Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Changes are coming..... Recommended that you read...
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 


Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.
~~General John Stark~~

Shock and Awe Lead
Hot Topics
Moderator
Posted
OK, there are not a lot of details yet, but some changes are coming down from the top. Keep your eyes open, and be flexible.... most of the changes will be for the good, I think.

One MAJOR change that is coming is that NO OUTSIDE LINKS WILL BE ALLOWED

THIS MEANS THAT UNLESS YOU are linking within Military.com, to a "dot-mil" website or to one found in our Military and Veteran Associations page, OUTSIDE LINKS ARE NOT ALLOWED.

This will definitely mean changes in HT's. We will make it work. For now, might as well stop using them.... as it WILL be enforced. If you make a post, you will be allowed to cut and paste verbiage, and as I understand it, you can tell where you found it, but the cut and pastes will only be as needed to document a point, and you must watch out for plagiarism/copyright concerns.

As I said.... change is coming, and it's from the very top, so, we will deal with it and make the best out of it.

With this crowd, I am sure we can make it work.

Zack
Lead Moderator
Hot Topics Forums


"The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life."
~~~Theodore Roosevelt~~~
 
Posts: 5215 | Registered: Tue 18 November 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of billbright
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Silent_Surface:
OK, there are not a lot of details yet, but some changes are coming down from the top. Keep your eyes open, and be flexible.... most of the changes will be for the good, I think.

One MAJOR change that is coming is that NO OUTSIDE LINKS WILL BE ALLOWED

THIS MEANS THAT UNLESS YOU are linking within Military.com, to a "dot-mil" website or to one found in our Military and Veteran Associations page, OUTSIDE LINKS ARE NOT ALLOWED.

This will definitely mean changes in HT's. We will make it work. For now, might as well stop using them.... as it WILL be enforced. If you make a post, you will be allowed to cut and paste verbiage, and as I understand it, you can tell where you found it, but the cut and pastes will only be as needed to document a point, and you must watch out for plagiarism/copyright concerns.

As I said.... change is coming, and it's from the very top, so, we will deal with it and make the best out of it.

With this crowd, I am sure we can make it work.

Zack
Lead Moderator
Hot Topics Forums


Any comment on WHY?
 
Posts: 5535 | Registered: Tue 13 March 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<klassylady25>
Posted
Just thinking: Can you imagine all the reading that a moderator has to do to make sure that the links are reliable? Applause I think they do a fantastic job as it is!!

Candice
 
Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
hasnt this been tried b4? and it didnt go over well either time.
the brass tryin to run folks off again?
 
Posts: 5710 | Registered: Sun 30 April 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of greywolfghost
Posted Hide Post
Good-bye point/counter-point and In the News....

So, what's the point of being here? I can go to Relief Society with Mystical and listen to all the old bitties talk about their grandkids, I guess --


Wandering and Wondering
 
Posts: 24108 | Registered: Fri 01 June 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SgtSchaeffersMom
Posted Hide Post
I guess I'm confused as to why we don't post the links?

I understand the mission, but geez, . . its going to be a lot more work to post stuff here, . . . oh well, . . Frown
 
Posts: 6314 | Registered: Thu 08 June 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.
~~General John Stark~~

Shock and Awe Lead
Hot Topics
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by billbright:


Any comment on WHY?


It will probably be better explained later, BUT, this is coming down from the Very Top.... and we will need to make the best of it.

It will work.... take some getting used to, but will work. Many posts already have no links.... they are usually posted when someone asks for documantation, or to back up a quote.....

Worse things have changed before, and we survived... this crowd can do it.


"The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life."
~~~Theodore Roosevelt~~~
 
Posts: 5215 | Registered: Tue 18 November 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of DCookeUSA1
Posted Hide Post
The old adage comes to mind: what you don't know will always hurt you.

I'll probably be spending most of my posts in the General Discussion forum, in the funny pictures/funny games threads. And that social forum might be interesting...
 
Posts: 1831 | Registered: Mon 20 February 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of KJ1110
Posted Hide Post
Hmmmm! The last couple of times things have "come down from the very top," there were huge Exoduses of membership elsewhere, many of which have never returned!

This does not bode well!


It is not our belief or disbelief that can make or unmake the fact. ~ Thomas Paine
 
Posts: 8715 | Registered: Wed 17 September 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of billbright
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by KJ1110:
Hmmmm! The last couple of times things have "come down from the very top," there were huge Exoduses of membership elsewhere, many of which have never returned!

