Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    IMMIGRATION THEN AND NOW
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
There is a tremendous difference. The overwhelming majority of the hard-working Americans of those days did not have the taxman's gun pointed at their heads, saying "pay up, or go to jail and lose the modest wealth you've accumulated by dint of tact of mind and sweat of brow over the years," only to see billions of dollars taken from them and handed out to illegals on the so-called basis of "need;" we all have "needs." And once the guvmoint taxes something, we don't even get the satisfaction of knowing we have perhaps helped others on a truly voluntary basis. The nanny state wealth transfers have changed the situation drastically, with most dollars taken from middle class taxpayers and handed to others, including illegals, who pay little or no tax.

If family lore is right, one of my relatives sought to come to the US in the late 19th century but a health problem caused him to be turned away from entry to the US. I have read that such did indeed occur for those who sought legal entry, if they wewre obviously sick. Who checks the health of illegals to ensure they are healthy before being allowed into our nation, to sicken American citizens and to burden our health care system with even more requirements?

The simplistic notions that what happened with immigration in the 19th century is somehow much the same as with immigration in the 21st century lead to mistaken conclusions and fail to address the problems for what they really offer.
 
Posts: 3828 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
I'd rather be knitting.
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GunnyRet03:
quote:
Originally posted by MightyB:
quote:
The subject WASN'T about contracts or lobbyist monies, it was about immigration. Don't try and cloud the issue.


I was responding to the totally legal. by the book post that was made. "They are criminals" statement. If that is the only criteria for disavowing them, then I just stated that we should also disavow a lot of Washiington.

To clarify my position; No I am not for open borders. What grabs my attention more than anything is the vitrial thrown at these people. And no, not all of them, because I don't want more criminals coming here. We have enough of our own to deal with.

On the other hand though, it is impossible to round up all of the millions of these people who are imbeded within our society all across this country. So I say stop the influx first and then if and when someone breaks the law, deport them. To actively seek out illegals will be the same wasted money as is the war on drugs and prostitution. We have to realize that we are not going to stop certain things even with the most active enforcement. Criminals will be criminals and will eventually get caught. I just believe we have better things to spend our tax dollars on.


MB, where have you been? 95% of the anti illegals peeps here are for attrition/self deportation of the masses of illegals. Of course the more the criminal the faster the deportation. And an actual border fence all of these things when actual enforement to include states will force them out of the country. That is the way to do this



quote:
I know people who have been waiting since the 1980's for the citizenship process to be completed. Surely, we can do better than that. It doesn't excuse those who sneak in, but if legal processes are this way, I can understand the desire to skirt the law, at least.
Well I have 4 naturalized citizens in my family that had to travel across an ocean legally. Not one waited 20yrs. I find people all the time saying that this and that person have been waiting decades for citizenship. Frankly they're lying. If it took that long 1. They have issues with their bios and investigations. 2. They have been here isnce the 80's but didnt bother filing until tha last couple of yrs. Now the process is slow, but usually within 2yrs of filing for citizenship it happens, and you can only do that after you are a legal resident for a number of yrs. Also, if you're trying to apply for an immigrant vise from abroad it could take decades depending on what country you are applying at. And that is no justification for people to come illegally. There is no right to immigrate here. Furthermore any amnesty will put all those people who applied legally at the back of the line. And that isnt fair! All these people that ask wherte your heart is, thats where it is for the people who do it legally!

Gunny, I'm speaking specifically of folk who applied while abroad, as they did not want to risk coming here until they did get the "all clear". They have relatives who are here, but not relatives close enough or wealthy enough to be considered sponsors. I'm not saying it happens all the time. I'm not saying it's justification for coming here illegally. I'm saying we could do better, and be more efficient.
 
Posts: 5345 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of john2x
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sweetsuds:
quote:
Originally posted by GunnyRet03:
quote:
Originally posted by MightyB:
quote:
The subject WASN'T about contracts or lobbyist monies, it was about immigration. Don't try and cloud the issue.


I was responding to the totally legal. by the book post that was made. "They are criminals" statement. If that is the only criteria for disavowing them, then I just stated that we should also disavow a lot of Washiington.

To clarify my position; No I am not for open borders. What grabs my attention more than anything is the vitrial thrown at these people. And no, not all of them, because I don't want more criminals coming here. We have enough of our own to deal with.

On the other hand though, it is impossible to round up all of the millions of these people who are imbeded within our society all across this country. So I say stop the influx first and then if and when someone breaks the law, deport them. To actively seek out illegals will be the same wasted money as is the war on drugs and prostitution. We have to realize that we are not going to stop certain things even with the most active enforcement. Criminals will be criminals and will eventually get caught. I just believe we have better things to spend our tax dollars on.


