Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    E.U. DEMOCRACY IS BREATHING THE DEATH RATTLE
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted
E.U. DEMOCRACY IS BREATHING THE DEATH RATTLE
Democracy is officially dead in Europe as the EU is on the verge of making the historical move of breaking its own laws in order to force all nation states to comply with the Lisbon Treaty. At the same time, the move to silence criticism of this dictatorship is being driven ahead as well. DON’T THINK IT WON’T HAPPEN IN YOUR COUNTRY!!!
The time where we were safe from the outside world within our own national borders is over. It’s time we looked beyond our own national situation. We can no longer be secure in the knowledge that our own laws or constitution will protect us. THE WHOLE WORLD IS UNDER THREAT and we’ve got to be watching for changes globally rather than nationally if we want to be prepared for what is going to absolutely affect each one of us.
The hate speech witchhunt in Canada corresponds to similar witchhunts in Australia and in Europe. The whole movement to silence and to suppress the peoples of the world has sprung up overnight in the post 9/11 world. Of course, it was always present in Communist societies. So it should come as no surprise that it’s a socialist at the driving edge of tightening the noose further on bloggers in Europe. Estonian Socialist Marianne Mikko is pushing for bloggers to be put under scrutiny. Her justification?
Read the rest of this entry »
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of ScotsVisitor
Posted Hide Post
Yes, it's very democratic for one of the smallest nation states in the EU to try and move the other 26 into dropping the treaty.

Confused
 
Posts: 4825 | Registered: Tue 25 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I assume you're against the US government reading our emails and listening to our phone calls without a warrant, whitetiger?

And that you are against the claim of the Bush administration to lock anyone, including US citizens arrested in the USA, indefinitely without a warrant, court review or a lawyer?

If you are not against these things, please don't point a finger at Europe.
 
Posts: 844 | Registered: Tue 04 September 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of JakobA_DK
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by whtetiger:
E.U. DEMOCRACY IS BREATHING THE DEATH RATTLE
Democracy is officially dead in Europe as the EU is on the verge of making the historical move of breaking its own laws in order to force all nation states to comply with the Lisbon Treaty. At the same time, the move to silence criticism of this dictatorship is being driven ahead as well. DON’T THINK IT WON’T HAPPEN IN YOUR COUNTRY!!!
The time where we were safe from the outside world within our own national borders is over. It’s time we looked beyond our own national situation. We can no longer be secure in the knowledge that our own laws or constitution will protect us. THE WHOLE WORLD IS UNDER THREAT and we’ve got to be watching for changes globally rather than nationally if we want to be prepared for what is going to absolutely affect each one of us.
The hate speech witchhunt in Canada corresponds to similar witchhunts in Australia and in Europe. The whole movement to silence and to suppress the peoples of the world has sprung up overnight in the post 9/11 world. Of course, it was always present in Communist societies. So it should come as no surprise that it’s a socialist at the driving edge of tightening the noose further on bloggers in Europe. Estonian Socialist Marianne Mikko is pushing for bloggers to be put under scrutiny. Her justification?
Read the rest of this entry »
You know the author is sortof right. What the new treaty tries to implement is not a pure democracy in that the president of the EU will not be elected directly by the people, but will instead be appointed by the elected representatives in the various countries. Do you know any other nation that do things that way Wink

Then again the rest of the article reveal the author to be a far right idealist with little grasp of reality, so I woudnt worry too much about the doom and gloom predicted.

regards JakobA


"Good is better than bad cause its nicer" Mammy Yokum (as related by Al Capp)
 
Posts: 6181 | Registered: Sun 01 May 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BabySupine:
I assume you're against the US government reading our emails and listening to our phone calls without a warrant, whitetiger? I'm all for it...I remember when there were partylines...

And that you are against the claim of the Bush administration to lock anyone, including US citizens arrested in the USA, indefinitely without a warrant, court review or a lawyer?I'm also for erxecuting traitors...when you capture a man on the battle field with a weapon in his hand he is a POW...no trial is needed...

