Link removed

He wrote this on May 20, 2009

"NidalHasan scribbled: There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that "IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE" and Allah (SWT) knows best."

He transferred to Ft. Hood this past July.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: IronErik,

Im not going to read his blog, but I will say this. Screw that cowardly sack of ****

.45 in the ear would be appropriate - -

Torgo;

I removed your link.

Military.com has strict rules about hotlinking.

You could have just removed the URL link or added a character to it. This is what I've seen normally done in the past.

But instead of just removing a hot link, you have removed an information resource.

Lame. The users of this forum are intelligent enough to process information on their own without you censoring the SFW content. Sure, get rid of a hot link, but don't eliminate information.

quote:

Originally posted by rcjarrell:
You could have just removed the URL link or added a character to it. This is what I've seen normally done in the past.

But instead of just removing a hot link, you have removed an information resource.

Lame. The users of this forum are intelligent enough to process information on their own without you censoring the SFW content. Sure, get rid of a hot link, but don't eliminate information.

Why not do it the way the rest of us do?

+++URL

The man was doing his unpaid job.

It is better to play by the rules and have a forum than have the forum taken away because of violations.

You can Google it back.


++http://www.scribd.com/NidalHasan

This is not a blog, rather a posted comment.

BTW, there is no evidence that Major Hasan posted that, in fact I just created a account there and deleted one and the only info it asked for was my Email. I made everything else up and I could change my screen name at will at any time and any document I uploaded the screen name changed, across the boards. Once I deleted my account the subscription to NidalHassan disappeared So my guess is this might be a hoax. Real interesting how that software system works.

I'm not sure the Media knows if he posted that or not and certainly they did not do their research on how easy it is to impersonate someone on that website after the Ft. Hood shootings.

I suspect everyone is guessing. I'm curious what the investigation reveals or if someone does definitively prove he posted that.

Go ahead try it yourselves, create an account, subscribe or post something, go into settings and change your screen name and note that it changes across the scribd website.

So anyone and any screen name could have posted those comments and then changed the screen name to match after the tragic event.

Ft. Hood Massacre Suspect Remembered As 'Odd'

Upstate Woman Says She Knew Maj. Nadil Hasan
POSTED: 5:35 pm EST November 10, 2009
UPDATED: 6:22 pm EST November 10, 2009

GREENVILLE, S.C. -- An Upstate woman says she knew the suspect in the Fort Hood massacre years ago, and she says his "odd behavior" was unforgettable.

The woman, who does not want to be identified, said out of the thousands of soldiers she treated as an optician at Fort Lee, one face still stands out eight years later. It’s the face she saw staring back at her on her television screen -- the man the Army has identified as Maj. Nadil Hasan.

Hasan is suspected of killing 13 people and wounding 29 others last Thursday at Fort Hood.

The woman said Hasan’s odd behavior raised eyebrows at a Virginia Army base as far back as 2001. She said when she worked as a manager of the Sunland Optical at Fort Lee she called military police on Hasan on three separate occasions.

The first time she says she called police was not long after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. She said Hasan wandered around the hallways of the post, set a briefcase on a bench outside the optical office and disappeared.

Not long after that, she said Hasan prompted an Anthrax scare that forced a building to be evacuated. She said a trail of white powder, later identified as laundry detergent was found leading from his car into the building. She said Hazmat crews were called in, but she doesn’t remember anything coming of the incident.

She said the third time she called police, Hasan left a suspicious package on a bench and walked away. She said it was later determined to be a sandwich.

“Odd” is how she described Hasan. She said she didn’t think he was evil, but wasn’t surprised when she learned he was the man accused of going on a one man rampage. She said she did everything she could to do to warn the Army.

She said, “It’s horrific. I don’t know the government could have prevented this but they should have.”

A special agent with the FBI confirmed investigators have spoken to the woman. He said the information could come into play as they develop a timeline.

WYFF has contacted Fort Lee. Officials are now searching through old incident reports to verify the connection.

