Mullah Omar.

No doubt they would behead him and play soccor with what's left of him.

Dave

Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006

Ignored post by Grachus posted

Experienced Member
Picture of AngelHeart

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by Grachus:
quote:
Originally posted by AngelHeart:
quote:
Originally posted by proudcavmom:
Overlooking... Excusing... either way it is wrong. The man still should not be allowed to work near an airport, let alone being allowed into secure areas.

I totally agree. Why he isn't in prison for the rest of his life is beyond me.

Absolutely Right! Anyone who is an enemy of Al Qaeda and the Taliban is an enemy of America!!!!

Thank you for correcting me! Of course as usual, I just don't feel the NEED to apologise for my strange attitude. I actually believe you should give a medal to people who fought the Taliban. How anti-American of me.

Of course that doesn't mean I think he should be in an airport. But I must admit, that if British Intellgence decided to give him an OK, I would be fine with that.

Dave

Yeah, I'm really sorry he killed a bunch of Taliban, and hijacked one of their planes.

And the British, if you can believe this, actually gave him asylum.

Mark This

Your hatred of reality has reached the point where you actually condemn this guy because he hates the Taliban and Al Qaeda - All we have to do is say, "He's a terrorist," and your ready to extradict him back to Afghanistan and the tender mercies of Mullah Omar.

No doubt they would behead him and play soccor with what's left of him.

Dave

You sound as if you are pissed off Davey.
Where is the information coming from? How about a link?

Posts: 3256 | Registered: Fri 31 December 2004

Ignored post by AngelHeart posted