Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  The Soapbox    Civil Rights & Phone Companies
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of geejaydee
Posted
Perhaps money grubbing capitalism does have its upside:

quote:


Oops - FBI wiretaps halted over unpaid bills

Lara Jakes Jordan, Associated Press


Friday, January 11, 2008

The FBI has hit a major hang-up in its wiretapping: failing to pay its phone bills on time.

Facing tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid bills, telephone companies have cut off FBI wiretaps used to eavesdrop on suspected criminals, a Justice Department audit released Thursday shows. In one office alone, unpaid costs for wiretaps from one phone company totaled $66,000.

And, in at least one case, a wiretap used in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act investigation "was halted due to untimely payment," the audit found. FISA wiretaps are used in the government's most sensitive and secretive criminal and intelligence investigations, and allow eavesdropping on suspected terrorists or spies.

"We also found that late payments have resulted in telecommunications carriers actually disconnecting phone lines established to deliver surveillance results to the FBI, resulting in lost evidence," according to the audit by Inspector General Glenn Fine. . .

. . . "It seems the telecoms, who are claiming they were just being 'good patriots' when they allowed the government to spy on us without warrants, are more than willing to pull the plug on national security investigations when the government falls behind on its bills," said former FBI agent Michael German, the ACLU's national security policy counsel.

//SOURCE//



...gjd
 
Posts: 10005 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
They don't have the legal right to tap phones. I'm happy that they haven't paid the bill. Maybe it was Nixon? but one of the presidents tried that before.
 
Posts: 2037 | Registered: Sun 24 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stormer:
They don't have the legal right to tap phones. I'm happy that they haven't paid the bill. Maybe it was Nixon? but one of the presidents tried that before.


Concerning CELL PHONES...No "tapping" required.
 
Posts: 9051 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Hooligan1790
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Concerning CELL PHONES...No "tapping" required.



If you are not an authorized government agent and are listening in on cell phone conversations you are breaking the law. The key word here is authorized.
 
Posts: 6776 | Registered: Sun 22 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
11/14/08: Member suspended 30 days for obscene posts.
Posted Hide Post
The MSRC ship in Hawaii had a fairly sophisticated scanner on the bridge. We amused ourselves by scanning for juicy cell phone arguments, then broadcasting it onto the workdeck during the boring hours of draggin "drill" boom around in the water. Some of it was hysterical ...
 
Posts: 3607 | Registered: Wed 06 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of spacecowboy1
Posted Hide Post
I really don't see why the adverage joe honest citizen cares about wire tapping..i doubt that george or even cheney..care about what you or i say on the phone..if they catch a bad guy..i am for it..that is one right i don't really need..i would not say anything on the phone or here..that i would be upset about..would you?

why not make life as tough on crooks and terrrorist as possible ?

Smilesc
 
Posts: 8356 | Registered: Fri 11 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
that is one right i don't really need


Nice job of CYA, Steve. Now what do you really think????? Big Grin

...gjd
 
Posts: 10005 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"going to talk and cause suspicion..."
Picture of asm3driscoll
Posted Hide Post
I don't mind them listening as long as they don't hold it against me. I like to roll with the libertarians! Cool
 
Posts: 6124 | Registered: Wed 31 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of spacecowboy1
Posted Hide Post
lol..George..there is a new show comming out on TV soon..where a lie detector is hooked up to a contestent..and they ask them some pretty personal questions for money.

I would love to see some politicans on this show.. Smile..that's all i am saying..nope nutthing else..well i love republicans..that's it ..keep us safe..bomb bomb bomb everybody.. Big Grinsc
 
Posts: 8356 | Registered: Fri 11 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by spacecowboy1:
I really don't see why the adverage joe honest citizen cares about wire tapping


Probably because the average joe believes in the constitution. What if your guns you bought legally were taken away?
 
Posts: 512 | Registered: Sat 12 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hooligan1790:
quote:
Concerning CELL PHONES...No "tapping" required.



If you are not an authorized government agent and are listening in on cell phone conversations you are breaking the law. The key word here is authorized.


The key word is common sense..I would never expect that what I say on open airwaves is somehow protected...(other than by the law)...

No different than I would feel secure with a sub standard lock on my front door...It's still illegal to break in, but if my security is based on poor logic....
 
Posts: 9051 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of spacecowboy1
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mboccia:
quote:
Originally posted by spacecowboy1:
I really don't see why the adverage joe honest citizen cares about wire tapping


Probably because the average joe believes in the constitution. What if your guns you bought legally were taken away?


I understand your point..but OUR world has changed since 9/11 so if someone's life is saved from terrorist..or if some drug dealer gets caught ..and at the same time my secretsauce recipe is compromised..oh well.

