Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Obama's Top Five Health Care Lies
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Ruanne
Posted Hide Post
People shouldn't go bankrupt if they get cancer, spending all their life's savings and selling their house to pay for treatment, after their yearly (or lifetime!) insurance max has been reached, knowing that their pre-existing condition will bar them from getting coverage from any other insurance provider in the future. They will be reliant on charity health care if their cancer ever goes into remission.

What we have now is an injustice. I would personally prefer a government option, mainly because I was born into the military health care system and have had no real complaints against it in my own time in service.

But even if we don't go for a government-run option, we should do something about people who HAVE health insurance going bankrupt paying for medical treatment, about people being barred from coverage due to pre-existing conditions, as well as about people who literally can't afford insurance.

I worry about all this for personal reasons. My mother's been having seizures. Last year, we could handle it, since her insurance covered most of the expenses, and we are now repaying the balance. But this year, she's had two seizures already. We'll manage to pay what insurance covers. But if anything else happens this year, she may well go past her yearly limit.

In Europe nobody worries about these things. (I studied there in college.) Sure they pay more taxes. But they don't pay thousands of dollars for medical care a year (and MORE if something happens medically.) It balances out.
 
Posts: 1706 | Registered: Thu 22 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Bowlers have BIG balls!"


Picture of Kegler300
Posted Hide Post


"The World's Finest"
 
Posts: 15567 | Registered: Wed 07 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of threerings
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ruanne:
People shouldn't go bankrupt if they get cancer, spending all their life's savings and selling their house to pay for treatment, after their yearly (or lifetime!) insurance max has been reached, knowing that their pre-existing condition will bar them from getting coverage from any other insurance provider in the future. They will be reliant on charity health care if their cancer ever goes into remission.

What we have now is an injustice. I would personally prefer a government option, mainly because I was born into the military health care system and have had no real complaints against it in my own time in service.

But even if we don't go for a government-run option, we should do something about people who HAVE health insurance going bankrupt paying for medical treatment, about people being barred from coverage due to pre-existing conditions, as well as about people who literally can't afford insurance.

I worry about all this for personal reasons. My mother's been having seizures. Last year, we could handle it, since her insurance covered most of the expenses, and we are now repaying the balance. But this year, she's had two seizures already. We'll manage to pay what insurance covers. But if anything else happens this year, she may well go past her yearly limit.

In Europe nobody worries about these things. (I studied there in college.) Sure they pay more taxes. But they don't pay thousands of dollars for medical care a year (and MORE if something happens medically.) It balances out.


How does it balance out?
 
Posts: 4435 | Registered: Mon 07 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Rationalized health care, heavy fines for refusing to purchase the health care plan

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Icetiger22,
 
Posts: 53 | Registered: Thu 25 June 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Only five at the top? At least go to 10.
 
Posts: 3828 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Icetiger22:
Rationalized health care, heavy fines for refusing to purchase the health care plan


Yes, in effect: "Ve haf vays of makink you obey, Komerad! Your life shall be run by ve who know vaht is gut fur you. You do not haf the brains and gut intentions ve haf, so you shall do as ve demand of you! Your opinions mean nuttink. Your vealth is ours to spread as ve tink best. We are progressink to der Brafe New Welt. Hang on and shut up!"
 
Posts: 3828 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Ruanne
Posted Hide Post
How does it balance out? You pay taxes, and you get health care in return for said taxes. Since the government is not a for-profit organization (obviously) it will be better motivated to keep costs down (you can argue this point. For instance, the military does not control costs, seemingly. But those private contractors we've hired out to replace certain military functions have spent FAR AND AWAY more than the military units ever have for the same services, ie food preparation.)

The alternative is, you pay premiums, and deductibles, and the price of both go up every year FAR BEYOND the rate of inflation, until it takes up half of your income, or your employer quits offering insurance at all. This is assuming your employer even OFFERS health coverage, or that you are even employed.

I think it irresponsible that we have cut taxes in a time of war. That worked fine when the economy was booming. But the economy can't boom forever, that is a given. The bill will come due. We may as well start paying it now. The interest will pile up if we put it off another few decades.
 
Posts: 1706 | Registered: Thu 22 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of ipw533
Posted Hide Post
As a welfare caseworker, I'm in a specialized field--I deal primarily with medical assistance applications submitted by medical providers. How does that work? Glad you asked.

Patient A goes to Hospital B but has no health insurance. Let's say the patient is hospitalized overnight and discharged the following day--typically this will generate a bill of several thousand dollars. The hospital knows the patient can't pay that bill, so it or its representatives submit an application to the state for Medicaid benefits--my job is to process and resolve those applications. I've been doing this for a year now, and I've noticed certain trends, none of which are encouraging.

