Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Medal Of Honor Recipient Col. Bud Day On The Liberal’s “War On America”
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
"Cannon Cockers, The Grunts 911 call"

"Has Been 1"

Picture of scwestusmc
Posted Hide Post
quote:
SIR BUD DAY Thank you!

The lefties are wise enough not to take on a MOH winner like Col. Day.

The real big hippo in the room is.......What the hell are the Demos going to say next summer when it is clear that the surge is/has "worked?" What will they say......Luck????....How could they be wrong....Remember Harry (The Dig Bat) Reid has said "the war is lost" It will be played back to him in an endless loop.
 
Posts: 7225 | Registered: Wed 06 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Liberal Member
Picture of scottrj50
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
quote:
Originally posted by SSgtRobertMorris:
"limpy". So, is that like limpdick, or what?


I think that is what he means and it makes no sense at all. I mean, how many military ops did Clinton do? Wow, I think that was none, unless you count relegating our troops to the Blue-beanied UN police force. And, let's see, Both the Bush's have waged positive military campaigns in their tenures, and we all remember Reagan's legacy - a strike against Qaddafi and bringing down the iron curtain, star wars, etc. So, if the conservatives are limpdicks, then I guess that the libs are limper- or nodicks. Hmmmm.



Now be fair...There was the Beruit disaster.You might want to put down your John Birch books and read Reagans thoughts on the Beruit debacle.Bush II should have read them to.Ok you can go back to your Birch books.
Eek
 
Posts: 9355 | Registered: Wed 27 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
COL Day nails it, recognizing the left, some of whom opine in this forum, for the dirtbags they are. . . .
 
Posts: 3796 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kegler300:
This may have been previously posted, but is certainly worth a repeat. This is truly a great American and a "real soldier"...



quote:
My Dear Fellow Americans:

For the last few weeks, the “Liberal’s War on America” has gone badly.

* MoveOn, the New York Times, and Senators who accused Gen. Petraeus of being a traitor and a liar have been exposed and repudiated;
* The media’s attempted flim-flam to portray Iran’s Terrorist Dictator as a “Statesman,” tripped on Columbia University’s red carpet;
* The brave combat Marines whom Congressman Murtha and the press eagerly charged with “cold-blooded murders” in Iraq are being found innocent, acquitted one by one.

The “War” is not going well … the “War On America,” that is.

Those who claim they “Support the Troops” are finally being unmasked, shown for being the cowards they are. But, it won’t be long before they regroup, begin their own “Surge” in this decades-long “War On America.” We won’t stand by quietly when they do; nor, should you.

My fellow POWs and I have long known the contempt the extreme Left has for our military. We felt the crush of rifle butts in our faces, beatings and unspeakable torture in the Hanoi Hilton Prison when we refused to kowtow to American traitors who traveled to these countries for propaganda “photo-ops” with our Communist jailors.

The so-called “anti-war movement,” lead by the likes of Lt. John Kerry and his mentor, Sen. Ted Kennedy, also said they “supported the troops”. What they didn’t say is whose “troops.”

We knew the answer then, we were witnesses and victims. It’s the same today. They “support” America’s enemies, any Communist Regime, Dictator or Terrorists that vow to kill and maim American soldiers and innocent civilians.

American soldiers in Vietnam were falsely accused of being a “barbarian horde,” “rapists,” “murderers,” “drug addicts” and “baby killers.”

Today, their sons, daughters and grandchildren serving in uniform stand accused of being “terrorists,” “Nazis,” “cold-blooded murderers,” people who wantonly conduct “air raids on villages” bombing and killing civilians.

Every one of those spurious accusations were spewed from the Halls of Congress, most often by the same men and women who voted to send America’s youth to war, only to denounce, vilify and abandon them later, when the opportunity for personal, political advantage presented itself.

When I and my fellow veterans — POWs, Soldiers, Airmen, Marines and Navy Swift Boat combat veterans alike — attempted to warn America about one of the most notorious turncoats from the Vietnam era, we were initially ignored by the mainstream media.

When the press and TV networks could no longer cover-up for John Kerry’s very public treasonous conduct, we were accused of being “serial liars,” shouted down by Leftist political campaign operatives disguised as “journalists.” All the while the networks kept the film evidence of Lt. Kerry’s betrayal under lock and key, where it remains hidden from the American public even today.

