Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 71
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
I've had both. I vote for the 9mm for a couple of reasons but agree the .45 has real knock down power!(low velocity; from the right angle you can actually see the round going thru the air)So,
greater range w/ the 9mm, more rounds(the more rounds,the better although we dont think of the 9mm as a fire supression weapon...)interchangeability of ammo, easy weapon to fire(increased accurancy),easy to maintain, will fire dirty.
 
Posts: 718 | Registered: Wed 22 September 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Well, I have a H&K .45 ACP and the glock 9mm with the long barrel and cut out on top...can't remember the number now...? Anyways, as for shooting I have equal accuracy with both guns, but the punch of a .45 satisfies. Bounce the can twice and all that is left is shreds...good times. But the max clip of 12 is kind of a drag. Nothing beats a 33 round clip in the nine.
 
Posts: 87 | Registered: Tue 12 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Picture of twisted1vy
Posted Hide Post
I respect everyone's opinions, and its great to hear that I have been able to produce a decent thread.

Me personally, in regards to the comments about magazine capacity in 9 v 45, while understandable, I still dont accept it. The way I see it, yes you may have more bullets, but when it takes two and three times as many rounds to put a subject down, you have just taken away the advantage of more rounds. lol yes i know it all depends on the shooter, just going off examples used in which required to shoot multiple times (LE purposes).

But again, thank you all for posting, I look forward to hearing more responses.
 
Posts: 58 | Registered: Fri 10 February 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Honor - Courage - Commitment
Experienced Member
Picture of ETC1966
Posted Hide Post
I'm in the minority here, but I think we should keep the 9mm.

Yes, a .45 round has more mass, so it delivers more "authority" WHEN it hits your enemy, thus ensuring he stays down, if you hit "center of mass".

However, that's if/when you hit him. Remember the military has to plan around the "lowest common denominator". Most people shoot a lot better with the 9mm. They can put those "3 or 4 rounds needed to make an incorrigible assailant stay down" into him, whereas most folks likely wont even hit him at all with a .45, given they only have 7 tries and their odds of hitting the target are lower.

Also consider, in most situations, unless you're in Somalia, you're not shooting guys who are charged up on drugs. I don't have the statistics in front of me, but I suspect that most shootings with pistols are in law enforcement situations, where you don't necessarily want to kill the perpetrator, just incapacitate them. Well, maybe you really DO want to kill them, but that's not what your boss (who's generally not ever getting shot at) wants. If you're really worried about them getting back up, aim for the neck if it's exposed, or the bottom of their chin.

Another thing that hasn't been mentioned so far, in regard to magazine capacity, is that you're not always trying to make a kill shot. Sometimes you have to lay down suppression fire, and for that more is definitely better.
 
Posts: 5685 | Registered: Fri 07 February 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Picture of twisted1vy
Posted Hide Post
ETC, all of your points are very well made and give definate substance to the debate. I do agree with you in regards to the fact most shootings are involving LE. I guess Im a little biased since I am at a predominately LE base and have been working LE for past 6 years. Its funny but true what you say in regards to the military having to work around the lowest common denominator. Very sad but unavoidable at time being.

In regards to kill shots, I see your point, but I dont see it as going for kill shots. Me personally Im not a very big fan of going for head shots beyond at most 7m. The target is too small most of the time and lowers percentage of getting a hit dramatically. If your wanting to stop your subject dead in his tracks at further distances, go for hip area. Knock out someones ability to move, there not going anywhere. Not to mention chance of hitting fumoral artery (sp). BTW, this "rant" here is stemming from AF going to 2 to chest 1 to head theory up to 15 meters away. It just seems ilogical to me.
 
Posts: 58 | Registered: Fri 10 February 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Quiet Professional
A Silent Warrior
BTDT
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of Duster6
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Muttling:
quote:
Originally posted by Duster6:
The heck with those two weapons. If I was President all our troops would be issued a 4 1/2" vented rib colt python 357mag. with pacmyer grips. I know it is only a 6 shooter but I would award Colt a $150 million dollar contract to come up with a 15 round mag for it.



