Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Marine Corps Discussions  Hop To Forums  Political News, Commentary or Opinion    Hilarious - U.S. agency apologizes for fake wildfires news conference
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
20 days!
11/19/07
Posted
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/261007_b_fake.htm

Brought to you by the same folks who presented WMD Big Grin

They are just by passing FOX altogether now Big Grin

NO CRED!!!!!!
 
Posts: 1234 | Registered: Sat 21 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
999 days from
11/14/07
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 850 | Registered: Sat 21 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Humble member of the 10K poster club.
Picture of wayoutfront
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Harpdawg:
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/261007_b_fake.htm

Brought to you by the same folks who presented WMD Big Grin

They are just by passing FOX altogether now Big Grin

NO CRED!!!!!!


Yeah that was stupid

but not near as stupid as your analysis
 
Posts: 10565 | Registered: Thu 14 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
20 days!
11/19/07
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wayoutfront:
quote:
Originally posted by Harpdawg:
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/261007_b_fake.htm

Brought to you by the same folks who presented WMD Big Grin

They are just by passing FOX altogether now Big Grin

NO CRED!!!!!!


Yeah that was stupid

but not near as stupid as your analysis


You are the idiot that still gets your news from the MSM who clearly have no cred. If I am stupid you are a total f@ck!ng sheepublican idiot
 
Posts: 1234 | Registered: Sat 21 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Humble member of the 10K poster club.
Picture of wayoutfront
Posted Hide Post
MSM?? what that

I go to Breitbart.com and read through All the Bureaus.

and when I watch TV for politics Its usually CSpan.
 
Posts: 10565 | Registered: Thu 14 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"Bowlers have BIG balls!"


Picture of Kegler300
Posted Hide Post
Harpy, are you stating that you believe the California wildfires were fake? That is a terrible thing to imply after all those who have lost everything and some who even lost their lives. Have you no compassion, man? I read a story about FEMA employees posing as fake reporters, but nothing was mentioned about any fake wildfires. Wait till mediamorons get ahold of this. You better standby for the smear...oh, wait...you're a democrat. Nevermind, you get a pass...


"The World's Finest"
 
Posts: 12693 | Registered: Wed 07 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
I was out on Santiago canyon here in OC tuesday, wendnesday,thursday. This place is a disaster. My lungs are f'ed. My shift was 14+ hrs. until I was relieved by the next deputy. The press conference was fake. OC fire authority has a pissing contest with Dept of Forestry(feds) vice-versa and alot of politics going on while fires where breaking out. I wish I can discuss all details.
 
Posts: 791 | Registered: Sat 18 August 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Humble member of the 10K poster club.
Picture of wayoutfront
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I wish I can discuss all details.


Dude its not like its Opsec or anything, I don't think fires gather intelligence before they ignite Beer
 
Posts: 10565 | Registered: Thu 14 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
20 days!
11/19/07
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kegler300:
Harpy, are you stating that you believe the California wildfires were fake? That is a terrible thing to imply after all those who have lost everything and some who even lost their lives. Have you no compassion, man? I read a story about FEMA employees posing as fake reporters, but nothing was mentioned about any fake wildfires. Wait till mediamorons get ahold of this. You better standby for the smear...oh, wait...you're a democrat. Nevermind, you get a pass...



Sir, the title says 'FAKE WILDFIRES NEWS CONFERNCE'. That's the only thing fake about this siutation.

Brought to you by the same republican people who sponsored the WMD story
 
Posts: 1234 | Registered: Sat 21 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"Bowlers have BIG balls!"


Picture of Kegler300
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Harpdawg:
quote:
Originally posted by Kegler300:
Harpy, are you stating that you believe the California wildfires were fake? That is a terrible thing to imply after all those who have lost everything and some who even lost their lives. Have you no compassion, man? I read a story about FEMA employees posing as fake reporters, but nothing was mentioned about any fake wildfires. Wait till mediamorons get ahold of this. You better standby for the smear...oh, wait...you're a democrat. Nevermind, you get a pass...



Sir, the title says 'FAKE WILDFIRES NEWS CONFERNCE'. That's the only thing fake about this siutation.

Brought to you by the same republican people who sponsored the WMD story


Well, I didn't want you to be taken out of context like so many are these days by liberal watch dog groups. I accept the clarification and your apology... Big Grin


"The World's Finest"
 
Posts: 12693 | Registered: Wed 07 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
999 days from
11/14/07
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kegler300:
Harpy, are you stating that you believe the California wildfires were fake? That is a terrible thing to imply after all those who have lost everything and some who even lost their lives. Have you no compassion, man? I read a story about FEMA employees posing as fake reporters, but nothing was mentioned about any fake wildfires. Wait till mediamorons get ahold of this. You better standby for the smear...oh, wait...you're a democrat. Nevermind, you get a pass...


Originally posted by Harpdawg:
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/261007_b_fake.htm

Brought to you by the same folks who presented WMD

They are just by passing FOX altogether now

NO CRED!!!!!!

___________________________________________


Kegler300, sounds more like you are implying WMD's were a fake more so than harpdawg never saying the fire was a fake !

