Sunday, 15 June 2008 16:13

Official Account of 9/11: “Flawed”, “Absurd”, “Totally Inadequate”, “a Cover-up”

Eight U.S. State Department veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. “There is no question in my mind, that there is enough evidence to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of the kind we have not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, releasing a lot of documents,” said Daniel Ellsberg, PhD, in a 2006 interview with Jack Blood. [1]

Dr. Ellsberg is one of many signers of a petition to reinvestigate 9/11. [2] Best known for leaking the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times in 1971, Dr. Ellsberg is a former U.S. State Department envoy to Viet Nam and Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Defense.

Another State Department critic of the official account of 9/11 is Col. Ann Wright, who said in a 2007 interview with Richard Greene on the Air America Radio Network, “It's incredible some of these things that still are unanswered. The 9/11 Report -- that was totally inadequate. I mean the questions that anybody has after reading that.” [3]

Col. Wright is one of three U.S. State Department officials to publicly resign in direct protest of the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003. She joined the Foreign Service in 1987 and served for 16 years as a U.S. Diplomat, including assignments as Deputy Chief of Mission of U.S. Embassies in Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Afghanistan. She helped reopen the U.S. Embassy in Kabul in December, 2001. She also served for 13 years on active duty and 16 additional years on reserve duty with the U.S. Army.

She continued in her interview with Greene: “How could our national intelligence and defense operations be so inept that they could not communicate; that they could not scramble jets; that they could not take defensive action? And I totally agree, I always thought the Pentagon had all sorts of air defense equipment around it; that they could take out anything that was coming at it. And for a plane to be able to just fly low right over Washington and slam into that thing is just -- I mean, you still just shake your head. How in the world could that happen?”

Fred Burks, former Presidential interpreter, is another State Department veteran who questions the official account of 9/11 and who signed the petition to reinvestigate. “How is it possible that our military's highly touted missile detection systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense system of the U.S.?,” he asked in an essay. [4]

During his 18-year State Department career, Mr. Burks served as interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Dick Cheney and Al Gore, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright and many others.

Mr. Burks continued, “An even bigger question is why isn't our media asking these questions? Why isn't our military spending many millions of dollars to find out why military defense systems failed on 9/11? Why is it that the 9/11 commission budget was far less than the budget allotted to the Challenger Disaster or even the Monika Lewinsky affair? Why aren't we, the public, asking these questions and demanding answers?”

Melvin Goodman, PhD, is another former State Department employee who signed the petition to reinvestigate 9/11. He served as a Senior Analyst at the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Dr. Goodman also later served as Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs and as Professor of International Security at the National War College, 1986 - 2004.

In testimony before a 2005 Congressional briefing on the 9/11 Commission Report, Dr. Goodman said, “I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission. … The final report is ultimately a coverup. I don't know how else to describe it.” [5]

Dr. Goodman is currently Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy and Adjunct Professor of Government at Johns Hopkins University.
Another former career Foreign Service Officer who questions the official account of 9/11 is Michael Springmann. He is also one of many signers of the petition to reinvestigate 9/11.

In a speech at the National Press Club, Mr. Springmann said, “I used to be in charge of the visa section at the CIA's Consulate in Jeddah. ... There for a year and a half I issued visas to terrorists recruited by the CIA and its asset Osama Bin Laden. ... Fifteen of the nineteen people who allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA Consulate at Jeddah.” [6]

George Kenney During his more than 20 years of U.S. government service, Mr. Springmann worked at both the State Department and the Foreign Commercial Service of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Among his many assignments, Mr. Springman served as Consular Officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where he supervised the issuance of visas.

In a later interview with the BBC, Mr. Springmann said, “In Saudi Arabia I was repeatedly ordered by high level State Dept officials to issue visas to unqualified applicants. These were, essentially, people who had no ties either to Saudi Arabia or to their own country. I complained bitterly at the time there. I returned to the US, I complained to the State Dept here, to the General Accounting Office, to the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and to the Inspector General's office. I was met with silence. ... What I was protesting was, in reality, an effort to bring recruits, rounded up by Osama Bin Laden, to the US for terrorist training by the CIA. They would then be returned to Afghanistan to fight against the then-Soviets.” [7]

Another State Department veteran publicly questioning the official account of 9/11 is former career Foreign Service Officer, George Kenney, who served as Yugoslav desk officer at the State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. He resigned his commission in 1991 over U.S. policy towards the Yugoslav conflict. He then served as consultant in residence at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Currently he’s a consultant and commentator on foreign affairs and current events.

In a commentary after a 2007 interview of David Ray Griffin, PhD, Mr. Kenney said, “We should strive to clearly separate what we know from things we don't. Thus, we have a reasonably high level of confidence that the Establishment conspiracy narrative is absurd. The World Trade Center structures came down through controlled demolition. Flight 93 was shot down over rural Pennsylvania. And whatever it was that hit the Pentagon could not have been Flight 77. Further, whatever his peripheral involvement, the planning and implementation of 9/11 did not originate with Osama bin Laden.” [8]
Michael Mennard, PhD, is another U.S. State Department veteran who questions the official account of 9/11 and calls for a new investigation. Among his assignments as a career Foreign Service Officer, Dr. Mennard served as Regional Public Affairs Officer in India.

