|
||||||||||||||||||
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
Middle East
Iran inches closer to that b|tch slapping|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
Sloppy, quit talkin out your "military enthusiast" azz and STFU
|
|||
|
|
Super Member |
In a hurry were you? |
|||
|
|
Super Member |
I got a better idea jagoff...lets play a game instead. |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
I think I know what the sports injury was that kept you from serving.........they musta cut off your balls cuz it appears if you had any you would have put your money where your mouth is and joined. |
|||
|
|
Super Member |
I guess I'm supposed to admire and respect you though huh?
Little man talking tough on the Internet...pfff...you're like all the others who can't debate topics around here, so they try and cheap shot their opponent. You act like a punk...and I doubt you even served. |
|||
|
|
Super Member |
Iran snubs Annan over nuclear program
LINK TEHRAN, Iran - The U.N. chief got little satisfaction Sunday at the close of his trip to Tehran, snubbed by Iran's leader over international demands to stop enriching uranium and ignored in warnings not to incite hatred by questioning the Holocaust. In a provocative move on the final day of Kofi Annan's two-day visit, Iran announced it would host a conference to examine what it called exaggerations about the Holocaust, during which more than 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis. |
|||
|
|
Highly Experienced Member |
Lets compare DD-214's MF'r.........oh yeah you don't have one.... |
|||
|
|
New Member |
Should the other 99% in America also STFU?
|
|||
|
|
Banned for Personal Attacks and Baiting a Moderator. Failure to heed warning. Kehmina New Member |
.
When will Americans figure out that they are fighting not for our security or our freedom, but for Eretz Israel (Greater Israel)? I'm beginning to wonder if Gentiles really are inferior? . |
|||
|
|
US Marine "Hack's Best" IYAOYAS Super Member |
Knock It Off! This member does post some interesting and thought-provoking material throughout the site that does warrant some excellent conversation. You are way out of line in this and a couple of other postings directed towards him... |
|||
|
|
US Marine "Hack's Best" IYAOYAS Super Member |
Ease it back, Gordon... Don't escalate this...he's been warned. |
|||
|
|
Banned for Personal Attacks and Baiting a Moderator. Failure to heed warning. Kehmina New Member |
.
Sounds like an arrogant hypocrite to me. Maybe he's just having a bad day. . |
|||
|
|
Banned for Personal Attacks and Baiting a Moderator. Failure to heed warning. Kehmina New Member |
.
I mentioned you but neglected to Flag you. See above. . |
|||
|
|
New Member |
The supposed Sargent doesn't deserve a reply, but I can't help myself. Mr. you need to look back at the history of the Middle East and the US's role there. Example: the CIA's installation of the Shaw of Iran in '53, who was worse than Sadam Husain and gave the oil to the US for protection. This happened everywhere in the Middle East, and the people there were **** on. This is the only reason we're in Iraq now. You don't think a wimp like George Bush would sit his dumb *** down at the table with his equals and negotiate like an intelligent man should do, do you? He won't even debate the President of Iran. All soldiers now inlisted ought to see him for what he is, and stop dying for his sickness.
|
|||
|
Member![]() |
|
|||
|
|
Super Member |
Profile not found 3247750 is no longer a member of military.com |
|||
|
|
Super Member |
EU official: Iran talks hitting wall
President repeats nation won't halt nuclear enrichment By Elaine Sciolino and John O'Neil New York Times News Service Published October 5, 2006 link PARIS -- Javier Solana, the European Union's foreign policy chief, suggested Wednesday that talks with Iran over its nuclear program have all but reached a dead end, saying the matter would be referred to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions unless Tehran agrees quickly to suspend uranium enrichment work. Underscoring the divide, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad repeated his position Wednesday that Tehran is willing to continue to talk but not to consider halting nuclear enrichment work for even one day. Solana told the European Parliament, according to a statement released by his office, that despite negotiating for "endless hours," Iran still has not made a commitment to suspend its nuclear enrichment work, the "key point" in the talks. "Dialogue could not last forever," Solana said. Referring to the possibility of sanctions, he said, "It is up to them to decide whether the time has come to follow the second track." Solana said "the door to negotiations is always open," and he has said before that there has been no breakthrough on suspending enrichment work, as the UN Security Council has called for. But the tone of his remarks Wednesday was more negative than earlier statements, which have rankled other European officials who have seen him as grasping at straws of progress. The remarks by Solana and Ahmadinejad appeared to signal the winding down of four months of what have amounted to talks about talks. A coalition of the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China has been working since early June to persuade Iran to suspend its work on uranium enrichment as a precondition to discussing a package of incentives for Iran to abandon its nuclear program entirely. Iran insists that its program is for peaceful purposes only, while the United States contends that it is a cover for the development of nuclear weapons. U.S. wanted action American officials initially insisted that Iran had "weeks, not months," in President Bush's words, to respond to the June offer of incentives. But when China and Russia opposed any quick move toward sanctions, the Americans allowed Solana to engage in discussions of the proposal with Iran, while criticizing Iran's eventual response as little more than playing for time. The coalition's patience may have come to an end Tuesday, when an Iranian official brought up an entirely new proposal, suggesting that France organize and monitor the production of enriched uranium inside Iran. The United States, France and Britain quickly rejected the proposal, saying it was a stalling tactic that fell far short of the UN Security Council's demand that Iran freeze all its uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities. The proposal also caused some European governments' frustration with Solana to boil over. They were irritated at him for presenting the results of his talks in too positive a light, several European officials said. Solana has acknowledged the lack of progress on substantive issues, telling reporters in Finland on Monday, "The fundamental matter of suspension has not been