This does not bode well!


My suggestion: if you have an outside link, simply paste the word DOT in place of the dot. We can translate that easily enough.

This has become the worlds most rinky-dink place. I can see why it's called Military dot com... it's a general military style cluster fk.
 
Posts: 5535 | Registered: Tue 13 March 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SgtSchaeffersMom
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by billbright:
quote:
Originally posted by KJ1110:
Hmmmm! The last couple of times things have "come down from the very top," there were huge Exoduses of membership elsewhere, many of which have never returned!

This does not bode well!


My suggestion: if you have an outside link, simply paste the word DOT in place of the dot. We can translate that easily enough.

This has become the worlds most rinky-dink place. I can see why it's called Military dot com... it's a general military style cluster fk.


Bill, could you explain to us dense folks, just how does that assuage those "at the top"? How does that address their issue? Which reminds me, "What exactly IS the issue?" Confused
 
Posts: 6314 | Registered: Thu 08 June 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
This is getting into lawyer territory. Being no lawyer, I semi - understand why. I think it goes something like this:

When a site get's linked to, the folks that own the site can see where it was linked. If their site has copyrighted material, and they investigate and see that indeed their material is being used without their permission, they may(probably) come around asking for their fee for posting their material, or get the shysters involved in litigation.

This is a area that has been gray since the beginning of the WWW. Many news and entertainment corporations argue that it hurts their revenue, etc.

Others say that a discussion of news and topical items is mostly protected by the "Fair Use" provision in the copyright laws, where short quotes and attribution can be made in a public arena, such as in editorials, letters to editors, and so forth.

In my own opinion, the internet is much more akin to a town square, where you should be free to discuss what you want, as our Constitution says.

Unfortunately, since it is in printed or graphic form (the Founders likely never envisioned electronic communications)
the laws are worded in such a way that folks with enough money and interest to take it to the courts can do so, and those folks mostly happen to be corporations who see a chance to make a buck.

But "No linking" does not mean that you cannot provide a URL

For instance, www.military.com can be typed "www.military.com"
Wink


"Never try to teach a pig to sing; It wastes your time and annoys the pig." - Heinlein
 
Posts: 7874 | Registered: Mon 29 November 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
" 'Sperienced Crap Disturber"
Picture of spikerzzz
Posted Hide Post
Asked and answered Wink BeerApplauseBeerThank you again to Zack and th mods here for the unpaid work you all do for us. Beer Applause Beer


No replies needed, most are even unwanted. I am only posting to hear the clank of th keys, and to amuse myself.
 
Posts: 4864 | Registered: Sat 29 March 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Resistance to reason is futile"

Posted Hide Post
I for one find this change of direction exceedingly curious. Especially in the middle of the current presidential campaign.

It strikes me as the doors are being flung open to a Dodge City style of unchecked and unsupported bias and name calling that leaves no room for challenge or substance or rebuttal. Other than biting kicking screaming rants back and forth and supported by nothing other that who will attempt to out last the other via personal attacks and the use of vitriol. And that doesn't even begin to consider the wolf packs and cliques that will form for supposedly savaging the individual unable or unskilled enough to protect themselves.

If that is the path that the supposed "powers that be" want this forum to take? Then I say, "You know what? It is their forum and they are more than welcome to do as they damn well please." Just don't be surprised when the forums here cease to be anything other than the soapboxes of the left and those whose only objective is to rant. Because that is precisely all you will have left.
 
Posts: 3108 | Registered: Tue 22 April 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pken:
U.S.MilVets.com has no such rules. Many folks will go there......is that the mission?

Then it would be up to US.Milvets to deal with the lawyers, wouldn't it?

You think that free speech will out over profits when it comes to the news,information and entertainment entities that are taking web sites to court for infringement of copyright?


"Never try to teach a pig to sing; It wastes your time and annoys the pig." - Heinlein
 
Posts: 7874 | Registered: Mon 29 November 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of DCookeUSA1
Posted Hide Post
Typing the URL out like that just makes the post look ugly.

Too bad for the No Bull, Just Debate Forum. How am I supposed to debate if we're alone in the universe or if Jesus is alive without any links?
 
Posts: 1831 | Registered: Mon 20 February 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SgtSchaeffersMom
Posted Hide Post
USAF,

Thanks for the explanation, . . .

