Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Military.com Poll: War Support Waning
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 39
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Picture of Grunt4Life0311
Posted Hide Post
Oh there is no doubting that America and Britain will be targets for a long time to come from the AQ. I just want to find Bin Laden. and kick him in the nuts for hiding for so long.
 
Posts: 122 | Registered: Thu 05 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
[/QUOTE]
Gene pool is apparently not deep enough! Seriously though, the only reason you believe we're reffing a civil war is because the media tells you so. There is better intel available than them. We are fighting mostly non-Iraqis...ask anyone that's made any kills at all.[/QUOTE]

If that country isn't fighting within itself, then why haven't the POLITICAL benchmarks (love the term) been remotely addressed?

Perhaps it's because they're busy HIGHLY disagreeing with each other by attempting to kill each other in numerous areas, each vowing for more control...

My definition of at least a massive CIVIL dispute, I'd like to call a War.

If they were together, they'd wouldn't even need us.

Say you're correct, how come WE CAN'T convince barely a soul to help in this DIRE quest to thwart Iraq of this massive influx of AQ?

You don't think that's a big problem?
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grunt4Life0311:
Oh there is no doubting that America and Britain will be targets for a long time to come from the AQ. I just want to find Bin Laden. and kick him in the nuts for hiding for so long.


Thanks for adding so needed brevity to this serious topic.

I CAN picture a HardCore Grunt, pulling back that Steel Toe "version" and blammmm!!!!

He'd better duck though, because at least TWO objects are flying out of his mouth at a high velocity.
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Wait for Septembers report from the Corps Commander (not the MSM), to make the descission. But, a reduction of Combat troops and closing our Monsterous Logistics bases we have made are in order. Just think of how many Unnessary Combat troops are in Iraq just providing Security too these bases? 1/4 of the Combat force is sitting idle on paremeter watch or providing road side security (not atcually going after the Insurgents or Al Qaida). The bigger the base, the more security needed...thus it feeds on itself. If the US learned to live off the fat of the land and stopped with the McDonalds/ LaQuinta mindset how many troops could be brought home today? Just think of it. If the Corps commander could actually get a feel of what type of troops he truely actually needs there, which are nessassary and which is just there providing a service just for the sake of providing that service...how many troops would be already removed from the sandbox? Start cutting that Logistics Monster we have created and you'd start reducing a lot of your combat troops needed to protect it. Then the troops actually needed for training the Iraqi Security forces and going after Al Qaida would pretty much be all that was left. Take the money "saved" by removing these Logistic Bases and put it into the local economy to support the remainder of the US troops (and also build up local security forces). Hell, just imagine all the jobs that would be created and remove potential insurgents just by getting the locals a secured paycheck they could count on. Hmmm...of coarse that aint gonna happen.

Just a though anyways...like I said, it aint gonna happen like that anyways.
 
Posts: 229 | Registered: Tue 11 October 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
*
Member
Picture of Weatherguesser
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Oh there is no doubting that America and Britain will be targets for a long time to come from the AQ. I just want to find Bin Laden. and kick him in the nuts for hiding for so long.


I would be willing to bet just about any amount that we already know exactly where he is, but we won't go after him because GWBush is either afraid of losing Mushariff(sp), or ... what?

What good reason is there for NOT going after that dirt-bag anywhere, is my question... (anywhere except in IRAQ, where we know he AIN'T).
 
Posts: 2428 | Registered: Sat 23 September 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SkipHadaway
Posted Hide Post
So, what I got out of this is that there are 58% of those polled that want us to be there, stay in the fight, at least until the end of 2008, where 17% think we should have this wrapped up... another 17 months... 41% saying take it to their butts and wipe them out, and then just 42% saying 'OH, woe is me, we are so bad and are ruinning the world and making people hate us more - we should get out now'.

I agree with Mr Snow... there is not enough emphasis place on what is going on in Iraq for the positive... I know that bad news sells, but is isn't responsible journalism (like they are responsible anyway).
 
Posts: 3397 | Registered: Thu 10 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Suspended.
S_S
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ltcbj:
A few notes.

This is why I have stopped wasting time on this forum. There are so many losers on it. Not merely losers, but give up and run awayers.

