Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Stop loss Payments Approved
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of Fin_atic
Posted
Can't post the link, but evidently you have to apply but can do it online. Goes back to 2001, $500 a month. Thought this was dead in the water but evidently the Army has already processed aprx. 2000 applications. If it applies you should check it out.


If you need to brag about it, you're probably lying.
 
Posts: 1838 | Registered: Mon 03 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of john2x
Posted Hide Post
Of course its still in effect. How else would you keep a volunteer military together without Bonuses and stop loss money? Heavens forbid they had to consider conscription at an affordable rate.
 
Posts: 8300 | Registered: Sun 27 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobApril
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by john2x:
Heavens forbid they had to consider conscription at an affordable rate.
I think you were being sarcastic - but I agree with your actual words. We currently have a far more professional and skilled force than we did with conscript troops. You get what you pay for, and forcing people in doesn't get you an effective and motivated force.
 
Posts: 1281 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of john2x
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BobApril:
quote:
Originally posted by john2x:
Heavens forbid they had to consider conscription at an affordable rate.
I think you were being sarcastic - but I agree with your actual words. We currently have a far more professional and skilled force than we did with conscript troops. You get what you pay for, and forcing people in doesn't get you an effective and motivated force.


We currently have a far more professional and skilled force than we did with conscript troops.


How would that be possible when with a conscription you get to pick from the very best in any field necessary. And best yet its at a sustainable cost with the ability to have a military force large enough to confront any situation and multiple fronts when needed.
 
Posts: 8300 | Registered: Sun 27 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobApril
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by john2x:
How would that be possible when with a conscription you get to pick from the very best in any field necessary. And best yet its at a sustainable cost with the ability to have a military force large enough to confront any situation and multiple fronts when needed.
I suppose, in some imaginary draft policy where the military actually gets to pick and choose who comes in, and gets to select the best people in related fields, taking them away from their civilian jobs - yeah, that MIGHT work. You'd still have the problem of motivating these enslaved...pardon me, I mean conscripted troops. After all, anyone who is yanked out of their comfortable civilian life and forced to place their life on the line for their country is likely to be a little resentful.

But of course, that's never been the way conscription has worked. In general, it involves some sort of lottery system. We don't get the best and the brightest, we get a random selection. Even that is subject to exemptions and exceptions - and those usually end up applying to just those experts you suggest we might get, as they're too valuable in their civilian occupations to part with.

Morale and esprit de corps are very useful force multipliers. Both are heavily damaged by the inclusion of conscript troops.

A draft is also a bad idea simply on libertarian principles. Frankly, if a country cannot inspire enough citizens to defend it voluntarily, then I question whether it deserves to be defended.
 
Posts: 1281 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of john2x
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Frankly, if a country cannot inspire enough citizens to defend it voluntarily, then I question whether it deserves to be defended.



Fortunately America has never nor will ever experience that problem in times when America is attacked or its national security is truely threatened.
 
Posts: 8300 | Registered: Sun 27 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobApril
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by john2x:
quote:
Frankly, if a country cannot inspire enough citizens to defend it voluntarily, then I question whether it deserves to be defended.
Fortunately America has never nor will ever experience that problem in times when America is attacked or its national security is truely threatened.
Very true, we never have, though I'd not say "never will" - forever is a long time. No, it seems that our difficulty in maintaining the military is when we send them out on questionable foreign adventures. Vietnam being the most-cited example...but I think we had a lot more support for our troops in Afghanistan before we diverted our attention to Iraq.
 
Posts: 1281 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of Duster6
Posted Hide Post
Maybe with our all volunteer, highly trained and skilled force we will win a war someday.
 
Posts: 12677 | Registered: Sun 24 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Navy Forums
Moderator
and Keeper
of the Cane


GerryRM3@yahoo.com
Picture of GerryRM3
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Maybe with our all volunteer, highly trained and skilled force we will


not have to be at war.


USS Liberty, Never Forget.

I believe in Murrays Law, he thought Murphy was an optimist.
 
Posts: 10532 | Registered: Wed 12 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Persy
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Duster6:
Maybe with our all volunteer, highly trained and skilled force we will win a war someday.



If the folks in the White House would let us actually fight a war, we would.
 
Posts: 4403 | Registered: Wed 25 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of john2x
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BobApril:
quote:
Originally posted by john2x:
Heavens forbid they had to consider conscription at an affordable rate.
I think you were being sarcastic - but I agree with your actual words. We currently have a far more professional and skilled force than we did with conscript troops. You get what you pay for, and forcing people in doesn't get you an effective and motivated force.




If that were true we'd just hire mercenaries to fight our wars.
 
Posts: 8300 | Registered: Sun 27 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Stop loss Payments Approved

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.