The recent treatment accorded Gen. Petraeus by the same radicals in Congress and the media was strikingly similar to our experiences in 2004. Before he uttered a single word, this highly decorated combat veteran, a man of great honor who has risked his life many times in the defense of our country, stood accused, disparaged and berated by a pack of power-hungry shirkers and slackers unworthy to polish his combat medals. Contribute

Veterans who attempted to expose Sen. Kerry in 2004 were treated no better. But, Kerry and his band of Leftist comrades had something special in store for me and my fellow POWs and their wives. We were sued repeatedly for three long years, forced to spend $1 million just to defend ourselves in several frivolous lawsuits.

What did we do to cause such a prolonged, vindictive assault? We told the truth no Mainstream Media news operation wanted the American public to know, then or now.

Dozens of my fellow POWs and their wives participated in a documentary, “Stolen Honor: Wounds that Never Heal.” In that film we said Kerry and his anti-war followers were liars and frauds working on behalf of our brutal Communists captors. Their collaboration with the enemy prolonged our captivity and the Vietnam War itself by years. Their vicious lies accusing us and all U.S. servicemen of being “war criminals” put our lives and the lives of Americans still fighting on the battlefield in grave danger.

Worse of all, Kerry’s self-aggrandizing, false accusations against American soldiers who had born the brunt of the bleeding and dying in Vietnam, spawned the myths our young men and women in Iraq today are forced to defend against, even as they fight for their lives on the battlefield each and every day.

You can draw a straight line from the deceitful Leftist tactics used to bring America’s defeat and dishonor in Vietnam to Iraq today.

America’s military didn’t lose the Vietnam War. Congress declared defeat, voted to abandon South Vietnam nearly two years after our last combat troops left. That sell-out, not only of our South Vietnam ally, but the nearly 60,000 Americans who gave their lives on the battlefield, ignited a genocidal holocaust throughout Southeast Asia that can still only be measured in the millions, an estimated three to five million innocent civilians brutally murdered.

We cannot let that happen again. We will not let that happen. You can stand shoulder to shoulder with us to prevent that from happening.

Three years ago, I and my fellow POWs and Vietnam combat veterans created a non-profit organization, ” The Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation”. Our mission was simple, to set the record straight about the Vietnam War and those who served and fought there. Little did we know then we’d be slapped with multiple lawsuits for daring to uncover the layer upon layer of lies that constitute the false Vietnam History.

Nor, could we know then the Left’s plans to use the same Vietnam blueprint for defeat in Iraq. Little wonder Kerry and his followers wanted to sue us into silence! But, we prevailed. We successfully defended against each of those lawsuits, all have now been withdrawn. And, we will not remain silent any longer.

Our research into the Vietnam War, most especially, those individuals and organizations responsible for creating the completely false history of Vietnam, is voluminous, factual and compelling. We have amassed a virtual library of records, documents and eyewitness testimony that proves, conclusively, the popular history of Vietnam is pure bunk, propaganda.

Once we get the truth out to the American people, there will be winners. Those winners will be every man and woman who has served in our Armed Forces. To them and their families, this is a war we cannot lose.

The “War On America” is just heating up again. What we do now will dictate America’s future, whether it is one of victory over terrorism, or, decades more of defeat, humiliation in a lost, but noble cause.

God Bless You and America,

Col. Bud Day


GatheringofEagles


Applause Applause
 
Posts: 6952 | Registered: Tue 15 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
How does being against the war make one an Anti-American? How does not supporting the President make one an Anti-American? I will not speak out against an war hero such as this. His sacrifice makes him an honorable man in my books, but I cannot and will not agree with his politics. Yes it is politics. I am against the war, but I can't stand Kerry or Teddy, and as for Hanoi Jane "when the Jews forgive Hitler, I might forgive her". But how many more soldiers must die before our government wakes up and either fights a war or comes home. And why is coming home cutting and running? I am as much an American as anyone else on this website and I pray to God that not one more American life is waisted in Iraq. Bring home the boys and girls and thank you Col. Bud Day for your service to the country that I love.
 
