|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Experienced Member |
Hike up those trousers laddies and gentlemen because the other shoe is about to drop.
-http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5985ET20091009?sp=true Whats crazy is that these people didn't see this coming. |
||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Want immediate relief? Decriminalize drug use. One fourth of all US prisoners are there for drug convictions.
In addition, America has a big problem convicting people and handing out long sentences for "crimes" that either get no sentence in other countries or have much shorter sentences. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1 How much does it cost to keep a prisoner? http://www.doc.state.nc.us/dop/cost/ About $74.77 a day according to the North Carolina Department of Corrections (or, $27,911 per year) Decriminalize drug use and you've just saved the states 14 billion dollars. Lower the sentences or eliminate sentences for minor crimes and you could probably reduce the prison roles by another half million and find another 14 billion for the state coffers. Added all together, that would be an average savings of 500 million for each of the 50 states. This message has been edited. Last edited by: The_Bonesaw, |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
You could tax the newly decriminalized drugs as well. Cigarettes produce good tax revenue. So could drugs. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Hey Politicians why don't you try a novel idea.
When less money comes into my home I have to cut back. It is time for the states to cut back too! Gee What a novel idea, never would expect a poltician to think of that! That is probably because they never have thought of it! Gee I wish I could raise our salaries the way you politicians raise your taxes that way I would not have to cut back either. You politicians are no better than common thieves! You steal our hard earned money through the overblown tax rates with a gun pointed at our heads. Just like the Armed Robbers you are! It is time politicians are treated like the thieves they are! Frisco |
|||
|
---------------- Proud Member ---------------- |
Michigan just cut 165 dollars per pupil from K-12 spending to help cover a revenue shortfall. That's good for everyone, right? Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time! |
|||
|
---------------- Proud Member ---------------- |
The Standish facility has been looked at as a place to hold Guantanamo detainees. Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time! |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies. I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education. As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block. Frisco |
|||
|
|
|
Yeah! And I am tired of being taxed to pay for roads I will never drive on. And I am sick of my tax dollars buying books for the public library I will never read. And since I don't own a boat, I'm tired of being taxed for lighthouses and the Coast Guard rescue services which I'll never need. And since I don't fly, I am sick of taxes being spent on navigation aids, GPS satellites, the FAA, and the NTSB. And I am tired of taxes going to firefighting services. I can put out my own fires. And although I am using the internet, I resent the fact that tax payer money was involved in its development. |
|||
|
|
Teamwork: Everyone doing as I say |
Wasn't it Al Gore that invented the Internet? From what I have observed, we wouldn't miss you on that either. "We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo |
|||
|
|
Member |
Gee. Raise taxes. But don't cut spending. What a novel way to destroy the sources of revenues. Once put out of business or moved elsewhere, guess what? Even less revenues. Heck, let's raise taxes more!
This is just so utterly brilliant! Why didn't I think of that! Dern common sense just keeps getting in the way, I guess! |
|||
|
|
Teamwork: Everyone doing as I say |
We have as many geniuses on these forums as we have in Washington. $10+T in debt and another $100 in unfunded mandates (read SS and Medicare). But we can grow and spend out way out of here, yeah, right. Take the time to look at the National Debt Clock and tell me how we solve this massive problem. Like you said, the whole formula being used makes no sense. Proven fact more taxes, less revenue. In about five years we will be circling the drain and then we will have to "reform Social Security and Medicare). Not to mention hyper-inflation. And that is the optomistic prediction of a person who has confidence in the American way of life, somehow we will prevail.
"We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
And you just proved my point that our tax money for the government indoctrination centers called public schools would be best spent elsewhere. My point was in my original post is that when less money is coming into my family we have to cut back. It is time for the governments, local, state, and especially federal to learn that theory. You don't spend more when you have less coming in you cut back. But I forgot those of the political, ruling class can always put a firearm to our heads and take more from us. Well, one of these days the serfs may get restless, I am almost so fed up with our government's especially crazy overspending that I believe the sooner the better! Time for you to read: "Atlas Shrugged". Go back to school and make it a private school this time you may just learn something! Frisco |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Not very quick are you? Please tell me you are joking and you knew he was being sarcastic. |
|||
|
---------------- Proud Member ---------------- |
Atlas Shrugged? Nothing to do with the Serfs...unless you're talking about those 'drains on society' most likely to send their kids to public school.