If you are not against these things, please don't point a finger at Europe.


at you
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of stickshauler3
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BabySupine:
I assume you're against the US government reading our emails and listening to our phone calls without a warrant, whitetiger?

And that you are against the claim of the Bush administration to lock anyone, including US citizens arrested in the USA, indefinitely without a warrant, court review or a lawyer?

If you are not against these things, please don't point a finger at Europe.
How is this for a grand scenario? One terrorist telling another on the phone, "Hey Abdul, are you going to be part of the next 9/11 in Los Angeles on the date we agreed on"? "Hell yes praise be to Allah, but hey, shouldn't we be careful talking on the phone"? "Naw not to worry says Mohammad, it will take the stupid Kafirs (Infidels) the better part of a day or two to even get a phone tap Warrant"! Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 2911 | Registered: Mon 28 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post


Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ScotsVisitor:
Yes, it's very democratic for one of the smallest nation states in the EU to try and move the other 26 into dropping the treaty.

Confused


Ah but let's not forget that the Paddies were the only ones whose government had the courtesy to ask.
Mind you the rest of it is the usual far-right w&~k fantasy.
 
Posts: 4382 | Registered: Sat 14 February 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BabySupine:
I assume you're against the US government reading our emails and listening to our phone calls without a warrant, whitetiger?

And that you are against the claim of the Bush administration to lock anyone, including US citizens arrested in the USA, indefinitely without a warrant, court review or a lawyer?

If you are not against these things, please don't point a finger at Europe.
P.S. the American member of the Taliban John Walker should have been shot in Afgan...
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of ScotsVisitor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Ah but let's not forget that the Paddies were the only ones whose government had the courtesy to ask.
Mind you the rest of it is the usual far-right w&~k fantasy


True, on both points.

It would have been "interesting" if the other member states has allowed a referendum.

Still, it's a strange form of democracy where 3 million can veto the other 300 million.

Maybe the Irish should bale out of the EU ? Perhaps their having gone from being a net beneficiary to a net donator has made them think again.
 
Posts: 4825 | Registered: Tue 25 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Fiannan
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bladensburg:
quote:
Originally posted by ScotsVisitor:
Yes, it's very democratic for one of the smallest nation states in the EU to try and move the other 26 into dropping the treaty.

Confused


Ah but let's not forget that the Paddies were the only ones whose government had the courtesy to ask.
Mind you the rest of it is the usual far-right w&~k fantasy.


Uh, didn't the French voters reject this treaty a couple of years ago?

Maybe the Germans should allow their people the right to vote on it.
 
Posts: 5431 | Registered: Mon 27 January 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stickshauler3:
quote:
Originally posted by BabySupine:
I assume you're against the US government reading our emails and listening to our phone calls without a warrant, whitetiger?

And that you are against the claim of the Bush administration to lock anyone, including US citizens arrested in the USA, indefinitely without a warrant, court review or a lawyer?

If you are not against these things, please don't point a finger at Europe.
How is this for a grand scenario? One terrorist telling another on the phone, "Hey Abdul, are you going to be part of the next 9/11 in Los Angeles on the date we agreed on"? "Hell yes praise be to Allah, but hey, shouldn't we be careful talking on the phone"? "Naw not to worry says Mohammad, it will take the stupid Kafirs (Infidels) the better part of a day or two to even get a phone tap Warrant"! Roll Eyes


Nice strawman, completely untrue of course but a nice strawman. You are aware I hope that under the FISA laws, BEFORE Bush decided to ignore them, a tap could be started immediately and the government then had several days (I forget if it was 3 or 4) to file the paperwork.

