Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Experienced Member
Posted
Hike up those trousers laddies and gentlemen because the other shoe is about to drop.

quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy may be creeping toward recovery after the worst slowdown since the Great Depression, but many states see no end in sight to their diving tax revenues.

Tax revenues used to pay teachers and fuel police cars continue to trail even the most pessimistic expectations, despite the cash from the economic stimulus plan pouring into state coffers.

"It's crazy. It's really just unbelievable," said Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers, and called the states' revenue situations "close to unprecedented."

Most states had been pessimistic in forecasting their tax revenues for the 2010 fiscal year, Pattison said. So far, collections have fallen below even those low targets.

Lower tax revenues could lead to higher taxes or another sharp reduction in services if receipts do not show signs of improvement before year-end, as every state but Vermont is required by law to balance their budgets.

That could mean fewer teachers, early prisoner releases and fewer highway repairs as residents battle soaring unemployment.

States are coming off a terrible first quarter, which for most states began on July 1.


-http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5985ET20091009?sp=true

Whats crazy is that these people didn't see this coming.
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of The_Bonesaw
Posted Hide Post
Want immediate relief? Decriminalize drug use. One fourth of all US prisoners are there for drug convictions.

In addition, America has a big problem convicting people and handing out long sentences for "crimes" that either get no sentence in other countries or have much shorter sentences.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

How much does it cost to keep a prisoner?

http://www.doc.state.nc.us/dop/cost/

About $74.77 a day according to the North Carolina Department of Corrections (or, $27,911 per year)

Decriminalize drug use and you've just saved the states 14 billion dollars.

Lower the sentences or eliminate sentences for minor crimes and you could probably reduce the prison roles by another half million and find another 14 billion for the state coffers.

Added all together, that would be an average savings of 500 million for each of the 50 states.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: The_Bonesaw,
 
Posts: 6107 | Registered: Fri 06 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by The_Bonesaw:
Want immediate relief? Decriminalize drug use.


You could tax the newly decriminalized drugs as well. Cigarettes produce good tax revenue. So could drugs.
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of FriscoLady01
Posted Hide Post
Hey Politicians why don't you try a novel idea.

When less money comes into my home I have to cut back.

It is time for the states to cut back too!

Gee What a novel idea, never would expect a poltician to think of that! That is probably because they never have thought of it!

Gee I wish I could raise our salaries the way you politicians raise your taxes that way I would not have to cut back either.

You politicians are no better than common thieves! You steal our hard earned money through the overblown tax rates with a gun pointed at our heads. Just like the Armed Robbers you are!

It is time politicians are treated like the thieves they are!

Frisco
 
Posts: 3069 | Registered: Fri 22 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
----------------
Proud Member

----------------




Posted Hide Post
quote:
Hey Politicians why don't you try a novel idea.

When less money comes into my home I have to cut back.

It is time for the states to cut back too!

Gee What a novel idea, never would expect a poltician to think of that! That is probably because they never have thought of it!


Michigan just cut 165 dollars per pupil from K-12 spending to help cover a revenue shortfall.

That's good for everyone, right?


Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time!
 
Posts: 1884 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
----------------
Proud Member

----------------




Posted Hide Post
quote:
Now that Michigan is taking steps to shrink its prison system, the implications, economic and otherwise, are troubling to some.

As political columnist Peter Luke recently noted: "The downside to Michigan's relatively high prison population has been its cost to taxpayers. The upside has been the thousands of jobs it has provided."

Eight prison facilities are slated to close this year. One of them, the Standish Maximum Correctional Facility in Arenac County, is in one of the poorest parts of the state. When it closes, 340 jobs will go with it.

While it's not going to be painless, the need to trim the state budget, particularly in corrections, is clear. Michigan is one of four states that spends more on prisons than higher education. The prison system consumes 26 percent of the state's general fund revenue, a 10 percent jump from a dozen years ago.

Michigan prisoners stay locked up slightly longer than the national average . That's likely to change in the coming months as looming cuts result in faster paroles. That will inevitably include some sex offenders, who make up 68 percent of the prison population and are generally paroled at a much lower rate.

