Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  The Soapbox    God Damn America! And God Damn the white man!
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 30
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Have you gone to church and not agreed with something the pastor said? If so, did you walk out?


I have never been to a church where hate was spewed from the pulpit.....but yes I definitely WOULD walk out...with my family in tow....never to return.
 
Posts: 2059 | Registered: Thu 22 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Wehr:
quote:
Originally posted by disagreed:
If I read the intent of your post correctly, you are attacking me for reporting the truth rather than discuss the facts of what really occurred.


Oh..Dis,

These "facts" of yours is what is referred to as "truthiness". In other words, truth with your spin on it. Spoken from example? In reality you interpret others words the very same way.

Have you gone to church and not agreed with something the pastor said? If so, did you walk out?

Have been to a sporting event, how many did not put their hands over the hearts? Sporting event? How does an anonymous person compare to someone in the limelight...running for President?? He should recognize - considering that as a candidate for President the extreme prejudice created by ones actions or inactions work for against a candidate - heck, that's what creates almost all issues in competing campaigns...as such the people are trying to understand (get a feel for) a candidates real character...as well as find holes in a candidates real character...It's like the saying "Sports does not create character, it reveals it." ALOT, does this make them any less patriotic? Perception...much bigger than reality...candidates know this probably better than we do. We don't know. But some like yourself, assume they are not. You're busy assuming yourself...spelled out clearly by your response.

This wrap yourself in the flag B.S. that began after 9/11, No - Patriotism has been a virtue for some time - Now, denegrating those for being patriotic or bringing up patriotism or expecting patriotism, that is something new...something the left (you continually support) has been doing ever since 9/11...you are simply regurgitating this...even though Representative members of the left joined the representative members of the right on the steps singing God Bless America...immediately following the attacks of 9/11...was that patriotic? Was that wrong? it's time has past. Wow! Patriotism has past...how very profound of you to come to this conclusion People are FINALLY beginning to come from under the veil of 9/11. We all should judge one's patriotism by the content of their character "But don't you dare use your discernment to determine character" Roll Eyes not because they don't wear a frickin' lapel.

I think Obama is the real deal, Herein lies your assumption! Of which you insult otrhers for having??...and your entire post here is based upon it, as well. I think this is someone given the opportunity could bridge the partisan divide.
 
Posts: 8353 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Have been to a sporting event, how many did not put their hands over the hearts?


I did, my son does, and I expect my president to place his hand over his heart also.
 
Posts: 2059 | Registered: Thu 22 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"I am not giving them hell. I am just describing it, and it seems like hell."
Harry S Truman

Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I did, my son does, and I expect my president to place his hand over his heart also.


Do you notice other people around you NOT putting hand over heart? If so, do you tell them?
Roll Eyes
...gjd
 
Posts: 8591 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
So here it is all nice and neat,

Obama either knew about Wright's views and lied about it or he didn't know and lacks the judgment to be president.
 
Posts: 2059 | Registered: Thu 22 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?" - Gordon Lightfoot
Picture of 21yrsUSCGUSCS
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Wehr:

I think Obama is the real deal, I think this is someone given the opportunity could bridge the partisan divide.


Yep....just look how undivided the Democratic Party has been the past few months. Big Grin



Don
 
Posts: 4940 | Registered: Mon 31 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"I am not giving them hell. I am just describing it, and it seems like hell."
Harry S Truman

Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
denegrating those for being patriotic or bringing up patriotism or expecting patriotism, that is something new...something the left (you continually support) has been doing ever since 9/11...you are simply regurgitating this...even though Representative members of the left joined the representative members of the right on the steps singing God Bless America...immediately following the attacks of 9/11...was that patriotic? Was that wrong?


It was a sign of the patriotism of the left -- just like flying and wearing the flag when appropriate or desired. (You might remember that the "right" stole the flag -- my flag -- back in the 60s and 70s, and that didn't happen this time around!) Now, not wearing a flag does not show a lack of patriotism -- either on the left or right. Sometimes a flag is just a flag. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 8591 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"I am not giving them hell. I am just describing it, and it seems like hell."
Harry S Truman

Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JACoastie:
So here it is all nice and neat,

Obama either knew about Wright's views and lied about it or he didn't know and lacks the judgment to be president.


To make it both nicer and neater:

Either way it's irrelevant. . .