But of course since the truth does not support the Bush admin propaganda feel free to ignore it.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: rayld2,
 
Posts: 12283 | Registered: Wed 02 July 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
ray we are at war...are you doing something you don't want to be caught doing...
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Super Member
Picture of greywolfghost
Posted Hide Post
quote:
E.U. DEMOCRACY IS BREATHING THE DEATH RATTLE



It's supposed to be a republic, not a democracy, and our's is FAR from healthy, too! 3 trillion in debt, economy going in the toilet, two wars we got no clue how to win, a generation graduating into an era where family homes cost 1/2 a million because American money has been devalued to laughable levels, and we're enslaved via oil and products to countries that hate our guts and would love to see us crumble....

Any bets on who collapse first: Europe or America??

Hint Hint - Europe has been around for a VERY long time Roll Eyes


Wandering and Wondering
 
Posts: 27860 | Registered: Fri 01 June 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by greywolfghost:
quote:
E.U. DEMOCRACY IS BREATHING THE DEATH RATTLE



It's supposed to be a republic, not a democracy, and our's is FAR from healthy, too! 3 trillion in debt, economy going in the toilet, two wars we got no clue how to win, a generation graduating into an era where family homes cost 1/2 a million because American money has been devalued to laughable levels, and we're enslaved via oil and products to countries that hate our guts and would love to see us crumble....

Any bets on who collapse first: Europe or America??

Hint Hint - Europe has been around for a VERY long time Roll Eyes
Frown
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Shock & Awe
Lead Mod
HT Mod


Retired Submariner
Experienced Member
Picture of Silent_Surface
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by whtetiger:
ray we are at war...are you doing something you don't want to be caught doing...


Mod Hat Off

That is a TOTALLY ludicrous argument. Under OUR Constitution, the Government does NOT have the right to violate our RIGHTS because we MIGHT be up to something.

Our RIGHTs as citizens have been whittled away a little at a time over MANY YEARS..... and every right that we lose will be hard fought to get back.

One of our FOUNDING FATHERS had a very good handle on what is going on TODAY, and made a very intelligent and insightful statement about it.....

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
~~~Benjamin Franklin~~~

What we see happening in this Country in the current era is EXACTLY what our forefathers tried to protect us from with the laboriously written Constitution they left us...... and you are willing to throw it out so casually?

I am not.

Any rights we cede away to a Government we may trust today will also be held by a Government of the future that we may have reason to FEAR.

Mod Hat On


"The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life."
~~~Theodore Roosevelt~~~
 
Posts: 5381 | Registered: Tue 18 November 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SurfaceDog
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ScotsVisitor:
Maybe the Irish should bale out of the EU ? Perhaps their having gone from being a net beneficiary to a net donator has made them think again.

Nothing makes a country rethink socialism faster than prosperity. Big Grin


You know that look a woman gets when she wants sex? Neither do I.
 
Posts: 5858 | Registered: Tue 24 February 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post


Experienced Member
Picture of rcjarrell
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by greywolfghost:

It's supposed to be a republic, not a democracy...


All the word "Republic" means is that the power of the government is derived from the people - as opposed to a king/monarchy.

Democracy and Republics aren't mutually exclusive.

In fact, Democracies are a form of republic, but not all republics are democratic.


quote:
Originally posted by greywolfghost:
3 trillion in debt


More like $9.4 Trillion!
 
Posts: 4591 | Registered: Mon 11 March 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ScotsVisitor:
quote:
Ah but let's not forget that the Paddies were the only ones whose government had the courtesy to ask.
Mind you the rest of it is the usual far-right w&~k fantasy


True, on both points.

It would have been "interesting" if the other member states has allowed a referendum.

Still, it's a strange form of democracy where 3 million can veto the other 300 million.



Who gave you the right to speak for "the other 300 million?"

From what I read, if the UK had a referendum, the result would be the same as Ireland.

But your elites won't let the hoi-polloi vote on it. They know better.
 
Posts: 844 | Registered: Tue 04 September 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Silent_Surface:
quote:
Originally posted by whtetiger:
ray we are at war...are you doing something you don't want to be caught doing...