So in addition to the loss of jobs, there are the to-be-expected misgivings associated with releasing prisoners, however much money -- $120 million is the goal -- it ultimately trims from the state budget....
http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2009/06/michigan_prison_closures_raise.html


The Standish facility has been looked at as a place to hold Guantanamo detainees.


Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time!
 
Posts: 1884 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of FriscoLady01
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Yooper_tj:
quote:
Hey Politicians why don't you try a novel idea.

When less money comes into my home I have to cut back.

It is time for the states to cut back too!

Gee What a novel idea, never would expect a poltician to think of that! That is probably because they never have thought of it!


Michigan just cut 165 dollars per pupil from K-12 spending to help cover a revenue shortfall.

That's good for everyone, right?


They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies.

I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education.

As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block.

Frisco
 
Posts: 3069 | Registered: Fri 22 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Picture of rcjarrell
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:

They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies.

I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education.

As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block.

Frisco


Yeah!

And I am tired of being taxed to pay for roads I will never drive on.
And I am sick of my tax dollars buying books for the public library I will never read.
And since I don't own a boat, I'm tired of being taxed for lighthouses and the Coast Guard rescue services which I'll never need.
And since I don't fly, I am sick of taxes being spent on navigation aids, GPS satellites, the FAA, and the NTSB.
And I am tired of taxes going to firefighting services. I can put out my own fires.
And although I am using the internet, I resent the fact that tax payer money was involved in its development.
 
Posts: 4557 | Registered: Mon 11 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Teamwork:
Everyone doing
as I say

Picture of RogerCollins
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcjarrell:
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:

They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies.

I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education.

As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block.

Frisco


Yeah!

And I am tired of being taxed to pay for roads I will never drive on.
How do you get around and why Not?
And I am sick of my tax dollars buying books for the public library I will never read.
That explains a lot about your postings.
And since I don't own a boat, I'm tired of being taxed for lighthouses and the Coast Guard rescue services which I'll never need.
Me too, but don't they protect us from terrorists and drug runners? And since I don't fly, I am sick of taxes being spent on navigation aids, GPS satellites, the FAA, and the NTSB.
I haven't tried to fly, normally try to use an airplane. THEN I want those things.
And I am tired of taxes going to firefighting services. I can put out my own fires.
Move out in the sticks like I go, its optional. Fight your own fires or pay when used. Its called Volunteer Fire Fighters.
And although I am using the internet, I resent the fact that tax payer money was involved in its development.

Wasn't it Al Gore that invented the Internet? From what I have observed, we wouldn't miss you on that either.


"We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo
 
Posts: 928 | Registered: Thu 15 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Gee. Raise taxes. But don't cut spending. What a novel way to destroy the sources of revenues. Once put out of business or moved elsewhere, guess what? Even less revenues. Heck, let's raise taxes more!
This is just so utterly brilliant! Why didn't I think of that! Dern common sense just keeps getting in the way, I guess!
 
Posts: 978 | Registered: Sat 24 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Teamwork:
Everyone doing
as I say

Picture of RogerCollins
Posted Hide Post
We have as many geniuses on these forums as we have in Washington. $10+T in debt and another $100 in unfunded mandates (read SS and Medicare). But we can grow and spend out way out of here, yeah, right. Take the time to look at the National Debt Clock and tell me how we solve this massive problem. Like you said, the whole formula being used makes no sense. Proven fact more taxes, less revenue. In about five years we will be circling the drain and then we will have to "reform Social Security and Medicare). Not to mention hyper-inflation. And that is the optomistic prediction of a person who has confidence in the American way of life, somehow we will prevail.


"We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo
 
Posts: 928 | Registered: Thu 15 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of FriscoLady01
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcjarrell:
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:

They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies.

I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education.

As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block.

Frisco


Yeah!