Guns i don't own any guns.. Big Grin
 
Posts: 8356 | Registered: Fri 11 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
People have to stop using the 9/11 card for government failures. When will people realize that the government can not protect you, people can only protect themselves. If we didn't have bogus government agencies like TSA and the FAA, 9/11 never would have happend in the first place. Airline companies are owned privately, therefore it should be their responsibility to use all their constitutional rights to protect their passengers. The writers of the constitution were of the most brilliant people to ever walk this earth. They wrote it to protect people FROM the government. Slowly but surely, more and more rights slip away, everything from the economy (by way of the federal reserve), to now you cant even talk on the phone without someone listening. And when this is brought up, people just go with it. Anyone who agrees with illegal wire tapping, torture, etc..., does not deserve to live in a free society, no matter what the excuse. Especially members of the military, who took an oath to protect that document.
 
Posts: 512 | Registered: Sat 12 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of spacecowboy1
Posted Hide Post
I see your passionate about this so..let me tell you this you start your own revolution..as for me ..i am almost 50 and i have had a long hard day at work ..and i am working tommarro..so i believe ..i,ll eat some strawberrie newtons and drink a little coffee ..while you are fighting the good fight. Big Grinsc

FAA is bogus Confused i would,nt want to fly without that organization around..bad enough as it is..and flight controllers are retireing left and right..so the standards are being lowered to fill the slots..

as for the constitution..it begins with WE THE PEOPLE ..so if it needs changing..and WE THE PEOPLE want change ...why not?

Pls remember the writers of the constitution ..did,nt even know what a telephone or a airplane was..times have change..

Smilesc

This message has been edited. Last edited by: spacecowboy1,
 
Posts: 8356 | Registered: Fri 11 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
When talking about cell phone "tapping" I'm speaking about an expectation of privacy...for crying out loud these signals cross through the air like radio waves....I'm just saying the expectation is too high.....If terorists are so stupid as to talk about hurting US citizens on a cell phone, they deserve to be caught. I've heard many a cell phone conversation that I didn't want to hear, because something somewhere routed wrong....

Yet these same folks have no problems concerning our lifestyle liberties slowly eroding away...liberties concerning choice, wearing seat belts, eating a sandwich while driving, constitutionally protected gun rights etc....
 
Posts: 9051 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Out here in la la land you get a ticket if you're talking on a cell phone. My daughter has a headset so can talk and drive. I don't use the cell when driving, I pull over. Another law is 'children should be in the back seat and belted in.' I can remember my son was in a car seat that hung over the front seat. If I'd made a quick stop he'd have gone through the windshield. Laws are made to 'protect' us. It's getting more and more like a dictator.
 
Posts: 2037 | Registered: Sun 24 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of geejaydee
Posted Hide Post
quote:
slowly eroding away...liberties concerning choice, wearing seat belts, eating a sandwich while driving, constitutionally protected gun rights etc....



Really? Are you saying the "right" to eat a sandwich while driving is equal to "constitutionally protected gun rights?"


...gjd
 
Posts: 10005 | Registered: Thu 11 July 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I used to shoot a 357 magnum at the range here in town. Just for fun. I out shot my husband and his father. Big Grin Pop gave me the firearm. I wish I had it back. But 'carrying' a weapon is beyond me. If citizens all had guns and knew how to use them this would be a safer world.
that time will never come
 
Posts: 2037 | Registered: Sun 24 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by geejaydee:
quote:
slowly eroding away...liberties concerning choice, wearing seat belts, eating a sandwich while driving, constitutionally protected gun rights etc....





Really? Are you saying the "right" to eat a sandwich while driving is equal to "constitutionally protected gun rights?"


...gjd


I'm not aying that at all...Sorry my words implied that.

I'm saying I find it curious (suspect) that the same people that cry about (complaint: the loss of some liberties)cell phone traffic intercepts (tapping), ....are the same ones that want to fight over our consitutionally protected gun rights. I see that as selective liberty concerns...Obviously it's just politically motivated rants...

This message has been edited. Last edited by: scrounge,
 
Posts: 9051 | Registered: Fri 20 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of spacecowboy1
Posted Hide Post
I like what fred says...keep having fun.
personally i figure..cops are just people..they go to work..and they want to go home.

I doubt anyone of them is out looking for your gun ..regardless of the constituntion..unless you draw attention to yourself ie..shoot up the street signs etc etc.

ammo is expensive..if i waste it..i would rather waste it on a home intruder..than just shooting to be shooting.

oh but..that does,nt matter..uh..i have no guns Smilesc

Roll Eyes You never know who is listening. Big Grin
 
Posts: 8356 | Registered: Fri 11 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Coast Guard Discussions  Hop To Forums  The Soapbox    Civil Rights & Phone Companies

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.