The question however begs the issue, focussing on WHEN to run and not if we should. Opening the question to non-members further skews any possible value this could provide as it does not give us a snapshot of the membership anyway.

Reading the stupid anti-Bush/Cheney/Rove/"neo-con/military comments has gotten boring. I no longer subscribe to any topic because it just gets too frustrating to hear the same unsubstantiable lies being repeated over and over on the forum as I hear from the congressional self-servers and the mess media.

A pox on all your houses.
Violin
So let me get this straight.
You , who advocate 'staying the course' because anything else is cowardice on the part of the 'give up and run awayers', gave up and ran away from this forum when faced with nothing more intimidating than opposing views during debate.
Hmmmmm.



Whisper



Anyways. A Pox on Your Pox, and I'll raise you a Pus-filled Boil.
 
Posts: 4023 | Registered: Thu 08 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Say you're correct, how come WE CAN'T convince barely a soul to help in this DIRE quest to thwart Iraq of this massive influx of AQ?
Actually, we've convinced quite a few "souls". We undoubtedly would have convinced quite a few more were it not for folks such as yourself and the preponderance of the Democrats in the Senate that undercut our soldiers' efforts to do so by continuously calling for us to either back off or back out. Part of convincing "them" to commit to us requires that they perceive "us" as being committed to them.

Undermining our soldiers? Damn right. If I were an Iraqi listening to last night's Senate "stunt" (despite Mary Landrieu's staunch denial), I wouldn't trust us either.
 
Posts: 3488 | Registered: Mon 09 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SkipHadaway
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Weatherguesser:
quote:
Oh there is no doubting that America and Britain will be targets for a long time to come from the AQ. I just want to find Bin Laden. and kick him in the nuts for hiding for so long.


I would be willing to bet just about any amount that we already know exactly where he is, but we won't go after him because GWBush is either afraid of losing Mushariff(sp), or ... what?

What good reason is there for NOT going after that dirt-bag anywhere, is my question... (anywhere except in IRAQ, where we know he AIN'T).


I agree, for once. I, too, believe that bin Laden is in Pakistan. But, I think he is up in the mountains between there and India... and I believe we don't venture off into the wilderness because of the tension between those two countries.

But, back to Iraq. I disagree to what we should do there... I am part of the 41% that said stay and finish this crap... and we may have enough done by the end of next year to get out... so I may be part of the 58%, technically.
 
Posts: 3397 | Registered: Thu 10 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of FIST101CAV
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by outlaws93:
quote:
Originally posted by Weatherguesser:
quote:
Do you guys realize that you are arguing over a poll that has no basis. Just some ppl that voted to say bring the troops home or voted for them to stay and finish (which i did). But this vote isn't going to sway the government one way or the other.


You mean it won't sway the President, one way or the other, eh? And THAT is the problem.


why you want to gov to govoner by polls??? hell they change more then i do my underwear.... that is just crazy talk...


That's how the Dems rule. They don't have any of their own ideas. They only tell the population what they think it wants to hear. They use polls to gauge where they are going to stand on a certain issue. They only care about staying in office.
 
Posts: 1101 | Registered: Mon 02 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 10336704:
Sorry I didn't catch this one sooner, but as far as Iraq, Afghanistan and the 'War on Terror' goes, we have only one problem, the politicians controlling the military.
When they get up on their soapbox spouting off how we should retreat, again, it doesn't exactly instill faith in the troops under fire. If we really are serious about winning this thing, take the politicos out of the loop.
Has any one ever considered the fact that a 'Department of Defense' has NEVER won a war? Go back to a War Department and maybe we can save some lives from here on.
So, when the body count comes back this week, don't blame the officers in the field, put the blame where it belongs, on Capitol Hill.
The troops need to be able to operate without the ties that bind, within certain constraints, yes, but not as restrictive they are now.
The troops have my backing, however I am seriously concerned about having politicians degrading our troops and our country at every chance.
Pull out, yes, after the job is done, not before.