First of all, people have a tendency to use the hospital ER as a primary caregiver, and they do do for minor ailments that can either be treated by a reasonably competent and reasonably priced GP or even by themselves. An abcess is not a hard thing to treat, folks. Clean and drain the wound and apply antibiotics--you don't need an ER MD to do that! And why the Hell are you going to the ER for a simple headache, backache or cold?

But that's what people do, and the state ends up paying the bill. Excuse me, you end up paying the bill, since you're a state taxpayer. The people for whom you are paying that bill probably never paid taxes in their lives.

Some of these expenses are covered by Medicaid and Medicare, but more often than not the remainder is either shifted onto the patient or eaten by hospital's charity slush fund. Look at your next hospital bill--you'll be charged for things like rubber gloves and cotton balls. Where does that money go? If you guessed the slush fund I'd say you were correct.

If you have private health insurance it will pay for most of those bills; if you have Medicare it will pay up to 80% of those bills--the rest either falls to you or is picked up by the taxpayers.

One thing few people seem to be aware of is that the doctors get paid cents on the dollar for such patients. More and more physicians are refusing to accept Medicare/Medicaid patients, and can you blame them--they actually lose money when they do so. Their alternative is to overcharge for things like tests, costs which get passed onto the insurance companies and cause them to raise their rates. And the cycle continues.

Now let's say that I'm a young student with an interest in a career in medicine (OK, I'm not so young and my interest is in veterinary medicine). I've got to get a normal college BA with pre-med courses and then I've got to qualify for and get into a medical graduate program. I'll rack up a mountain of debt doing that.

But wait, there's more. Let's say I get into medical school and I pass all of my classes. What happens next? I get to be an intern at a hospital and I deal with life-threatening cases while simultaneously dealing with sleep deprivation equal to that of a Ranger school candidate--except that if I sleepily screw up I've got a boatload of lawyers on my butt. And I know those guys, they partied with us but decided to take the easy road, which was smart.

OK, so I make it through my internship and am now a fully-fledged MD. I set up my own practice. That costs serious bucks, plus I have to pay to get the privledge of working at the local hospitals. And I've got to pay out the wazoo to insurance companies in case some patient thinks I didn't treat his hangnail properly, and that's before I even see a patient.

Who in his right mind is gonna go through all of that crap for a teensy government payout? And then where are we going to find the physicians who will make Obamacare work? Asylums are not a good choice and don't look at me--unless you're a cat I've no business treating you.....
 
Posts: 16791 | Registered: Sat 05 May 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
----------------
Proud Member

----------------




Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ipw533:
As a welfare caseworker, I'm in a specialized field--I deal primarily with medical assistance applications submitted by medical providers. How does that work? Glad you asked.

Patient A goes to Hospital B but has no health insurance. Let's say the patient is hospitalized overnight and discharged the following day--typically this will generate a bill of several thousand dollars. The hospital knows the patient can't pay that bill, so it or its representatives submit an application to the state for Medicaid benefits--my job is to process and resolve those applications. I've been doing this for a year now, and I've noticed certain trends, none of which are encouraging.

First of all, people have a tendency to use the hospital ER as a primary caregiver, and they do do for minor ailments that can either be treated by a reasonably competent and reasonably priced GP or even by themselves. An abcess is not a hard thing to treat, folks. Clean and drain the wound and apply antibiotics--you don't need an ER MD to do that! And why the Hell are you going to the ER for a simple headache, backache or cold?

But that's what people do, and the state ends up paying the bill. Excuse me, you end up paying the bill, since you're a state taxpayer. The people for whom you are paying that bill probably never paid taxes in their lives.

Some of these expenses are covered by Medicaid and Medicare, but more often than not the remainder is either shifted onto the patient or eaten by hospital's charity slush fund. Look at your next hospital bill--you'll be charged for things like rubber gloves and cotton balls. Where does that money go? If you guessed the slush fund I'd say you were correct.

If you have private health insurance it will pay for most of those bills; if you have Medicare it will pay up to 80% of those bills--the rest either falls to you or is picked up by the taxpayers.

One thing few people seem to be aware of is that the doctors get paid cents on the dollar for such patients. More and more physicians are refusing to accept Medicare/Medicaid patients, and can you blame them--they actually lose money when they do so. Their alternative is to overcharge for things like tests, costs which get passed onto the insurance companies and cause them to raise their rates. And the cycle continues.

