No suprise here... but thought I'd keep the nonsense up to date..
Barnett v. Obama, the last birther case filed by Orly Taitz that hasn’t been dismissed has, well, been dismissed:
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter has dismissed Barnett et al v. Obama et al, Orly Taitz’s most successful lawsuit — that is, the one that got the furthest through the legal system — demanding proof of the president’s citizenship
The outcome isn’t surprising, but after reading the order (which is embedded below), it’s clear why Judge Carter too three weeks to release this; he wanted an airtight order that gives Orly Taitz no grounds for appeal.
The best part is Section F, which Cater titled “Conduct Of Plaintiff’s counsel” and it deserves to be quoted in full:
Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.
and:
quote:
...the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court.
It would be interesting to see what would happen if Ms. Taitz is indicted for suborning perjury. Would she act as her own attorney? After all, Ms. Taitz has a sterling record as an attorney - she's never won a case yet, batting 1,000.