agreed." But he has repeatedly pointed to "progress" on peripheral issues, such as where and when further negotiations with the six governments would take place. On Tuesday, Solana appeared to keep the door open to Iran's new proposal, describing it as "interesting," and adding, "This is something we have to analyze in greater detail." On Wednesday, too, Solana said that "for us, and for me, the door to negotiation will always remain open." Cooling to idea For its part, Iran backed away from its proposal for French-supervised enrichment, according to the Iranian Student News agency, which often reflects official thinking. In two speeches broadcast Wednesday on Iranian television, Ahmadinejad said he is ready to continue talks but said his country "will not step back one inch from its legal rights." "They want to negotiate with us after we suspend our program," he said. "Negotiations are no good if we suspend our program. Then we should run after them." "We want to continue the talks," Ahmadinejad said. "But they are mistaken if they think they can use the negotiations as a tool to put pressure on us." |
|||
|
Member![]() |
|
|||
|
|
Super Member |
Iranian Government Behind Shipping Weapons to Iraq Insurgents
(Source: US Department of Defense; dated Sept. 28, web-posted Sept. 29, 2006) WASHINGTON --- The Iranian government is behind shipping components used to make improvised explosive devices to Iraqi insurgents, a senior intelligence official in Iraq said yesterday. Labels on weapons stocks seized inside and outside Iraq point to Iranian government complicity in arming Shiite militias in Iraq, Army Maj. Gen. Richard Zahner, the deputy chief of staff for intelligence with Multinational Force Iraq, said at a news roundtable. U.S. officials have said in the past that Iran is fomenting instability in Iraq. In August, Army Brig. Gen. Michael Barbero said that the Iranian government is training many members of the Shiite insurgency in Iraq. Barbero is the deputy operations chief on the Joint Staff. “Iran is definitely a destabilizing force in Iraq,” Barbero said during an Aug. 23 Pentagon news conference. “I think it's irrefutable that Iran is responsible for training, funding and equipping some of these Shiia extremist groups and also providing advanced (improvised explosive device) technology to them, and there's clear evidence of that.” Zahner said Iran is funneling millions of dollars for military goods into Iraq. He noted that labels on C-4 explosive found in Baghdad make it clear where the munitions came from. “You'll find a red label on the C-4 printed in English and will tell you the lot number and name of the manufacturer,” he said. In 2002, the Israelis seized a small ship bringing military supplies to Hezbollah. “Compare the labels on the military C-4 in that and tell me if they're not identical,” Zahner said. He said British, Iraqi and American officials in Basra also have found blocks of C-4. “You will see the same red label for each and every one of those,” he said. Zahner also said it’s clear that the Iranian government is behind the munitions shipments. “I will tell you that the control of military-grade explosives in Iran is controlled through the state apparatus and is not committed through rogue elements right there,” he said. “It is a deliberate decision on the part of elements associated with the Iranian government to affect this type of activities.” -ends- |
|||
|
|
Super Member |
Iran warns of response to nuke sanctions
LINK TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's firebrand president warned on Monday that his country would respond with an "appropriate and firm response" to any U.N. sanction over its nuclear program. The comments by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came as key United Nations Security Council members were considering a draft European resolution that would impose punishing measures on Iran over its disputed nuclear program. "Efforts by the big powers will only incite anger and hatred," the hard-line leader told a large crowd on the outskirts of Tehran. "The Iranian nation will respond to restrictive activities with an appropriate and firm response," he said without elaborating. Meanwhile, Mohamed ElBaradei, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency, said at the U.N. that his organization has not been able to verify that Iran's nuclear program is peaceful. Tehran insists its nuclear efforts are solely geared at peacefully producing electricity. But the U.S. and its allies fear Iranians want to build atomic weapons. Russia and China, which wield veto power as permanent Security Council members, have shied away from imposing punitive measures on their trade partner Iran, saying they prefer a diplomatic solution to the impasse. But the United States says the proposed sanctions are not tough enough. Russian President Vladimir Putin told Ahmadinejad on Monday that Moscow strongly favors further negotiations on Tehran's nuclear program, the Kremlin said. The brief Russian statement after a telephone conversation between the two leaders was the latest indication that Russia opposes sanctions against Iran and believes the international community should try to defuse tension through talks. With Iran waving threats of a firm response to any U.N. sanction, it also appeared aimed at cooling Tehran's rhetoric and casting Russia as a peacemaker. In the Iranian-initiated conversation with Ahmadinejad, "Putin outlined the fundamental position of the Russian side in favor of a continuation of the negotiation process," the Kremlin said. President Bush insists that Washington will only agree to negotiate about Tehran's nuclear program if the Iranians first halt uranium enrichment, a key step to produce either peaceful nuclear power or an atomic bomb. With the council divided, Ahmadinejad remained defiant, telling the crowd that Iran would prefer to endure sanctions rather than bow to Western pressure. "We want to stand on our own feet," he said. "You should know that our nation will not give in one iota in the nuclear case." He also mocked Britain as a "follower of arrogance," for aligning itself with U.S. foreign policy, days after British Prime Minister Tony Blair called on the Security Council to achieve a "proper, binding resolution" on Iran's nuclear activities. The British "have simply become the guide for a blind U.S," Ahmadinejad said. "We do advise Britain not to squirm and not to do childish activities concerning the resolution. Iran's nation has stood up and will not let you achieve anything except humiliation," he added. His speech was delivered after Iran officially confirmed on Friday that it has doubled its uranium enrichment capacity. |
|||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Military.com Forums
Hot Topics & Current Events
Middle East
Iran inches closer to that b|tch slapping