How did you go to Yale ?

 
Posts: 850 | Registered: Sat 21 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"Bowlers have BIG balls!"


Picture of Kegler300
Posted Hide Post
WMD's are real, they exist, we all know that, we have a few of our own and will use them if necessary. Next question? Cool


"The World's Finest"
 
Posts: 12693 | Registered: Wed 07 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Chief Moderator

Lead Moderator Marine Forums
Picture of ipscone
Posted Hide Post
quote:
If I am stupid you are a total f@ck!ng sheepublican idiot
ONE (1), repeat 1 more comment like this and you are history.

WOF was referring to "your analysis"; not YOU. Your comment however was a direct, irrelevant attack on a member here.

You can count to 1, right? Because there will not be a 2nd warning.
 
Posts: 35710 | Registered: Mon 02 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"Bowlers have BIG balls!"


Picture of Kegler300
Posted Hide Post
Now, in defense of Harpy, he used "if" in the supposition sense. We all know he's dumber than a box of rocks, but that's Harpy, and we've accepted him like that mangy stray cat that wanders up on the back porch. See how those innocuous suppositions work?


"The World's Finest"
 
Posts: 12693 | Registered: Wed 07 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Humble member of the 10K poster club.
Picture of wayoutfront
Posted Hide Post
quote:
WOF was referring to "your analysis"; not YOU. Your comment however was a direct, irrelevant attack on a member here.



Its called "walking the line" Big Grin

at least I know I hit the mark when he calls me names Wink

I am a big boy I can take it
 
Posts: 10565 | Registered: Thu 14 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
999 days from
11/14/07
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ipscone:
quote:
If I am stupid you are a total f@ck!ng sheepublican idiot
ONE (1), repeat 1 more comment like this and you are history.

WOF was referring to "your analysis"; not YOU. Your comment however was a direct, irrelevant attack on a member here.

You can count to 1, right? Because there will not be a 2nd warning.


Deifinition of "your" Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

YOUR: 1 : of or relating to you or yourself or yourselves especially as possessor or possessors.

ETYMOLOGY:
Middle English, from Old English ow, dative and accusative of g, ye, you; see yu- in Indo-European roots
 
Posts: 850 | Registered: Sat 21 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Chief Moderator

Lead Moderator Marine Forums
Picture of ipscone
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Deifinition of "your" Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
I hope you aren't trying to suggest that "your analysis" implies "you" because that would be a shameful ignorance of the english language.

Clearly "your analysis" is referring to the thing; not the person. English101.
quote:
Its called "walking the line"

at least I know I hit the mark when he calls me names

I am a big boy I can take it
Fair enough! You're on your own. Wink But hopefully he will not make the mistake that he can do the same of others. Wink
 
Posts: 35710 | Registered: Mon 02 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Humble member of the 10K poster club.
Picture of wayoutfront
Posted Hide Post
quote:
YOUR: 1 : of or relating to you or yourself or yourselves especially as possessor or possessors.



You got this wrong too

Yes I identified the possessor of the analysis

exactly as it is written

example

Your Dress is ugly... Your the posessor of the ugly dress

If I said Your UGLY .... your the possessor of ugly

so in closing

Your analysis of "your" is as screwy as Harpdawgs analysis of the article
 
Posts: 10565 | Registered: Thu 14 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Chief Moderator

Lead Moderator Marine Forums
Picture of ipscone
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Your analysis of "your" is as screwy as Harpdawgs analysis of the article
I just realized, he's probably one of those people that confuses "your" with "you're" Wink
 
Posts: 35710 | Registered: Mon 02 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
999 days from
11/14/07
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wayoutfront:
quote:
YOUR: 1 : of or relating to you or yourself or yourselves especially as possessor or possessors.



You got this wrong too

Yes I identified the possessor of the analysis

exactly as it is written

example

Your Dress is ugly... Your the posessor of the ugly dress

If I said Your UGLY .... your the possessor of ugly

so in closing
Your analysis of "your" is as screwy as Harpdawgs analysis of the article


I guess you overlooked the fact that its not my contradictory analysis of "your", but Merriam Webster's.

YOUR: 1 : of or relating to you or yourself or yourselves especially as possessor or possessors.

Don't forget the or's !

Thanks for proving my point WOF Wink

ipscone, if you're ever in trouble and need a witness make sure you bring WOF

 
Posts: 850 | Registered: Sat 21 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Humble member of the 10K poster club.
Picture of wayoutfront
Posted Hide Post
LOL yeah whatever
 
Posts: 10565 | Registered: Thu 14 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
999 days from
11/14/07
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kegler300:
WMD's are real, they exist, we all know that, we have a few of our own and will use them if necessary. Next question? Cool


No WMD in Iraq as you correctly implied Wink

THE TRUTH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQk3Pu5uJrM

 
Posts: 850 | Registered: Sat 21 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Marine Corps Discussions  Hop To Forums  Political News, Commentary or Opinion    Hilarious - U.S. agency apologizes for fake wildfires news conference

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.