In a statement to this author, Dr. Mennard wrote, “I am concerned about the numerous inconsistencies in the official account of 9/11. I support a new investigation regarding the tragic events of that day, the events leading up to it, and subsequent efforts to ignore the whole matter.”

Edward Peck Shortly after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report, a group of over 100 prominent Americans signed a petition [9] urging Congress to immediately reinvestigate 9/11. In addition to six former CIA officials, [10] the signers included Daniel Ellsberg, Melvin Goodman, Fred Burks, Michael Springman (all mentioned above), and Edward Peck.

Edward Peck served as Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department. He later served as Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Mr. Peck, a 32-year veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service, also served as U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq (1977 - 1980).
The petition stated, in part, “We want truthful answers to questions such as:

1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?

2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?

3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?

4. Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?

5. Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?”

These questions and many others still remain unanswered three years after the petition was submitted and years after the terrible events of 9/11. As the statements of these eight U.S. State Department veterans show, the need for a new thorough and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world.

http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/99-americas/4535-eig...of-september-11.html

wow what craziness...


hahahahahhahaha and this from the Pakistan Daily... hahahahahahahahahahhaaaa

quote:

Originally posted by outlaws93:
wow what craziness...


hahahahahhahaha and this from the Pakistan Daily... hahahahahahahahahahhaaaa

Three simple questions for you, gobshite. And they really are simple - in line with your obvious level of intelligence:

Have you read the 9/11 Commission Report?

Have you read the FEMA interim report on the collapse of WTC7?

Have you read the NIST Report on the collapse of the Twin Towers?

In your own time, bollock-brain. Go!

MsG

hell i seen it i know people that were there and i know who and why they did it... hell i probity know more about it then you and the author of that book any book about the events leeding up to and after 9\11.... Pakistan Daily hahahahhahaa oh what a joke... probilty written by alqueda to further destoblize our country...

quote:

Originally posted by outlaws93:
hell i seen it i know people that were there and i know who and why they did it... hell i probity know more about it then you and the author of that book any book about the events leeding up to and after 9\11.... Pakistan Daily hahahahhahaa oh what a joke... probilty written by alqueda to further destoblize our country...

The question was, knob-features, if you've read the reports. Or should I ask: have you had the reports read to you and did you, insofar as that's possible for you, actually understand them.

So, have you?

MsG

quote:

Originally posted by bugsy48:

quote:

Originally posted by outlaws93:
hell i seen it i know people that were there and i know who and why they did it... hell i probity know more about it then you and the author of that book any book about the events leeding up to and after 9\11.... Pakistan Daily hahahahhahaa oh what a joke... probilty written by alqueda to further destoblize our country...

The question was, knob-features, if you've read the reports. Or should I ask: have you had the reports read to you and did you, insofar as that's possible for you, actually understand them.

So, have you?

MsG

what are you talking about the article is bougus probity written by alqueda themselves to further destoblize our country.... but Pakistan Daily the creator of this article is not a reliable source... but i guess you think it is because it says what you want to hear....

quote:

Originally posted by outlaws93:
what are you talking about the article is bougus probity written by alqueda themselves to further destoblize our country.... but Pakistan Daily the creator of this article is not a reliable source... but i guess you think it is because it says what you want to hear....

So what we have is that you've never read the reports I mentioned, although (according to your previous post) you know much more about the issue than anyone else. Well, that must be a first, it nothing else.

I realise that you just want to be THERE! man (sometimes the internet can be a real burden with numbnuts like outlaw posting). It's just that you never, ever actually make any contribution at all to any themes you post on.

I know it's difficult for you to imagine, but there are folks out there who really know what they're talking about, in contrast to you. I've had US muckers track you on the internet and on all of the forums you post on, and you average 300 posts per day, all of the folks there have pretty much written you down as a total nut-job.

It's become known on these forums that your ostensible 100% disability is not physical, but due to the fact that you're intellectually sub-normal. Which is why you had to attend "speshul skoolz" and why these forums allow you to continue to post but never take you in any way seriously. I do find it rather sad that, on these forums, you're led to maintain that you knew John Wayne personally; that you're a direct descendant of Edgar Hoover; that you used to play bowls with Jimmy Carter; that you visited Al Capone while he was in jail etc.

I don't condone leading on a retard like you, but the fact of the matter is that the only forum you contribute to that takes you seriously is mil.com (I wonder why).

Does that give you food for thought, wankstain?

MsG

This message has been edited. Last edited by: bugsy48,

quote:

disability is not physical

actually it is

Bugsy- I hope that post was cathartic...B/C you are on Warning for it.- FIN