Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  CG Uniform and Awards Board    Can someone explain this?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted
The Boutwell returning home from a deployment. Why are these folks in cammo? Note the first pic shows four folks in cammo and one wearing ODU's. Is there no longer a uniform of the day in the Coast Guard?

The second photo shows the C.O. in the same uniform.

What's up with that? Confused

http://cgvi.uscg.mil/media/main.php?g2_itemId=598885

http://cgvi.uscg.mil/media/main.php?g2_itemId=598838

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Ex_CG_GM,
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Hoof Hearted
Ice Melted
Picture of Mastersmate
Posted Hide Post
The one in ODUs near the "L" in Boutwell appears to be either an E-8 or cadet. The big star above the anchor stands out.
 
Posts: 3350 | Registered: Wed 14 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
Sure looks young for an E-8, but to me now everyone looks young. Even so, why the uniform disparity and why camos while entering port....and why camos on a ship anyway? Are thos 8 point covers they are wearing? Are those even authorized?
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
CG Forums
Moderator

Are you going to pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?
Picture of JerryG
Posted Hide Post
PSUs have had the eight-point covers issued to them since the first Gulf War days. We wore them in Haiti in '94.
 
Posts: 7830 | Registered: Tue 23 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
For PSU's camo's and 8 points make sense, but for the crew of a 378? Confused
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Picture of vftb
Posted Hide Post
We pulled into port anywhere, except Vietnam, it was always the dress uniform of the season (mostly tropical whites with flat hats and ribbons for the enlisted folks).
 
Posts: 1042 | Registered: Tue 11 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
God created beer, to keep the Irish from conquering the world.
Picture of aklis
Posted Hide Post
While I was over in Bahrain (land side)every coastie had DCU's even the patrol boat crews. might be a way for the supply chain to use up that version of camos being no one else is using them. The person in the ODU's is a cadet, there is a shield behind the anchor. Most likely met the boat some where and did not get issued the DCU's. I do agree that it looks crappy. Beer
 
Posts: 88 | Registered: Fri 22 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
That all makes sense, including the PB's since they were ported over there, but the crew of a 378? Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
For the female in ODUs, she's a 1st Class Cadet (Senior, who is graduating in the Spring). If you zoom in on the picture you barely see the blue shield behind the Cadet Anchor and star. If my memory serves me correct, they don't make subdued cadet insignia for the DCUs, so that could be the reason she's in ODUs.
 
Posts: 210 | Registered: Tue 07 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
Thanks Kevin, that explains that part of the mystery. Only ones left are why a 378, steaming up the Oakland Estuary, needs a crew in camouflage uniforms, and why they needed them anywhere else. I doubt they ever poured much sand out of their boots. Eek

Heck, we didn't wear them in Vietnam, even when we humped batteries through the bush up to a lighthouse.
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Picture of LEDETOIC
Posted Hide Post
Well, I'd certainly hope that you wouldn't wear DCUs in Vietnam, might defeat the purpose! Smile

Ok, just kidding, I know you said "camouflage" and not DCUs...I just couldn't resist.

When I was a LEDET guy, we wore DCUs in the middle east, with either the boonie or 8 pt cover.
 
Posts: 348 | Registered: Sat 14 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Picture of davidsonjb
Posted Hide Post
USCG personnel wear DCUs (actually CCUs) in the Middle East and East Africa. This includes 110 crews, land-based personnel, etc. BOUTWELL was in the region for awhile and perhaps the CO wanted the crew to keep their "combat" uniforms on when they came into homeport. When I returned directly to CGHQ from Baghdad in 2007 -- and since it was the only uniform that I had with me -- I outprocessed for a week in DCUs before returning home in civis.
 
Posts: 199 | Registered: Tue 11 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
From COMDTINST 1020.10

"Subject to the uniform policies of the local Operational Commander, CUUs are authorized for wear by USCG personnel"

They were deployed in support of DOD Combatant Commands OCONUS, so the uniform is appropriate.

Why they decided to wear it for the return home? I suspect it has a lot to do with reminding the general public that our mission set is much greater than what they normally see us do in their own backyard.
 
Posts: 269 | Registered: Thu 16 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
I had already checked the manual so understand the whole authorization process. What I am trying to understand is why a crew on a great white ship would need or want to wear the camouflage uniform. I doubt they were trudging around in the sand and camouflage REALLY doesn't work against a white hull and superstructure.

We didn't need camouflage uniforms when I was on a 378 and a 180 in Nam, so why is it needed now?

Nor is it needed when entering Alameda.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Ex_CG_GM,
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
CG Forums
Moderator

Are you going to pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?
Picture of JerryG
Posted Hide Post
We had a BMC who returned from Saudi to GI, NY during Gulf War I for some medical testing. All he had to wear were the six-color "chocolate chip" BDUs issued to our PSU.

BMC B was approached twice at GI and was told a) "that is not an approved CG uniform," and b) "don't wear those around here, you are scaring people."

Figure that one out!
 
Posts: 7830 | Registered: Tue 23 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
Epaulets? Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
KPS
Picture of ironmandv33
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ex_CG_GM:
I had already checked the manual so understand the whole authorization process. What I am trying to understand is why a crew on a great white ship would need or want to wear the camouflage uniform. I doubt they were trudging around in the sand and camouflage REALLY doesn't work against a white hull and superstructure.

We didn't need camouflage uniforms when I was on a 378 and a 180 in Nam, so why is it needed now?

Nor is it needed when entering Alameda.


I imagine the crew of the 378 "needed" to wear CUU's to signify to their families and the public that they are returning from a COMBAT deployment directly supporting the CENTCOM and AFRICOM Commanders during their deployment.

I see it as a bit of pride in what they have accomplished.
 
Posts: 159 | Registered: Wed 30 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Why they decided to wear it for the return home? I suspect it has a lot to do with reminding the general public that our mission set is much greater than what they normally see us do in their own backyard.


Good for them! Applause
 
Posts: 1127 | Registered: Wed 15 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
Picture of Ex_CG_GM
Posted Hide Post
[quote]I imagine the crew of the 378 "needed" to wear CUU's to signify to their families and the public that they are returning from a COMBAT deployment directly supporting the CENTCOM and AFRICOM Commanders during their deployment. quote]

One would think their families had a pretty good idea where they had been.

Combat deployment, hmmm? How many rounds did they fire at what targets?

Sorry, wearing a uniform designed to help conceal the person in a desert environment makes no sense when worn on a ship.

We wore this uniform....



But some wore this one:

 
Posts: 8602 | Registered: Fri 09 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ex_CG_GM:

Combat deployment, hmmm? How many rounds did they fire at what targets?

Sorry, wearing a uniform designed to help conceal the person in a desert environment makes no sense when worn on a ship.



Its really quite simple. You asked about a uniform of the day earlier, and DCU's are the uniform of the day for ALL US CENTCOM units, their rules. I bet they were wearing them into homeport because that is probably the only uniforms they took for their 6 month deployment since they would be operating in the CENTCOM AOR.
 
Posts: 85 | Registered: Sun 29 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  CG Uniform and Awards Board    Can someone explain this?

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.