Mod Hat Off

That is a TOTALLY ludicrous argument. Under OUR Constitution, the Government does NOT have the right to violate our RIGHTS because we MIGHT be up to something.

Our RIGHTs as citizens have been whittled away a little at a time over MANY YEARS..... and every right that we lose will be hard fought to get back.

One of our FOUNDING FATHERS had a very good handle on what is going on TODAY, and made a very intelligent and insightful statement about it.....

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
~~~Benjamin Franklin~~~

What we see happening in this Country in the current era is EXACTLY what our forefathers tried to protect us from with the laboriously written Constitution they left us...... and you are willing to throw it out so casually?

I am not.

Any rights we cede away to a Government we may trust today will also be held by a Government of the future that we may have reason to FEAR.

Mod Hat On
SS we have been monitored fo years...what store we shop at, bbuy gas, movies we go to, down to what kind and how much toilet paper we use...we can stand up and raise all kinds of hell but it will not stop any thing...we are at war for the duration of our childrens lives...until the Caliphate is set...then there will be a new/old problem to face...wiretaps is a grain of sand on the beach...
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by whtetiger:
quote:
Originally posted by Silent_Surface:


That is a TOTALLY ludicrous argument. Under OUR Constitution, the Government does NOT have the right to violate our RIGHTS because we MIGHT be up to something.

Our RIGHTs as citizens have been whittled away a little at a time over MANY YEARS..... and every right that we lose will be hard fought to get back.

One of our FOUNDING FATHERS had a very good handle on what is going on TODAY, and made a very intelligent and insightful statement about it.....

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
~~~Benjamin Franklin~~~

What we see happening in this Country in the current era is EXACTLY what our forefathers tried to protect us from with the laboriously written Constitution they left us...... and you are willing to throw it out so casually?

I am not.

Any rights we cede away to a Government we may trust today will also be held by a Government of the future that we may have reason to FEAR.

SS we have been monitored fo years...what store we shop at, bbuy gas, movies we go to, down to what kind and how much toilet paper we use...we can stand up and raise all kinds of hell but it will not stop any thing...we are at war for the duration of our childrens lives...until the Caliphate is set...then there will be a new/old problem to face...wiretaps is a grain of sand on the beach...


I am amused when the scary Muslims and "the Caliphate" are used as the reasons to invade our privacy and deny our freedoms.

The fact is that none of these Arab countries could find their asses without our help, or the help of the French, Brits or Russians. To suggest that they are a serious threat to the USA is a joke. Funny we got through the Cold War, with hundreds of Soviet divisions and thousands of nuclear weapons, the KGB, the GRU and the Warsaw Pact threatening us, without the kind of spying on everyone that Bush is excusing.

"They" are not just monitoring our credit card purchases. They are listening to your phone calls to your wife, reading your emails and even reading your posts here and putting a profile of you in their databases.

We "the people" do not know how far it goes. You post about the lack of democracy in Europe. The same problem exists here when unaccountable officials stonewall the Congress and courts about what sort of unconstitutional surveillance is being conducted.
 
Posts: 844 | Registered: Tue 04 September 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of ScotsVisitor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
quote:
Originally posted by ScotsVisitor:

quote:
Ah but let's not forget that the Paddies were the only ones whose government had the courtesy to ask.
Mind you the rest of it is the usual far-right w&~k fantasy


True, on both points.

It would have been "interesting" if the other member states has allowed a referendum.

Still, it's a strange form of democracy where 3 million can veto the other 300 million.



Who gave you the right to speak for "the other 300 million?"

From what I read, if the UK had a referendum, the result would be the same as Ireland.

But your elites won't let the hoi-polloi vote on it. They know better.


Who gave you the right to speak for "the other 300 million?"

That, indeed, was my point about Ireland.

The UK government is very reluctant to allow the British electorate to have a referendum on ANY subject in case of the outcome.

For example, the administration in Scotland would like to hold one on Independence, however the opposition are reluctant in principle.
 
