Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
Petty Officer 1st Class Steven R. Franklin was convicted of aggravated assault for having unprotected sex with at least two females after he was diagnosed as HIV+ in 2003. I'd like to hear from all of the pro DADT people that use the whole "Homosexuals will spread AIDS" fear-mongering as their rationale for keeping DADT. What about this heterosexual male who is HIV+ and asking women for unprotected sex? Does this not illustrate to you that HIV doesn't discriminate? Do you feel this man's punishment is just or not, and why? You can read the article here:http://www.military.com/news/article/sailor-with-hiv-punished-for-unsafe-sex.html?col=1186032325324
 
Posts: 192 | Registered: Wed 02 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
-
Posted Hide Post
I think that ANY/ALL HIV+ people who engage in sexual encounters with ANYONE....owe their prospective partner the knowledge of the risk they're to accept. Failure to do so ought to carry with it a charge of attempted murder and conviction should require lengthy incarceration AND chemical neutering, whether male or female.
 
Posts: 391 | Registered: Thu 16 April 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
10 DAYS SUSPENSION NEMESIS
Posted Hide Post
Anyone who would call this attempted murder doesn't understand the disease, but let's set that aside and talk about this point.

A friend of mine, Kevin, works in the Navy's HIV clinic in San Diego as a Preventive Medical Technician. He took that job after retiring as an HM1 and doing essentially the same job on active duty for several years, and he is a great resource for general information when I need it. One thing he has told me is that when a Sailor or Marine is diagnosed, they sign a page 13 stating that they will inform all sexual partners and health care workers they come into contact with of their HIV status.

This Sailor obviously violated those orders, and received an appropriate sentence. It's galling to me that anyone who presumably contracted HIV from someone who may have known their own status but not disclosed it to him would then - knowing the possible consequences to a person's life - turn around and do the same thing. He Must have done this with many more women than these two, as well, because it's pretty unlikely that he would pass on the virus from a one night stand unless he was not on meds.
 
Posts: 11062 | Registered: Mon 07 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
-
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bleah:
Anyone who would call this attempted murder doesn't understand the disease, but let's set that aside and talk about this point.

A friend of mine, Kevin, works in the Navy's HIV clinic in San Diego as a Preventive Medical Technician. He took that job after retiring as an HM1 and doing essentially the same job on active duty for several years, and he is a great resource for general information when I need it. One thing he has told me is that when a Sailor or Marine is diagnosed, they sign a page 13 stating that they will inform all sexual partners and health care workers they come into contact with of their HIV status.

This Sailor obviously violated those orders, and received an appropriate sentence. It's galling to me that anyone who presumably contracted HIV from someone who may have known their own status but not disclosed it to him would then - knowing the possible consequences to a person's life - turn around and do the same thing. He Must have done this with many more women than these two, as well, because it's pretty unlikely that he would pass on the virus from a one night stand unless he was not on meds.



I'll admit that I'm no expert about HIV, but I believe that it normally progresses to AIDS, which is a potentially fatal disease. My understanding of HIV is that it's not necessarily transmitted by contact with another HIV+ person. In fact, I've been informed that IV drug use is more common today. In any event, I stand by my statement that the intentional exposure of another to a deadly disease ought to be seen as an effort to cause an end of life event.
 
Posts: 391 | Registered: Thu 16 April 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 21194237:
quote:
Originally posted by Bleah:
Anyone who would call this attempted murder doesn't understand the disease, but let's set that aside and talk about this point.

A friend of mine, Kevin, works in the Navy's HIV clinic in San Diego as a Preventive Medical Technician. He took that job after retiring as an HM1 and doing essentially the same job on active duty for several years, and he is a great resource for general information when I need it. One thing he has told me is that when a Sailor or Marine is diagnosed, they sign a page 13 stating that they will inform all sexual partners and health care workers they come into contact with of their HIV status.

This Sailor obviously violated those orders, and received an appropriate sentence. It's galling to me that anyone who presumably contracted HIV from someone who may have known their own status but not disclosed it to him would then - knowing the possible consequences to a person's life - turn around and do the same thing. He Must have done this with many more women than these two, as well, because it's pretty unlikely that he would pass on the virus from a one night stand unless he was not on meds.



I'll admit that I'm no expert about HIV, but I believe that it normally progresses to AIDS, which is a potentially fatal disease. My understanding of HIV is that it's not necessarily transmitted by contact with another HIV+ person. In fact, I've been informed that IV drug use is more common today. In any event, I stand by my statement that the intentional exposure of another to a deadly disease ought to be seen as an effort to cause an end of life event.


I actually happen to agree with you Kathy, that we should charge them with attempted murder. Some states do that. I don't know where you got your information from about transmission routes, but if you google it and go to the CDC website, they break it down quite well. In fact, the ONLY group that does not have ONE SINGLE CASE of transmission where sexual contact is the ONLY risk factor, are LESBIANS. Go figure...
 
Posts: 192 | Registered: Wed 02 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 


© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.