And I am tired of being taxed to pay for roads I will never drive on.
And I am sick of my tax dollars buying books for the public library I will never read.
And since I don't own a boat, I'm tired of being taxed for lighthouses and the Coast Guard rescue services which I'll never need.
And since I don't fly, I am sick of taxes being spent on navigation aids, GPS satellites, the FAA, and the NTSB.
And I am tired of taxes going to firefighting services. I can put out my own fires.
And although I am using the internet, I resent the fact that tax payer money was involved in its development.


And you just proved my point that our tax money for the government indoctrination centers called public schools would be best spent elsewhere.

My point was in my original post is that when less money is coming into my family we have to cut back. It is time for the governments, local, state, and especially federal to learn that theory. You don't spend more when you have less coming in you cut back.

But I forgot those of the political, ruling class can always put a firearm to our heads and take more from us.

Well, one of these days the serfs may get restless, I am almost so fed up with our government's especially crazy overspending that I believe the sooner the better!

Time for you to read: "Atlas Shrugged".

Go back to school and make it a private school this time you may just learn something!

Frisco
 
Posts: 3069 | Registered: Fri 22 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of WepsFP
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogerCollins:
quote:
Originally posted by rcjarrell:
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:

They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies.

I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education.

As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block.

Frisco


Yeah!

And I am tired of being taxed to pay for roads I will never drive on.
How do you get around and why Not?
And I am sick of my tax dollars buying books for the public library I will never read.
That explains a lot about your postings.
And since I don't own a boat, I'm tired of being taxed for lighthouses and the Coast Guard rescue services which I'll never need.
Me too, but don't they protect us from terrorists and drug runners? And since I don't fly, I am sick of taxes being spent on navigation aids, GPS satellites, the FAA, and the NTSB.
I haven't tried to fly, normally try to use an airplane. THEN I want those things.
And I am tired of taxes going to firefighting services. I can put out my own fires.
Move out in the sticks like I go, its optional. Fight your own fires or pay when used. Its called Volunteer Fire Fighters.
And although I am using the internet, I resent the fact that tax payer money was involved in its development.

Wasn't it Al Gore that invented the Internet? From what I have observed, we wouldn't miss you on that either.


Not very quick are you? Please tell me you are joking and you knew he was being sarcastic.
 
Posts: 4213 | Registered: Wed 20 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
----------------
Proud Member

----------------




Posted Hide Post
Atlas Shrugged? Nothing to do with the Serfs...unless you're talking about those 'drains on society' most likely to send their kids to public school.

It's pretty clear she knew nothing of what happens when the brightest mind in any industry goes on strike--the next brightest capitalist seizes on the opportunity to fill the void--hell, even the dumbest capitalist sees the opportunity when the big dog wanders off.

Dig this here:

Rational self-interest is a truly rare commodity among those who see the US under a Democratic Administration, 'discover' the book, and believe they've had some great epiphany supposing they've 'discovered' life imitating art. The innovators and artists and thinkers aren't being oppressed--but I'm hoping the imitators and the crooked bankers are taking some lumps these days.

I was educated in an indoctrination center--a Catholic School--until The State quit subsidizing them in 1971. I can read, write, and cipher circles around most, and I won't go near a Church but for weddings and funerals.

It's common knowledge that States--and the Fed--need to spend less.

The battle will always be over The Question:

Spend less on what? Education or Transportation? Big Weapons Projects or Spy Satellites? VA or Medicare?


Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time!
 
Posts: 1884 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"The day is wasted in which you learn nothing"
Picture of cheapthrills
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:
Hey Politicians why don't you try a novel idea.

When less money comes into my home I have to cut back.

It is time for the states to cut back too!

Gee What a novel idea, never would expect a poltician to think of that! That is probably because they never have thought of it!

Gee I wish I could raise our salaries the way you politicians raise your taxes that way I would not have to cut back either.

You politicians are no better than common thieves! You steal our hard earned money through the overblown tax rates with a gun pointed at our heads. Just like the Armed Robbers you are!

It is time politicians are treated like the thieves they are!

