Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Equipment Guide  Hop To Forums  Small Arms - Civilian    Over 60??.. Too Old to own Guns...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
"Hits Count"
Picture of IC2SS19Z50C5
Posted
I just got the below e-mail from two separate fellow Veterans, one an old Navy Shipmate, the other a retired M-Day Army Guard CW3 and retired Tacoma, WA PD homicide detective… Obama and his socialist minions are certainly at it already it seems…

Guns to Be Banned for Elderly
Staff Reports
United Press International
Washington

Deputy Attorney General Designate David Ogden is circulating a draft of an executive order in which, among other things, firearms possession would be severely limited to people over 60.

An assistant to Ogden told us, "It appears that in these changing times, it is no longer necessary to allow the elderly to be armed. With all of their physical ailments and increasing senility, to leave them in control of a deadly weapon would be ludicrous."

While the Executive Order may sound too powerful, experts in Constitutional law state that it is not actually un-Constitutional.

"It's a question of wording." states Columbia Law Professor, Dr. John Braxton. "The Constitution forbids the Congress, that is, the legislative branch, from passing any laws infringing on gun ownership. The executive branch is not included in this proviso. As long as the Congress doesn't get involved, it's technically a non-issue."

The Justice Department was tossing the idea of a gun ban for seniors during the Carter and Clinton Administration, but public opinion stopped these initiatives. Now, the Obama White House believes differently.

An unnamed aide close to Ogden agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity.

"Clinton and Carter didn't have as much of a mandate as President Obama. They were both Southerners, and the Second Amendment was sacrosanct to their constituents. However, President Obama comes from a new sort of politics, where divisive issues like firearms do not apply to him."

"Quite frankly, it's a shame that no one has had the good conscience to have done this already. It's a simple process, and the majority of the American people will understand it and follow the law."

The enforcement mechanism for this particular executive order has not been published. It is likely that the confiscation of weapons will be similar to Great Britain's handgun ban, in which citizens willingly gave the weapons to police.
 
Posts: 1608 | Registered: Thu 16 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
I wonder what part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED they don't understand.
 
Posts: 5108 | Registered: Fri 27 September 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Hits Count"
Picture of IC2SS19Z50C5
Posted Hide Post
The trouble is John, is that b. HUSSEIN!!!!! no-bama doesn't understand anything but doing an end around the Constitution, in more ways than one. Just Google this subject and you'll get lots of online discussion about it.

I just wonder how many gun owners voted for B.H.O...???... If they did, what a bunch of worthless POUGs..
 
Posts: 1608 | Registered: Thu 16 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
If a person over 60 doesn't have the mental accutiy to own a firearm, does that mean someone over 60 also doesn't have the mental accuity to hold elected office?
Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Robert Byrd etc etc etc
 
Posts: 5108 | Registered: Fri 27 September 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Been there, done that. Played the terrorism game...and kicked their A$$!
Picture of STARSnBARS
Posted Hide Post
Sounds way too much like an urban rumor. Lots of Cops are over 60, which makes this story a bit silly.

My Dad went hunting 6 days before he died....at 90.


Life ain't worth living, if ya ain't got a good cigar.
 
Posts: 1837 | Registered: Thu 07 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Ecce Agnus Dei
Picture of swremwin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gumbydammit:
If a person over 60 doesn't have the mental accutiy to own a firearm, does that mean someone over 60 also doesn't have the mental accuity to hold elected office?
Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Robert Byrd etc etc etc


Bingo! This is what happens when people vote for politicians who hate firearms --- unless the weapons are used by Ayers and Black Panther members.
 
Posts: 1874 | Registered: Wed 04 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of oreegun
Posted Hide Post
Check out Snopes.com. This in NOT true. Only an urban myth and totally false
 
Posts: 84 | Registered: Fri 05 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by IC2SS19Z50C5:
I just got the below e-mail from two separate fellow Veterans, one an old Navy Shipmate, the other a retired M-Day Army Guard CW3 and retired Tacoma, WA PD homicide detective… Obama and his socialist minions are certainly at it already it seems…

Guns to Be Banned for Elderly
Staff Reports
United Press International
Washington

Deputy Attorney General Designate David Ogden is circulating a draft of an executive order in which, among other things, firearms possession would be severely limited to people over 60.

An assistant to Ogden told us, "It appears that in these changing times, it is no longer necessary to allow the elderly to be armed. With all of their physical ailments and increasing senility, to leave them in control of a deadly weapon would be ludicrous."

While the Executive Order may sound too powerful, experts in Constitutional law state that it is not actually un-Constitutional.

"It's a question of wording." states Columbia Law Professor, Dr. John Braxton. "The Constitution forbids the Congress, that is, the legislative branch, from passing any laws infringing on gun ownership. The executive branch is not included in this proviso. As long as the Congress doesn't get involved, it's technically a non-issue."

The Justice Department was tossing the idea of a gun ban for seniors during the Carter and Clinton Administration, but public opinion stopped these initiatives. Now, the Obama White House believes differently.

An unnamed aide close to Ogden agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity.

"Clinton and Carter didn't have as much of a mandate as President Obama. They were both Southerners, and the Second Amendment was sacrosanct to their constituents. However, President Obama comes from a new sort of politics, where divisive issues like firearms do not apply to him."

"Quite frankly, it's a shame that no one has had the good conscience to have done this already. It's a simple process, and the majority of the American people will understand it and follow the law."

The enforcement mechanism for this particular executive order has not been published. It is likely that the confiscation of weapons will be similar to Great Britain's handgun ban, in which citizens willingly gave the weapons to police.


Citation Needed.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Fri 17 July 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Equipment Guide  Hop To Forums  Small Arms - Civilian    Over 60??.. Too Old to own Guns...

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.