It's pretty clear she knew nothing of what happens when the brightest mind in any industry goes on strike--the next brightest capitalist seizes on the opportunity to fill the void--hell, even the dumbest capitalist sees the opportunity when the big dog wanders off. Dig this here: Rational self-interest is a truly rare commodity among those who see the US under a Democratic Administration, 'discover' the book, and believe they've had some great epiphany supposing they've 'discovered' life imitating art. The innovators and artists and thinkers aren't being oppressed--but I'm hoping the imitators and the crooked bankers are taking some lumps these days. I was educated in an indoctrination center--a Catholic School--until The State quit subsidizing them in 1971. I can read, write, and cipher circles around most, and I won't go near a Church but for weddings and funerals. It's common knowledge that States--and the Fed--need to spend less. The battle will always be over The Question: Spend less on what? Education or Transportation? Big Weapons Projects or Spy Satellites? VA or Medicare? Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time! |
|||
|
|
"The day is wasted in which you learn nothing" |
And IF they do cut back, the first to go is police and firefighters/emergency squads. Seems to me they could prioritize and cut the lesser before the greater services. Then they make you feel guilty, as if it's "your" fault that the police can't protect you...as if they ever could every minute in every situation (better to have a couple friends along, like smith and wesson). |
|||
|
|
"The day is wasted in which you learn nothing" |
Back in the 80's. I worked for the USDA (agricultural research). When times got rough, the government (yeah, OUR government) would cut back funding/spending by, say, 10% across the board (except for personel saleries, of course). Every funded project shared the burden of short funds. What has happened with that very doable concept? |
|||
|
|
Member |
It's funny, I know several people who went to private schools in addition to the rest of us who went to public, and the achievement level of the public school grads is much higher. My graduating class from high school includes doctors, lawyers, PhD's, a number of veterans, at least one Oscar-nominated artist, a Rhodes scholar, a regular contributor for Fox News, and even a consultant for a major right-wing think tank... I am neither joking nor exagerating when I say that none of the private schoolers went anywhere. Unless you count our valedictorian, who was home schooled until 6th grade, private schooled until 8th, public until 12th, and then dropped out of college. She was awesome. One of the other private schoolers is a personal injury lawyer - I have to admit I actually liked him back in high school. By the way, I read Atlas Shrugged, and came to the conclusion that Ayn Rand had a lot of issues that she could have worked out much more productively without writing it down. I also feel she is a terrible author. Read Sartre, at least it is entertaining. |
|||
|
|
That's a joke, son. |
Yes and the battle is almost always a battle of words only. |
|||
|
|
That's a joke, son. |
Ayn Rand? Did someone get a late night glimpse of the Fountainhead? |
|||
|
|
Teamwork: Everyone doing as I say |
Quick enough to identify a troll when I see one. You may look up situational awareness. Then you could possibly understand the context of my reply. An example you would probably understand would be: A sub gets a message that a hostile is nearby. The CO calls battlestations, conducts a passive sonar sweep, goes to PD and conducts a 360 degree search, locates the threat, TELLS the WEPS 0 to shoot., Threat eliminated. "We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Remember those hoovervilles (aka tent cities) from the great depression?
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46r4yxttThw The sick part about all this is that we are spending ourselves (at the national level) into a hole that we'll be taxed heavily to get out of. All to help make the speculators and bankers whole! As taxes begin to rise to pay that debt and they will soon, there will be far more of these cities popping up around the country. |
|||
|
|
Teamwork: Everyone doing as I say |
Our GDP for a few years has been around $14T. It is now dropping due to the economy tanking. Given that the National Debt clock has our national debt currently at about $12T and rising and the approximately $100T in unfunded mandates, explain how high taxes will get us out of this mess? It would take ten years of 100% GDP to clear the accumulated debt. We are facing decades of problems as it is and there is no stopping Washington. They are on a run. "We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Higher taxes wont get us out of this by itself. Many programs will be dropped regardless of who it hurts. The dollar will be devalued to reduce the magnitude of the debt. And of course Taxes will be raised. All of which hurts middle class America. Either way these tent cities are going to grow in population. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
A very simple answer to all your statements, concerns and comments.
"www.fairtax.org" Everyone pays, fairly across the board. The only thing I would change in this is a mandate to stop paying out money for STUPID pet projects that have no value to America as a whole. A Ted Kennedy, W Bush, Dick Nixon or anyone Library does not benefit this nation as a whole. Testing the speed of catsup coming out of a bottle, well I guess that could |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
Hey I am all for the fair tax. But we have passed the point of fairness. We have lived beyond our means for so long and made far too many commitments and then shipped off our jobs while importing more dependents. There will be nothing FAIR about whats coming. The sick part is that those who benefited the most from that debt will not be the ones paying it back. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Not to worry folks...I heard great news last night that 57% of those making over $200K per year are DEMs!
Isn't that great..., that means, at least it should, that them DEMs won't mind paying some hefty tax increases to cover their "Anointed One..." Nothing like "sticking it to the LIB man" ! ! ! Crackerjack, I concur with your proposal, but alas LIBs just won't put up with any fair tax talk... Why..., it just won't stick it to the rich deep enough to suit liberals...that's why. |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
It sure is good to know the banks are getting theirs. I guess it should be obvious our economy is on the path to recovery. After all, what caused this is worse now then it was then.
-http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/15/real_estate/foreclosure_crisis_deepens/ |
|||
|
|
Teamwork: Everyone doing as I say |
Interesting that several of us with significantly different political views agree on the upcoming challenges facing us under the auspices of TAX REVENUE. Politicians will never agree to a fair tax unless it is 90%. Takes away too much of their power. Under normal circumstances, pre-Obama this may have been possible, that train is now gone. Kind of like term limits, why would you vote for a bill that would stop your gravy train. Incumbency rules!
The foreclosures are continuing at a record pace due to nothing has been done to eliminate the situation that created them. Approx. 50% of the refi's to help those with mortgage problem go into default within six months. And the Dems want to expand the DRA. According to the deutsche bank, the worst is yet to come in the residential market. Commercial is on the way. And we have a VP who thinks the Stimulous effectiveness is exceeding all expectations. Tell that to the unemployed. Gosh, I am in a good mood this morning. Anyone have the Hemlock Society's phone number. Just kidding Crackerjack. "We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo |
|||
|
|
Experienced Member |
|
|||
|
| Powered by Eve Community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|


