Infowars
October 28, 2009

“Has President Obama, the Constitutional Lawyer, Committed Open Treason?”

When the president of the United States, Barack H. Obama accepted rotating status as chairman of the United Nations Security Council, he committed high treason… not only a direct violation of article 1 section 9 clause 8 of the Constitution for the United States of America, which states emphatically:
“No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall without consent of Congress accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

But this act by the President also has violated the 13th article of amendment that was duly ratified by March of 1819, but with secrecy and by active subterfuge, it was replaced by Lincoln’s 14th amendment right after the Civil War. This duly ratified original 13th amendment states the following:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
++http://www.amendment-13.org

No hot links..

Article 1 section 9 describes what shall not be allowed, but, it puts forth no punishment for such actions on the part of an elected government official… the original 13th amendment however, which was proposed in 1810… and some would say was a large part of the reason for the War of 1812, not only states that an elected government official cannot accept this kind of gratuity or office, but also states, if so done, the official would lose all possibility of office present and future, as well as citizenship, and if the circumstances are grave enough could be tried for treason and ultimately hung.

In either case I do not recall there having been a bill, resolution, or memorial, put forth by Congress, granting this president its permission for accepting the position of chairman of the Security Council of the United Nations… Without this permission and open discussion about it, prior to the granting of the permission… President Barack H. Obama is in violation of article 1 section 9 clause 8 of the Constitution for the United States of America… at the very least.

The creation of the United Nations at the Presidio in San Francisco in 1945, was done by treaty power. It is not part of the United States in any way other than by treaty in the form of an international “Peace” treaty. The Constitution states that treaties are considered part of Constitutional law when they are enacted by an act of Congress and signed by the president.

They are not etched in stone however, and as with all treaties, as was addressed in 1803 by the Supreme Court in the landmark Marbury vs Madison, which states that a law, (by law I mean act of Congress, and no treaty can become law without an Act of Congress), cannot void the Constitution. The Constitution however can void any law including treaties, if that law is repugnant to the Constitution.

When Obama took the position of Chairman of the UN Security Council… he violated Article 1 Section 9 Clause 8 by accepting leadership in an organization that is clearly at odds with the Constitution for the United States of America.

The instant the United Nations starts amending the Constitution by treaty power is the day that the United Nations should be carved off of the East Coast and floated out past the continental shelf and sunk in 2 miles of water, for good.

For further discussion and information, go here: No advertising. Read the TOS

This message has been edited. Last edited by: pipedreamsandbabies,

You are forgetting one minor detail. Obama is the "Chosen One".

First the chairman of the UN Security Council is not a title of nobility. In fact it is not a position on the UN Security Council. The council is headed by the president of the council. It rotates among members, and in September 2009, it was in fact the US permanent representative to the UN, Ambassador Susan E. Rice.

It is a ritual that world leaders make a trip to New York at the start of the new General Assembly Session, and make speeches. George Bush and Barack Obama have both made those visits and speeches.

So you are wrong every way and on every count. Not a good way to start the membership in this group.

6110161- Read the TOS. Advertising and hot link are both violations of the TOS. Thanks.

quote:

Originally posted by Dave_M:
First the chairman of the UN Security Council is not a title of nobility. In fact it is not a position on the UN Security Council. The council is headed by the president of the council. It rotates among members, and in September 2009, it was in fact the US permanent representative to the UN, Ambassador Susan E. Rice.

It is a ritual that world leaders make a trip to New York at the start of the new General Assembly Session, and make speeches. George Bush and Barack Obama have both made those visits and speeches.

So you are wrong every way and on every count. Not a good way to start the membership in this group.

==============================================
I can see it now with Obama's Civilian Military Force he said he wanted as strong as our military force or stronger. "My idea of" them dressed up in thier Black Uniforms and High top Black Boots all shined up and Red armbands with an Elephant insignia on it. I am not belittling the POTUS he did say he wanted them. The uniform was a suggestion for him..

Ron, what are you talking about. You can not have a Civilian Military Force. He wanted a Civilian volunteer service. No uniforms (maybe tee shirts), but where did you find this BS and how does it relate to my post or the OP?

Accepting the Nobel Peace Prize and 1.4 Million as a bribe to get out of the Middle East would be a better thing to quibble about - -