Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

by CB_Brooklyn


From the moment people thought that planes crashed in the World Trade Center, the brainwashing had begun.

The “official” account of Boeing 767s striking the North and South Towers, at 400+MPH and 500+MPH respectively, became glued in peoples’ minds as “fact” because of the “tee-vee”. Good ol’ tee-vee. We all trust the media.

Even in 1938, when Orson Welles directed a special Halloween radio broadcast of the novel “War of the Worlds”, millions of Americans believed Martians were invading earth. Everyone trusts the media! (As a side note, I’d like to advertise a new article by Andrew Johnson: “Mars Anomalies”)

It should come to no surprise how the media affects peoples’ minds and our culture, and the media’s reporting of 9/11 is no exception.

The 9/11 coverup perpetrators had their deceptive propaganda well planned. With their total control over the media they successfully conditioned most into believing their “19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims” story. People were overwhelmed; their brains saturated with the propaganda.

November 10, 2001 - George W Bush brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of “inside job” is crazy: ”Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011110-3.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ

But the propaganda didn’t stop there. The coverup perps, the experts they are, knew some people would see through their “boxcutter” deception, so they crafted an alternate propaganda… specifically targeting those already suspicious of the “official” story.

Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
http://www.realnews247.com/fascism_disguised_at_democracy.htm

This alternate propaganda is promoted by government plants within the “truth movement”, along with its fabricated evidence (such as molten metal). Of course, the media carefully publicize this “evidence” as a “wacky conspiracy theory”…

November 14, 2005 - Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of an “inside job” theory is offensive. Steven Jones promotes the “alternate propaganda”:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445


Yet, the coverup perpetrators use ridicule to keep the “REAL” version hidden…

December 6, 2006 - Steven E Jones brainwashes the 9/11 “truth movement” into thinking the idea of directed energy weapons and no planes is “crazy disinfo”: “Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm

Jones is one of many in and around the “truth movement” associated with Los Alamos where Directed Energy Weapons are researched. See here to learn how the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media. Jones also suppressed free energy research in ways that mirror his 9/11 coverup:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
By CB_Brooklyn
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=151&Itemid=60

Timeline of Events Involving Steve Jones, Crockett Grabbe and Steve Koonin
By Russ Gerst
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=162&Itemid=60


If no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, why didn’t the media use it to discredit the “truth movement”? Here’s a video of Dr Morgan Reynolds on FOX News: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8

Certainly if no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, the media would have invited Dr Reynolds back. Why didn’t they?

On top of that, why didn’t the media report Reynolds’ or Wood’s court cases, represented by Attorney Jerry Leaphart?

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case

Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GBD
Title: Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al.
Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge: George B. Daniels


Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD
Title: Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.
Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge: George B. Daniels

=================================================
UPDATE!!! While composing this article the author became aware of the following:

New York Times
“For Engineer, a Cloud of Litigation After 9/11”
By Jim Dwyer
February 23, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/nyregion/23about.htm


The relevant quote is as follows (emphasis added):

”… one man has sued on behalf of the United States, claiming that Mr. Gilsanz is part of a vast conspiracy to cover up the truth about 9/11, including the “so-called building failures.” The lawsuit maintains that exotic weaponry actually destroyed the buildings, and that the airplanes were mass psychological trickery.”


Wood and Reynolds have filed two separate lawsuits.

No mention of Wood/Reynolds/Leaphart’s names in the Times article.
=================================================


Let us review…

The media (i.e. MSNBC):
promote the “official” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “alternate” version as the “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
shun the “REAL” version and court cases

Plants in the ”truth movement” (i.e. Steven Jones):
promote the “alternate” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “REAL” version as “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”



We can now understand why many “truthers” shy away from no-planes/TV-Fakery. Seems the 9/11 coverup perps tricked the “truth movement” with a well orchestrated plan of deception! Will these theories really “damage” the “truth movement”, or has the movement merely been tricked into thinking so?

Many “truthers” often wonder why the mainstream media hasn’t broken the “inside job” story yet. The reason is simple: The 9/11 perps have not been exposed. (Check the “Suppression Timeline” linked above.)