Ever tried to do a combat reload on a revolver???? What about a 1 handed combat reload????



BTW, there is a .357 automatic on the market these days. Just look in the holster of a Tennessee State Trooper if you want to see one.


Thanks for the info. Next time I get stopped for speeding by the Tennessee State Police I will make sure I say "Yes Sir. Thank you Sir" to them. Smile
 
Posts: 13575 | Registered: Sun 24 October 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of kogybear
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Muttling:
quote:
Originally posted by Duster6:
The heck with those two weapons. If I was President all our troops would be issued a 4 1/2" vented rib colt python 357mag. with pacmyer grips. I know it is only a 6 shooter but I would award Colt a $150 million dollar contract to come up with a 15 round mag for it.



Ever tried to do a combat reload on a revolver???? What about a 1 handed combat reload????



BTW, there is a .357 automatic on the market these days. Just look in the holster of a Tennessee State Trooper if you want to see one.

Loading any pistol always takes two hands, one to hold the pistol one to manipulate the speedloader/magazine.

By the way, a top break Webley can be reloaded almost as fast as an automatic. Big Grin
 
Posts: 2261 | Registered: Mon 15 August 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
[/QUOTE]The real problem that the 10mm had was chamber pressure, which caused failure in a number of contenders. Overpenetration could be a problem with FMJ, but as the round was designed for the FBI.... [/QUOTE]

The 10mm was not designed for the FBI, it was designed for a pistol, based on the CZ-75 called the Bren 10. This gun came out in 1983 but wasn't very successful due to no magazines were produced for it. Jeff Cooper, of Gunsite fame, was one of the moving forces behind the Bren 10. The designers say down and figured an alternate round to the .45., 10mm(40 caliber), 180 grain bullet traveling 1,000 foot per second.
After the Miami shootout, the FBI was in a panic to adopt the "ideal" anti-personnel round. After the computers clicked and whirred, they decided on the 10mm.

The FBI purchased pistols from S&W and were on their way. BUT, the full power 10mm was so powerful, most FBI agents couldn't qualify with it. Follow up shots, as in a double tap or fail to stop drill, were difficult or impossible for most agents. So..... they downloaded it.

Some smart guy at S&W figured out, that a downloaded 10mm would fit in a case the same length as a 9mm's. So, you could get the downloaded 10mm in a smaller size pistol. The result was the 40S&W.
 
Posts: 5583 | Registered: Fri 27 September 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Forum Furball
Experienced Member
Picture of Muttling
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kogybear:
quote:
Originally posted by Muttling:
quote:
Originally posted by Duster6:
The heck with those two weapons. If I was President all our troops would be issued a 4 1/2" vented rib colt python 357mag. with pacmyer grips. I know it is only a 6 shooter but I would award Colt a $150 million dollar contract to come up with a 15 round mag for it.



Ever tried to do a combat reload on a revolver???? What about a 1 handed combat reload????



BTW, there is a .357 automatic on the market these days. Just look in the holster of a Tennessee State Trooper if you want to see one.

Loading any pistol always takes two hands, one to hold the pistol one to manipulate the speedloader/magazine.

By the way, a top break Webley can be reloaded almost as fast as an automatic. Big Grin


No it does not take two hands to reload an automatic. Some police departments train for wounded reloading and I know of one incident where a one handed reload saved an officer's life.

All you have to do is drop the empty magazine, set the gun down, put the new magazine in the weapon, pick it back up, and release the slide.


---------
Sincerely,

Muttling
Champion of the underdog and other household pets.
 
Posts: 4336 | Registered: Thu 19 September 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of kogybear
Posted Hide Post
I never thought about it that way.