Now let's say that I'm a young student with an interest in a career in medicine (OK, I'm not so young and my interest is in veterinary medicine). I've got to get a normal college BA with pre-med courses and then I've got to qualify for and get into a medical graduate program. I'll rack up a mountain of debt doing that.

But wait, there's more. Let's say I get into medical school and I pass all of my classes. What happens next? I get to be an intern at a hospital and I deal with life-threatening cases while simultaneously dealing with sleep deprivation equal to that of a Ranger school candidate--except that if I sleepily screw up I've got a boatload of lawyers on my butt. And I know those guys, they partied with us but decided to take the easy road, which was smart.

OK, so I make it through my internship and am now a fully-fledged MD. I set up my own practice. That costs serious bucks, plus I have to pay to get the privledge of working at the local hospitals. And I've got to pay out the wazoo to insurance companies in case some patient thinks I didn't treat his hangnail properly, and that's before I even see a patient.

Who in his right mind is gonna go through all of that crap for a teensy government payout? And then where are we going to find the physicians who will make Obamacare work? Asylums are not a good choice and don't look at me--unless you're a cat I've no business treating you.....


Insurance companies, a draconian residency 'hazing' for new doctors, hospital overhead, and patients.

Lots of culprits today--we don't disagree.

Much comes down to our 'right' to see any doctor, any time, for any reason, with some other party carrying the burden, and hospital administrators and insurers deciding how the money's divvied up.

Throw in those who won't leave the doctor until they have a script for an antibiotic that won't treat their viral infection, or an expensive scan that only proves that nothing's there that can't be treated at home with rest, ice, compression, and elevation--maybe some tylenol if you don't take too much.

Others get their narcotics at the ER, and someone making minimum wage will give up half a week's pay to see a doctor on a cash basis.

We can do better.


Now go a-way or I shall taunt you a second time!
 
Posts: 1895 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of ipw533
Posted Hide Post
Agreed, Yooper, we can do better, but the question is how do we do so? Health care reform is needed, but looking at the Canadian and British models I'd say the first step to real health care reform is to shoot and then bayonet any politician who thinks the government should be the prime mover behind that reform; display their carcasses outside of hospitals and don't remove them until people get the point.

YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GIVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REAL HEALTH COVERAGE BY MEANS OF CONGRESS!!!!

OK, I'm done yelling. Seriously, we need to find our way back to where doctors and patients worked together, without insurance companies and government busybodies. Perhaps one of the first things we need to do is to realize that there is no medical utopia. God, I've gotten to really hate that word, especially since I've learned it's Greek origins--nowhere.

Homeostasis is a better term in this case. It refers to the body's natural balance. If a person gets an infection he will run a fever--that means a potentially life-threatening elevated temperature--but that is how the body kills off the invading pathogens. Once the infection is cleared up the fever breaks and the patient returns to normal. Any doctor knows that; most patients don't, but a good dose of education might be a damn sight cheaper than some taxpayer-funded boondoggle. And the best part of this the doctor gets to tell the patient how to avoid the infection in the first place. That will be $100.00, now go and sin no more--much cheaper than a government solution and much more effective.

An emphasis on preventative health care could drive down costs, but only if the middle men (insurance companies and government bureaucrats) were cut out of the picture. I might not agree to working fewer hours and smoking or drinking less, but I'll resent that advice a lot less from a doctor rather than from some Blue Cross agent or some government busybody. Cut those guys out, make them get real honest jobs, and watch health care prices fall, The fever breaks, and homeostasis is restored. And we don't look like a bunch of pale toothless Brits....
 
Posts: 16791 | Registered: Sat 05 May 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of threerings
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ruanne:
How does it balance out? You pay taxes, and you get health care in return for said taxes. Since the government is not a for-profit organization (obviously) it will be better motivated to keep costs down (you can argue this point. For instance, the military does not control costs, seemingly. But those private contractors we've hired out to replace certain military functions have spent FAR AND AWAY more than the military units ever have for the same services, ie food preparation.)

The alternative is, you pay premiums, and deductibles, and the price of both go up every year FAR BEYOND the rate of inflation, until it takes up half of your income, or your employer quits offering insurance at all. This is assuming your employer even OFFERS health coverage, or that you are even employed.

I think it irresponsible that we have cut taxes in a time of war. That worked fine when the economy was booming. But the economy can't boom forever, that is a given. The bill will come due. We may as well start paying it now. The interest will pile up if we put it off another few decades.


You're living in a dream world. The government..keep costs down? Even IF (and that is about the biggest IF ever) someone how government DOES reduce costs..you'll never see a refund. It will just go to another pet project.