Frisco


And IF they do cut back, the first to go is police and firefighters/emergency squads. Seems to me they could prioritize and cut the lesser before the greater services. Then they make you feel guilty, as if it's "your" fault that the police can't protect you...as if they ever could every minute in every situation (better to have a couple friends along, like smith and wesson).
 
Posts: 1898 | Registered: Tue 25 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"The day is wasted in which you learn nothing"
Picture of cheapthrills
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:
My point was in my original post is that when less money is coming into my family we have to cut back. It is time for the governments, local, state, and especially federal to learn that theory. You don't spend more when you have less coming in you cut back.
Frisco


Back in the 80's. I worked for the USDA (agricultural research). When times got rough, the government (yeah, OUR government) would cut back funding/spending by, say, 10% across the board (except for personel saleries, of course). Every funded project shared the burden of short funds. What has happened with that very doable concept?
 
Posts: 1898 | Registered: Tue 25 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of cosmicfish
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:
And you just proved my point that our tax money for the government indoctrination centers called public schools would be best spent elsewhere.

My point was in my original post is that when less money is coming into my family we have to cut back. It is time for the governments, local, state, and especially federal to learn that theory. You don't spend more when you have less coming in you cut back.

But I forgot those of the political, ruling class can always put a firearm to our heads and take more from us.

Well, one of these days the serfs may get restless, I am almost so fed up with our government's especially crazy overspending that I believe the sooner the better!

Time for you to read: "Atlas Shrugged".

Go back to school and make it a private school this time you may just learn something!

Frisco

It's funny, I know several people who went to private schools in addition to the rest of us who went to public, and the achievement level of the public school grads is much higher. My graduating class from high school includes doctors, lawyers, PhD's, a number of veterans, at least one Oscar-nominated artist, a Rhodes scholar, a regular contributor for Fox News, and even a consultant for a major right-wing think tank... I am neither joking nor exagerating when I say that none of the private schoolers went anywhere. Unless you count our valedictorian, who was home schooled until 6th grade, private schooled until 8th, public until 12th, and then dropped out of college. She was awesome. One of the other private schoolers is a personal injury lawyer - I have to admit I actually liked him back in high school.

By the way, I read Atlas Shrugged, and came to the conclusion that Ayn Rand had a lot of issues that she could have worked out much more productively without writing it down. I also feel she is a terrible author. Read Sartre, at least it is entertaining.
 
Posts: 816 | Registered: Tue 29 July 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
That's a joke, son.
Picture of SenClaghorn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The battle will always be over The Question:

Spend less on what? Education or Transportation? Big Weapons Projects or Spy Satellites? VA or Medicare?



Yes and the battle is almost always a battle of words only.
 
Posts: 976 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
That's a joke, son.
Picture of SenClaghorn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Atlas Shrugged



Ayn Rand? Did someone get a late night glimpse of the Fountainhead?
 
Posts: 976 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Teamwork:
Everyone doing
as I say

Picture of RogerCollins
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WepsFP:
quote:
Originally posted by RogerCollins:
quote:
Originally posted by rcjarrell:
quote:
Originally posted by FriscoLady01:

They should have had to cut more, everywhere. The education of one's child (children) is the parents not societies.

I strongly object to paying taxes for the education of other children when the money I am spending on their child could be put to better use giving my children a better education.

As it was my children went to private school, because I was not going to have them in the corrupt, liberal, government schools. I could have given them a far better educational experience if I did not have to support Joe Shmos kids down the block.

Frisco


Yeah!

And I am tired of being taxed to pay for roads I will never drive on.
How do you get around and why Not?
And I am sick of my tax dollars buying books for the public library I will never read.
That explains a lot about your postings.
And since I don't own a boat, I'm tired of being taxed for lighthouses and the Coast Guard rescue services which I'll never need.
Me too, but don't they protect us from terrorists and drug runners? And since I don't fly, I am sick of taxes being spent on navigation aids, GPS satellites, the FAA, and the NTSB.
I haven't tried to fly, normally try to use an airplane. THEN I want those things.
And I am tired of taxes going to firefighting services. I can put out my own fires.
Move out in the sticks like I go, its optional. Fight your own fires or pay when used. Its called Volunteer Fire Fighters.
And although I am using the internet, I resent the fact that tax payer money was involved in its development.