Well, then I suppose you could do that with a revoler, if you had to. Big Grin
 
Posts: 2261 | Registered: Mon 15 August 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<DragonSSG>
Posted
I practiced "rapid reload" from dump-pouches all the time.. Got pretty good at it, too. Then I got in a gunfight...

All six fell outta my hand... Got lucky tho, the actor was already dead from the first six..

Don't remember much after that, I was bleeding pretty bad..
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gumbydammit:
The 10mm was not designed for the FBI, it was designed for a pistol, based on the CZ-75 called the Bren 10.
Technically, the designers of the bullet based it upon a "wish-list" put forth by Colonel Jeff Cooper, one that law enforcement embraced and listened to. The principle reason why Cooper was brought on board was because law enfocement was the target market from the beginning.

quote:
The FBI purchased pistols from S&W and were on their way. BUT, the full power 10mm was so powerful, most FBI agents couldn't qualify with it. Follow up shots, as in a double tap or fail to stop drill, were difficult or impossible for most agents. So..... they downloaded it.
Yup. Current 10mm loads generate only about 50% of the pressure that they were designed for, according to reloaders.

quote:
Some smart guy at S&W figured out, that a downloaded 10mm would fit in a case the same length as a 9mm's. So, you could get the downloaded 10mm in a smaller size pistol. The result was the 40S&W.
Without the need for a longer case and even lower pressure than current 10mm loads, you can build a slightly slimmer and shorter weapon.

Still, it becomes a matter of just how much you are willing to compromise on performance. It would have made more sense to choose a platform that shared identical operation but had two different upper slides/barrels/springs for different duties and user qualifications. The Glock and, unless I'm mistaken, the EAA Witness series of weapons have ease of interchangeability between .40 S&W, .45 ACP, and 10mm Auto models. For the Glock platform, all you have to do is replace the uppers for all of the above three rounds and .357 SIG.

Of course, if you prefer .45, you can use .45 Super in many .45 ACP semi-autos. The cartridge is almost identical (some .45 Super cartridges are practically indistiguishable from .45 ACP cartridges) to .45 ACP. Some Super loads can produce performance similar to that of 10mm Auto. Obviously, terminal ballistics will differ due to differences in cross-sectional density.
 
Posts: 2208 | Registered: Sat 22 May 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Yeah, I realize we could be talking all kinds of weapons and most of the discussions here talk about doing battle between 25 and 50 feet.

I prefer my 44 mag, stopping power and penetration power. With 240 grains, it's tough and has great muzzle velocity.

I for one don't intend to knock them down, I want a shot where they die. I've seen people shot at really close distances with all kinds of weapons, and if the body doesn't want to die, it won't.
 
Posts: 368 | Registered: Thu 07 August 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Starship Captain and all around good guy
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by firepow24:
Yeah, I realize we could be talking all kinds of weapons and most of the discussions here talk about doing battle between 25 and 50 feet.

I prefer my 44 mag, stopping power and penetration power. With 240 grains, it's tough and has great muzzle velocity.

I for one don't intend to knock them down, I want a shot where they die. I've seen people shot at really close distances with all kinds of weapons, and if the body doesn't want to die, it won't.


That's WHY you shoot them with the .45 - or in your case, the .44mag wheelgun - that way you don't give the body not wanting to die a choice in the matter.

.45 caliber holes make invisible souls.
 
Posts: 3075 | Registered: Wed 18 July 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Strak
Posted Hide Post
.45 wins easy!
 
Posts: 1581 | Registered: Fri 12 August 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Yog Shoggoth!!
Member
Picture of Many_Angled_One
Posted Hide Post
I carry a Wilson Combat CQB 1911 in .45 and after putting 1000+ rounds per month through that pistol, it is one of the easiest guns to shoot well.


In my dimension, we too have an intense dislike for the French....

