Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    PROGRESS TOWARDS FORUM GOALS
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 

LEAD MODERATOR
HOT TOPICS


Picture of Silent_Surface
Posted
MEMBERS AND MODERATORS:

There seems to be a lot of ill will right now.

I have had posters tell me I am giving Liberals a free pass. Another poster is convinced that I am after him because he is a liberal.

I think I have a good plan, and that it will work.

IT WILL TAKE TIME!

WE WILL NOT CATCH EVERY BAD POST!

WE NEED YOUR HELP!

If you are a conservative, and you believe the liberals are getting a free ride, USE THE ALERT SYSTEM.

If you are a liberal and believe that the conservatives are getting a free ride, USE THE ALERT SYSTEM.

If you are of ANY POLITICAL PERSUASION OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION, and you see a post that you think needs to be addressed, USE THE ALERT SYSTEM.

Using the alert system is NOT "tattling", it is a TOOL that will help ALL OF US to get the Hot Topics Forums to where they should be.

There is a limited Moderator staff right now, so we can really use your help. I only ask that you not submit frivolous alerts just because you do not like someone. If you, however, feel it is justified, USE THE ALERT SYSTEM.

See the pattern here. It is impossible for the few mods we have at this time to read each and every thread, and we will NEVER catch the posts we should be looking at without help.
USE THE ALERT SYSTEM!!!!!!!!

I stand by the sticky I posted, and will keep working towards the goal of a fair and equitable Hot Topics Forums. It will happen much sooner if the Members help to moderate themselves, and if you USE THE ALERT SYSTEM.

I ask for your patience and forbearance as we work this out. It will not be easy, but will be worth it.

Zack
Silent_Surface
Lead Moderator
Hot Topics


"The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life."
~~~Theodore Roosevelt~~~
 
Posts: 5074 | Registered: Tue 18 November 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
GONE
8 Nov
Fin
Posted Hide Post
yea right!
 
Posts: 3394 | Registered: Thu 22 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

LEAD MODERATOR
HOT TOPICS


Picture of Silent_Surface
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rpschnecksr:
yea right!


Thank you for agreeing with me.
Roll Eyes


"The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life."
~~~Theodore Roosevelt~~~
 
Posts: 5074 | Registered: Tue 18 November 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
I know it'll never happen, but if these forums were restricted to those who have actually served, or who are currently serving, (obviously), this place'd be a helluva lot more civil. There'd still be disagreements, but it seems to me that the real rabble-rousers round here are the "members" who've never served in uniform a day in their lives; especially those on the far left, (a few of em qualify as true socialist radicals and imo, they have no business posting on this site).
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of foxred03
Posted Hide Post
I've got a big problem with the radicals on both sides. The ones that think Bush is a Nazi and the ones who think the entire middle east should be nuked.
 
Posts: 3137 | Registered: Thu 02 January 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
On the soapbox here:

I don't care about liberals v. neoconservatives. I have had to put up with being bashed for my anti-neoconservative opinions for years. I can handle that. It comes with the territory.

What I am seeing is a resurgence of veteran bashing and "whose the better veteran," chest-thumping.

I don't handle that crap very well at all. Never have and never will.

Stepping back down again.
 
Posts: 10065 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:
On the soapbox here:

I don't care about liberals v. neoconservatives.


Are you EVER going to find it within you to drop the bigotry and simply voice it as Liberals vs. CONSERVATIVES?

How about a little honesty, for a change?
 
Posts: 3062 | Registered: Wed 08 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:
On the soapbox here:

I don't care about liberals v. neoconservatives. I have had to put up with being bashed for my anti-neoconservative opinions for years. I can handle that. It comes with the territory...

Y'know, skinman, there are those who disagree with liberals on a variety of issues who cannot be accurately described as "neoconservatives". I know that's the hot leftist buzzword, and has been for a few years now, but it is almost always used incorrectly to describe everyone to the right of Nancy Pelosi. Most of us on the right are just plain ol conservatives, not "neocons". Please learn to use the term correctly.
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by foxred03:
I've got a big problem with the radicals on both sides. The ones that think Bush is a Nazi and the ones who think the entire middle east should be nuked.


The term "radical" refers to an individual on the far left of the political spectrum. The term "reactionary" refers to an individual on the opposite end of the spectrum: the far right.
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of foxred03
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shades_of_grey:
quote:
Originally posted by foxred03:
I've got a big problem with the radicals on both sides. The ones that think Bush is a Nazi and the ones who think the entire middle east should be nuked.


The term "radical" refers to an individual on the far left of the political spectrum. The term "reactionary" refers to an individual on the opposite end of the spectrum: the far right.


Webster does not agree, I used the word "radical" correctly. "Reactionary" does apply to the far right though I don't know why you care.
 
Posts: 3137 | Registered: Thu 02 January 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by foxred03:
quote:
Originally posted by shades_of_grey:
quote:
Originally posted by foxred03:
I've got a big problem with the radicals on both sides. The ones that think Bush is a Nazi and the ones who think the entire middle east should be nuked.


The term "radical" refers to an individual on the far left of the political spectrum. The term "reactionary" refers to an individual on the opposite end of the spectrum: the far right.


Webster does not agree, I used the word "radical" correctly. "Reactionary" does apply to the far right though I don't know why you care.