Only after the real 9/11 perpetrators are widely exposed with the media break!

Will “truthers” finally start promoting no-planes/TV-Fakery? If the “truth movement” can’t admit their mistakes, why should the average person? People will simply continue believing what they feel most comfortable with: the “boxcutter” story. They don’t care about the evidence. Why should they? After all, the “truth movement” doesn’t. Or do they???


How many “truthers” have looked at the no-planes/TV-Fakery evidence lately… evidence that anyone can understand?

Below you will find a ton of evidence. Look it through… you maybe surprised!

======================================================
======================================================
======================================================



Article is continued here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=163&Itemid=60

So, did the government pay off all the families of the passengers and crew of those four flights who are all in on this devious coverup? Or are they all "LOST" on some Pacific Island with "The Others".

What's your theory there? I guess the government "erased" them all.

Seek help sir and keep your tinfoil hat with you at all times.

Don

Please send me your mailing address so I can go to Walmart and get some generic meds for you to help out in these difficult times. Then I will ask the Postman to slap the crap out of you until you wake up from the dream you are in.

quote:

Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
By the way i'm a computer programmer with a computer science major.
I don't believe all the internet videos or images nor paper news,
especially if nobody takes credit with a binding declaration.

In the early 90's prior to James Gosling (Sun Microsystem) inventor of
Java, though not the compiler writer, and previous to animated
gif, or sequential jpeg videos I altered animation (via <img SRC="">
which is not a computer programming language) by using multiple digital
images and changing their output by adjusting the image files within the
tag attribute. You can do the samething more effectively with a real
programming language.

There is a government intelligence agency that provides images with world
patented image format, and when image processed under contract I doubt the
intelligence work is posted public on the internet.

quote:

Originally posted by 21yrsUSCGUSCS:
What's your theory there?
Don

the steel turns to dust as it falls

I am God, I was with the DoD when the action began. Brainwashing or no, it is not real and did not happen. You saw nothing, you know nothing, and you have an agenda.

Be sure to continue reading article at the last link I posted.

Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article that details the military's hologram project.

Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick".

Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them.

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=163&Itemid=60

Here we go again!

Man, where the hell do you people come from? I know what I saw and It wasn't a ****ing hologram!

Ok, I'll bite. So here is a question that I would like one of the conspiracy theory nuts to answer. What exactly did all the people on the ground see? You know the people that lived there and watched as people jumped out of the bldgs., the debris falling and hitting the ground. Was the whole area under a "cloaked hologram" and everyone just imagined it?

BTW- I have some Coast Guard friends who were in the water watching as this was happening and evacuating people with their cutters. Was that all in their imagination as well?

quote:

Originally posted by F_N_G:
Man, where the hell do you people come from? I know what I saw and It wasn't a ****ing hologram!

im telling you dude they have paranoid delusions...

My devastated sister watched the 2nd plane hit. CB Brklyn you need hep, lottsa hep

quote:

Originally posted by CB_Brooklyn:
Be sure to continue reading article at the last link I posted.

Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article that details the military's hologram project.

Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick".

Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them.

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=163&Itemid=60

Ok, not for nothing, but your "proof", your "support" of your post, is a site of your very own? Ummmm....hmmmmmm....
Makes about as much sense as the theory you propose..

quote:

Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
Hi,
this is more a question for CB_Brooklyn, however I welcome any person to
answer my question.

Reference::< link >

Brief Auto Biography of flights.
Ultra Lights, Cessna's, DC class, MD-90. Except for Ultra Lights I departed and
returned to the 2'nd busiest airport in the world at the times. A 747 or larger can
not land there. American and United both had sections with aircraft at this airport
however all aircraft were smaller than 747. At LAX and Ontario international airports
I have never seen an American or United jet being a 747 or larger, and I have been to
both of those airports numerous times also.

My question,
How many 747's or larger did American and United airlines have flying within their
fleets on the date of 9-11-01?

quote:

Originally posted by NAVY_GRUNT:
Here we go again!