Wasn't it Al Gore that invented the Internet? From what I have observed, we wouldn't miss you on that either.


Not very quick are you? Please tell me you are joking and you knew he was being sarcastic.


Quick enough to identify a troll when I see one. You may look up situational awareness. Then you could possibly understand the context of my reply. An example you would probably understand would be: A sub gets a message that a hostile is nearby. The CO calls battlestations, conducts a passive sonar sweep, goes to PD and conducts a 360 degree search, locates the threat, TELLS the WEPS 0 to shoot., Threat eliminated. Applause Now if the WEPS 0 is asleep in the Wardroom and wakes up in the middle of the action, runs into the Control Room and fires a weapon without knowing whats happening, bad news. The WEPS 0 gets fired from boats and probably the US Navy. Yes, I knew that the posting was sarcasm and I replied in kind. Keep trolling, you may find something better to bite on.


"We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo
 
Posts: 928 | Registered: Thu 15 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Remember those hoovervilles (aka tent cities) from the great depression?

-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46r4yxttThw

The sick part about all this is that we are spending ourselves (at the national level) into a hole that we'll be taxed heavily to get out of. All to help make the speculators and bankers whole! As taxes begin to rise to pay that debt and they will soon, there will be far more of these cities popping up around the country.
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Teamwork:
Everyone doing
as I say

Picture of RogerCollins
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by floersh:
Remember those hoovervilles (aka tent cities) from the great depression?

-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46r4yxttThw

The sick part about all this is that we are spending ourselves (at the national level) into a hole that we'll be taxed heavily to get out of. All to help make the speculators and bankers whole! As taxes begin to rise to pay that debt and they will soon, there will be far more of these cities popping up around the country.


Our GDP for a few years has been around $14T. It is now dropping due to the economy tanking. Given that the National Debt clock has our national debt currently at about $12T and rising and the approximately $100T in unfunded mandates, explain how high taxes will get us out of this mess? It would take ten years of 100% GDP to clear the accumulated debt. We are facing decades of problems as it is and there is no stopping Washington. They are on a run.


"We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo
 
Posts: 928 | Registered: Thu 15 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogerCollins:
quote:
Originally posted by floersh:
Remember those hoovervilles (aka tent cities) from the great depression?

-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46r4yxttThw

The sick part about all this is that we are spending ourselves (at the national level) into a hole that we'll be taxed heavily to get out of. All to help make the speculators and bankers whole! As taxes begin to rise to pay that debt and they will soon, there will be far more of these cities popping up around the country.


Our GDP for a few years has been around $14T. It is now dropping due to the economy tanking. Given that the National Debt clock has our national debt currently at about $12T and rising and the approximately $100T in unfunded mandates, explain how high taxes will get us out of this mess? It would take ten years of 100% GDP to clear the accumulated debt. We are facing decades of problems as it is and there is no stopping Washington. They are on a run.


Higher taxes wont get us out of this by itself. Many programs will be dropped regardless of who it hurts. The dollar will be devalued to reduce the magnitude of the debt. And of course Taxes will be raised. All of which hurts middle class America.

Either way these tent cities are going to grow in population.
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of crackerjacks61
Posted Hide Post
A very simple answer to all your statements, concerns and comments.

"www.fairtax.org"

Everyone pays, fairly across the board. The only thing I would change in this is a mandate to stop paying out money for STUPID pet projects that have no value to America as a whole. A Ted Kennedy, W Bush, Dick Nixon or anyone Library does not benefit this nation as a whole. Testing the speed of catsup coming out of a bottle, well I guess that could Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 5649 | Registered: Mon 29 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crackerjacks61:
A very simple answer to all your statements, concerns and comments.