It appears that my thinking about the issue was completely backwards. I thought that if you posted a link, that it was a GOOD thing, because then readers could click and get to the original site, where all the advertisers are. . . . thereby assuaging the original site's objections to using their materials, because they felt we were shortchanging their advertisers.

Oh, well, . . show's what I know.
 
Posts: 6314 | Registered: Thu 08 June 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Locutisprime:
I for one find this change of direction exceedingly curious. Especially in the middle of the current presidential campaign.

It strikes me as the doors are being flung open to a Dodge City style of unchecked and unsupported bias and name calling that leaves no room for challenge or substance or rebuttal. Other than biting kicking screaming rants back and forth and supported by nothing other that who will attempt to out last the other via personal attacks and the use of vitriol. And that doesn't even begin to consider the wolf packs and cliques that will form for supposedly savaging the individual unable or unskilled enough to protect themselves.

If that is the path that the supposed "powers that be" want this forum to take? Then I say, "You know what? It is their forum and they are more than welcome to do as they damn well please." Just don't be surprised when the forums here cease to be anything other than the soapboxes of the left and those whose only objective is to rant. Because that is precisely all you will have left.

Nice rant. Wink


"Never try to teach a pig to sing; It wastes your time and annoys the pig." - Heinlein
 
Posts: 7874 | Registered: Mon 29 November 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Lead Moderator
Post War Iraq

Hot Topics Moderator
mainedawg72gmail.com




Picture of mainedawg
Posted Hide Post
Give it time to be posted. It's new to all of us.

We will help all we can to understand what the new way of posting will be.

We don't want the doors to slow down here.

This is a site for military people. The public is invited to set in and post with us. We want it to stay that way.

Just give it time.

Mainedawg
Moderator
 
Posts: 17047 | Registered: Sun 19 February 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DCookeUSA1:
Typing the URL out like that just makes the post look ugly.

Too bad for the No Bull, Just Debate Forum. How am I supposed to debate if we're alone in the universe or if Jesus is alive without any links?

Darned if ya didnt beat me too it. Yep too bad for that forum. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 1966 | Registered: Sun 22 December 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
What he said.
quote:
Locutisprime

And this is going to be real boring.
 
Posts: 18111 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Resistance to reason is futile"

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by USAF_76_2_80:
quote:
Originally posted by Locutisprime:
I for one find this change of direction exceedingly curious. Especially in the middle of the current presidential campaign.

It strikes me as the doors are being flung open to a Dodge City style of unchecked and unsupported bias and name calling that leaves no room for challenge or substance or rebuttal. Other than biting kicking screaming rants back and forth and supported by nothing other that who will attempt to out last the other via personal attacks and the use of vitriol. And that doesn't even begin to consider the wolf packs and cliques that will form for supposedly savaging the individual unable or unskilled enough to protect themselves.

If that is the path that the supposed "powers that be" want this forum to take? Then I say, "You know what? It is their forum and they are more than welcome to do as they damn well please." Just don't be surprised when the forums here cease to be anything other than the soapboxes of the left and those whose only objective is to rant. Because that is precisely all you will have left.

Nice rant. Wink


Thank you USAF, just thought you would want to get a leg up on what is in store. Whisper
 
Posts: 3108 | Registered: Tue 22 April 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SgtSchaeffersMom:
USAF,

Thanks for the explanation, . . .

It appears that my thinking about the issue was completely backwards. I thought that if you posted a link, that it was a GOOD thing, because then readers could click and get to the original site, where all the advertisers are. . . . thereby assuaging the original site's objections to using their materials, because they felt we were shortchanging their advertisers.

Oh, well, . . show's what I know.

Mom,
the advertisers want conclusive proof that the original web site was visited, and their ad banner was seen. Some sites charge "per view"
and get whanked when they think their chance to make a buck gets compromised.

IMO, this is one reason the issues being determined in congress about internet freedoms is important, and everyone should know where their representatives and senators stand.


"Never try to teach a pig to sing; It wastes your time and annoys the pig." - Heinlein
 
Posts: 7874 | Registered: Mon 29 November 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
------------------
Picture of marinesmother
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by USAF_76_2_80:
This is getting into lawyer territory. Being no lawyer, I semi - understand why. I think it goes something like this:

When a site get's linked to, the folks that own the site can see where it was linked. If their site has copyrighted material, and they investigate and see that indeed their material is being used without their permission, they may(probably) come around asking for their fee for posting their material, or get the shysters involved in litigation.