Posts: 469 | Registered: Tue 10 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Liberal Member
Picture of scottrj50
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by scottrj50:
quote:
Originally posted by USAF_76_2_80:
Thursday, June 22, 2006
Washington , D.C. — U.S. Senator Daniel K. Inouye voted in support of the Kerry and Levin Amendments to the Defense Authorization bill. His statement is set forth below:

“I voted in favor of a phased redeployment of troops from Iraq. I voted in favor of calling upon the Bush Administration to come up with a clear and cohesive plan which allows us to leave the battlefield with honor.

“This is not about ‘cut and run’ as President Bush has stated. We have been in Iraq for over three years – more than 2500 brave American men and women in uniform have died, and thousands of others have been seriously injured. There is no such thing as ‘cut and run’ in a war, and those of us who have put on the uniform and have shed blood know this all too well.

“How many more body bags need to come home before this White House acknowledges that ‘staying the course’ or not ‘cutting and running’ is no military strategy. As one of 100 U.S. senators who have the heart-wrenching duty of deciding when to commit our nation to war and to send our precious sons and daughters into harms way, I cannot in good conscience continue to condone sending our armed forces to the battlefield without a clear plan to win peace and to begin a responsible withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. It’s time to come home,” Senator Inouye stated.




Applause Applause Applause Applause
*
 
Posts: 9355 | Registered: Wed 27 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Could we knock off the repeated reposts? I think most would say it gets tiresome to have that kind of "counterpoint"?


"Never try to teach a pig to sing; It wastes your time and annoys the pig." - Heinlein
 
Posts: 7874 | Registered: Mon 29 November 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Elesso
Posted Hide Post
does anyone suppose that even extreme leftist may actually LOVE this country? maybe they want changes made (no maybe about it), but they want what is good for the people that they agree with?

i am not sure it is all about us or them.. it is about POLICY... if i support the troops, but think the war is wrong, i am a traitor.. if i hold soldiers accountable for their actions i am a liberal. if i want accountability for profiteers, i am, a commie... but...
if i support the presidents policies i am a patriot.

when do i get to be an American with the rights outlined on that very unique piece of parchment?

my loyalty is to my country... to my people... not to some halfassed political party.
 
Posts: 3185 | Registered: Fri 07 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Cannon Cockers, The Grunts 911 call"

"Has Been 1"

Picture of scwestusmc
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The real big hippo in the room is.......What the hell are the Demos going to say next summer when it is clear that the surge is/has "worked?" What will they say......Luck????....How could they be wrong....Remember Harry (The Dig Bat) Reid has said "the war is lost" It will be played back to him in an endless loop


What will the Lefties say??????????????????????
 
Posts: 7225 | Registered: Wed 06 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SUSPENDED NEMESIS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Elesso:
does anyone suppose that even extreme leftist may actually LOVE this country? maybe they want changes made (no maybe about it), but they want what is good for the people that they agree with?

i am not sure it is all about us or them.. it is about POLICY... if i support the troops, but think the war is wrong, i am a traitor.. if i hold soldiers accountable for their actions i am a liberal. if i want accountability for profiteers, i am, a commie... but...
if i support the presidents policies i am a patriot.

when do i get to be an American with the rights outlined on that very unique piece of parchment?

my loyalty is to my country... to my people... not to some halfassed political party.


A very good illustration can be made about leftist ideals and motivations from the October 1917 revolution in Russia when the leftists "just wanted change" from the right (the tsar). It resulted in the Tsar and his family being put to death and a tyrannical rule for the next 70 years. The ideals of the leftists in that case are the same as they are now - the "underprivileged" want the wealth to be divided more along what they consider fair. In the case today, tax the wealthy more, allow broader disallowance of privilge from the "overprivileged", remove those from positions of authority those with whom they disagree, even to the point of violence. Etc. The extreme left does not adhere to any real American principles because that would call for preserving those principles, when idealism is all about radical change to the status quo. That is why the Constitution has been mutated to include "expression" within the First Amendment along with "Freedom FROM Religion". That is what bothers me.
 