Not sure what your point is, since the B767 is considerably SMALLER in length (159.2 ft) and wingspan (156.1 ft) than a B747 (Length 231 ft) and (wingspan 195 ft).
The model number doesn't equate with the size of the plane IE: as the model number goes up, the size doesn't go up... this misunderstanding of basics is what allows conspiracy theories to fester... often, usually, the "facts" are not based on correct info.

Ignorance is bliss, you can never be sure of what you have seen.

I suggest you watch the long kiss goodnight

Im not going to sit here and make any conclusions because I dont know what happened, but to rule out possibilities solely upon personal agendas is blatantly ignorant

"Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths
by CB_Brooklyn
From the moment people thought that planes crashed in the World Trade Center, the brainwashing had begun.The “official” account of Boeing 767s striking the North and South Towers, at 400+MPH and 500+MPH respectively, became glued in peoples’ minds as “fact” because of the “tee-vee”. Good ol’ tee-vee. We all trust the media."

What about all the people on the ground in NYC that day who saw the planes hit WITH THEIR OWN EYES? Or are they part of the conspiracy, too? CB Brooklyn (this member), you are a troll. Go away.

quote:

Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
The point is I did not know the specs, so thank you for further
helping to debunk the conspiracy myths. Do you have a Boeing link
to substantiate this?

I'm looking at other Boeing specs however I have only seen the 737
wingtip specs which lands and takes off from the local airport mentioned.

quote:

Originally posted by simpleswine:

quote:

Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
Hi,
this is more a question for CB_Brooklyn, however I welcome any person to
answer my question.

Reference::< link >

Brief Auto Biography of flights.
Ultra Lights, Cessna's, DC class, MD-90. Except for Ultra Lights I departed and
returned to the 2'nd busiest airport in the world at the times. A 747 or larger can
not land there. American and United both had sections with aircraft at this airport
however all aircraft were smaller than 747. At LAX and Ontario international airports
I have never seen an American or United jet being a 747 or larger, and I have been to
both of those airports numerous times also.

My question,
How many 747's or larger did American and United airlines have flying within their
fleets on the date of 9-11-01?

quote:

Originally posted by NAVY_GRUNT:
Here we go again!

Not sure what your point is, since the B767 is considerably SMALLER in length (159.2 ft) and wingspan (156.1 ft) than a B747 (Length 231 ft) and (wingspan 195 ft).
The model number doesn't equate with the size of the plane IE: as the model number goes up, the size doesn't go up... this misunderstanding of basics is what allows conspiracy theories to fester... often, usually, the "facts" are not based on correct info.

Sure, look around... it's all here, and the reason I gave domestic model is because that is what was flying...

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/products.html

quote:

Originally posted by CB_Brooklyn:
Be sure to continue reading article at the last link I posted.

Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article that details the military's hologram project.

Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick".

Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them.

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=163&Itemid=60

"An evil magician's trick". Yeah, the buildings are STILL THERE. They've just been hidden by David Copperfield.

quote:

Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
Do you have the count of 767's owned by United and American on 9-11-2001?

What does that matter?
Possibly you could google the airline in question, look at fleet info?
However, I don't ee the relevence, unless you plan on bringing up N numbers? Registration numbers are assigned, and even re-used by airlines after a complete distruction of an aircraft.

When will people realize 911 was not planned or carried out by our government?
I always hear how questions haven't been answered, yet when I see the questions, I have to laugh at them... just about all of the "unanswered questions" are irrelevent, or down right a show of ignorance.. the folks who say a flight number is still in use, or a reg number... folks need to get a clue...

My son in law was waiting in a tower one coffee shop for his fellow worker and friend, who was up in his office, to meet him for breakfast, he has no tolorance for consperosy theorists at all, he missed dying by not going with his friend to their office, his friend wasen't so lucky. The doubting Thomas's are fools and need serious help.

All post by navblk4 have been removed or are in the
process of being removed within this thread due to
inconsistencies, though not limited to re-editing
of my own post, and or re-editing of images and or
re-editing of videos.