 
Posts: 628 | Registered: Fri 16 July 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of led4them
Posted Hide Post
I have a Browning Hi-Power, it is accurate, 14+1, but when I saw how ineffective the 115g fmj was I loaded my own with 147g XTP HP as hot as I could there is a BIG difference. But I prefer to carry my Star Firestar in .45, it is only 6+1 but is accurate for a compact because of the bbl and slide, they are cone shaped at the muzzle end so they lock up in the same position after the slide rocks forward. I can hold 3in groups at 10yds
 
Posts: 372 | Registered: Fri 01 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too close for missiles... Switching to guns...
Member
Picture of army_engineer
Posted Hide Post
Having both 9mm and .45ACP, I can say that I enjoy shooting the .45s more. Although the ammo costs a tad more, it is for me 1)more challenging to shoot, 2)more satisfying. On the range, I use 10 round Shooting Stars for the Springfield 1911, 13 rounders for Glock 21. Tons of 1911 parts and accessories, you trick them out anyway you like. Not much you can to to a 9mm.
 
Posts: 2546 | Registered: Sun 26 June 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post


Member
Posted Hide Post
Well, I've heard just about every story there is on this thread except one. . . the NRA (National Rifle Association) and their individual State affiliates. Their business is politics. Like rust, it never sleeps. We have our pistols because of politics. We can lose our pistols for same reason. Everything in life is political. For instance, New York State requires you to have a license to have a pistol in you home. It is about $400 every couple of years. If you shoot a thief in you home without a license, they put you in jail and throw away the key.

I know you've heard all of this before, but I will ask you to join the NRA and your State affiliate in order for us to keep our pistols. Some of our State legislators would love to take our pisols away. Thank you. www.nra.org.
 
Posts: 1045 | Registered: Sat 12 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
What does the NRA have to do with the main topic of "9mm vs .45"? This is not about the right to keep and bear arms, but the choice of pistol caliber, particularly by the military and peripherally by law enforcement agencies.
 
Posts: 2208 | Registered: Sat 22 May 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post


Member
Posted Hide Post
Dear Mr. ProxyAccount:

If you don't believe the citizenry of our country should have pistols, do what most people do, nothing, and continue with your discussions of military pistols.
 
Posts: 1045 | Registered: Sat 12 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
"I am the Sword of Light against the Darkness"
Experienced Member
Picture of BigRobT
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ProxyAccount:
The few 10mm pistols still around can doubtlessly handle the chamber pressure. I feel the pain with 10mm practice as well. Even Federal isn't that inexpensive. So, while I love 10mm, .45ACP and .40S&W are probably more practical for gun owners.


And Federal is made right here in MN Mad

I've heard stories of the 10MM rounds being reduced pressure from the originally designed 10MM platform. Frown


"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let people have guns ...why should we let them have ideas? --Joseph Stalin"
 
Posts: 4044 | Registered: Fri 25 June 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
New Member
Picture of twisted1vy
Posted Hide Post
Dear Fankhouser;
As proxy stated, your post doesnt have anything to do with the main topic of which caliber do you prefer. If its other than 9mm/45 thats cool too. The main thing I see is that this forum is supposed to refrain from solicitation. Even as I personally have no problem with the NRA, please follow the guidlines and try not to solicit. Greatly appreciated in advance.
 
Posts: 58 | Registered: Fri 10 February 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigRobT:
And Federal is made right here in MN Mad
Where's the love, man? Ah, well. For standard pistol training distances, .40 S&W is going to have very similar external ballistic performance. So, it's probably sufficient to allocate only one or two 10mm boxes per month and practice with .40 S&W most of the time.

quote:
I've heard stories of the 10MM rounds being reduced pressure from the originally designed 10MM platform. Frown
The 10mm Auto cartridge is designed to withstand about 60,000 psi, but the SAAMI specification, which most manufacturers fall at or under, is only 37,500 psi. The .40 S&W cartridge has a SAAMI specification of 35,000 psi or less. This unused capacity means that the 10mm Auto cartridge has enormous potential if you handload or buy from a manufacturer that exceeds SAAMI specs (i.e. DoubleTap). Of course, you'd have to go to an aftermarket or custom barrel and stronger springs, bushings, etc.
 