Posts: 4642 | Registered: Wed 14 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elesso:QUOTE]

A very good illustration can be made about leftist ideals and motivations from the October 1917 revolution in Russia when the leftists "just wanted change" from the right (the tsar). It resulted in the Tsar and his family being put to death and a tyrannical rule for the next 70 years. The ideals of the leftists in that case are the same as they are now - the "underprivileged" want the wealth to be divided more along what they consider fair. In the case today, tax the wealthy more, allow broader disallowance of privilge from the "overprivileged", remove those from positions of authority those with whom they disagree, even to the point of violence. Etc. The extreme left does not adhere to any real American principles because that would call for preserving those principles, when idealism is all about radical change to the status quo. That is why the Constitution has been mutated to include "expression" within the First Amendment along with "Freedom FROM Religion". That is what bothers me.


The October revolution is not a good comparison. It was about people starving while those in the upper class lived in opulance. The French Revolution was the same thing only with a different result. I think that the French Revolution is a better comparison. I am definitely not a commie, but some of my ideals you would consider leftest. If you insist on comparing our ideals with the commies then I will compare yours with the Tsarist regime. Let the poor starve and those that dare to complain we will kill or throw in prison. After all they are leftist scum and we on the right know that only we have a right to live free.
 
Posts: 469 | Registered: Tue 10 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SUSPENDED NEMESIS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elesso:QUOTE]

A very good illustration can be made about leftist ideals and motivations from the October 1917 revolution in Russia when the leftists "just wanted change" from the right (the tsar). It resulted in the Tsar and his family being put to death and a tyrannical rule for the next 70 years. The ideals of the leftists in that case are the same as they are now - the "underprivileged" want the wealth to be divided more along what they consider fair. In the case today, tax the wealthy more, allow broader disallowance of privilge from the "overprivileged", remove those from positions of authority those with whom they disagree, even to the point of violence. Etc. The extreme left does not adhere to any real American principles because that would call for preserving those principles, when idealism is all about radical change to the status quo. That is why the Constitution has been mutated to include "expression" within the First Amendment along with "Freedom FROM Religion". That is what bothers me.


The October revolution is not a good comparison. It was about people starving while those in the upper class lived in opulance. The French Revolution was the same thing only with a different result. I think that the French Revolution is a better comparison. I am definitely not a commie, but some of my ideals you would consider leftest. If you insist on comparing our ideals with the commies then I will compare yours with the Tsarist regime. Let the poor starve and those that dare to complain we will kill or throw in prison. After all they are leftist scum and we on the right know that only we have a right to live free.


"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This quote from William Shakespeare serves to demonstrate that labels mean nothing. The spirit of the philosophy does not change just because one chooses to a more pleasing label. "Leftist". "Socialist". "Idealist". "Utopian". All very much more pleasing and more acceptable. But they still espouse the same principles of communism.

My principles do match those of the Tsars. The Tsars followed the principle of preservation of a very old society. It is also appropriate to consider that along with Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great was also a Tsar. Probably the fairest of all the Tsars was Nicholas II. So, I do not consider it an insult to consider my principles to be grounded in the same way as the Tsars.

Now, in this country, the poor have every opportunity to better themselves. It is not the fault of the society that the poorest continue to have babies when they cannot afford the ones they already care for. And buying cigarettes and liquor or other drugs when the money would be better suited to take care of their kids does not bolster your argument.
 
Posts: 4642 | Registered: Wed 14 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SUSPENDED NEMESIS
Posted Hide Post
One other thing, you overlook the brutality by the leftist regime that took over after killing the Tsar and his family. Many more people were killed by the Chekists than under the Tsars. And the gulags thrived. So, again, the argument is ineffectual.
 
Posts: 4642 | Registered: Wed 14 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elesso:QUOTE]

QUOTE]


Now, in this country, the poor have every opportunity to better themselves. It is not the fault of the society that the poorest continue to have babies when they cannot afford the ones they already care for. And buying cigarettes and liquor or other drugs when the money would be better suited to take care of their kids does not bolster your argument.