...gjd
 
Posts: 8591 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Disagreed,

"I hold every elected official to that high standard but I have to know about an issue before I can make a personal judgment. And since I don’t know much about Billy Graham or Bush’s association with him, it’s hard for me to judge. "

First of all let me state that I did NOT state that only President Bush was associated with Billy Graham! I stated that many presidents have associated with him from Truman to Bush. All but Kennedy held him as a "spiritual adviser".
The fact that you are unaware of the issue of his anti-semitism is exactly my point!!!! Here is a minister that has advised almost every President of the modern era yet no one is holding ANY of those Presidents accountable because he has said "hateful" things! Why is it that we are only holding Senator Obama accountable for the words of his minister? Why is it that you know of the hateful words of Senator Obama's minister but never knew of the hateful words of the most influential (in terms of Presidential spiritual advisor's) minister of our time? Is it because Senator Obama's minister said his "hateful" words against "whitey" and all Reverend Graham did was to speak against Jews? Is making disparaging comments about those that are Jewish more acceptable then speaking against whites?

"Additionally, has President called Graham his ‘uncle’? Did he marry Bush and the Mrs.? Did Graham baptize Bush’s children? Did Bush visit Graham every week for 20 years? What’s the relationship?"

As I stated Reverend Graham has been close to almost every President since Truman not just President Bush. Eisenhower asked for him from his death bed. He was a close friend of President Nixon (whose secret tapes reveled the Reverend's anti-semitism). He presided over the graveside service of LBJ. He gave the Benidiction at President Bush Sr's inauuration and was President Regans guest at his inaguration. President Clinton has stated that he attended his revivials as a child. These are but a few of the examples of his "closness" to these Presidents yet none of those Presidents were held accountable for his "hateful" words!

Marklf
 
Posts: 1801 | Registered: Fri 22 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
DJ, I guess that the video tape of his hate-filled sermons are really the lies of the vast right-wing conspiracy. Roll Eyes Come on. I watched him spew his hate. Isn’t that enough? Oh, I have to hear his hatred in person? Sure… only when it come to a Democrat!

Have I gone to his church? Sorry, I don’t answer silly rhetorical questions. But I’ll believe my eyes since the minister is no denying he said those words.

I have never seen a person running for president attend a church that preaches the hatred of America, the hatred of white people, who had a wife that admitted she was never proud of America AND refuse (or forget) to place his hand over his heart. It’s the whole situation not one single cherry picked event.

I am personally insulted by your stupid, idiotic insinuation that I am wrapping myself in the flag after 9/11. I’d like to tell you to screw off but I don’t want the admin folks to have to warn about personal attacks. Your ignorance of my character is showing and is staggering in its shallowness and absurdity. The only reason 9/11 was brought up was because Wright stated that America deserved the attacks of that day. I did not judge anyone’s patriotism - as YOU did MINE! I simply pointed out the facts and asked what Obama should do. What he did do was to continue to attend and bring his wife and family along to hear the hate speech!

Thanks for insulting me! I believe that my 22 years of service earned me the right to stand next to the flag in its defense! I sacrificed for 22 years! My family sacrificed for 20 of those years! And you and your offensive comment was neither necessary nor appreciated! Mad
Oh, and if I misread your intent, which is possible, I apologize in advance, for me error.

GJD, how many of those ‘forgetting’ to place their hands over their hearts were running for President of the United States and attended an anti-American, anti-white church for 20 years? ONE! Only one.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: disagreed,
 
Posts: 9680 | Registered: Mon 24 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Like FSWILLIS I am disappointed. For the first time I was considering voting for a Democrat. I thought McCain was too old, and I know way too much about Hillary. Now, I ask myself - just what did/do I know about Obama? Like millions of others, I was caught up in the slogans about change etc. But I have seen enough. I could never vote for someone who claimed Wright as a mentor anymore than I could someone who claimed Al Sharpton or David Duke as mentors. All three of these guys are alike - racist hate mongerers. And anyone who has been close to any of them for any time deserves close scrutiny and suspicion.

But will any of this matter? It was buried on page 5 in a small article in my paper this morning. Mainstream media is being slow to grasp it. I am waiting to see if it gets mentioned by the Sunday talking heads.
 
