|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
General Discussion
Experimental Aircraft & Aircraft Photography thread.
Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
|
Member |
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
|||
|
Highly Experienced Member![]() |
Flying-Flapjack, thank you! It is not our belief or disbelief that can make or unmake the fact. ~ Thomas Paine |
|||
|
Experienced Member![]() |
They also called it the "skimmer" but the XF5U-1 "flying flapjack" never flew! http://www.voughtaircraft.com/heritage/products/html/xf5u-1.html |
|||
|
|
Member |
|
|||
|
|
Experienced Member "Behind the Redwood Curtain" "Semper Fi" |
|
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
I like the boeing 797 that thng is huge!
|
|||
|
Experienced Member![]() |
Got a picture? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member "Behind the Redwood Curtain" "Semper Fi" |
|
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Do believe they had OV-1's in the sixties in Vietnam?!
|
|||
|
Experienced Member![]() |
Think MOM would serve this @ the cafe ??? |
|||
|
Experienced Member![]() |
It appears the 797 blended wing superjumbo is a hoax.
http://www.ixpats.com/bahrain_expats_blog/item/54 If there is a Boeing 797 it is a replacement for the 737 and not a super jumbo 1000 passanger plane. http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/108623.asp |
|||
|
Experienced Member![]() |
That is correct. It is a late 50's design. The OV-1 was built as a joint US Army and Marine Corps project for a modern battlefield surveillance aircraft. The Marine Corps pulled out of the project before their prototype could be built, but the US Army began placing its orders late in 1959 for the OV-1A and OV-1B. The -1A and -1B differed in that the -1B variant had an 18 foot side-looking radar mounted under the fuselage and offset to the right. The OV-1B also had an internal camera with in-flight processor and an increased wingspan to cope with the extra equipment. While the plane was slow, its huge triple finned tail and engines mounted on top of the wings gave the Mohawk great maneuverability. To protect against small arms fire from the battlefields over which it kept a watchful eye, the cockpit was armored with an aluminum-alloy floor, flak curtains and bullet-resistant windows. http://www.warbirdalley.com/ov1.htm The Marines went with the OV-10. http://www.warbirdalley.com/ov10.htm |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Did you ever know Steve Hammond? |
|||
|
|
Member |
The name doesn't sound familiar, but my old memory ain't what it used to be. |
|||
|
|
Member |
I just saw a commercial for Boeing on the Travel Channel and they showed an image of the blended wing design exactly like the picture above only it was all silver and had a grid behind it rather than a city scene. So either Boeing is jumping on the hoax bandwagon to confuse Airbus, or they have decided to spill the beans. I checked out their website and could not find anything specific, but I did find where they are researching the concept and posted the linke below. http://www.boeing.com/ids/news/mdc/97-158.html Here is a rather large (5.18 mb) adobe file that shows the blended wing concept aircraft on page 3 of the document. http://www.boeing.com/ids/allsystemsgo/issues/vol2/num2/vol2_issue2.pdf |
|||
|
|
Member |
797 is not really a “hoax”; more of a concept A/C. It was in Popular Science couple of years ago.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
Neat it almost looks like its flyin backwards |
|||
|
|
Basic Training |
Is this the one that they said could take off from earth and make it to the outer Ionosphere or even space. They need to find a more economical, aerodynamic(space), and precise/accurate way to make it from earth to space. Maybe once in space we can have a little peice and quite to develope more technology. |
|||
|
|
DEATH FROM ABOVE |
Can someone please explan to me? First I like to visit this site, next I see that some photos have been taken off or deleted, is it a violation to put some of the planes on the thread? I think this info of pics would have to clear before private posting. So please explane where alot of the pics ended up and why taken off thread?
Death from above. |
|||
|
|
DEATH FROM ABOVE |
OK greywolfghost now be serious, is there an answer? But I did get a good laugh at your answer.
|
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 75 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
General Discussion
Experimental Aircraft & Aircraft Photography thread.