On this paragraph we totally agree. "The guvmett gwana take care of me" sucks. I was raised on welfare one of 5 children of a single mother. Before foodstamps and when there were still county hospitals and clinics. It wasn't easy, but we all pulled ourselves out of it. And our children after us are all good citizens who don't depend on the "guvment" to survive.
No everyone in this country who believes in the constitution is way to the left. But there are liberal ideas out there that are necessary for our way of life. Freedom from government control is one of them. Freedom from having the government wiretap, come into my house without due process, my right to have a gun, my right to go to a church of my choice, my right to peaceably protest, my right to my opinion even if it doesn't agree with the current folks in power.
I for one have both liberal and conservative ideals. Because of the former I am labled as a leftest. Because I believe that the war is wrong and the President needs to be held accountable for some of the things that have happened I am labled leftest. I am but one thing, An American.
BTW I felt that Clinton should have been held accountable for things that happened in eastern Europe and that Janet Reno belongs in prison for murder because of Waco.
For it is not about party.
 
Posts: 469 | Registered: Tue 10 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SUSPENDED NEMESIS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elesso:QUOTE]

QUOTE]


Now, in this country, the poor have every opportunity to better themselves. It is not the fault of the society that the poorest continue to have babies when they cannot afford the ones they already care for. And buying cigarettes and liquor or other drugs when the money would be better suited to take care of their kids does not bolster your argument.


On this paragraph we totally agree. "The guvmett gwana take care of me" sucks. I was raised on welfare one of 5 children of a single mother. Before foodstamps and when there were still county hospitals and clinics. It wasn't easy, but we all pulled ourselves out of it. And our children after us are all good citizens who don't depend on the "guvment" to survive.
No everyone in this country who believes in the constitution is way to the left. But there are liberal ideas out there that are necessary for our way of life. Freedom from government control is one of them. Freedom from having the government wiretap, come into my house without due process, my right to have a gun, my right to go to a church of my choice, my right to peaceably protest, my right to my opinion even if it doesn't agree with the current folks in power.
I for one have both liberal and conservative ideals. Because of the former I am labled as a leftest. Because I believe that the war is wrong and the President needs to be held accountable for some of the things that have happened I am labled leftest. I am but one thing, An American.
BTW I felt that Clinton should have been held accountable for things that happened in eastern Europe and that Janet Reno belongs in prison for murder because of Waco.
For it is not about party.


I think you and I agree more than you may know. It is just that I believe the Democrat party has become warped. My family used to be registered democrats until the 1976 Texas Democrat Convention. Jimmy Carter violated the rules of the convention and chose his delegates, rather than allowing them to be elected. My dad and mom were delegates from Odessa to that convention. We all changed our affiliation at that time.

What has happened is that the paradigm has shifted in a big way. The Republicans who become libertarians are actually the democrats of the Truman era. The democrats have shifted to the left. There are those who have become socialist, while the far left adheres to a communist principle.

To say that the far left believe in the Constitution is wishful thinking. Under that leadership, Janet Reno was allowed to use heavy handed tactics over and over again.

On the other hand, the conservatives take a "realist's" position with regard to the Constitution and seek to minimize the interpretational breakdown of the provisions. The First Amendment has been expanded to include things that were never intended by Madison, et al. The Second Amendment has been deemed archaic and disarmament has become the rallying cry for the democrat party (you should hear the verbal assaults against Ted Nugent here in Waco. He has a weekly column in our paper and he actively lobbies for removal of restrictions to the Second Amendment.) Then there is the lack of "due process" by the Clinton Administration with regard to Reno.

So you see, I am not without merit in my arguing of the seriousness of the shift to the left. My jabs at you were not meant to be mean spirited, but to get you to wonder why I would make such statements. I meant no disrespect. I do not intend disrespect to any fellow service member or veteran, and particularly to other docs out there. I just hope to stimulate a little thought regarding political philosophy among our fellows.
 
Posts: 4642 | Registered: Wed 14 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Just keeping this on top
 
Posts: 447 | Registered: Thu 19 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elesso:QUOTE]

QUOTE]

QUOTE]

I think you and I agree more than you may know. It is just that I believe the Democrat party has become warped. My family used to be registered democrats until the 1976 Texas Democrat Convention. Jimmy Carter violated the rules of the convention and chose his delegates, rather than allowing them to be elected. My dad and mom were delegates from Odessa to that convention. We all changed our affiliation at that time.

What has happened is that the paradigm has shifted in a big way. The Republicans who become libertarians are actually the democrats of the Truman era. The democrats have shifted to the left. There are those who have become socialist, while the far left adheres to a communist principle.