Just tryin to help you appear more edjumacated. Big Grin Do as you will.
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of foxred03
Posted Hide Post
Thanks for looking out. Whisper
 
Posts: 3137 | Registered: Thu 02 January 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by thanatos2:
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:
On the soapbox here:

I don't care about liberals v. neoconservatives.


Are you EVER going to find it within you to drop the bigotry and simply voice it as Liberals vs. CONSERVATIVES?

How about a little honesty, for a change?


Noun 1. neoconservative - a conservative who subscribes to neoconservatism

ne·o·con·ser·va·tism also ne·o-con·ser·va·tism (n-kn-sûrv-tzm)
n.
An intellectual and political movement in favor of political, economic, and social conservatism that arose in opposition to the perceived liberalism of the 1960s:

Can't get more honest than that. Wink

You need to lighten up with the bigotry stuff.

I promised I would not use it to inflame an discussion or as a epithet, and I have kept my promise.
 
Posts: 10065 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Veteran Member
Picture of outlaws93
Posted Hide Post
well that is second entry the first is this..

ne·o·con·serv·a·tism /ˌnioʊkənˈsɜrvəˌtɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[nee-oh-kuhn-sur-vuh-tiz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
moderate political conservatism espoused or advocated by former liberals or socialists.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/neoconservative

funny how you leave that one out...but i guess that one dosent serve your agenda...


 
Posts: 36858 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:

I promised I would not use it to inflame an discussion or as a epithet, and I have kept my promise.


There is NOTHING "neo" about my perspective, nor my position, and yet... that reality has NOTHING to restrain you from spewing the epithet in my direction.

Look at your post above... you cannot even voice the word conservative without perverting it for your own pleasure.
 
Posts: 3062 | Registered: Wed 08 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:
quote:
Originally posted by thanatos2:
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:
On the soapbox here:

I don't care about liberals v. neoconservatives.


Are you EVER going to find it within you to drop the bigotry and simply voice it as Liberals vs. CONSERVATIVES?

How about a little honesty, for a change?


Noun 1. neoconservative - a conservative who subscribes to neoconservatism

ne·o·con·ser·va·tism also ne·o-con·ser·va·tism (n-kn-sûrv-tzm)
n.
An intellectual and political movement in favor of political, economic, and social conservatism that arose in opposition to the perceived liberalism of the 1960s:

Can't get more honest than that. Wink

You need to lighten up with the bigotry stuff.

I promised I would not use it to inflame an discussion or as a epithet, and I have kept my promise.


Try less cutesy winking and more intellectual honesty, skinman. Outlaws has posted a much more accurate definition of what the term actually means.

I thought you were a teacher. Don't be so deliberately dense.
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by thanatos2:
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:

I promised I would not use it to inflame an discussion or as a epithet, and I have kept my promise.


There is NOTHING "neo" about my perspective, nor my position, and yet... that reality has NOTHING to restrain you from spewing the epithet in my direction.

Look at your post above... you cannot even voice the word conservative without perverting it for your own pleasure.


Yep. Skinman is deliberately twisting the meaning of "neoconservative" in order to use it as invective. He's been doing this for months, (if not years), so I guess at least he's consistent. Big Grin
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shades_of_grey:
Try less cutesy winking and more intellectual honesty, skinman. Outlaws has posted a much more accurate definition of what the term actually means.

I thought you were a teacher. Don't be so deliberately dense.


It helps to check into things before making such bold statements so you don't stick your foot in your mouth...Wink

outlaw didn't post all of the definitions he saw on Dictionary.com, just enough to slant the issue in one direction.

Here is the rest of it.
quote:


[Origin: 1960–65; neo- + conservatism]

—Related forms
ne·o·con·serv·a·tive, noun, adjective
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This

ne·o·con·ser·va·tism also ne·o-con·ser·va·tism (nē'ō-kən-sûr'və-tĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n. An intellectual and political movement in favor of political, economic, and social conservatism that arose in opposition to the perceived liberalism of the 1960s: "The neo-conservatism of the 1980s is a replay of the New Conservatism of the 1950s, which was itself a replay of the New Era philosophy of the 1920s" (Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.)

ne'o·con·ser'va·tive adj. & n.
(Download Now or Buy the Book)
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
WordNet - Cite This Source - Share This
neoconservative

noun
a conservative who subscribes to neoconservatism

WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University
 
Posts: 10065 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of shades_of_grey
Posted Hide Post
Skinman, why the fack can't you just use the term conservative? Why must you continue to show your blatant bias by derisively referring to anyone to the right of you as a "neocon"?

It's really quite childish.
 
Posts: 3538 | Registered: Tue 25 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by thanatos2:
quote:
Originally posted by skinman13:

I promised I would not use it to inflame an discussion or as a epithet, and I have kept my promise.


There is NOTHING "neo" about my perspective, nor my position, and yet... that reality has NOTHING to restrain you from spewing the epithet in my direction.

Look at your post above... you cannot even voice the word conservative without perverting it for your own pleasure.


I have not referred to you or anyone as a neoconservative or neocon since I accepted your cease fire.

I do not make promises often and I do not give my word lightly. I keep my word. Keep yours.
 
Posts: 10065 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shades_of_grey:
Skinman, why the fack can't you just use the term conservative? Why must you continue to show your blatant bias by derisively referring to anyone to the right of you as a "neocon"?

It's really quite childish.


This is incredible! Where in this topic did I refer to anyone here as a neoconservative?

I was making a fracking point about labeling in general. Get over it already!

God, what a bunch of whiners!
 
Posts: 10065 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message