This is a area that has been gray since the beginning of the WWW. Many news and entertainment corporations argue that it hurts their revenue, etc.

Others say that a discussion of news and topical items is mostly protected by the "Fair Use" provision in the copyright laws, where short quotes and attribution can be made in a public arena, such as in editorials, letters to editors, and so forth.

In my own opinion, the internet is much more akin to a town square, where you should be free to discuss what you want, as our Constitution says.

Unfortunately, since it is in printed or graphic form (the Founders likely never envisioned electronic communications)
the laws are worded in such a way that folks with enough money and interest to take it to the courts can do so, and those folks mostly happen to be corporations who see a chance to make a buck.

But "No linking" does not mean that you cannot provide a URL

For instance, www.military.com can be typed "www.military.com"
Wink


Such is the world we live in... will do.
 
Posts: 5257 | Registered: Tue 27 November 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of SgtSchaeffersMom
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by USAF_76_2_80:
quote:
Originally posted by SgtSchaeffersMom:
USAF,

Thanks for the explanation, . . .

It appears that my thinking about the issue was completely backwards. I thought that if you posted a link, that it was a GOOD thing, because then readers could click and get to the original site, where all the advertisers are. . . . thereby assuaging the original site's objections to using their materials, because they felt we were shortchanging their advertisers.

Oh, well, . . show's what I know.

Mom,
the advertisers want conclusive proof that the original web site was visited, and their ad banner was seen. Some sites charge "per view"
and get whanked when they think their chance to make a buck gets compromised.

IMO, this is one reason the issues being determined in congress about internet freedoms is important, and everyone should know where their representatives and senators stand.


Okay, I'm gettin a handle on this now. . . Still SUCKS. Big Grin
 
Posts: 6314 | Registered: Thu 08 June 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
The Spanking Monk

"That'll Butter Your Parsnips"

2542 posts as usmc_lovebug

Picture of monachus
Posted Hide Post
from a logical point of view, this makes no sense...in keeping with other things military, i suppose. i can understand issues with pasting whole articles...but linking brings traffic to the original site. but, hey, what do i know?

that said, i have faith that we here are more than capable of being creative and we WILL get used to our new-found (albeit forced) ninja skills in time...for those of us who are here regularly, we will adapt quickly.

it's a pain in the @ss, but isn't everything these days Wink
 
Posts: 1178 | Registered: Fri 01 December 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Tinukedaya
Posted Hide Post
No more linking to polls. Frown
 
Posts: 491 | Registered: Tue 17 June 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of TrollhunterX
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Locutisprime:
I for one find this change of direction exceedingly curious. Especially in the middle of the current presidential campaign.

It strikes me as the doors are being flung open to a Dodge City style of unchecked and unsupported bias and name calling that leaves no room for challenge or substance or rebuttal. Other than biting kicking screaming rants back and forth and supported by nothing other that who will attempt to out last the other via personal attacks and the use of vitriol. And that doesn't even begin to consider the wolf packs and cliques that will form for supposedly savaging the individual unable or unskilled enough to protect themselves.

If that is the path that the supposed "powers that be" want this forum to take? Then I say, "You know what? It is their forum and they are more than welcome to do as they damn well please." Just don't be surprised when the forums here cease to be anything other than the soapboxes of the left and those whose only objective is to rant. Because that is precisely all you will have left.
Why do you think these changes will only be of benefit to the 'left'? Because of all the links to NRO, Human Events, and even Frontpage Magazine? The 'right' can't rely on such things so badly, especially since the articles referenced are usually the kind of scuttlebutt you warn against at the top of your post.

I take it you don't trust the mods to keep order in 'Dodge City'?
 
Posts: 1130 | Registered: Mon 16 July 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Motive25
Posted Hide Post
Too bad- I learn a lot from the outside links people post.

I've always believed that if it gets posted on the WWW, it is fair game for cross-posting.

I think someone is practicing defensive/preemptive lawyering.
 
Posts: 3954 | Registered: Wed 01 February 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Picture of hooah71
Posted Hide Post
We lost a lot of fine members the last time this stunt was pulled just "in the news" section. Are the powers that be trying to remove what's left of the fine members?
 
Posts: 4935 | Registered: Tue 22 May 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  

Closed Topic Closed

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Changes are coming..... Recommended that you read...

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.