To say that the far left believe in the Constitution is wishful thinking. Under that leadership, Janet Reno was allowed to use heavy handed tactics over and over again.

On the other hand, the conservatives take a "realist's" position with regard to the Constitution and seek to minimize the interpretational breakdown of the provisions. The First Amendment has been expanded to include things that were never intended by Madison, et al. The Second Amendment has been deemed archaic and disarmament has become the rallying cry for the democrat party (you should hear the verbal assaults against Ted Nugent here in Waco. He has a weekly column in our paper and he actively lobbies for removal of restrictions to the Second Amendment.) Then there is the lack of "due process" by the Clinton Administration with regard to Reno.

So you see, I am not without merit in my arguing of the seriousness of the shift to the left. My jabs at you were not meant to be mean spirited, but to get you to wonder why I would make such statements. I meant no disrespect. I do not intend disrespect to any fellow service member or veteran, and particularly to other docs out there. I just hope to stimulate a little thought regarding political philosophy among our fellows.


I see that we are both Americans and that we know some changes need to be made. For that I salute you.
 
Posts: 469 | Registered: Tue 10 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Liberal Member
Picture of scottrj50
Posted Hide Post
the torys have spoken Big Grin
 
Posts: 9355 | Registered: Wed 27 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SUSPENDED NEMESIS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VietVet1stCavDoc:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeteCDR:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elesso:QUOTE]

QUOTE]

QUOTE]

I think you and I agree more than you may know. It is just that I believe the Democrat party has become warped. My family used to be registered democrats until the 1976 Texas Democrat Convention. Jimmy Carter violated the rules of the convention and chose his delegates, rather than allowing them to be elected. My dad and mom were delegates from Odessa to that convention. We all changed our affiliation at that time.

What has happened is that the paradigm has shifted in a big way. The Republicans who become libertarians are actually the democrats of the Truman era. The democrats have shifted to the left. There are those who have become socialist, while the far left adheres to a communist principle.

To say that the far left believe in the Constitution is wishful thinking. Under that leadership, Janet Reno was allowed to use heavy handed tactics over and over again.

On the other hand, the conservatives take a "realist's" position with regard to the Constitution and seek to minimize the interpretational breakdown of the provisions. The First Amendment has been expanded to include things that were never intended by Madison, et al. The Second Amendment has been deemed archaic and disarmament has become the rallying cry for the democrat party (you should hear the verbal assaults against Ted Nugent here in Waco. He has a weekly column in our paper and he actively lobbies for removal of restrictions to the Second Amendment.) Then there is the lack of "due process" by the Clinton Administration with regard to Reno.

So you see, I am not without merit in my arguing of the seriousness of the shift to the left. My jabs at you were not meant to be mean spirited, but to get you to wonder why I would make such statements. I meant no disrespect. I do not intend disrespect to any fellow service member or veteran, and particularly to other docs out there. I just hope to stimulate a little thought regarding political philosophy among our fellows.


I see that we are both Americans and that we know some changes need to be made. For that I salute you.


Back at you, bro-Doc. Salutes.
 
Posts: 4642 | Registered: Wed 14 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Elesso:
does anyone suppose that even extreme leftist may actually LOVE this country?


You may as well ask "does anyone suppose that the sky is green with purple polka dots?"

The answer to both questions is an obvious and resounding no.

By the time the "extreme left" got done twisting this country into the socialist "utopia" they desire, it'd no longer be even remotely recognizable as the US of A.
 
Posts: 4083 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Liberal Member
Picture of scottrj50
Posted Hide Post
well lets start with that famous aircraft carrier speech and the missing trillion dollars...which will not be forgotten in 08

yes America will remember the last eight years...Oh they'll remember...
 
Posts: 9355 | Registered: Wed 27 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
On Warning
14 Sept 08
20 Days
Fin
Posted Hide Post
Yeah, they will remember....They will remember how safe they have been...your Ilk will remember the negative crap....but that is ok................
 
Posts: 1209 | Registered: Sat 14 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
On Warning
14 Sept 08
20 Days
Fin
Posted Hide Post
Scott...Your a friggin jerk. A useless tool by the lefties...Ya don't see that?
 