Posts: 4825 | Registered: Tue 25 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 2nd_freedomfighter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The UK government is very reluctant to allow the British electorate to have a referendum on ANY subject in case of the outcome.
On an emotional level I too would have preferred a referendum here in Finland.

On a rational level though, who thinks even a majority of voters would have bothered to find out what the Lisbon Treaty entails? We've voted for our representatives, and they're doing an informed decision for us.

Ireland is different because any amendment to their constitution must be decided by referendum. After Ireland rejected the treaty, there are lots of different options where to go from here. I really don't see where the writer of the article got the idea that the EU will "force all nations to comply".

The best outcome, I think, would be yet another version of the treaty, only more comprehensible and better explained by the MEPs to their respective countries' populace. A more likely outcome is that Ireland opts out of certain parts of the treaty.

Either way, "EU democracy" is being constantly reformed to be more democratic (a big part of this treaty as well). We're not even close to the best solution yet, but "death rattle"? Please.
 
Posts: 1841 | Registered: Fri 10 October 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
pending ban Nemesis

Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 2nd_freedomfighter:
quote:
The UK government is very reluctant to allow the British electorate to have a referendum on ANY subject in case of the outcome.
On an emotional level I too would have preferred a referendum here in Finland.

On a rational level though, who thinks even a majority of voters would have bothered to find out what the Lisbon Treaty entails? We've voted for our representatives, and they're doing an informed decision for us.

Ireland is different because any amendment to their constitution must be decided by referendum. After Ireland rejected the treaty, there are lots of different options where to go from here. I really don't see where the writer of the article got the idea that the EU will "force all nations to comply".

The best outcome, I think, would be yet another version of the treaty, only more comprehensible and better explained by the MEPs to their respective countries' populace. A more likely outcome is that Ireland opts out of certain parts of the treaty.

Either way, "EU democracy" is being constantly reformed to be more democratic (a big part of this treaty as well). We're not even close to the best solution yet, but "death rattle"? Please.

The (EU) directives on the Lisbon Treaty are very clear: either it's ratified by ALL 27 countries, or it's dead! But now they're all back-pedalling and saying there are possibilities of still implementing it. Talk about two-faced!

I was one of those who voted against the treaty, simply because it's deeply undemocratic. The French and Dutch voted against the original EU Constitution for the very same reason and the Lisbon Treaty is the exact same agreement in all but name.

Given the choice, many EU nations would vote against this awful agreement, so it's not just a case of the Micks standing belligerently alone on this.

MsG
 
Posts: 1173 | Registered: Sat 30 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of NSNN
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fiannan:


Uh, didn't the French voters reject this treaty a couple of years ago?

Maybe the Germans should allow their people the right to vote on it.


Both France and Netherlands rejected it 3 years ago (It was called the EU Constitution); the politicians simply changed it into a “treaty” so member states wouldn’t have to run referendums. Wink

EU steam roller will simply force the Irish to vote again. Popcorn

The Irish voted No to the Nice Treaty in 2001 and were asked to vote again a year later. That time they said Yes. The Danish voted No to the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 - and voted Yes a year later. The French and Dutch rejected the constitution in 2005 and the leaders designed Lisbon instead.


"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
Posts: 4296 | Registered: Thu 12 February 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 2nd_freedomfighter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The (EU) directives on the Lisbon Treaty are very clear: either it's ratified by ALL 27 countries, or it's dead! But now they're all back-pedalling and saying there are possibilities of still implementing it. Talk about two-faced!
What would prevent Ireland from having another referendum after Ireland could opt out from some parts of the treaty (like the UK for example)? Isn't that essentially what happened with the Treaty of Nice in Ireland?

quote:
I was one of those who voted against the treaty, simply because it's deeply undemocratic. The French and Dutch voted against the original EU Constitution for the very same reason and the Lisbon Treaty is the exact same agreement in all but name.
I agree in that it's pretty much the same agreement, only that it is done in the same way as all previous treaties (and not rewritten as a constitution).