Posts: 654 | Registered: Fri 11 October 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Marklf, the reason I know little of Billy Graham is because I didn’t want to learn anything about him. When news of him came on the television, I quickly turned the channel. So, my ignorance of his personal view is 100% intentional. But I do recall the left bashing him a time or ten. I just turned the channel.

I know of the hate-filled words of this man because I heard them on Hannity a long time ago and then I heard them again on Fox or MSNBC (can’t recall which). Funny thing is that I was in the process of changing the channel when I heard the Anti-America crap spew forth. That made me listen to the bigot and I was shocked at what I heard. I was one second away from knowing nothing about this!
 
Posts: 9680 | Registered: Mon 24 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Tub, I already voted for him once and now I must reflect upon that vote and soul search as to where my vote will go in November. I am leaning away from casting that vote the same way ever again.
 
Posts: 9680 | Registered: Mon 24 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Wehr:
This wrap yourself in the flag B.S. that began after 9/11, it's time has past. People are FINALLY beginning to come from under the veil of 9/11.


Yep, and there's a word for it - forgetfulness. It didn't then and still doesn't seem like BS to me. 9/11 was a wake up call and a reminder. Now we are drifting off again.
 
Posts: 654 | Registered: Fri 11 October 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by geejaydee:
quote:
denegrating those for being patriotic or bringing up patriotism or expecting patriotism, that is something new...something the left (you continually support) has been doing ever since 9/11...you are simply regurgitating this...even though Representative members of the left joined the representative members of the right on the steps singing God Bless America...immediately following the attacks of 9/11...was that patriotic? Was that wrong?


It was a sign of the patriotism of the left -- just like flying and wearing the flag when appropriate or desired. (You might remember that the "right" stole the flag -- my flag -- back in the 60s and 70s, and that didn't happen this time around!) Now, not wearing a flag does not show a lack of patriotism -- either on the left or right. Sometimes a flag is just a flag. Roll Eyes


(You might remember that the "right" stole the flag -- my flag -- back in the 60s and 70s, and that didn't happen this time around!)

????Splain...
 
Posts: 8353 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MarkLF:
Disagreed,

"I hold every elected official to that high standard but I have to know about an issue before I can make a personal judgment. And since I don’t know much about Billy Graham or Bush’s association with him, it’s hard for me to judge. "

First of all let me state that I did NOT state that only President Bush was associated with Billy Graham! I stated that many presidents have associated with him from Truman to Bush. All but Kennedy held him as a "spiritual adviser".
The fact that you are unaware of the issue of his anti-semitism is exactly my point!!!! Here is a minister that has advised almost every President of the modern era yet no one is holding ANY of those Presidents accountable because he has said "hateful" things! Why is it that we are only holding Senator Obama accountable for the words of his minister? Why is it that you know of the hateful words of Senator Obama's minister but never knew of the hateful words of the most influential (in terms of Presidential spiritual advisor's) minister of our time? Is it because Senator Obama's minister said his "hateful" words against "whitey" and all Reverend Graham did was to speak against Jews? Is making disparaging comments about those that are Jewish more acceptable then speaking against whites?

"Additionally, has President called Graham his ‘uncle’? Did he marry Bush and the Mrs.? Did Graham baptize Bush’s children? Did Bush visit Graham every week for 20 years? What’s the relationship?"

As I stated Reverend Graham has been close to almost every President since Truman not just President Bush. Eisenhower asked for him from his death bed. He was a close friend of President Nixon (whose secret tapes reveled the Reverend's anti-semitism). He presided over the graveside service of LBJ. He gave the Benidiction at President Bush Sr's inauuration and was President Regans guest at his inaguration. President Clinton has stated that he attended his revivials as a child. These are but a few of the examples of his "closness" to these Presidents yet none of those Presidents were held accountable for his "hateful" words!

Marklf


What anti-semitism? News to me....Could you elaborate?
 
Posts: 8353 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by geejaydee:
quote:
Originally posted by JACoastie:
So here it is all nice and neat,

Obama either knew about Wright's views and lied about it or he didn't know and lacks the judgment to be president.


To make it both nicer and neater:

Either way it's irrelevant. . .

...gjd


Only if character doesn't matter.
 