Couldn't agree more! The traitorous politicians did the same thing in 'Nam. Our country is being sabatoged by the egotistical cowards on Capitol Hill while the rest of the world sits back at laughs at the foolishness that goes on here in this country. No wonder they don't want to share in Democracy. What country would want a bunch of losers like we have running their government. The damn politicians need to back off and let the military do it's job. We were sent there to fight and win...not to die and lose. If we are going to be in a war (Iraq won't be the end of it whether we pull out or not) then we need people (Leaders) in place that have the b*lls to do what's necessary to win decisivly and let whoever wants to challenge us know...we ain't in the mood to screw around and we will kick their everlovin ***! Period! We need another George Patton. 'Nuff said.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: Wed 03 January 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of rhanley
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Weatherguesser:
quote:
Originally posted by ltcbj:
A few notes.

This is why I have stopped wasting time on this forum. There are so many losers on it. Not merely losers, but give up and run awayers.

The question however begs the issue, focussing on WHEN to run and not if we should. Opening the question to non-members further skews any possible value this could provide as it does not give us a snapshot of the membership anyway.

Reading the stupid anti-Bush/Cheney/Rove/"neo-con/military comments has gotten boring. I no longer subscribe to any topic because it just gets too frustrating to hear the same unsubstantiable lies being repeated over and over on the forum as I hear from the congressional self-servers and the mess media.

A pox on all your houses.


I believe the Church Lady would say, "Well, isn't that special"?

Good, get lost.


WG: I must admit that was a good one!
 
Posts: 308 | Registered: Wed 19 November 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SkipHadaway
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Squizzer:
quote:
Originally posted by ltcbj:
A few notes.

This is why I have stopped wasting time on this forum. There are so many losers on it. Not merely losers, but give up and run awayers.

The question however begs the issue, focussing on WHEN to run and not if we should. Opening the question to non-members further skews any possible value this could provide as it does not give us a snapshot of the membership anyway.

Reading the stupid anti-Bush/Cheney/Rove/"neo-con/military comments has gotten boring. I no longer subscribe to any topic because it just gets too frustrating to hear the same unsubstantiable lies being repeated over and over on the forum as I hear from the congressional self-servers and the mess media.

A pox on all your houses.
Violin
So let me get this straight.
You , who advocate 'staying the course' because anything else is cowardice on the part of the 'give up and run awayers', gave up and ran away from this forum when faced with nothing more intimidating than opposing views during debate.
Hmmmmm.



Whisper



Anyways. A Pox on Your Pox, and I'll raise you a Pus-filled Boil.


Why would anyone bail out when this is just getting fun?

Don't forget the canker on your boil with the pox on your pox.
 
Posts: 3397 | Registered: Thu 10 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Picture of Grunt4Life0311
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Weatherguesser:
quote:
Oh there is no doubting that America and Britain will be targets for a long time to come from the AQ. I just want to find Bin Laden. and kick him in the nuts for hiding for so long.


I would be willing to bet just about any amount that we already know exactly where he is, but we won't go after him because GWBush is either afraid of losing Mushariff(sp), or ... what?

What good reason is there for NOT going after that dirt-bag anywhere, is my question... (anywhere except in IRAQ, where we know he AIN'T).


Couldn't tell you that one. He is a sneaky Bast*rd. When we do find him though. I hope somebody just shoots him instead of a trial like sadam.
 
Posts: 122 | Registered: Thu 05 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RichardSl:
I just wish the newspapers would really report what is going on - AQ and the Arabs have factories all over the Arab states building landing craft, carriers, troop ships, transport aircraft and all the other things necessary for the big invasion of America. The elite units are now given US Passports with names like Tom Smith, Jimmy Jones, and Frankie Arnold so that they can sneak into America and set the stage for the big invasion. The hidden members here in America are buying munitions, TNT, guns, and all the other necessary weapons right under the eye of the Government. I just hope we stay in Iraq for another 10 to 20 years - I would rather bankrupt America than have it invaded - can't you see them landing on the shores of Florida, the Carolinas or parachuting from planes all over America like in Red Dawn. As for these polls - it is really 90 percent of us wanting our troops to stay there for ever and ever - the 10 percent have to be traitors or libels or even from our legislative branch. Come on America wake up. As Gomer Pyle or Tom Hanks would say "Stupid is stupid".