How do you see it as "deeply undemocratic"?

quote:
Given the choice, many EU nations would vote against this awful agreement, so it's not just a case of the Micks standing belligerently alone on this.
True, but I trust my representatives to make these decisions. I have to say though that I'm disappointed about the lack of public debate by our Parliament.
 
Posts: 1841 | Registered: Fri 10 October 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 2nd_freedomfighter
Posted Hide Post
NSNN,
quote:
EU steam roller will simply force the Irish to vote again. Popcorn

The Irish voted No to the Nice Treaty in 2001 and were asked to vote again a year later. That time they said Yes. The Danish voted No to the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 - and voted Yes a year later.
The writer (conveniently) left out what happened in-between the votes. Ireland got the exceptions they wanted, Denmark got the exceptions they wanted.

    In general, the law of the European Union is valid in all of the twenty-seven European Union member states. However, occasionally member states negotiate certain opt-outs from legislation or treaties of the European Union, meaning they do not participate in the common structure in these fields. Currently, four states have opt-outs from parts of the European Union: Denmark (four opt-outs), Ireland (one opt-out plus one more under the proposed Treaty of Lisbon), Sweden (one opt-out, but only de facto) and the United Kingdom (two opt-outs plus two more under the proposed Treaty of Lisbon). Poland will gain their first opt-out under the proposed Treaty of Lisbon.

    Opt-outs in the European Union
 
Posts: 1841 | Registered: Fri 10 October 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SUSPENDED MEMBER
S_S

Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BabySupine:
quote:
Originally posted by whtetiger:
quote:
Originally posted by Silent_Surface:


That is a TOTALLY ludicrous argument. Under OUR Constitution, the Government does NOT have the right to violate our RIGHTS because we MIGHT be up to something.

Our RIGHTs as citizens have been whittled away a little at a time over MANY YEARS..... and every right that we lose will be hard fought to get back.

One of our FOUNDING FATHERS had a very good handle on what is going on TODAY, and made a very intelligent and insightful statement about it.....

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
~~~Benjamin Franklin~~~

What we see happening in this Country in the current era is EXACTLY what our forefathers tried to protect us from with the laboriously written Constitution they left us...... and you are willing to throw it out so casually?

I am not.

Any rights we cede away to a Government we may trust today will also be held by a Government of the future that we may have reason to FEAR.

SS we have been monitored fo years...what store we shop at, bbuy gas, movies we go to, down to what kind and how much toilet paper we use...we can stand up and raise all kinds of hell but it will not stop any thing...we are at war for the duration of our childrens lives...until the Caliphate is set...then there will be a new/old problem to face...wiretaps is a grain of sand on the beach...


I am amused when the scary Muslims and "the Caliphate" are used as the reasons to invade our privacy and deny our freedoms
The fact is that none of these Arab countries could find their asses without our help, or the help of the French, Brits or Russians. To suggest that they are a serious threat to the USA is a joke. Funny we got through the Cold War, with hundreds of Soviet divisions and thousands of nuclear weapons, the KGB, the GRU and the Warsaw Pact threatening us, without the kind of spying on everyone that Bush is excusing.We are not at war with Arab countries...we are at war with a people...mixed and mingled...

"They" are not just monitoring our credit card purchases. They are listening to your phone calls to your wife, reading your emails and even reading your posts here and putting a profile of you in their databases. This hasn't just begun...I'm 58 and can remember my Mom and Dad talking about government watching when I was 12...

We "the people" do not know how far it goes. You post about the lack of democracy in Europe. The same problem exists here when unaccountable officials stonewall the Congress and courts about what sort of unconstitutional surveillance is being conducted.Mr Christian read you instruction manual...its all there...
 
Posts: 16477 | Registered: Thu 29 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    E.U. DEMOCRACY IS BREATHING THE DEATH RATTLE

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.