Posts: 2059 | Registered: Thu 22 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
"I am not giving them hell. I am just describing it, and it seems like hell."
Harry S Truman

Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
(You might remember that the "right" stole the flag -- my flag -- back in the 60s and 70s, and that didn't happen this time around!)

????Splain...


Easy, and it applied to a couple of situations. The pro-war advocates used the Flag as it's symbol, and the anti-war (the left, by and large) allowed it to be used against them. In some cases, for example, they in turn burned the flag or otherwise "desecrated" it, which only escalated the dispute between the two sides.

This time around (Iraq), the anti-war folks adopted the flag as their symbol -- sharing it with the pro-war groups. So the flag as a pro-war symbol lost its impact.

Similarly, back when MLK was assassinated, the anti-civil rights advocates adopted the flag as a symbol. (That was when fire departments throughout the country started affixing flags to their apparatus -- as if we or they doubted they were Americans. Roll Eyes ) These were the same element who, in many cases, refused to lower the flag to half mast at that time, and included some American Legion and VFW local posts, and some volunteer fire departments. The flag used to symbolize pure and simple racism? I can't prove, but I was there as a witness and participant (guess which side), and I sincerely think so.

This time, both sides quickly adopted the flag, flying it in front of their homes and on their personal vehicles. So the flag (OUR flag) couldn't be used as an identifier or a scorecard, as it had been in the past.

I hope that "Splains" it. Cool

...gjd
 
Posts: 8591 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by geejaydee:
quote:
(You might remember that the "right" stole the flag -- my flag -- back in the 60s and 70s, and that didn't happen this time around!)

????Splain...


Easy, and it applied to a couple of situations. The pro-war advocates used the Flag as it's symbol, and the anti-war (the left, by and large) allowed it to be used against them. In some cases, for example, they in turn burned the flag or otherwise "desecrated" it, which only escalated the dispute between the two sides.

This time around (Iraq), the anti-war folks adopted the flag as their symbol -- sharing it with the pro-war groups. So the flag as a pro-war symbol lost its impact.

Similarly, back when MLK was assassinated, the anti-civil rights advocates adopted the flag as a symbol. (That was when fire departments throughout the country started affixing flags to their apparatus -- as if we or they doubted they were Americans. Roll Eyes ) These were the same element who, in many cases, refused to lower the flag to half mast at that time, and included some American Legion and VFW local posts, and some volunteer fire departments. The flag used to symbolize pure and simple racism? I can't prove, but I was there as a witness and participant (guess which side), and I sincerely think so.

This time, both sides quickly adopted the flag, flying it in front of their homes and on their personal vehicles. So the flag (OUR flag) couldn't be used as an identifier or a scorecard, as it had been in the past.

I hope that "Splains" it. Cool

...gjd


This shows how the different sides view things so differently....The Anti -war crowd this time around recognized that beating up the service members is a bad plan and they would be crucified for doing so, because of the long term effects this had on our service personel. Hence the oft used term, "support the troops not the war" and why it rings hollow to many. Second...the anti-war crowd recognized the problem with destroying/desecrating the flag..bad publicity.

No one ever stole the flag, some chose to stand behind and for it...while others spit on it or burned it up.
 
Posts: 8353 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
Disagreed,

For last last few days Obama's minister has been all over the news from FOX to ABC, and every radio talk show that I have heard (sorry don't get air America so I don't know if they covered it), it has been covered heavily on the Internet as well in the print media, so if someone hasn't heard of this they just are not paying attention to the news! Yet for some reason no one has looked to see what the ministers of the other candidates have said, I wonder why? You managed to never hear of Billy Graham's comments yet Reverend Wrights comments are being so played up that you have heard them. That shows me that his anti-white comments got alot more coverage then the Reverend Graham's anti-Jewish comments. Why do you think there was such a difference in coverage? Most importantly do you really think that his anti-Jewish thoughts affected the views of any of the Presidents that he advised? Were those Presidents able to rise above the bigotry of their spiritual adviser and act as the President of all our citizens even those that are Jewish? If so what makes you think that Senator Obama is less capable of rising above the bigotry of his minister? While I disagree with his politics, I have come to admire the way that he has presented himself as a candidate of ALL the people NOT as the "Black Candidate". His message for change may not be a message that I agree with but it is NOT a message of hate!!!

Marklf
 
Posts: 1801 | Registered: Fri 22 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 30