For a second, I thought my ridiculous post above would be accepted - especially from all those that see AQ following us home. It is such a dumb premise but that is what people on this blog are basically saying - we have to stay in Iraq and settle their civil war or else they will follow us home. Read the above post again and see how stupid that remark is - how are they following us home.
 
Posts: 461 | Registered: Wed 02 August 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of NikeAjax
Posted Hide Post
Don't want to bore you folks, but I was tired seeing everything done by polls.

Did a short calculation, how "human influence" would work.
Take five of your friends, let them do five hours of voting each. The security of blocking last IP could be bypassed, only it lasts a bit longer. Let's assume one vote per minute is possible.
That would give 60 x 5 x 5 = 1500 votes in the one or other bias.

At all it were 5440 votes, therefrom 41 percent stay, 40 percent immediately out, and 19 percent out later. If one would add 1500 votes to bias immediately out, then it would be 6940 votes at all. Still 2230 for stay, now 3676 for immediately out, still 1034 for later.

That changes the poll to: 32.13 percent stay, 52.97 immediately out, 14.90 later.

I do NOT say, this was cheated, I only say have a look on what you want to depend on.
Such a little effort and such a big difference.

Hope the mods won't roast me for that...
 
Posts: 886 | Registered: Mon 15 August 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Ifs thats the poll they had on here a few weeks ago, I didn't see those kind of numbers stating 60% wanted out. And I voted in it and voted for them to stay and finish the job. Then after that hit see results and I swear I didn't see those kind of numbers. It was the more like 60% stay...
Must be a liberal trick.

And for you "People" who want to cut and run.

Remember the military is there to do their jobs, period. You can't handle it, leave. And don't let the door hit you in the azz.
Little do you know that you sitting us up to have the very worst military in the world. Everybody will know our reslove and it won't be much..
As I have stated before, You hear rumors that there is a bad azz around...then he approaches you and the fight is on, but then he calls time out and leaves...Is he still a bad azz in your mind?
Nope, For now you know how to beat him. You in the military (active) ought to be ashame of yourselves for putting your own Service down and your own President..(thats what the voting thing is for, for him/her out) but don't refuse your duty or put your country down. It a reflection that is heard around the world. You just have beat your self.

And for you prior service folks and retiree's the same goes for you..even though you might have served your time, do it with pride. If you want to gripe, go to Moveon.org and have it.

But don't sit here on a site like this and put down your own service and country...Its speaks volumes of your owm self worth and that is nothing.
The only thing I can figure is that, its so easy for you to put down the service and our country, for you have someones ear, nobody listens to you about your civilian job do they? Your just another chump...So in order to "Get" attention, you slam your owe service and country.
I sure wouldn't have you watching my six, you can't be trusted.
 
Posts: 2264 | Registered: Tue 13 June 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I would be willing to bet just about any amount that we already know exactly where he is, ...
LOL. What's that old saw? "A fool and his money are soon parted"?
 
Posts: 3488 | Registered: Mon 09 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
it saddens me that today's americans dont have the intestinal fortitude to fight for their freedom. people do not understand that we are actually in a war with madmen who embrace an idilogy of violence and death. most americans are ignorant of the fact that muslim terrorists are in the process of spreading and practicing their doctrine of death worldwide.they have france in the palm of their hand,great Britain is experiencing increasing violence as well as organization of muslim fundamentalism in its capitol. most americans do not know that the muslim community of dearborne michigan was allowed, by american authority, to hold a vote to determine whether or not their community would be allowed to live by shariya,the muslim legal system which includes amputation of limbs and tongues,and death for illicit sex etc. the majority of this nonsense is pre-iraqi war.what happened to the america that was willing to,and did fight for its freedom? the guys in todays military are willing to fight but they are hindered by a cowardly,unpatriotic democratic party and a weak civilian populace! wake up america the turban is coming!
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Wed 18 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:

Anyways. A Pox on Your Pox, and I'll raise you a Pus-filled Boil.


I agree and throw in some validated parking at the FREE Clinic.
 
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 39 
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Military.com Poll: War Support Waning

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.