The MA. RMV collects, by their own data, 125 to 130% of their operating costs..where does that extra 25-30% go? The MA. Pike collects, by teir own data, as much as 200% of the money needed to run the Pike. Where does that extra go?
 
Posts: 4435 | Registered: Mon 07 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*
Picture of threerings
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Yooper_tj:
quote:
Originally posted by ipw533:
As a welfare caseworker, I'm in a specialized field--I deal primarily with medical assistance applications submitted by medical providers. How does that work? Glad you asked.

Patient A goes to Hospital B but has no health insurance. Let's say the patient is hospitalized overnight and discharged the following day--typically this will generate a bill of several thousand dollars. The hospital knows the patient can't pay that bill, so it or its representatives submit an application to the state for Medicaid benefits--my job is to process and resolve those applications. I've been doing this for a year now, and I've noticed certain trends, none of which are encouraging.

First of all, people have a tendency to use the hospital ER as a primary caregiver, and they do do for minor ailments that can either be treated by a reasonably competent and reasonably priced GP or even by themselves. An abcess is not a hard thing to treat, folks. Clean and drain the wound and apply antibiotics--you don't need an ER MD to do that! And why the Hell are you going to the ER for a simple headache, backache or cold?

But that's what people do, and the state ends up paying the bill. Excuse me, you end up paying the bill, since you're a state taxpayer. The people for whom you are paying that bill probably never paid taxes in their lives.

Some of these expenses are covered by Medicaid and Medicare, but more often than not the remainder is either shifted onto the patient or eaten by hospital's charity slush fund. Look at your next hospital bill--you'll be charged for things like rubber gloves and cotton balls. Where does that money go? If you guessed the slush fund I'd say you were correct.

If you have private health insurance it will pay for most of those bills; if you have Medicare it will pay up to 80% of those bills--the rest either falls to you or is picked up by the taxpayers.

One thing few people seem to be aware of is that the doctors get paid cents on the dollar for such patients. More and more physicians are refusing to accept Medicare/Medicaid patients, and can you blame them--they actually lose money when they do so. Their alternative is to overcharge for things like tests, costs which get passed onto the insurance companies and cause them to raise their rates. And the cycle continues.

Now let's say that I'm a young student with an interest in a career in medicine (OK, I'm not so young and my interest is in veterinary medicine). I've got to get a normal college BA with pre-med courses and then I've got to qualify for and get into a medical graduate program. I'll rack up a mountain of debt doing that.

But wait, there's more. Let's say I get into medical school and I pass all of my classes. What happens next? I get to be an intern at a hospital and I deal with life-threatening cases while simultaneously dealing with sleep deprivation equal to that of a Ranger school candidate--except that if I sleepily screw up I've got a boatload of lawyers on my butt. And I know those guys, they partied with us but decided to take the easy road, which was smart.

OK, so I make it through my internship and am now a fully-fledged MD. I set up my own practice. That costs serious bucks, plus I have to pay to get the privledge of working at the local hospitals. And I've got to pay out the wazoo to insurance companies in case some patient thinks I didn't treat his hangnail properly, and that's before I even see a patient.

Who in his right mind is gonna go through all of that crap for a teensy government payout? And then where are we going to find the physicians who will make Obamacare work? Asylums are not a good choice and don't look at me--unless you're a cat I've no business treating you.....


Insurance companies, a draconian residency 'hazing' for new doctors, hospital overhead, and patients.

Lots of culprits today--we don't disagree.

Much comes down to our 'right' to see any doctor, any time, for any reason, with some other party carrying the burden, and hospital administrators and insurers deciding how the money's divvied up.

Throw in those who won't leave the doctor until they have a script for an antibiotic that won't treat their viral infection, or an expensive scan that only proves that nothing's there that can't be treated at home with rest, ice, compression, and elevation--maybe some tylenol if you don't take too much.

Others get their narcotics at the ER, and someone making minimum wage will give up half a week's pay to see a doctor on a cash basis.

We can do better.


So, who decides?
I once broke my left hand kickboxing and spent 2 months trying to get an X-ray..because even with a broken hand I could still squeeze hard enough to hurt this frail 70 year old nurse practinoer's hand. Should I have just given up and not received treatment?

Hell, under UHC, should I have even been allowed to kickbox? I've could run down the list of broken noses, and fingers, and toes, and shins and ribs I've pickup over the years..am I using HC unfairly? Driving up the costs unfairly? My brother broke a leg skiing one year..ban that too! And that fat slob at McDonalds..no more fried for him!

The left..we beleive in choice when killing babies..other than that..we'll choice for you!
 
Posts: 4435 | Registered: Mon 07 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Obama's Top Five Health Care Lies

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.