Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Senate Committee Flushes Rockefeller's Public Option
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate
Picture of I_M_Qwerty
Posted
quote:
DEVELOPING: The Senate Finance Committee has voted against creating a new government health insurance plan to compete with the private market.

The 15-to-8 vote could forecast the fate of the public option in the Senate as a whole. The outcome was expected but still a defeat for liberals who view government-sponsored insurance for the middle class as a key component of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

Five committee Democrats, including Chairman Max Baucus, joined with all 10 committee Republicans to defeat the measure by Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia.

Opponents said a public option would drive private insurers out of business and amount to a government takeover. Proponents said it would give consumers choice and competition.

<more>

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/29/senate-panel-debates-govt-run-health-plan/

Good!
 
Posts: 8121 | Registered: Sun 01 June 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
------------------

Proud member

------------------

Picture of dragonflyer04
Posted Hide Post
Idiocy is always engendered by the rich and monied....or is it the rich and famous????probibly both.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: dragonflyer04,
 
Posts: 5188 | Registered: Wed 12 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Tomcatt
Posted Hide Post
I am not rich nor monied nor famous, nor do I want a public option


Forget the dog, Beware of Owner
 
Posts: 3869 | Registered: Mon 11 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
That's a joke, son.
Picture of SenClaghorn
Posted Hide Post
I can surely understand the hate for government, yet I fail to see how much better the for profit group would be at ensuring I get the health care I might need.
 
Posts: 976 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Tomcatt
Posted Hide Post
I don't depend on anyone else, I have always taken the steps needed to ensure I have healthcare


Forget the dog, Beware of Owner
 
Posts: 3869 | Registered: Mon 11 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tomcatt:
I don't depend on anyone else, I have always taken the steps needed to ensure I have healthcare


You would have to pay for a public option, just like any private insurance plan.

Are you saying you don't depend on insurance at all?
 
Posts: 2914 | Registered: Tue 19 June 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Picture of tawodi
Posted Hide Post
Yes you would have to pay and after the insurance companies stop offering health care, because no one was buying it, you would REALLY have to pay for your health care....with your life most likely!!!
 
Posts: 7237 | Registered: Wed 29 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Score one for the Republican fight to keep the status-quo. They played that fear card and won. Republicans earned their blood money. That was millions in campaign contributions, lobby junkets, and under-the-table payola well placed by the pharmaceutical and health care industry.

And, unfortunately, since a majority of Americans actually want the public option, we are the ones who lost. Nothing will change, health care will remain out of reach for millions of hard-working citizens, pre-existing conditions will still disqualify, catastrophic illnesses and injury will still bankrupt, and the only thing the Republicans care about is that they banded together to obstruct change.
 
Posts: 10671 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
It ain't over 'till its over. Reconciliation anyone?
 
Posts: 12708 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate
Picture of I_M_Qwerty
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
It ain't over 'till its over. Reconciliation anyone?
I don't think anyone but cheerleaders on the sidelines (and maybe Harry Reid) are self-destructive and dumb enough to favor that route ... but if Congressional libs run that course, it will be a heck of an Xmas present for conservatives.
 
Posts: 8121 | Registered: Sun 01 June 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by I_M_Qwerty:
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
It ain't over 'till its over. Reconciliation anyone?
I don't think anyone but cheerleaders on the sidelines (and maybe Harry Reid) are self-destructive and dumb enough to favor that route ... but if Congressional libs run that course, it will be a heck of an Xmas present for conservatives.
Keep dreaming. The Public Option is what the people want. Didn't seem to hurt the last few that used it...
 
Posts: 12708 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate
Picture of I_M_Qwerty
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
quote:
Originally posted by I_M_Qwerty:
quote:
Originally posted by SeaWitch1220:
It ain't over 'till its over. Reconciliation anyone?
I don't think anyone but cheerleaders on the sidelines (and maybe Harry Reid) are self-destructive and dumb enough to favor that route ... but if Congressional libs run that course, it will be a heck of an Xmas present for conservatives.
Keep dreaming. The Public Option is what the people want. Didn't seem to hurt the last few that used it...
Dreaming? Nah. Most people don't want HR 3200 at all ... whether they want individual items within it is irrelevant. Methinks also that you don't know for beans about the reconciliation process ...

quote:
Provisions can also be challenged where the impact on spending is "merely incidental." (Simple question: Would a financially self-sustaining public option or co-op have a "merely incidental" impact on the deficit?)

So popular is the Byrd Rule that it has its own lexicon. If someone thinks he/she can strike a section of the bill, that section is considered "Byrdable." Once it is struck from the bill, it's called a "Byrd Dropping." A bill that has been riddled by the Byrd Rule has gone through a "Byrd Bath."

(Bonus phrase: The Byrd Bath leaves the bill looking like "Swiss Cheese" for all the holes created within the original legislation.)


You may find this educational ... note that it is an MSNBC source and quite current ... not some conservative site!

"http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/29/2082655.aspx"

Regardless, to pass a bill using reconciliation that 55% flat oppose (Rasmussen) seems a bit stupid to me ... but ... press on with your nightmare.
 
Posts: 8121 | Registered: Sun 01 June 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
Everything will change once the bill passes. Most want a public option in their reform bill. There is no reform without it. Reconciliation still remains a viable choice.
 
Posts: 12708 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of WilliamMalcomson
Posted Hide Post
In other words, you are now willing to admit that there are at least portions of this Bill you would be quite willing to do without?
 
Posts: 1051 | Registered: Fri 23 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of SeaWitch1220
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WilliamMalcomson:
In other words, you are now willing to admit that there are at least portions of this Bill you would be quite willing to do without?
The Baucus bill? It is, as Bill Maher described it, a BJ for the insurance companies. http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/09/19/bill-maher-baucus-healthcare-bill-is-a-*******-to-the-health-insurance-industry/ I can do without all of it. Which bill are you referring to?
 
Posts: 12708 | Registered: Tue 13 February 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Previous Posts as Jade_Gate
Picture of I_M_Qwerty
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Everything will change ...
Keep chanting that mantra ... LOL

"Yes we can" ... "Yes we can" ... "errr ... No we can't" ... Wink
 
Posts: 8121 | Registered: Sun 01 June 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 18362 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GunnyRet03:
anotherdumbimg.jpg


Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 10671 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
------------------

Proud member

------------------

Picture of dragonflyer04
Posted Hide Post
The Republicans are going to push everything that is good for the insurance companies...as are the cornservative democrats who owe the insurance companies their asses...like Senator Baucas...

Personally it is time to remind the idiots in DC what life is really about and send them packing ... or the morning dew will be do...do...for them in small and large piles.
 
Posts: 5188 | Registered: Wed 12 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
That's a joke, son.
Picture of SenClaghorn
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 976 | Registered: Mon 11 May 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    Senate Committee Flushes Rockefeller's Public Option

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.