Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  Point-CounterPoint    Willow and Monomoy COs Relieved for Cause
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
CG Forums Moderator
Picture of tc1uscg
Posted Hide Post
quote:
deleted by moderator


deleted by moderator

Say what you want about me, but comments like yours directed at ones family. You've just taken the offramp into the wrong neighborhood . Wink

Critical statement toward Tim removed at my discretion. Thank you Tim for putting the breaks on this issue..

This message has been edited. Last edited by: tc1uscg,
 
Posts: 2680 | Registered: Wed 06 December 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
deleted by moderator

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Nobodyaskedmebut,
 
Posts: 612 | Registered: Mon 22 July 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Nobodyaskedmebut
Posted Hide Post
You know what guys - its been said several times that this discussion has wandered over the double yellow line several times. Although TC1 did mention his son in the post it was used to illustrate his point. Keko your reply to his post is totally inappropriate; you two need to make nice comments to each other ( take it to e-mail and discuss your differences not on the forums or else the attacker shall be punished. TC1 has pretty much exercised some restraint of pen but calling out a moderator and forums administrator on the forums isn't exactly endearing either...

Call me a censor but I am going to delete the offensive comments instead of closing the discussion. Stay on topic or stay out of the discussion...Keko consider this to be a final warning; TC1, wisely do not retaliate in kind.

TC1 you have mail.
 
Posts: 1623 | Registered: Thu 23 May 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm sorry but I did not say anything offensive in the reply this AM, other than to stick w/ the thread as you indicated. Matter of fact, someone else indicated that my previous replies where not offensive or directed at him or anyone else. But if you still feel that it was wrong and I deserve to be suspended, then go ahead and suspend me. I still believe that never ever I attacked him or anyone else on this thread. Someone else brought up the issue of gender and he brought the issue of his kids to the thread despite my attempts to stick w/ the topic. I can not help if he and/or others consider using their family members to illustrate or make a point. They should think twice. Again, I apologize if in anyway I offended him, you or anyone else. But I don't see how I did.

V/R
 
Posts: 612 | Registered: Mon 22 July 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
Picture of Wray
Posted Hide Post
.
 
Posts: 13472 | Registered: Fri 22 September 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Straight and to the point!
Picture of CGSCOTTY
Posted Hide Post
Sleeping
 
Posts: 763 | Registered: Thu 22 January 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
Don't know about willow, but I was on the MONOMOY with this guy, Temporary turned in to permanet. For creating a hostile work enviornment. This guy was a very aukward/queer socially, insecure about himself and was a bit to big for his JO britches. The boat had big problems within the first month of him taking command. It's good to see things work out the way they should from time to time.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Thu 13 March 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
god help you if you ever run in to Kerry D. McKeever. Now that he ruined his own chances at being a CO in the coast guard, maybe he'll move on to the Army.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Thu 13 March 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Mightyz90_93
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ak_coastie:
god help you if you ever run in to Kerry D. McKeever. Now that he ruined his own chances at being a CO in the coast guard, maybe he'll move on to the Army.


Pretty cowardly putting someone else's name out there like that Mr 'this member.' An annoymous opinion is one thing, posting this, without attaching your name to it shows me you may need to read up on our Core Values a bit.
 
Posts: 4574 | Registered: Sun 15 June 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
If any were to apply.
 
Posts: 149 | Registered: Tue 17 April 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
Picture of Wray
Posted Hide Post
quote:
An annoymous opinion is one thing, posting this, without attaching your name to it shows me you may need to read up on our Core Values a bit.


To me it is a sign and action of a immature coward.... If you are going to belittle someone, criticize them or what ever, at least be man enough to put your name behind it.. otherwise, keep your mouth shut. (just my opinion)

Phil, after reading a post I can almost certain if a person is putting their name behind it or they remain "this member"... Pretty sad, huh?

Wray.. Cool

P.S. Pictures of the softail coming soon!
 
Posts: 13472 | Registered: Fri 22 September 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kekojones123:
I don't know why this guy has taken it against me. But yes, I am a former Chief that went to OCS. But as directed by the moderator, back to the topic.

My point was that chances are that if he was relieved for cause, there is sufficient information to do so. We all know the routine. Now the investigation will determine among many other things if the unit and the crew was placed in harms way as a result of the CO's action; if someone else was involved, etc, etc, etc, and finally if any other disciplinary action is appropriate. Again, I don't recall a single case ever being reverted. If anyone knows of one, I honestly would like to know. As far as a "he" or "she", yes based on what I had been told of the CO, I assumed the other person was a "she". But someone did asked, who ever said it was a "she". To me that meant this person knew more about the facts and was saying that the other person is another "he". Never intended to offend anyone, but I can't help those that are immature and inexperienced!

Thanks
Keko


CO of the CONIFER back in the mid 90's was temporarily relieved for a "suspected" inappropriate relationship with the ombudsman and then returned to Command 6 weeks later. Only case I've seen of someone going back.
 
Posts: 6 | Registered: Thu 20 December 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
CG Forums
Lead Moderator

Something Wicked This Way Comes
Picture of militia1
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Wray:
quote:
An annoymous opinion is one thing, posting this, without attaching your name to it shows me you may need to read up on our Core Values a bit.


To me it is a sign and action of a immature coward.... If you are going to belittle someone, criticize them or what ever, at least be man enough to put your name behind it.. otherwise, keep your mouth shut. (just my opinion)

Phil, after reading a post I can almost certain if a person is putting their name behind it or they remain "this member"... Pretty sad, huh?

Wray.. Cool

P.S. Pictures of the softail coming soon!


Well Wray, if we are expected to consistantly enforce the TOS fairly and equally, and taking into account that Mil.com allows anonymous posting, this is a clear personal attack.

Please attack the message, and not the messenger.

I too dont agree with name dropping, but I am not going to call the member a coward because I dont know them.

T
 
Posts: 5089 | Registered: Sun 08 July 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Picture of Ropeyarnsunday
Posted Hide Post
Then it is a cowardly act.
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: Sat 01 November 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
CG Forums
Lead Moderator

Something Wicked This Way Comes
Picture of militia1
Posted Hide Post
The act of a coward and a cowardly act are two different things are they not? One signifies the one act may be seperate, but the subject is a coward. The other indicates the one act is of a coawardly nature, but doesnt neccessarily mean that the subject is one.

Wait, I have kind of confused myself.

T
 
Posts: 5089 | Registered: Sun 08 July 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"going to talk and cause suspicion..."
Picture of asm3driscoll
Posted Hide Post
" if you can't say something nice, say nothing at all"

Peace,
 
Posts: 6121 | Registered: Wed 31 January 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Picture of Ropeyarnsunday
Posted Hide Post
You are absolutely right, Dick.
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: Sat 01 November 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of BMCS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ak_coastie:
god help you if you ever run in to Kerry D. McKeever. Now that he ruined his own chances at being a CO in the coast guard, maybe he'll move on to the Army.



Another pu$$y post.

--Jim
Life is good! Cool
 
Posts: 740 | Registered: Sat 23 September 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
CG Forums
Lead Moderator

Something Wicked This Way Comes
Picture of militia1
Posted Hide Post
Thread is closed. It has gone off track for the last time.

T
 
Posts: 5089 | Registered: Sun 08 July 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  

Closed Topic Closed

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  Point-CounterPoint    Willow and Monomoy COs Relieved for Cause

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.