Posts: 2208 | Registered: Sat 22 May 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post


Member
Posted Hide Post
Dear Mr. Twisted1vy
Ideas are more powerful than guns. The idea of the NRA has more power than any 9mm Luger or 1911 45. I prefer the power of the NRA and the people who hold it up and the people in the future that will hold it up. And with any luck someday it will be you. I'm sure it will be. This is my idea of a powerful pistol.
 
Posts: 1045 | Registered: Sat 12 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Honor - Courage - Commitment
Experienced Member
Picture of ETC1966
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by army_engineer:
Having both 9mm and .45ACP, I can say that I enjoy shooting the .45s more. Although the ammo costs a tad more...

50% is a "tad"?
 
Posts: 5685 | Registered: Fri 07 February 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of hkfan
Posted Hide Post
As a police officer i was issued a glock 21 (.45) though i chose to carry a HK USP .45.
In Iraq i carried the M9 which constantly had feed problems.
Besides the power of a .45, another issue is penetration. the .45 is safer cause it is such a slow, heavy round that the chances of over penetration are less likely than a 9mm.
and Chief,no offence but LE is the same as the military, you dont shoot to wound..you shoot to kill. if you percieve someone as a threat enough to point a weapon at him,youd better kill him.
we used the .45 HK UMP sub-machine gun on SWAT with gold dot hollow points because the chances of it going through the suspect and the wall and hitting the neighbors was less likely.
I vote for .45
 
Posts: 365 | Registered: Sun 31 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by redjohn48:
As I understand it we converted to 9mm in order to conform to NATO. In my opinion it was a ridiculous compromise. The purpose of a side arm is to defend yourself in close quarters. A 9mm will injure an adversary, but leave him active enough to possibly still do you harm. 45cal. on the other hand will disable the individual most entirely. Made by Colt or whoever the 45. is superior for flat out stopping power and NATO should have conformed to us.

The reason for the conversion when the stock of 45's needed replacing was because having a separate supply line of .45 ammo just for the VERY RARE cases in which a sidearm will actually be used would have been stupid. Remember this started back during the Cold War.
 
Posts: 12285 | Registered: Wed 02 July 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SergeantJ:
I ain't no expert, but a couple months back I was out doing some plinking. I was shooting at a metal, man sized target at about 100 yards.

With my little Smith & Wesson Model #39-2 9mm, I was routinely hitting the target...probably 80% of all rounds fired.

With my bone stock Colt Government Model US-M1911 .45, 1945 vintage, I'd say I was hitting the target maybe 30% of the time.

And with my Smith & Wesson Model .38 M&P, I couldn't hit the broad side of a barn at 20 feet, let alone 100 yards!

The 9mm is great for accuracy, but I'd take the .45 anyday if I got to put a bad guy down. The .38 is fun and makes a lot of smoke and noise, but is pretty much useless unless the target is no more than an arm's length away, in which case I'll just bean the bad guy on the noggin with it...


The issue Colt .45 was designed to be able to fire in just about any circumstance but they sacrificed accuracy to do it. With an issue .45 (one that has not been worked on) the joke used to be that the prefered range was stick it in the enemies belly and pull the trigger Smile
 
Posts: 12285 | Registered: Wed 02 July 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too close for missiles... Switching to guns...
Member
Picture of army_engineer
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ETC1966:
50% is a "tad"?

ETC, I buy them in bulk, reloads from Miwall at gunshows. Example, 9mm 48.00 per 500. 45ACP 80.00 per 500. But you are right about 50% more in cost, never thought of it that way. I have been firing Wolf 45, .223, 7.62x39. A little less but still shoots well.
 
Posts: 2546 | Registered: Sun 26 June 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 71 
 


© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.