Posts: 1209 | Registered: Sat 14 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Liberal Member
Picture of scottrj50
Posted Hide Post
Sandy Koufax was a lefty.... slick Big Grin
 
Posts: 9355 | Registered: Wed 27 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of comingofage
Posted Hide Post
Man, what a great letter. I'm glad to see others understand what's happening to our country, and understand that it is a war. With guys like Col. Day around, maybe more lazy Americans will get it and stand up for the Constitution and America.

Absolutely outstanding post.... Thanks Keg.


There can't be any logical response from the left on this. All there's gonna be is "changing the subject" and stupid one liners...The truth hurts.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: comingofage,
 
Posts: 2080 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by scottrj50:
Sandy Koufax was a lefty.... slick Big Grin



Being a Southpaw doesn't make one an idiot.

Being a Political Lefty does.

...Dick
 
Posts: 3551 | Registered: Thu 01 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Julock
Posted Hide Post
Boy there is more quoting going on in here LOL.
As a Disabled Veteran 100% and Proud Father of a Marine I will be brief.
Support the Warior and not the war makes no sense to me. This is a just war with false reasoning for us being there. We need to stand up and simply tell the left to shut up and back our troops over there until the end. To pull out now would have an effect that will be even more distructive than the Nam Pull Out by Congress NOT the troops.
Our men and women fighting this war has been hog tied by Congress and those charged with crimes over there are getting aquitted fast. It is, after all, a war that Congress will not allow these Men and Women to fight like they need to. The left needs to stand up and support our troops and their mission. I could care less if they want to support the Politicians that are causing the problems over there but the Troops? It is an absloute must for all Americans to stand up and be heard.
If someone like Hillary Clinton gets into the Whitehouse our military will be the loosers in the long run. They will destroy our military like her Husband tried to do when he was there. Ok now I will shut up.
Ron Whaley
USN/Disabled EN-1
 
Posts: 289 | Registered: Thu 28 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Liberal Member
Picture of scottrj50
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by quietlunatic:
quote:
Originally posted by scottrj50:
Sandy Koufax was a lefty.... slick Big Grin



Being a Southpaw doesn't make one an idiot.

Being a Political Lefty does.

...Dick

...Cheney... Big Grin
 
Posts: 9355 | Registered: Wed 27 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Suspended Member, 06 July 2008
PhoenixDark
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I have long known the contempt the extreme Left has for our military.


I really don't understand why the colonel considers neo-conservatives like Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Bill Kristol, Fred Kagan and the crew of cretins at the American Enterprise Institute to be "extreme Left". I guess it makes sense if you think about how taking the extreme right far enuf and there's really no difference between it and the extreme left.

The contempt that "extreme Left"-ists like Cheney and Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz showed for our military by invading Iraq without any Phase IV planning and by firing officers who told them that was stupid... is despicable.

Incompetent and arrogant -- and contemptuous of those guys who actually had Mid East or warfighting experience -- the neo-cons have hit the trifecta.

Unbelieveably, there are still folks on these boards who defend these idiots.
 
Posts: 5720 | Registered: Tue 15 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of TomGustafson
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Julock:
Boy there is more quoting going on in here LOL.
As a Disabled Veteran 100% and Proud Father of a Marine I will be brief.
Support the Warior and not the war makes no sense to me. This is a just war with false reasoning for us being there. We need to stand up and simply tell the left to shut up and back our troops over there until the end. To pull out now would have an effect that will be even more distructive than the Nam Pull Out by Congress NOT the troops.
Our men and women fighting this war has been hog tied by Congress and those charged with crimes over there are getting aquitted fast. It is, after all, a war that Congress will not allow these Men and Women to fight like they need to. The left needs to stand up and support our troops and their mission. I could care less if they want to support the Politicians that are causing the problems over there but the Troops? It is an absloute must for all Americans to stand up and be heard.
If someone like Hillary Clinton gets into the Whitehouse our military will be the loosers in the long run. They will destroy our military like her Husband tried to do when he was there. Ok now I will shut up.
Ron Whaley
USN/Disabled EN-1


Well said Sir!
 
Posts: 6835 | Registered: Wed 16 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Medal Of Honor Recipient Col. Bud Day On The Liberal’s “War On America”

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.