"www.fairtax.org"

Everyone pays, fairly across the board. The only thing I would change in this is a mandate to stop paying out money for STUPID pet projects that have no value to America as a whole. A Ted Kennedy, W Bush, Dick Nixon or anyone Library does not benefit this nation as a whole. Testing the speed of catsup coming out of a bottle, well I guess that could Roll Eyes


Hey I am all for the fair tax. But we have passed the point of fairness. We have lived beyond our means for so long and made far too many commitments and then shipped off our jobs while importing more dependents. There will be nothing FAIR about whats coming. The sick part is that those who benefited the most from that debt will not be the ones paying it back.
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Not to worry folks...I heard great news last night that 57% of those making over $200K per year are DEMs!

Isn't that great..., that means, at least it should, that them DEMs won't mind paying some hefty tax increases to cover their "Anointed One..."

Nothing like "sticking it to the LIB man" ! ! !

Crackerjack, I concur with your proposal, but alas LIBs just won't put up with any fair tax talk...

Why..., it just won't stick it to the rich deep enough to suit liberals...that's why.
 
Posts: 1892 | Registered: Thu 05 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
It sure is good to know the banks are getting theirs. I guess it should be obvious our economy is on the path to recovery. After all, what caused this is worse now then it was then.

quote:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Despite concerted government-led and lender-supported efforts to prevent foreclosures, the number of filings hit a record high in the third quarter, according to a report issued Thursday.

"They were the worst three months of all time," said Rick Sharga, spokesman for RealtyTrac, an online marketer of foreclosed homes.

During that time, 937,840 homes received a foreclosure letter -- whether a default notice, auction notice or bank repossession, the RealtyTrac report said. That means one in every 136 U.S. homes were in foreclosure, which is a 5% increase from the second quarter and a 23% jump over the third quarter of 2008.

Nevada continued to be the worst-hit state with one filing for every 23 households. But even tranquil Vermont, where the foreclosure crisis has barely brushed the housing market, saw foreclosure filings jump nearly 170% compared with the third quarter of 2008. Still, that resulted in just one filing for every 5,023 households in the state -- the best record in the country.


-http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/15/real_estate/foreclosure_crisis_deepens/
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Teamwork:
Everyone doing
as I say

Picture of RogerCollins
Posted Hide Post
Interesting that several of us with significantly different political views agree on the upcoming challenges facing us under the auspices of TAX REVENUE. Politicians will never agree to a fair tax unless it is 90%. Takes away too much of their power. Under normal circumstances, pre-Obama this may have been possible, that train is now gone. Kind of like term limits, why would you vote for a bill that would stop your gravy train. Incumbency rules!
The foreclosures are continuing at a record pace due to nothing has been done to eliminate the situation that created them. Approx. 50% of the refi's to help those with mortgage problem go into default within six months. And the Dems want to expand the DRA. According to the deutsche bank, the worst is yet to come in the residential market. Commercial is on the way.
And we have a VP who thinks the Stimulous effectiveness is exceeding all expectations. Tell that to the unemployed. Gosh, I am in a good mood this morning. Anyone have the Hemlock Society's phone number. Just kidding Crackerjack.


"We have met the Enemy and he is Us." Pogo
 
Posts: 928 | Registered: Thu 15 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogerCollins:
Interesting that several of us with significantly different political views agree on the upcoming challenges facing us under the auspices of TAX REVENUE. Politicians will never agree to a fair tax unless it is 90%. Takes away too much of their power. Under normal circumstances, pre-Obama this may have been possible, that train is now gone. Kind of like term limits, why would you vote for a bill that would stop your gravy train. Incumbency rules!
The foreclosures are continuing at a record pace due to nothing has been done to eliminate the situation that created them. Approx. 50% of the refi's to help those with mortgage problem go into default within six months. And the Dems want to expand the DRA. According to the deutsche bank, the worst is yet to come in the residential market. Commercial is on the way.
And we have a VP who thinks the Stimulous effectiveness is exceeding all expectations. Tell that to the unemployed. Gosh, I am in a good mood this morning. Anyone have the Hemlock Society's phone number. Just kidding Crackerjack.


Applause Beer
 
Posts: 6717 | Registered: Sat 26 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 


© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.