Yep! He inadvertently said either his wife or Obama would be rolling the dice and hoping for the best. Gotta love it when even her husband doesn't think she should be CiC.
quote:
"If you listen to the people who are most strongly for him, they say basically, 'We have to throw away all these experienced people, because they have been through the wars of the nineties,'" Clinton said in an interview on PBS' The Charlie Rose show. "'They made enough decisions and enough calls that they made a few mistakes, and what we want is someone who started running for president a year after he became a senator because he's fresh, he's new, he's never made a mistake. And he has massive political skills, and we're willing to risk it.'"
Asked later in the interview if he thought voters would be "rolling the dice about America" if they elect Obama president, Clinton did not outright disagree, saying, "It's less predictable."
Not disagreeing would suggest he actually believes that. But to be PC, he gives an evasive answer. An evasive answer and "less" implies that both are a roll of the dice.
Not experienced. Just because they were in Washington does not mean they got anything done. 0 Bills passed that she wrote. Hill could not even get elected to anything in her home state and had to move to the Left leaning New York. They have both been running for Pres. since they got to Washington. They remind me of the old SNAKE OIL SALESMAN.
How fitting, as Bill and his cabal are the ones refusing to open Hillary's records as first lady.
Meanwhile she is touting that experience as her main qualification. It's like telling a prospective employer that they can't access your prior work history, after telling them how great you were there!