MB, where have you been? 95% of the anti illegals peeps here are for attrition/self deportation of the masses of illegals. Of course the more the criminal the faster the deportation. And an actual border fence all of these things when actual enforement to include states will force them out of the country. That is the way to do this



quote:
I know people who have been waiting since the 1980's for the citizenship process to be completed. Surely, we can do better than that. It doesn't excuse those who sneak in, but if legal processes are this way, I can understand the desire to skirt the law, at least.
Well I have 4 naturalized citizens in my family that had to travel across an ocean legally. Not one waited 20yrs. I find people all the time saying that this and that person have been waiting decades for citizenship. Frankly they're lying. If it took that long 1. They have issues with their bios and investigations. 2. They have been here isnce the 80's but didnt bother filing until tha last couple of yrs. Now the process is slow, but usually within 2yrs of filing for citizenship it happens, and you can only do that after you are a legal resident for a number of yrs. Also, if you're trying to apply for an immigrant vise from abroad it could take decades depending on what country you are applying at. And that is no justification for people to come illegally. There is no right to immigrate here. Furthermore any amnesty will put all those people who applied legally at the back of the line. And that isnt fair! All these people that ask wherte your heart is, thats where it is for the people who do it legally!

Gunny, I'm speaking specifically of folk who applied while abroad, as they did not want to risk coming here until they did get the "all clear". They have relatives who are here, but not relatives close enough or wealthy enough to be considered sponsors. I'm not saying it happens all the time. I'm not saying it's justification for coming here illegally. I'm saying we could do better, and be more efficient.



Some thing to consider.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ
 
Posts: 8319 | Registered: Sun 27 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
I'd rather be knitting.
Posted Hide Post
That's not terribly helpful- he uses some facts, but not enough of them to get an accurate view of the situation.
 
Posts: 5345 | Registered: Tue 04 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of john2x
Posted Hide Post
sweetsuds
Posted Wed 06 February 2008 02:45 PM
That's not terribly helpful- he uses some facts, but not enough of them to get an accurate view of the situation.


What did he miss?
 
Posts: 8319 | Registered: Sun 27 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of GunnyRet03
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sweetsuds:
quote:
Originally posted by GunnyRet03:
quote:
Originally posted by MightyB:
quote:
The subject WASN'T about contracts or lobbyist monies, it was about immigration. Don't try and cloud the issue.


I was responding to the totally legal. by the book post that was made. "They are criminals" statement. If that is the only criteria for disavowing them, then I just stated that we should also disavow a lot of Washiington.

To clarify my position; No I am not for open borders. What grabs my attention more than anything is the vitrial thrown at these people. And no, not all of them, because I don't want more criminals coming here. We have enough of our own to deal with.

On the other hand though, it is impossible to round up all of the millions of these people who are imbeded within our society all across this country. So I say stop the influx first and then if and when someone breaks the law, deport them. To actively seek out illegals will be the same wasted money as is the war on drugs and prostitution. We have to realize that we are not going to stop certain things even with the most active enforcement. Criminals will be criminals and will eventually get caught. I just believe we have better things to spend our tax dollars on.


MB, where have you been? 95% of the anti illegals peeps here are for attrition/self deportation of the masses of illegals. Of course the more the criminal the faster the deportation. And an actual border fence all of these things when actual enforement to include states will force them out of the country. That is the way to do this



quote:
I know people who have been waiting since the 1980's for the citizenship process to be completed. Surely, we can do better than that. It doesn't excuse those who sneak in, but if legal processes are this way, I can understand the desire to skirt the law, at least.
Well I have 4 naturalized citizens in my family that had to travel across an ocean legally. Not one waited 20yrs. I find people all the time saying that this and that person have been waiting decades for citizenship. Frankly they're lying. If it took that long 1. They have issues with their bios and investigations. 2. They have been here isnce the 80's but didnt bother filing until tha last couple of yrs. Now the process is slow, but usually within 2yrs of filing for citizenship it happens, and you can only do that after you are a legal resident for a number of yrs. Also, if you're trying to apply for an immigrant vise from abroad it could take decades depending on what country you are applying at. And that is no justification for people to come illegally. There is no right to immigrate here. Furthermore any amnesty will put all those people who applied legally at the back of the line. And that isnt fair! All these people that ask wherte your heart is, thats where it is for the people who do it legally!

Gunny, I'm speaking specifically of folk who applied while abroad, as they did not want to risk coming here until they did get the "all clear". They have relatives who are here, but not relatives close enough or wealthy enough to be considered sponsors. I'm not saying it happens all the time. I'm not saying it's justification for coming here illegally. I'm saying we could do better, and be more efficient.
You were talking about citizenship and people dont apply overseas for citizenship, they apply for a multitude of visas and maybe eventually citinship. As for as wealthy, well you dont have to be wealthy to sponsor someone. Obviously if you are on welfare then you have no business sponsoring anyone and that has been the only time I have seen someone be turned down
 
Posts: 18373 | Registered: Fri 05 September 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Point-Counterpoint    IMMIGRATION THEN AND NOW

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.