|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
Point-Counterpoint
Why is insisting on aiding ...|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
Honored Member![]() |
... when it is not wanted or welcome "the correct/right thing" to do when staying in a war to rebuild an infrastructure and economy "the wrong thing" to do by the same group of social liberals? Couldn't this aid money be better spent here at home? Especially since it is not wanted "there" by a foreign hostile government? The offer made and rejected, why don't we just take care of our own and not futher imperil our Air Force troops and national "humanitarian" supplies? Just curious what makes forced aid "correct" juxtaposed to what amounts to desertion of a people wanting the American aid/support "wrong"?
So make the best of this test, and don't ask why. It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time. It's something unpredictable, but in the end is right. I hope you had the time of your life. - Green Day |
||
|
Honored Member![]() |
Social liberals, I really want to know why and when leaving any country "high and dry" after it has been ravaged by the forces of destruction is a correct political stance. Surely there is at least one liberal out there who can say why the people of Iraq deserve less to rebuild when American aid is wanted there when another government totally hostile to the United States doesn't want the aid and it is insisted upon being provided, such as in Myanmar.
So make the best of this test, and don't ask why. It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time. It's something unpredictable, but in the end is right. I hope you had the time of your life. - Green Day |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Because helping people in their hour of need is the right thing to do.
We have the power, the resources and the willingness to help. What's wrong with that? It's not the government of Mynamar who needs us, it's the common Joe. Would you just leave them to their fate? |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Cal.....we should turn about face and head home.
The people of Myanmar (Burma) have allowed their country to fall to a sick regime. Right down to allowing the name to be changed. Quite frankly, we need to be putting the resources sent to a hostile country, to use here at home. Our resources are strapped and we have people in America in a bad way. It is sad when people suffer, but people are suffering all over the world. Do we run to EVERYONE'S aid? This right here speaks volumes...."Tired of waiting for help in Yangon, red-robed monks, other civilians and dozens of soldiers cleared piles of debris and toppled billboards from streets and cutting branches off uprooted trees". The people of Myanmar should have been doing this from the get go. If Myanmar doesn't want our help...then screw them. Keep our money at home. |
|||
|
|
Member |
My first thought was that the reason they would be declining our "help" is because we would probably send some GB medics to do the job. They know that those guys can be a great force multiplier and could possibly help the people overthrow the current regime. I could be WAY off. It was just a thought.
|
|||
|
Honored Member![]() |
So, again why would the people of Iraq with the devastation to their economy and physical infrastructure, in large part because of our presence there (not arguing for or against the merits of WHY we are there but rather just looking at the aftermath), deserving to have that assistance removed from them for a government that does not want ANY foreign aid in? Can anyone make a horse drink just simply because it has been led to the water?
So make the best of this test, and don't ask why. It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time. It's something unpredictable, but in the end is right. I hope you had the time of your life. - Green Day |
|||
|
Honored Member![]() |
I concur! But I want to hear/read why the social do-gooders on site think the Myanmarese/Burmese deserve our federal funds and infrastructure support MORE than the people of Iraq or even Afghani. What constitutes in liberal minds the deservedness of aid and what constitutes disqualification of same. If the troops ALL come home, a vacuum is created and what has been accomplished a total loss. So why would billions on rebuilding Myanmar be better spent - not allies nor fans of the U.S. - than in Iraq or Afghani where as much of the mission is rebuilding as it is re-securing. The Myanmarese have Red China to help them - so where is the massive Chinese humanitarian aid? So make the best of this test, and don't ask why. It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time. It's something unpredictable, but in the end is right. I hope you had the time of your life. - Green Day |
|||
|
Honored Member![]() |
And we cut the funding to Iraq and Afghani or do we further extend our financial indebtedness to be "the saviors" of the world? The liberals will b*tch about the federal deficit - cuts have to be made somewhere or better yet NO NEW ONES added to it. So which way is it to be, social liberals? Who is going to pay for this? Remember U.S. military transport teams are "the who" are delivering the goods/aid to Myanmar. The military does not fly for free - no matter what they told you to get you to raise your right hand "back in the day." So make the best of this test, and don't ask why. It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time. It's something unpredictable, but in the end is right. I hope you had the time of your life. - Green Day |
|||
|
|
Member |
Mynamar is a sovereign nation. If the legitimate govenment of that nation refuses aid or aid personnel... That's their call to make. I don't agree with what the Mynamar Junta is doing.. or has done; but short of invading the place and removing such government by force of arms... There's not much anybody or any organization can legally do. When the cholera hits... (and it will) perhaps the Junta will be weakened sufficiently for a counter-coup (Civil War) and restore Burma to it's former system of government. |
|||
|
|
Member |
I hope for your sake that the next time you need a hand you find somebody that doesn't have your attitude. I suspect the Burmese that have lost their homes, food and livelihoods will accept help from anywhere. I have never been to Burma but i know the people of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh are generous and hospitable even when they have nothing. What a contrast with the attitude of some on here who have so much! |
|||
|
|
Member |
COMMENT: Why would you classify this as a question for liberals? Many conservatives are asking the same. |
|||
|
|
|
Three cheers for IzzyBizzy....now BuuteryKnob get out your own checkbook
|
|||
|
Member![]() |
I agree with Izzy, to put it mildly, F---them. i would rather America be feared than loved to death! |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
And....
New flash there Mr. Smarmy.....I am not filthy rich. I have worked for everything I have. Due to identity theft by an illegal, I live week to week. I pay ALL my own medical, food, electric, mortgage, etc. And now attorney fees. Having said that, I still find time in THIS country to volunteer at our community services for people worse off than me. You know U.S. citizens who have paid taxes during the course of their life? I spent 5 hrs in front of a Wal Mart along with another veteran for "Poppy Day". Did you? I believe charity begins at home and I am tired of people thinking we should take care of other countries first before our own. If YOU feel that way....like Fank said "get out your own checkbook". Mine stays in America. Yes, what happened in Myanmar is a tragedy, but what happened in the SE in America just recently is also a tragedy. A tragedy we should be concerned about helping with right here at home. If saying this makes me selfish...then by all means color me selfish. Stickshauler said it best....." i would rather America be feared than loved to death!" Buttery...at the end of the day, I sleep just fine and I thank the good Lord for another reasonably good day and for what I do have. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Already have mate. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Ah, a religious person, good thing you spelt it out, I would never have guessed from what you had said. |
|||
|
Experienced Member![]() |
The ruling Junta don't "allow" any attempts to reform the regime - as recently as last autumn the police and troops violently put down protests led by the Buddhist priests - it was all over the news. They even shot dead a foreign journalist in a main street. |
|||
|