Wendell, do you live in Greenville, SC? Thats interesting. I am still curious to see what the investigation uncovers and how far back it goes. Thats is rather strange behavior.

quote:

Originally posted by 22185905:
Im not going to read his blog, but I will say this. Screw that cowardly sack of ****

+1 on that count. The SWAT team did score a hit on this schitbag, but come on boys, when in doubt: DOUBLE-TAP!

Also, isn't it ironic that after all the years of media stereotyping combat veterans as potential "flip-out" and kill a bunch of people psychos, it's a non-veteran that actually does it? I won't even go into the fact that of all people, a friggin psychiatrist was the one who went nuts....

quote:

Originally posted by ErichG2:
Wendell, do you live in Greenville, SC? Thats interesting. I am still curious to see what the investigation uncovers and how far back it goes. Thats is rather strange behavior.

I live in Easley which is the largest city in the county West of Greenville. It is about 12 miles the backway avoiding the red lights.
Clemson is 15 miles further West.

20-25 miles Northwest, they filmed 'Deliverence"

-----------
On the 11 o'clock news, they stated that the thinking is, he was using the package leaving to test response times at Ft. Lee.

It didn't click before that you were near there until I saw the story line.

Yeah, if this guy is connected with terrorism in anyway, whatsoever. I think heads are going to roll in the Army somewhere.

This is still hearsay until it's confirmed via investigation results, IMO.

I notice a lot of this is going on in the press right now and so far the Devil is in the details. Story he attended a Mosque in Virgina with other radicals.....then says membership was several thousand Muslims and one of the largest Mosques in the state of VA. Exactly how many Mosques are there in Northern VA near DC?

I'm just real skeptical on our Media reporting.

I just want to say that when it comes to the kamikaze pilots of WWII, these suicide bombers have absolutely nothing in common with them except for the fact that to be sucessful both parties had to die. The truth of the matter is that Japanese pilots flew planes with military markings, specifying them as enemy combatants. Muslim extremests wear no uniforms, kill indiscriminately, and hide amongst the populace. Now, they are bringing their "strategy" to the united states, but through some backward logic the American people are told by their government not to be wary of muslims living in this country. It is my feeling that the only uniform this enemy wears is the color of his skin and the hatred his ideology preaches. I myself have muslim friends, and I know that they are a pleasant people who do great things to further society. At the same time, radical Muslims have already brought this war to our home. You better be wary of this religion because before you know it, that nice Muslim gentleman who works in the cubicle next to you may make you his target just like this scumbag Hasan did to fellow soldiers. Their loyalties are obviously stronger to their faith than friends, family, co-workers, oaths to do no harm, or nation.

quote:

Originally posted by ErichG2:
Wendell, do you live in Greenville, SC? Thats interesting. I am still curious to see what the investigation uncovers and how far back it goes. Thats is rather strange behavior.

Strange doesn't even cover it...his behavior was antagonistic in nature really. In the wake of 9/11, almost every 'suspicious package' has been called in, hazmat or bomb squad comes in, etc...so to randomly leave things like the briefcase, the sandwich, and a trial of laundry soap in basically the same areas (since it was the same gal that kept seeing this and calling about it), he was purposefully doing this for a reason. My guess would be along the lines of seeing how long it took someone to make a call, see who comes out, how it's handled, and how others surrounding the areas react. As a psych, that would all be very 'interesting' to him I imagine....

I dunno, maybe I'm just a very simplistic person or whatever, but it seems to me by this gal's account--it was done with a purpose and was very antagonistic...

Enlisted Infantry in 1988-1989 came out today as a PFC and Stationed at Ft. Irwin. Showed up on his Army credits for training transcripts he was a PFC when he was enlisted. I guess that throws out the theory he only went through Officer Basic. I think I read that on Military.com here. It says "Infantry unit" though so that might not be the MOS.

http://www.military.com/news/a...ml?col=1186032320397